Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

US Soccer and its shortcomings
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pkang0202



Joined: 09 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:12 pm    Post subject: US Soccer and its shortcomings Reply with quote

I don't believe what people say about Americans being bad at soccer because the other sports take all the talent.

To me, that is a cop-out excuse. With a population of 300+ million people, the other sports should be able to take all the athletes they want, and there should STILL be plenty of athletic talent to go around. I don't think sports starts like Tom Brady, Kobe Bryant, Derek Jeter, would've made great soccer players, so the other sports taking all the talent doesn't fly with me.

I look at teams like Ururguay, Paraguay, Argentina, Slovenia who have populations much much smaller than the US, and they have good teams. So, you soccer experts, what do you think? I don't know too much about the sport. Just recently i've been reading more about it.

In the US we have Soccer Moms. That term was coined from all the suburban moms taking their kids to and from soccer practice/games in their minivans. Don't tell me Americans don't play soccer. There are millions of little kids playing soccer all across the US.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Senior



Joined: 31 Jan 2010

PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The US team is fairly talented. They are lucky that they can make up for many of their short comings with superior financial resources.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oskinny1



Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Location: Right behind you!

PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:21 pm    Post subject: Re: US Soccer and its shortcomings Reply with quote

pkang0202 wrote:
There are millions of little kids playing soccer all across the US.


You answered your own questions. Yes, there are millions of little kids who play (I was one of them) but by the time most turn 12 they quit and play little league or pee-wee football.

The big question is why don't kids want to continue playing soccer into their teens. I think the MLS is helping out, but most things kids see on tv are football (American style) or baseball. I still expect us to win a World Cup in my lifetime.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Seoulio



Joined: 02 Jan 2010

PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In most of those countries you listed the countries are geographically quite small, and the population is hardly diverse at all.

Most people in Urugau, Slovenia etc are born and raised there, and very few people in the country are immigrants.

Soccer is like THE Game in many of these places, largely in part because of the relatively low cost and need for nothing more than a ball and some nets on an open field. Its a national pride to eat sleep and crap soccer, and to play it from a young age.

Also NONE of these countries have a huge league for ANY professional sport, theres no hockey, no football, basicaly they have cricket ( if they are lucky)


THe Americans and Canadians don't care about soccer as much as there are far too many other exciting sports where you are likely to see more than a goal or two scored, and where 0 - 0 ties after 90 minutes of playing anything are fairly rare.

So yes when other athletes are drawn away by other more exciting sprts it does leave little room for lot's of talented soccer players.


hell even the term "soccer" shows how little the sport is regarded, GOtta take the term the rest of the world uses, and change it because "we already have football"

Its an import sport that doesnt compare to guys crushing each other and making awesome catches for the average American.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

America has more than enough players at middle school and high school age to produce great players.

In comparison to a country like Holland (constantly produces great players), the US goes the wrong way about developing players. Players play too many competitive games at a young age. Do not get enough technical coaching at this age. In their later teens, they do not play against good enough talent and play too few games. It is the opposite in holland.

When you are 12 and very talented, you need maybe 3 highly technical coaching sessions that concentrate on ball control and short crisp passing. You need to play maybe one competitive 11 v 11 game(or preferably 8v8/5v5). You need to develop your imagination/creativity by playing with your buddies in a casual setting outside these times. This is the dutch template. When you are older (16), you train 5 times a week and play much less outside the club.

America has the players but does not have the system currently to develop them. At the end of the day, competitive games/high school games and leagues are meaningless when you are 12 years old. You need the coaching and then you need to play with your buddies in enclosed spaces where you can develop the imagination to outwit your opponent.

Soccer btw is a perfectly valid way to refer to Football. It comes from the soc in association football and differentiates it from rugby football. Football is really an umbrella name to talk about games in the same family that are played on 'foot'. The dominate game from this family in a particular region will be called football. In Ireland for example, I call Gaelic Football 'football' and association football 'soccer'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steve_Rogers2008



Joined: 22 Mar 2010

PostPosted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe people saying Americans don't watch soccer because it's so boring! 90 minutes for a 0-0 tie is exciting?

and who wants to play a boring game?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 4:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steve_Rogers2008 wrote:
I believe people saying Americans don't watch soccer because it's so boring! 90 minutes for a 0-0 tie is exciting?

and who wants to play a boring game?


It amazes me that people actually judge a game exciting/boring by how high a score is produced. Surely Cricket is the most awesome sport ever produced. Teams can, gasp, score 500 runs (points)!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Seoulio



Joined: 02 Jan 2010

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JMO wrote:
Steve_Rogers2008 wrote:
I believe people saying Americans don't watch soccer because it's so boring! 90 minutes for a 0-0 tie is exciting?

and who wants to play a boring game?


It amazes me that people actually judge a game exciting/boring by how high a score is produced. Surely Cricket is the most awesome sport ever produced. Teams can, gasp, score 500 runs (points)!!



Yeah imagine that eh, people getting excited about scoring. Why does this amaze you? Hockey, Football, soccer, baseball etc, MOST of the enjoyment is in the scoring. There are others where the scoring is constant so its the ralleys/process that peek interest ( volleyball, badminton, golf, tennis, basketball)

TO watch a ball go up and down the court, and never getting a goal is not the idea many of us have for fun.

I am sure if I was drunk and had a full frontal lobotomy I would love watching a non scoring game over and over again, but as I am a non drinker and have full use of my faculties soccer is not for me ( just a little jibe there, its sarcasm so don't jump down my throat)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pkang0202



Joined: 09 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JMO wrote:


America has the players but does not have the system currently to develop them. At the end of the day, competitive games/high school games and leagues are meaningless when you are 12 years old. You need the coaching and then you need to play with your buddies in enclosed spaces where you can develop the imagination to outwit your opponent.


That is pretty much what I've been thinking. Talent is not an issue in the USA. I believe the US has plenty of talent and athletes. The USA has Division 1, 2, and 3 Men's Soccer at the Collegiate level. There are probably thousands of soccer players when you look at all 3 divisions combined. Just looking at the numbers, I can't believe that out of thousands and thousands of players, the USA can't find 11 guys who can win at the World level.


Here is where I see the problem with American soccer, and correct me if I am wrong. Making the sport more popular will mean nothing. Americans can watch MLS and go to all the games starting tomorrow and it won't make a lick of difference at the next World Cup. The reason for this, in my opinion, is the lack of coaches who can truly identify develop talent. Coaching isn't something you can throw money at and get better. Its pointless to get more and more young people to play soccer if there aren't enough great coaches.


So my point is, getting MLS to be popular in the US isn't going to help matters. Getting the players more money isn't going to help either. I think what the US really needs is more quality coaches.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
El Macho



Joined: 07 Nov 2008

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 8:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A big problem is that soccer is pay-to-play. There's not a reliable academy system. Instead, youth join as many teams as they can and play a ton of games. It's been suggested that this accounts for much of the lack of creativity among American players.

Additionally, that the system is pay-to-play means that many (otherwise talented) athletes drop out. Once MLS is able to get an academy system in place, this will change and we'll see a better development of the sport across the country.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seoulio wrote:
JMO wrote:
Steve_Rogers2008 wrote:
I believe people saying Americans don't watch soccer because it's so boring! 90 minutes for a 0-0 tie is exciting?

and who wants to play a boring game?


It amazes me that people actually judge a game exciting/boring by how high a score is produced. Surely Cricket is the most awesome sport ever produced. Teams can, gasp, score 500 runs (points)!!



Yeah imagine that eh, people getting excited about scoring. Why does this amaze you? Hockey, Football, soccer, baseball etc, MOST of the enjoyment is in the scoring. There are others where the scoring is constant so its the ralleys/process that peek interest ( volleyball, badminton, golf, tennis, basketball)

TO watch a ball go up and down the court, and never getting a goal is not the idea many of us have for fun.

I am sure if I was drunk and had a full frontal lobotomy I would love watching a non scoring game over and over again, but as I am a non drinker and have full use of my faculties soccer is not for me ( just a little jibe there, its sarcasm so don't jump down my throat)


first of all. If you are being sarcastic, and that is barely sarcasm, don't point it out. It demeans us both.

secondly, in my experience the more casual the fan, the more interested he is in scoring. I'm an avid college football fan and I massively enjoy low scoring defensive games(especially in the SEC). However if I watch baseball for example, their had better be lots and lots of runs. That is because I have limited understanding of baseball and I'm not really a fan.

As a soccer fan, I'm quite happy to lose the casual fan. Enough people around the world love the game. Why change it for the few who don't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

El Macho wrote:
A big problem is that soccer is pay-to-play. There's not a reliable academy system. Instead, youth join as many teams as they can and play a ton of games. It's been suggested that this accounts for much of the lack of creativity among American players.
.


That is a great point. Pay to play is a terrible system and too many games can kill a young athlete's spark.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
El Macho



Joined: 07 Nov 2008

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NY Times Magazine had an article about the Ajax youth system. They talk about how the US pay-to-play and college soccer systems are probably detrimental to developing our players.

I think the argument makes lots of sense since we are producing great athletes with mediocre skillsets.

Also, the lack of competition doubtlessly hurt US players. Look at Altidore, Adu, Kljestan, even Donovan...they all have or have had the rep of not trying hard in practice. (This has kept a number of them out of Europe.) Since they're rarely challenged in the US, it makes sense that they'd be used to just not working that hard. In MLS they can coast. The more competitive and skills-oriented things get, the better we'll become.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 11:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yea, I read that article. I actually heard about on this blog.

http://mustreadsoccer.com/

It collects all the best writing from around the web on football. Some of the best blogs out there are American btw.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
metalhead



Joined: 18 May 2010
Location: Toilet

PostPosted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's not popular? Same as soccer is only popular with the blacks in South Africa and not the whites?

It's a very boring game for the most part, no wonder the patrons at matches need to drink themselves nutless.

Who knows, soccer is huge in England, and they are horrible at it (to be fair though, they suck at everything these days pretty much, except unfounded arrogance).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International