|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
NYC_Gal

Joined: 08 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fair enough. I always went for supportive shoes, as I'm flat footed and walked everywhere in the city. A pair of trainers would run me $50 (because I bought the kids' version, rather than adult ones, which were $30-40 more), and flats were usually at lot more, but comfy and classic styles that I could wear for years. In a pinch, I'd pick up some Clarks at DSW for $60, but, while not always pretty, they lasted and were comfy.
I could never wear cheap shoes. When one has no arches, one needs proper support. Besides: your feet are your main form of transportation. You wouldn't skimp on tires for your car, why mess with your body?
As for payless: isn't 2 pair at $20 apiece under $100? This is what I was saying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DorkothyParker

Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Location: Jeju
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I cheat by wearing heels. The heels act like support for me feet. I can't wear flats either. I was frontin'. Like I said, in the summer I wear my Fit Flops (tm) unless I am trying to look snazzy and in the winter I just wear boots or shoes with short heels (<2inches).
I walk poorly (too heavy on my heels) and I would hate to ruin a pair of heels that cost over $30 with my wanton walking ways.
I guess I like cheap things because I know I destroy everything easily. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Goon-Yang
Joined: 28 May 2009 Location: Duh
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Clothes @$200-300 (sometimes more...I wear suits)
wallet :$50
Laptop: $1000
PSP: $200
cell phone: $100 ( I know eh!)
My bag: $100
Shoes: $200
PMP sometimes: $400
2 rings:$500
So I 'wear' about $2800 on a good day. About $500 of that is what I'd call clothes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NYC_Gal

Joined: 08 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| When I used to wear heels, I wore Stuart Weitzman. Super comfy, and, while expensive, really well made. I always kept a lookout at DSW. A pair was usually 300 in a department store, but I always got mine for 100 or less. I had 2 pair, and my friend has them now, since I only wear flats nowadays. They're both over 7 years old, yet, with proper maintenance (getting them re-heeled and professionally cleaned,) they are as good as new. One of my friends wears Payless, and they fall apart after a couple of months. I find that to be wasteful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DorkothyParker

Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Location: Jeju
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| OMG I've never had anything professionally cleaned before. I also have never used an iron. :/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chellovek

Joined: 29 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chuckling at the whole quality over quantity thing, you sound like you come from a different planet to me.
If I could afford to shell out that type of money on individual items, I would. For me before now during the hardest times I have had to supplement my wardrobe each year with amounts of money which you casually drop for the purchase of single items ~$100.
All this about the quality stuff being so much better for humanity and whatnot is really great but naive pie-in-the-sky. Anyone who has been out in the pecuniary 'field of screams' knows how big a deal spending even a trivial amount more money than necessary for something is. The feeling of guilt and remorse can be feckin' soul destroying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NYC_Gal

Joined: 08 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
@Chellovek:
I was a broke college student. I paid for a shared apartment in NYC while working and studying--both full time--so I know the value of a dollar. The items that I own last an age. I don't go out and buy a new pair of sandals every year because I don't have to; my stuff is well made, therefore I don't have to spend $30-$60 every few months on shoes. The only shoes I have to replace on a regular basis are sneakers, because I kill them running.
These items aren't casual purchases, as you seem to think. My things last, therefore I don't need a new pair of winter boots or sandals every year. I do have a bit more disposable income, as I didn't take out any student loans, choosing instead to work one full time and 2 part time jobs whilst studying. I was burnt out for a few years, but it was well worth not having loans after graduation. I do save a fair amount every month, now, though, as I have no need to purchase shoes, bags, shades, or clothes
@Dorothy:
If you take your bag and shoes into a cobbler, they have a special way of cleaning them that makes them nearly as good as new. You could also get leather cleaner from leather shops (it's a lotion), then spray it with waterproofing mist the next day. The inside of the bag can be dry cleaned, if you don't have a cobbler nearby.
edit* I do have a weakness for bad engrish t shirts at the underground, though, and snap them up whenever I get a chance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chellovek

Joined: 29 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| NYC_Gal wrote: |
@Chellovek:
I was a broke college student. I paid for a shared apartment in NYC while working and studying--both full time--so I know the value of a dollar. The items that I own last an age. I don't go out and buy a new pair of sandals every year because I don't have to; my stuff is well made, therefore I don't have to spend $30-$60 every few months on shoes. The only shoes I have to replace on a regular basis are sneakers, because I kill them running.
These items aren't casual purchases, as you seem to think. My things last, therefore I don't need a new pair of winter boots or sandals every year. I do have a bit more disposable income, as I didn't take out any student loans, choosing instead to work one full time and 2 part time jobs whilst studying. I was burnt out for a few years, but it was well worth not having loans after graduation. I do save a fair amount every month, now, though, as I have no need to purchase shoes, bags, shades, or clothes
@Dorothy:
If you take your bag and shoes into a cobbler, they have a special way of cleaning them that makes them nearly as good as new. You could also get leather cleaner from leather shops (it's a lotion), then spray it with waterproofing mist the next day. The inside of the bag can be dry cleaned, if you don't have a cobbler nearby.
edit* I do have a weakness for bad engrish t shirts at the underground, though, and snap them up whenever I get a chance. |
I'm speaking of well before I was at university *wins the pitiful poverty stakes* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NYC_Gal

Joined: 08 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's not a contest. I was just illustrating that I do know the value of money and don't squander it. I don't think my family was poor, but we had rough times at some point when my dad was laid off. My mom told me a story about when I was 4. I REALLY REALLY wanted a Teddy Ruxbin (sp?), but the thing was $80 in 1986 money. Whenever I asked if I could have one, she said "I don't have enough money," because that was crazy money for a doll with a tape recorder.
One day, out of the blue, I asked if she had enough money. She said "Of course I have enough money, sweetie."
I then asked for a Teddy Ruxbin  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
.38 Special
Joined: 08 Jul 2009 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| chellovek wrote: |
All this about the quality stuff being so much better for humanity and whatnot is really great but naive pie-in-the-sky. Anyone who has been out in the pecuniary 'field of screams' knows how big a deal spending even a trivial amount more money than necessary for something is. The feeling of guilt and remorse can be feckin' soul destroying. |
Jeez, brother. I had no idea England was so badly off.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chellovek

Joined: 29 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 6:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| .38 Special wrote: |
| chellovek wrote: |
All this about the quality stuff being so much better for humanity and whatnot is really great but naive pie-in-the-sky. Anyone who has been out in the pecuniary 'field of screams' knows how big a deal spending even a trivial amount more money than necessary for something is. The feeling of guilt and remorse can be feckin' soul destroying. |
Jeez, brother. I had no idea England was so badly off.  |
Nah, just those of us cut down by Thatcher and right-wing economic policy *waits for the 'lol'ertarians* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|