Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Grammar Question (who/whom)
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
raewon



Joined: 16 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does anyone else agree with FMPJ (that "whom" is correct in the original sentence)?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
grant gerstners



Joined: 13 Jan 2010
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with FMPJ (that "whom" is correct in the original sentence).

As a kid I was taught the same technique he demonstrated, of converting to the question form. It always works.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
El Macho



Joined: 07 Nov 2008

PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Edit: never mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chaucer



Joined: 20 Oct 2009

PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:35 pm    Post subject: Whom Reply with quote

"whom" is right in the original sentence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
b-class rambler



Joined: 25 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Grammar Question (who/whom) Reply with quote

raewon wrote:
I think how to master who and whom will plague me until I'm six feet under.
Could someone please let me know if "whom" can be used in the following sentence or not:

I worked hard and become the man whom I wanted to be.

I tried rewording the sentence to apply the old "he/him" trick but that doesn't seem to give me a definite answer.

Hopefully someone can help me with this one.

Thank you if you are that someone!



I haven't read all the replies above thoroughly, but at a brief glance I'd say centralcali is the one I agree with most.

I'd explain who/whom like this. 'who' is used when it's the subject and 'whom' when it's the object (either direct or indirect) within the particular clause in which it is located.

So I'd say 'whom' is incorrect. There's no object because 'be' is not a transitive verb. It cannot take an object. 'want' can be used as a transitive verb when it's not being used as an auxiliary to another verb, but that's not the case above.


He became the man who he wanted to be. (intransitive verb to be takes no object)

He called the man whom he wanted to appoint. (appoint is transitive and therefore whom is the object in that clause)


BTW, he/him is often a good test to apply, however it comes unstuck when the verb involved is 'to be'. Because although him is usually used as the object pronoun, it is also used when NOT the object after to be. Strictly grammatically speaking, we should say

I am he/ it's I/ this is she etc.


and many, many years ago we did. But the him/me/her we use in those examples nowadays are still grammatically not the object of the sentence.



Best way to master all this -

just use 'who' all the time as even when whom would be correct, who will be accepted

OR

learn German Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
soyoungmikey



Joined: 29 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who vs Whom

Many English speakers do not know the difference between who and whom. In some places, it hardly matters, because using who when you should use whom is so common that it's not even considered much of a mistake. But for those who want to know the difference between who and whom, here is an explanation.


Who

Who is an interrogative pronoun and is used in place of the subject of a question.

Who is going?

Who are you?

Is this who told you?

Who can also be used in statements, in place of the subject of a clause.

This is who warned me.

Jack is the one who wants to go.

Anyone who knows the truth should tell us.


Whom

Whom is also an interrogative pronoun, but it is used in place of the object of a question.

Whom is this story about?

With whom are you going?

Whom did they tell?

And whom can be used in statements, in place of the object of a clause.

This is the man whom I told you about.

John is the man whom you met at dinner last week.

Whom is always the correct choice after a preposition.

The students, one of whom is graduating this year, failed the test.

Lisa is the girl with whom I'm driving to Maine.


The Bottom Line

The difference between who and whom is exactly the same as the difference between I and me, he and him, she and her, etc. Who, like I, he, and she, is a subject - it is the person performing the action of the verb. Whom, like me, him, and her, is an object - it is the person to/about/for whom the action is being done. Whom is also the correct choice after a preposition: with whom, one of whom, not "with who, one of who."

Sometimes it helps to rewrite the sentence and/or replace who/whom with another pronoun so that you can see the relationships more clearly.

This is who warned me > He warned me (not "him" warned me)

Jack is the one who wants to go > He wants to go (not "him" wants to go)

This is the man whom I told you about > I told you about him (not about "he")

Lisa is the girl with whom I'm driving to Maine > I'm driving to Maine with her (not with "she")
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raewon



Joined: 16 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for all the replies.

soyoungmikey

Quote:
Sometimes it helps to rewrite the sentence and/or replace who/whom with another pronoun so that you can see the relationships more clearly.


Yes - but previous posters have done this to show that "who" is the correct answer, while others have done this to show that "whom" is correct.
So soyoungmikey, when you apply this nifty trick to the original sentence
in question, would you go with "who" or "whom"?

Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thiuda



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Location: Religion ist f�r Sklaven geschaffen, f�r Wesen ohne Geist.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:29 am    Post subject: Re: Grammar Question (who/whom) Reply with quote

raewon wrote:
I worked hard and become the man whom I wanted to be.


In my opinion, whom is used appropriately in your example. Whom is being used as a relative pronoun in object position and may be omitted: I worked hard and became the man I wanted to be. You could also substitute whom with that to get the same meaning: I worked hard and became the man that I wanted to be.

Check out Purdue OWL for some extra info on whom as a relative pronoun: Introduction and General Usage in Defining Clauses.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Cosmic Hum



Joined: 09 May 2003
Location: Sonic Space

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello Raewon,

Sorry to come late to this one�I thought it was well covered already.

FMPJ has given you some good feedback on this.
Whom is definitely the correct usage�in the prescriptive sense.
As others have mentioned there is more than one way to answer this question.

However, Thiuda is giving some good advice in understanding this from the relative pronoun position, and in my opinion if you follow that line of reasoning this thread becomes much clearer.
This sentence is a complex sentence with a restrictive relative clause.

I worked hard and become the man (whom I wanted to be.) Whom is the object of the dependent clause.
I worked hard and became (that kind of man). I wanted to be (that kind of man).


Relative clauses have about 40 different forms�but in this case we just need to be concerned with 2.
What we need to decide is whether or not the relative pronoun is subject or object related.
Once that is done�the question of whom or who becomes elementary.
If it is subject related � who
If it is object related � whom�prescriptively anyway.

If we take SoyoungMikey�s examples we can see this more clearly.

This is who warned me > He warned me (not "him" warned me)

Jack is the one who wants to go > He wants to go (not "him" wants to go)

This is the man whom I told you about > I told you about him (not about "he")

Lisa is the girl with whom I'm driving to Maine > I'm driving to Maine with her (not with "she")


1) This is who warned me�who relates to this�which is the subject�therefore�who.

In complex sentences it is sometimes easier to break it down to see things more clearly.
2) Jack is the one who want to go. (who relates to Jack..Jack is the subject�who is the relative subject in the dependant clause.)
Jack is the one. Jack wants to go.

3) This is the man (whom I told you about). (whom is object of the dependant clause�the man.)
This is the man. I told you about the man.

The same goes for the final example.
4) Lisa is the girl (with whom I�m driving to Maine.) with whom is the object of the dependant clause.
Lisa is the girl. I am driving to Maine with Lisa.

As I mentioned�there are about 40 different structures for relative clauses�but for this case all you need to decide/discover is whether or not the relative pronoun is acting as a subject or object.
Sometimes to see it more clearly...break down the clauses.
Sorry this post is so long�I didn�t have time to make it shorter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
b-class rambler



Joined: 25 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:04 pm    Post subject: Re: Grammar Question (who/whom) Reply with quote

Thiuda wrote:


Whom is being used as a relative pronoun in object position


As the object of what verb? The verb used in this example is 'to be'. 'To be' is an intransitive verb which cannot take an object.

I'm wary of going further up my grammatical anus than I suspect the OP intended anyone to do, but I'd say the function of who/whom in the original sentence is as predicate, not object, and therefore it has to be 'who'.

An object has something 'done' to it by the subject. e.g. He fired the worker he hated - 'the worker he hated' is the object of fire.
A predicate is kinda like a description or identification of the subject e.g. He is the boss - the boss is not the object; he had nothing done to him, it's effectively just a description of 'he'. Likewise, in 'I want to be you', 'you' is not the object. I don't want to do anything to you. 'You' is just a description or identification (one which is presumably meaningful to the listener) of 'I'.

The link below might explain better than I have.

http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/WhatIsAPredicateNoun.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raewon



Joined: 16 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thiuda - Thank you for your reply and for that link. I will definitely check it out.

The Cosmic Hum - Thanks for taking the time to break that down for me.
I guess I just got confused somewhere within this thread .... and couldn't find my way out.

Thanks everyone!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thiuda



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Location: Religion ist f�r Sklaven geschaffen, f�r Wesen ohne Geist.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Grammar Question (who/whom) Reply with quote

raewon wrote:
I worked hard and become the man whom I wanted to be.


b-class rambler wrote:
Thiuda wrote:


Whom is being used as a relative pronoun in object position


As the object of what verb? The verb used in this example is 'to be'. 'To be' is an intransitive verb which cannot take an object.


to be ≠ intransitive verb. In the relative clause the infinitive to be functions as a noun.

The relative clause functions as the indirect object of the ditransitive verb became. The example sentence is composed of three clauses: two coordinate clauses and the relative clause whom I wanted to be. In raewon's sentence the man is the direct object of became and the relative clause functions as the indirect object of became, whom is therefore used correctly. We can also tell that whom is used correctly, because we can omit it - relative pronouns may not be omitted if they could serve as the subject of the main verb, which is wanted in the relative clause. The subject of the relative clause is I.

b-class rambler wrote:
I'm wary of going further up my grammatical anus than I suspect the OP intended anyone to do, but I'd say the function of who/whom in the original sentence is as predicate, not object, and therefore it has to be 'who'.


You're not using the term predicate correctly. A predicate is the V (NP) that modifies the subject NP. While a predicate may be verb-only, there are no noun-only predicates. What I think you're trying to say is that who/whom is functioning as a predicate nominal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
b-class rambler



Joined: 25 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:42 pm    Post subject: Re: Grammar Question (who/whom) Reply with quote

Thiuda wrote:


to be ≠ intransitive verb.


So are you saying that to be is a transitive verb that can take an object? I'll admit that I probably should have described it better as a copulative or linking verb.



Thiuda wrote:

While a predicate may be verb-only, there are no noun-only predicates.


I don't really have the time or inclination to argue about this forever, but I don't agree. I know internet links aren't definitive proof of anything, but the one I provided earlier will back me up on this. This one will too.

http://www.esldesk.com/grammar/verbs


Incidentally, thiuda, the bit below your avatar suggests you speak German. (If not, no worries, ignore this.) If so, might I ask how you'd translate the original sentence into German?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thiuda



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Location: Religion ist f�r Sklaven geschaffen, f�r Wesen ohne Geist.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Grammar Question (who/whom) Reply with quote

b-class rambler wrote:
Thiuda wrote:


to be ≠ intransitive verb.


So are you saying that to be is a transitive verb that can take an object? I'll admit that I probably should have described it better as a copulative or linking verb.


No, I'm saying that to be is an infinitive and therefore functions as a noun. It is neither a transitive verb nor a linking verb, it's functioning as a NOUN.

b-class rambler wrote:
Thiuda wrote:

While a predicate may be verb-only, there are no noun-only predicates.


I don't really have the time or inclination to argue about this forever, but I don't agree. I know internet links aren't definitive proof of anything, but the one I provided earlier will back me up on this. This one will too.


Whether you agree or not, predicates "must contain a verb, and the verb requires, permits, or precludes other sentence elements to complete the predicate (Wikipedia, link)" This is pretty basic grammar, so I wouldn't spend too much time arguing against this point of view.

b-class rambler wrote:
Incidentally, thiuda, the bit below your avatar suggests you speak German. (If not, no worries, ignore this.) If so, might I ask how you'd translate the original sentence into German?


The bit below my avatar suggests correctly. I'd translate the sentence as: Ich habe hart gearbeitet um der Mann zu werden der ich sein wollte.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
b-class rambler



Joined: 25 Mar 2009

PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:58 pm    Post subject: Re: Grammar Question (who/whom) Reply with quote

There's a fair bit of other stuff I'd disagree with the above poster on, but it's getting way beyond what the OP asked, I doubt that many people are that interested and I don't wish to see this thread veer away from the pleasant tone it's thus far had, which I suspect it might do.

I don't think it's worth the effort of any further input and trust that the OP is happy with the varying contributions he received.


Thiuda wrote:

The bit below my avatar suggests correctly. I'd translate the sentence as: Ich habe hart gearbeitet um der Mann zu werden der ich sein wollte.


Thanks for answering that, by the way. That's not exactly what I would have come up with myself, but there are often various acceptable ways to translate things. Your German certainly seems decent enough Smile and I find the approach you've taken there to certain grammatical aspects (which I would agree with) interesting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International