|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:55 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Quote: |
Did Christianity Cause the Crash?
By Hanna Rosin
America�s mainstream religious denominations used to teach the faithful that they would be rewarded in the afterlife. But over the past generation, a different strain of Christian faith has proliferated�one that promises to make believers rich in the here and now. Known as the prosperity gospel, and claiming tens of millions of adherents, it fosters risk-taking and intense material optimism. It pumped air into the housing bubble. And one year into the worst downturn since the Depression, it�s still going strong.
|
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/12/did-christianity-cause-the-crash/7764/
The nerve. The unbelievable nerve. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rollo
Joined: 10 May 2006
Location: China
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
to say nothing about the use of christian babies blood in the making of matzohs would be a glaring oversight.
Lets examine the evil cabal of Canadians who have infiltrated into the hollywood upper crust. One name that should strike fear into to any honest Christians heart: Shatner. The very epitome of Canadian power and influence, who has used ethnic nepotism to bring myers, ,fox, Carrey into the control centers of Hollywood and into the theaters of America. Yes Canadians have been genetically tested and they are definite markers which show them to be seperate from Europeans, the presence of moose DNA being one.
the jews are nothing compared to the Northern menace. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Konglishman
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Location: Nanjing
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought that I would go ahead and add a few thoughts to this discussion.
First of all, I do not like the idea that there are large (by large, I mean 10 or more points different on average) statistical differences in between different ethnic groups. I suppose that I prefer to believe that these differences in IQ tests can largely accounted for by different cultural values. While I do not deny that is a genetic component to intelligence, I am going to go ahead and say that frequency of Jewish people doing well on IQ tests is largely due to them having a culture which highly values learning.
Second, it has been a long tradition in Western history for Jewish people to be involved in the lending of money with the caveat that interest must be paid. In fact, if you read the original Magna Carta, part of it delves into the issue in which a Christian owes a Jewish person money. So, I would say that the fact that Jewish people essentially invented banking as we know it in the West, became a very strong factor in their continuing success.
Third, I am very disappointed that none of you have mentioned that Adolf Hitler was actually part Jewish himself. Yes, it is really is incredibly ironic and tragic at the same time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sergio Stefanuto
Joined: 14 May 2009
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Konglishman wrote: |
| While I do not deny that is a genetic component to intelligence, I am going to go ahead and say that frequency of Jewish people doing well on IQ tests is largely due to them having a culture which highly values learning. |
Jews having a culture which highly values learning is an effect of their superior intelligence.
| Konglishman wrote: |
| Adolf Hitler was actually part Jewish himself. |
That myth was dispelled in this book |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Happy Warrior
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mises wrote: |
| Quote: |
Did Christianity Cause the Crash?
By Hanna Rosin
America�s mainstream religious denominations used to teach the faithful that they would be rewarded in the afterlife. But over the past generation, a different strain of Christian faith has proliferated�one that promises to make believers rich in the here and now. Known as the prosperity gospel, and claiming tens of millions of adherents, it fosters risk-taking and intense material optimism. It pumped air into the housing bubble. And one year into the worst downturn since the Depression, it�s still going strong.
|
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/12/did-christianity-cause-the-crash/7764/
The nerve. The unbelievable nerve. |
Hanna Rosin is the author of 'The End of Men,' which weakly hypothesizes that, in the wake of massive lay-offs in the manufacturing and construction industries and the boom of public service industries like education, women will be better employed and more successful than men. Her thesis rested on tidbits like this:
| Quote: |
| Over several centuries, South Korea, for instance, constructed one of the most rigid patriarchal societies in the world. Many wives who failed to produce male heirs were abused and treated as domestic servants; some families prayed to spirits to kill off girl children. Then, in the 1970s and �80s, the government embraced an industrial revolution and encouraged women to enter the labor force. Women moved to the city and went to college. They advanced rapidly, from industrial jobs to clerical jobs to professional work. The traditional order began to crumble soon after. In 1990, the country�s laws were revised so that women could keep custody of their children after a divorce and inherit property. In 2005, the court ruled that women could register children under their own names. As recently as 1985, about half of all women in a national survey said they �must have a son.� That percentage fell slowly until 1991 and then plummeted to just over 15 percent by 2003. Male preference in South Korea �is over,� says Monica Das Gupta, a demographer and Asia expert at the World Bank. �It happened so fast. It�s hard to believe it, but it is.� |
She's not trained for critical thinking. Only for cultural attack jobs.
But at some point, you have to move past cultural attack jobs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Happy Warrior wrote: |
| mises wrote: |
| Quote: |
Did Christianity Cause the Crash?
By Hanna Rosin
America�s mainstream religious denominations used to teach the faithful that they would be rewarded in the afterlife. But over the past generation, a different strain of Christian faith has proliferated�one that promises to make believers rich in the here and now. Known as the prosperity gospel, and claiming tens of millions of adherents, it fosters risk-taking and intense material optimism. It pumped air into the housing bubble. And one year into the worst downturn since the Depression, it�s still going strong.
|
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/12/did-christianity-cause-the-crash/7764/
The nerve. The unbelievable nerve. |
Hanna Rosin is the author of 'The End of Men,' which weakly hypothesizes that, in the wake of massive lay-offs in the manufacturing and construction industries and the boom of public service industries like education, women will be better employed and more successful than men. Her thesis rested on tidbits like this:
| Quote: |
| Over several centuries, South Korea, for instance, constructed one of the most rigid patriarchal societies in the world. Many wives who failed to produce male heirs were abused and treated as domestic servants; some families prayed to spirits to kill off girl children. Then, in the 1970s and �80s, the government embraced an industrial revolution and encouraged women to enter the labor force. Women moved to the city and went to college. They advanced rapidly, from industrial jobs to clerical jobs to professional work. The traditional order began to crumble soon after. In 1990, the country�s laws were revised so that women could keep custody of their children after a divorce and inherit property. In 2005, the court ruled that women could register children under their own names. As recently as 1985, about half of all women in a national survey said they �must have a son.� That percentage fell slowly until 1991 and then plummeted to just over 15 percent by 2003. Male preference in South Korea �is over,� says Monica Das Gupta, a demographer and Asia expert at the World Bank. �It happened so fast. It�s hard to believe it, but it is.� |
She's not trained for critical thinking. Only for cultural attack jobs.
But at some point, you have to move past cultural attack jobs. |
Yeah, sure. Hanna Rosin is much more important than you know. She killed the msm reporting on the AIPAC spying/bribery scandals (according to Russ Baker and Sibel Edmonds).
Did Christianity cause the depression? No. It did not. It is an absurd notion. Greenspan, Rubin, Bernanke and Summers did. Hindu's, all.
Look at what the Zionist thinks of you and your country:
http://mondoweiss.net/2010/07/america-is-a-thing-you-can-move-very-easily-said-netanyahu.html
Do you know why America is a thing that the Zionist can move easily? Because normal people are too scared and status seeking to speak up.
Time for mainstream status-seeking is over. Cards on the table.
By the way, aid to Israel is increasing. US is broke as a junkie, but more aid.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-official-more-u-s-aid-will-help-israel-make-tough-decisions-1.302374
| Quote: |
U.S. official: More U.S. aid will help Israel make 'tough' decisions
U.S. is confident that Iron Dome will provide improved defense for the people of Israel, says assistant secretary of state.
An expanded security aid package would allow Israel to reach tough decisions in its peace talks with the Palestinians, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Andrew J. Shapiro said Friday, adding that Washington planned to provide Israel with its most extensive security aid package in history.
Speaking at the Brookings Saban Center for Middle East Policy in Washington D.C., the assistant secretary spoke of the administration's intention to enhance the annual security aid it provides Israel, saying that in "2010, the administration requested [from Congress] $2.775 billion in security assistance funding specifically for Israel, the largest such request in U.S. history."
|
You feel a hand in your pocket? Your people being blamed for something they didn't do? Who will die in the looming war with Iran? For whom? Your people dieing in Iraq for nothing? And you say it is time to get over cultural attack jobs? No. It is time to get over the fear of pejoratives.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/features/white-man-s-burden-1.14110
Here's a short primer from J. Petras:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Petras
| Quote: |
| James Petras is a retired Bartle Professor (Emeritus) of Sociology at Binghamton University, SUNY, New York, U.S., and adjunct professor at Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada who has published prolifically on Latin American and Middle Eastern political issues. |
http://www.lahaine.org/petras/b2-img/petras_bended.pdf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Happy Warrior
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mises wrote: |
| The Happy Warrior wrote: |
| mises wrote: |
| Quote: |
Did Christianity Cause the Crash?
By Hanna Rosin
America�s mainstream religious denominations used to teach the faithful that they would be rewarded in the afterlife. But over the past generation, a different strain of Christian faith has proliferated�one that promises to make believers rich in the here and now. Known as the prosperity gospel, and claiming tens of millions of adherents, it fosters risk-taking and intense material optimism. It pumped air into the housing bubble. And one year into the worst downturn since the Depression, it�s still going strong.
|
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/12/did-christianity-cause-the-crash/7764/
The nerve. The unbelievable nerve. |
Hanna Rosin is the author of 'The End of Men,' which weakly hypothesizes that, in the wake of massive lay-offs in the manufacturing and construction industries and the boom of public service industries like education, women will be better employed and more successful than men. Her thesis rested on tidbits like this:
| Quote: |
| Over several centuries, South Korea, for instance, constructed one of the most rigid patriarchal societies in the world. Many wives who failed to produce male heirs were abused and treated as domestic servants; some families prayed to spirits to kill off girl children. Then, in the 1970s and �80s, the government embraced an industrial revolution and encouraged women to enter the labor force. Women moved to the city and went to college. They advanced rapidly, from industrial jobs to clerical jobs to professional work. The traditional order began to crumble soon after. In 1990, the country�s laws were revised so that women could keep custody of their children after a divorce and inherit property. In 2005, the court ruled that women could register children under their own names. As recently as 1985, about half of all women in a national survey said they �must have a son.� That percentage fell slowly until 1991 and then plummeted to just over 15 percent by 2003. Male preference in South Korea �is over,� says Monica Das Gupta, a demographer and Asia expert at the World Bank. �It happened so fast. It�s hard to believe it, but it is.� |
She's not trained for critical thinking. Only for cultural attack jobs.
But at some point, you have to move past cultural attack jobs. |
Yeah, sure. Hanna Rosin is much more important than you know. She killed the msm reporting on the AIPAC spying/bribery scandals (according to Russ Baker and Sibel Edmonds).
Did Christianity cause the depression? No. It did not. It is an absurd notion. Greenspan, Rubin, Bernanke and Summers did. Hindu's, all.
Look at what the Zionist thinks of you and your country:
http://mondoweiss.net/2010/07/america-is-a-thing-you-can-move-very-easily-said-netanyahu.html
Do you know why America is a thing that the Zionist can move easily? Because normal people are too scared and status seeking to speak up.
Time for mainstream status-seeking is over. Cards on the table.
By the way, aid to Israel is increasing. US is broke as a junkie, but more aid.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-official-more-u-s-aid-will-help-israel-make-tough-decisions-1.302374
| Quote: |
U.S. official: More U.S. aid will help Israel make 'tough' decisions
U.S. is confident that Iron Dome will provide improved defense for the people of Israel, says assistant secretary of state.
An expanded security aid package would allow Israel to reach tough decisions in its peace talks with the Palestinians, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Andrew J. Shapiro said Friday, adding that Washington planned to provide Israel with its most extensive security aid package in history.
Speaking at the Brookings Saban Center for Middle East Policy in Washington D.C., the assistant secretary spoke of the administration's intention to enhance the annual security aid it provides Israel, saying that in "2010, the administration requested [from Congress] $2.775 billion in security assistance funding specifically for Israel, the largest such request in U.S. history."
|
You feel a hand in your pocket? Your people being blamed for something they didn't do? Who will die in the looming war with Iran? For whom? Your people dieing in Iraq for nothing? And you say it is time to get over cultural attack jobs? No. It is time to get over the fear of pejoratives.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/features/white-man-s-burden-1.14110
Here's a short primer from J. Petras:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Petras
| Quote: |
| James Petras is a retired Bartle Professor (Emeritus) of Sociology at Binghamton University, SUNY, New York, U.S., and adjunct professor at Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada who has published prolifically on Latin American and Middle Eastern political issues. |
http://www.lahaine.org/petras/b2-img/petras_bended.pdf |
Its interesting. The neo-cons are out of power and the President has no connection to Israel. Of all our allies, Obama dislikes Israel's leader, Netanyahu, the most. Iran actually *has* nuclear development and the Middle East wants the US to act, but Obama is still justifiably reluctant. But I'm supposed to fear the power of the Zionist Jew over America? Because Bibi boasts he can do US as he likes? Why should I trust Bibi on this and on none of the other things? He is a complete whackjob.
I don't know. Maybe if I believed that Israel had some role in 9-11, I might be more receptive. Because I don't, I'm more likely to be skeptical. The Israeli aid is frustrating, but it alone just shows Israel is like every other special interest group in the US, be it farmers or teachers or auto manufacturers.
As for Iraq, yes, the neo-cons f***ed us. Do you want me to get angry about it? Oh, wait, I have been. I guess I don't have much room for it any longer. Happy Warrior, not Bitter Warrior, not Cynical Warrior. Its the ideal, anyway, but I certainly don't always live up to it.
But its funny. I went to a small liberal arts college where Leo Strauss taught and eventually died. The place is a haven for Straussianism, and Straussians fought multi-cult hard when that philosophy (if you can call it that) was ascendant. Many of my professors (we don't call them that, actually) had great affection for Strauss, none of which stemmed from the giant's political views. As I became more aware of academia outside our walls, I realized how indebted I was to Strauss's influence.
I remember the attacks on the so-called Straussians who were the neo-cons. Yes, many of those douchebags studied under Strauss. Here's the thing, though. Strauss is not responsible for neo-con views, because Straussianism doesn't advocate imperialism or even the intervention of philosophers into the political sphere. Yes, I consider Strauss a philosopher.
But many liberal academics, especially old intellectual rivals who were angry at Strauss for refusing to carry water for multi-cult, tried to tear down his legacy by associating him with the neo-cons. For me, this seemed as lazy and tenuous a connection as that erroneously made between Nietzsche and the Nazis (Heidegger has actual connections with the Nazis).
My basic feeling is distrust whenever I hear someone say 'Mr. X supports Y' when there is no direct evidence of Mr. X's beliefs. If the connection is inchoate and depends on association, I become emotionally skeptical, as in, 'what is this guy's agenda, anyway?'
If you can show Hanna Rosin killed the MSM reporting on the AIPAC scandals, I'll probably believe you that Rosin is an aggressive Zionist (I did a quick Google search and couldn't find it). As it is, I'm open to the idea that she might be a Zionist. They exist, they are powerful, and they have friends in Congress.
So when I come out against the cultural attack jobs, and I certainly despise the drek I've seen from Rosin, you need to understand that it comes from a deep seated respect I hold for Strauss, and how he was subject to an attack job because he was founder of a sub-culture I hold dear. But most of all, I refuse to let my psyche co-opted to advance some academic's ideological feud. I need better evidence.
Yes, I'll admit that when I post on political opinions, my sanity is at stake. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Konglishman
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Location: Nanjing
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sergio Stefanuto wrote: |
| Konglishman wrote: |
| While I do not deny that is a genetic component to intelligence, I am going to go ahead and say that frequency of Jewish people doing well on IQ tests is largely due to them having a culture which highly values learning. |
Jews having a culture which highly values learning is an effect of their superior intelligence. |
Certainly, one can argue it the other way around. However, I do not believe that there are any compelling reasons to think that your viewpoint is any more valid than mine.
| Sergio Stefanuto wrote: |
| Konglishman wrote: |
| Adolf Hitler was actually part Jewish himself. |
That myth was dispelled in this book |
Well, it looks like an interesting book. However, until I get a chance to read it, I see little reason to believe that whatever it was that the author said, was anything more than just her trying to argue away an uncomfortable likelihood. So, if you like me to believe otherwise, perhaps, you should say what the evidence actually was. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sergio Stefanuto
Joined: 14 May 2009
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Konglishman wrote: |
| Certainly, one can argue it the other way around. However, I do not believe that there are any compelling reasons to think that your viewpoint is any more valid than mine. |
Your view rests on a fundamental misconception about the nature of cause and effect in cases like this.
You assume causation goes only in one direction (culture of learning -----> high intelligence), but it doesn't. The arrow goes in both directions (culture of learning <-----> high intelligence).
| Konglishman wrote: |
| Well, it looks like an interesting book. However, until I get a chance to read it, I see little reason to believe that whatever it was that the author said, was anything more than just her trying to argue away an uncomfortable likelihood. |
It was written by one of the world's leading experts on Hitler and the Third Reich
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2045979.stm
| Konglishman wrote: |
| So, if you like me to believe otherwise, perhaps, you should say what the evidence actually was. |
http://www.google.com
http://www.wikipedia.com
http://www.ask.com/
Take your pick |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Konglishman
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Location: Nanjing
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sergio Stefanuto wrote: |
| Konglishman wrote: |
| Certainly, one can argue it the other way around. However, I do not believe that there are any compelling reasons to think that your viewpoint is any more valid than mine. |
Your view rests on a fundamental misconception about the nature of cause and effect in cases like this.
You assume that cause and effect goes like this: cause ----> effect
But it doesn't. It goes: cause <----> effect (eggs <----> chickens)
You assume causation goes only in one direction (culture of learning -----> high intelligence), but it doesn't. The arrow goes in both directions (culture of learning <-----> high intelligence). |
Actually, you are misinterpreting what I said. After all, you are forgetting two key phrases in the sentence that I wrote.
| Konglishman wrote: |
| While I do not deny that there is a genetic component to intelligence, I am going to go ahead and say that the frequency of Jewish people doing well on IQ tests is largely due to them having a culture which highly values learning. |
So, yes, I am well aware of causation being able to go in both directions. However, I do think that in this case, the causation is more heavily weighted in one direction (culture of learning <----->>>>>> high intelligence).
| Sergio Stefanuto wrote: |
| Konglishman wrote: |
| Well, it looks like an interesting book. However, until I get a chance to read it, I see little reason to believe that whatever it was that the author said, was anything more than just her trying to argue away an uncomfortable likelihood. |
It was written by one of the world's leading experts on Hitler and the Third Reich
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2045979.stm |
So, are you suggesting that I should automatically accept her opinion because she is an expert? Sorry, I am more independent in my thinking than that. Experts can be wrong sometimes and may even disagree with each other in some cases. In short, they are human like the rest of us.
The main reason that historians doubt that Hitler is one-quarter Jewish is because they have been unable to find any documentation to back up the testimony of Hans Frank. However, I think that there is good reason to believe that Hitler already knew about his partial Jewish heritage. Therefore, he could have easily seen to it to have had all relevant evidence destroyed when he took over Austria. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sergio Stefanuto
Joined: 14 May 2009
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Konglishman wrote: |
| So, are you suggesting that I should automatically accept her opinion because she is an expert? |
Why do you keep referring to Sir Ian Kershaw as female?
Answer to your question: yes, I am suggesting you accept that Hitler wasn't partly Jewish on the basis that one of the leading experts on Hitler said there's no evidence whatsoever for that.
| Konglishman wrote: |
| Sorry, I am more independent in my thinking than that. |
You're so independent in your thinking that you said "Hitler was part Jewish" as though it was an uncontested fact without even citing a source
| Konglishman wrote: |
| Experts can be wrong sometimes and may even disagree with each other in some cases. In short, they are human like the rest of us. |
Wouldn't it be helpful if you discovered what the evidence and the argument is in the case of this particular expert rather than just waffle on?
| Konglishman wrote: |
| The main reason that historians doubt that Hitler is one-quarter Jewish is because they have been unable to find any documentation to back up the testimony of Hans Frank. However, I think that there is good reason to believe that Hitler already knew about his partial Jewish heritage. Therefore, he could have easily seen to it to have had all relevant evidence destroyed when he took over Austria. |
THAT's your evidence?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Konglishman
Joined: 14 Sep 2007
Location: Nanjing
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sergio Stefanuto wrote: |
| Konglishman wrote: |
| So, are you suggesting that I should automatically accept her opinion because she is an expert? |
Why do you keep referring to Sir Ian Kershaw as female?
Answer to your question: yes, I am suggesting you accept that Hitler wasn't partly Jewish on the basis that one of the leading experts on Hitler said there's no evidence whatsoever for that. |
Ahh... It is late. For some reason, I misread the name. So, now, I will refer to the author as "he". As for the rest, see what I say below.
| Sergio Stefanuto wrote: |
| Konglishman wrote: |
| Sorry, I am more independent in my thinking than that. |
You're so independent in your thinking that you said "Hitler was part Jewish" as though it was an uncontested fact without even citing a source |
Well, this is a message board, not a scholarly journal. I said it more to elicit a healthy debate. Apparently, I succeded on that account.
| Sergio Stefanuto wrote: |
| Konglishman wrote: |
| Experts can be wrong sometimes and may even disagree with each other in some cases. In short, they are human like the rest of us. |
Wouldn't it be helpful if you discovered what the evidence and the argument is in the case of this particular expert rather than just waffle on? |
I happen to think that the testimony of Hans Frank is relevant evidence. Further, I think the possibility that Hitler's father was an illegitimate child of a Jewish man, does add fuel to the fire in explaining Hitler's pathological anti-semanticism.
| Sergio Stefanuto wrote: |
| Konglishman wrote: |
| The main reason that historians doubt that Hitler is one-quarter Jewish is because they have been unable to find any documentation to back up the testimony of Hans Frank. However, I think that there is good reason to believe that Hitler already knew about his partial Jewish heritage. Therefore, he could have easily seen to it to have had all relevant evidence destroyed when he took over Austria. |
THAT's your evidence?? |
Well, it is a reasonable scenario at the very least as it is very common for documents and historical treasures to be destroyed during a war.
Anyways, I am going to get some sleep now. I am also interested in hearing what other people have to say. Finally, lets not derail this thread too much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sergio Stefanuto
Joined: 14 May 2009
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Konglishman wrote: |
| I happen to think that the testimony of Hans Frank is relevant evidence. |
What evidence? None was ever given to support those allegations
| Konglishman wrote: |
| Well, it is a reasonable scenario at the very least as it is very common for documents and historical treasures to be destroyed during a war. |
Hitler's grandfather remains unknown. But it's highly unlikely that he was a Jew because there were no Jews in this particular town (Graz, Austra) at the relevant time.
| Quote: |
Ian Kershaw dismisses the Frankenberger story as a "smear" by Hitler's enemies, noting that all Jews had been expelled from Graz in the 15th century and were not allowed to return until well after Alois was born
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler |
What there is clear evidence of, however, is a history of insanity in Hitler's family tree. Any action taken by the Nazis to destroy evidence of his ancestry was likely connected with that, rather than to cover up part-Jewishness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
catman
Joined: 18 Jul 2004
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is no Jewish cabal controlling Hollywood. Jews have been successful in the Hollywood business but they are not making movies to benefit Jews.
The conspiracy theorists tend to overlook the more obvious group that controls Hollywood. Men.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
recessiontime
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Location: Got avatar privileges nyahahaha
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| catman wrote: |
There is no Jewish cabal controlling Hollywood. Jews have been successful in the Hollywood business but they are not making movies to benefit Jews.
The conspiracy theorists tend to overlook the more obvious group that controls Hollywood. Men. |
read the article before voicing your opinion, thanks.
| Quote: |
News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah."
The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish."
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
