Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Pension plan
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
freewheelin



Joined: 16 Jul 2010

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:08 am    Post subject: Pension plan Reply with quote

I have a simple question, would anybody please be able to confirm that a teacher working with an E2 Visa in Korea must be covered under the Natonal Pension scheme? By the way I am a Canadian. Hence, is it a mandatory requirement for your school and you to pay into the National Pension scheme? The answer I am looking for is yes, however, my recruiters are telling me that I am not covered for this, and I am thinking they are incorrect, but I wanted to make sure that it is a necessary requirement legally, prior to approaching my boss about this.

Any clarifying info. would be much appreciated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OculisOrbis



Joined: 17 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The basic answer is yes, you are required to be covered and your employer must contribute to the pension plan. Under your E-2 visa, you are a de-facto employee.

That said, there is a scam that, while technically illegal, goes unenforced where if your employer designates you an 'independent contractor' and they do not have to contribute to pension, provide the national health insurance, and then you are also required to pay almost double the regular employee income tax rate.

If your recruiter says that you arent an employee and you will not receive pension, refuse to sign the contract and decline the job. There is very good chance that they will not only screw you on the above mentioned items, but you will very likely have many other issues with such a slimy employer.

Pass and find A)a better position and/or B) another recruiter
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Nester Noodlemon



Joined: 16 Jan 2009

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

OculisOrbis wrote:
The basic answer is yes, you are required to be covered and your employer must contribute to the pension plan. Under your E-2 visa, you are a de-facto employee.

That said, there is a scam that, while technically illegal, goes unenforced where if your employer designates you an 'independent contractor' and they do not have to contribute to pension, provide the national health insurance, and then you are also required to pay almost double the regular employee income tax rate.

If your recruiter says that you arent an employee and you will not receive pension, refuse to sign the contract and decline the job. There is very good chance that they will not only screw you on the above mentioned items, but you will very likely have many other issues with such a slimy employer.

Pass and find A)a better position and/or B) another recruiter


If a Poster on this board claims the pension problem is only with 1%~2% of the schools these days, don't believe him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
freewheelin



Joined: 16 Jul 2010

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks so much for your prompt reply.

But for better or worst, I am in fact newly employed and working for this employer as we speak. I'm currently in week #2, so needless to say I have not been paid yet....and in fact I may naturally just pay into the plan....I'm not sure.

But as sort of a heads up I asked the recruiter about this, and that is what they told me....but I actually don't trust them (the recruiters) in the slightest. Although, I generally am a very trusting human....too trusting one could argue sometimes. Judging from my first 2 weeks I believe my employer's are decent and trustworthy....but whether or not I am deemed an "independent contractor," I'm not sure...is there anyway to confirm this? Additionally, I am as dictated by my contract covered under the standard 50/50 medical agreement....but no pension is mentioned. I have worked in Korea in the past, and although this may make me seem naive and uninformed....I never got paid a pension (or paid into) one before. So beleive it or not, it has just recently come to my attention that it is common place to pay into a pension.

So I am not entirely sure what my follow up question is, but judging from the above information, would you think that I should be entitled to this?....or perhaps one could not say for sure with this limited information.

Any suggestions? Thanks for your time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tophatcat



Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Location: under the hat

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

freewheelin wrote:
Thanks so much for your prompt reply.

But for better or worst, I am in fact newly employed and working for this employer as we speak. I'm currently in week #2, so needless to say I have not been paid yet....and in fact I may naturally just pay into the plan....I'm not sure.

But as sort of a heads up I asked the recruiter about this, and that is what they told me....but I actually don't trust them (the recruiters) in the slightest. Although, I generally am a very trusting human....too trusting one could argue sometimes. Judging from my first 2 weeks I believe my employer's are decent and trustworthy....but whether or not I am deemed an "independent contractor," I'm not sure...is there anyway to confirm this? Additionally, I am as dictated by my contract covered under the standard 50/50 medical agreement....but no pension is mentioned. I have worked in Korea in the past, and although this may make me seem naive and uninformed....I never got paid a pension (or paid into) one before. So beleive it or not, it has just recently come to my attention that it is common place to pay into a pension.

So I am not entirely sure what my follow up question is, but judging from the above information, would you think that I should be entitled to this?....or perhaps one could not say for sure with this limited information.

Any suggestions? Thanks for your time.


Based on the information I have, you are entitled to pension.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
World Traveler



Joined: 29 May 2009

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

freewheelin wrote:
Additionally, I am as dictated by my contract covered under the standard 50/50 medical agreement....but no pension is mentioned.


Sometimes contracts say something like "the employer will bear half the cost of the medical insurance plan" so this sounds like NHIC, but really they are signing you up for (nearly worthless) private insurance. Be careful of tricky, ambiguous, or incomplete wording in contracts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The facts about Pension are as follows:

The E2 visa is irrelevant. The pension and tax laws are separate. Many eople with no experience in taxes, accounting, government and law are confused about this. There was a Dave's myth which has now been completely debunked in another thread that you could not be an independent contractor on an E2 visa. However, this was proven to be not true.

1) It is perfectly legal to be an independent contractor on an E2 visa. The big IF is that your contract must not say that you are an employee. The contract must make it clear, even if the words "independent contactor" do not appear, that you are not an employee or that you do not have benefits that employees would have.

So, if you sign a contract as an "independent contractor" or an hourly worker without benefits etc. then school is NOT legally required to enroll you in the National Pension Scheme. However, you are legally required to enroll yourself in the pension. Being an independent contractor does not make you exempt, it means that you must enroll yourself.

In fact, in Korea today, nearly half (over 48%) of all enrollees in the National Pension Plan are self employed or Independent Contractors.

Korean law does not treat foreign workers any different from its own citizens in this regard. Being on an E2 visa is unrelated to your status under other agencies. Immigration cannot make the rules for the tax, pension or national health insurance agencies.

It is quite easy to be a legal independent contractor or self employed in Korea. You have to enroll yourself in the plan.

Teachers from countries that do not get a Pension refund are likely to prefer this kind of position since they can cheat, not pay the Pension, and keep the money that other teachers are able to get refunded.

Being an independent contractor is probably not a good deal for most teachers. But it is perfectly legal. Anyone who says otherwise is woefully misinformed.


2) Another myth popular in Korea not only on Dave's, but among Korean accountants and business owners, is that businesses with fewer than 5 workers are exempt. This used to be true, but no more.

If you are an employee, then you must be enrolled in the National Pension and Health Insurance Schemes. This is true even if the business only has one employee.



3) Finally, another bit of foolish advice sometimes heard on Dave's is that it doesn't matter if Pension and Health Insurance insurance are mentioned in your contract, since they are legally required. This is really bad advice.

First, you could be signing up to be an independent contractor and your school will have no legal obligation to enroll you.

Second, you could be signing up for a school that thinks that they are exempt under the 5 employee rule. There is still a large number of these. Most will comply with the law when they are faced with the facts provided by the teacher or a visit from the authorities, but there is no benefit to the teacher in signing a contract that guarantees a battle, even if you might win.

Third, a significant percentage of schools will try to cheat on the amount they pay. They will enroll you, but they will underreport your earnings so as to reduce the pension they pay in. There are many variations on this theme.

The National Pension Office actually promoted a 30% reduction, which used to be legal, and hundreds of public school teachers along with many hogwan teachers had their pension amounts legally reduced under this plan. Many were never aware of this and never knew that they were getting less than other teachers at more honest hogwans. A handful of public school teachers noticed and got the rate corrected. The rest never noticed. This is no longer allowed, but many schools still try to use this or other means to underreport and underpay their share of the pension cost.


Fourth, about 1 or 2% of schools refuse to enroll their teachers in the National Pension plan at all, even though they know its the law and their employees are not "independent contractors." You do not want to fight with these people as they will use almost any means to avoid paying, and although you could win some judgement, you might still never collect and the lengthy battle is not worth it.


Finally, you should not sign a contract that does not have the proper tax withholding , according to the national tax service website (income tax is not a flat rate, it's progressive from 0 to 36%), the proper pension, and the proper health insurance rates spelled out in some way.

When these items are missing, it is generally a good indication that the school does not want to pay, and may use some method to avoid paying these items


Last edited by ontheway on Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:40 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OculisOrbis



Joined: 17 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hate the fact that I am even asking this, but, show your references that validate all the claims youve been making above regarding pension, e-2 visas and independent contractors. And also please show the numbers and sources of your claim that only 1-2% of employers dont contribute to pension from previous threads.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
wooden nickels



Joined: 23 May 2010

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I call B.S. on, only 1-2% of employers don't contribute to pension.

Of the E-2 visa holders I know, the numbers would be more like 15-20%.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wooden nickels wrote:
only 1-2% of employers don't contribute to pension.

Of the E-2 visa holders I know, the numbers would be more like 15-20%.



if you sign a contract as an "independent contractor" or an hourly worker without benefits etc. then school is NOT legally required to enroll you in the National Pension Scheme. However, you are legally required to enroll yourself in the pension.

Being an independent contractor does not make you exempt, it means that you must enroll yourself.

In fact, in Korea today, nearly half (over 48%) of all enrollees in the National Pension Plan are self employed or Independent Contractors.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wooden nickels



Joined: 23 May 2010

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ontheway wrote:
wooden nickels wrote:
only 1-2% of employers don't contribute to pension.

Of the E-2 visa holders I know, the numbers would be more like 15-20%.



if you sign a contract as an "independent contractor" or an hourly worker without benefits etc. then school is NOT legally required to enroll you in the National Pension Scheme. However, you are legally required to enroll yourself in the pension.

Being an independent contractor does not make you exempt, it means that you must enroll yourself.

In fact, in Korea today, nearly half (over 48%) of all enrollees in the National Pension Plan are self employed or Independent Contractors.


The 15-20% I know aren't independent contractors.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I call B.S. on, The 15-20% I know aren't independent contractors.


Post their contracts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
World Traveler



Joined: 29 May 2009

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ontheway wrote:
wooden nickels wrote:
only 1-2% of employers don't contribute to pension.

Of the E-2 visa holders I know, the numbers would be more like 15-20%.



if you sign a contract as an "independent contractor" or an hourly worker without benefits etc. then school is NOT legally required to enroll you in the National Pension Scheme. However, you are legally required to enroll yourself in the pension.


But how many of the contracts in the contract review section come out and say this? (Say that you are an independent contractor without benefits). I haven't seen one yet. (What would be even more surprising would be a contract letting workers know that they would be responsible for enrolling themselves in the NHIC and pension).

ontheway wrote:
In fact, in Korea today, nearly half (over 48%) of all enrollees in the National Pension Plan are self employed or Independent Contractors.


A large percentage of the Korean population is not working at all (many women do not work), which is why they don't have an employer presently paying into their pension. Non income earners age 27 and older must enroll themselves as individually insured. So do those (non-income earners) under 27 who have ever paid one month or more of a contribution.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hari seldon



Joined: 05 Dec 2004
Location: Incheon

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ontheway wrote:
The facts about Pension are as follows:

...Fourth, about 1 or 2% of schools refuse to enroll their teachers in the National Pension plan at all, even though they know its the law and their employees are not "independent contractors." ...


Based on my experience working at three hagwons and what I've been told by numerous friends and acquaintances who also work(ed) at hagwons, the numbers of hagwons that resist or patently refuse to enroll their teachers in the National Pension Scheme is much higher, probably on the order of 50% or more of the schools.

Understand that most schools resist or absolutely refuse to change their standard contract and most schools have standard contracts that were written by hagwon associations or a franchiser. Those contracts usually don't describe the teacher as being an employee, omit the Pension Scheme, omit the National Health Plan and describe the higher independent contractor tax rate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OculisOrbis



Joined: 17 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 3:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ontheway wrote:
The facts about Pension are as follows:

The E2 visa is irrelevant. The pension and tax laws are separate. Many eople with no experience in taxes, accounting, government and law are confused about this. There was a Dave's myth which has now been completely debunked in another thread that you could not be an independent contractor on an E2 visa. However, this was proven to be not true.

1) It is perfectly legal to be an independent contractor on an E2 visa. The big IF is that your contract must not say that you are an employee. The contract must make it clear, even if the words "independent contactor" do not appear, that you are not an employee or that you do not have benefits that employees would have.

So, if you sign a contract as an "independent contractor" or an hourly worker without benefits etc. then school is NOT legally required to enroll you in the National Pension Scheme. However, you are legally required to enroll yourself in the pension. Being an independent contractor does not make you exempt, it means that you must enroll yourself.

In fact, in Korea today, nearly half (over 48%) of all enrollees in the National Pension Plan are self employed or Independent Contractors.

Korean law does not treat foreign workers any different from its own citizens in this regard. Being on an E2 visa is unrelated to your status under other agencies. Immigration cannot make the rules for the tax, pension or national health insurance agencies.

It is quite easy to be a legal independent contractor or self employed in Korea. You have to enroll yourself in the plan.

Teachers from countries that do not get a Pension refund are likely to prefer this kind of position since they can cheat, not pay the Pension, and keep the money that other teachers are able to get refunded.

Being an independent contractor is probably not a good deal for most teachers. But it is perfectly legal. Anyone who says otherwise is woefully misinformed.


2) Another myth popular in Korea not only on Dave's, but among Korean accountants and business owners, is that businesses with fewer than 5 workers are exempt. This used to be true, but no more.

If you are an employee, then you must be enrolled in the National Pension and Health Insurance Schemes. This is true even if the business only has one employee.



3) Finally, another bit of foolish advice sometimes heard on Dave's is that it doesn't matter if Pension and Health Insurance insurance are mentioned in your contract, since they are legally required. This is really bad advice.

First, you could be signing up to be an independent contractor and your school will have no legal obligation to enroll you.

Second, you could be signing up for a school that thinks that they are exempt under the 5 employee rule. There is still a large number of these. Most will comply with the law when they are faced with the facts provided by the teacher or a visit from the authorities, but there is no benefit to the teacher in signing a contract that guarantees a battle, even if you might win.

Third, a significant percentage of schools will try to cheat on the amount they pay. They will enroll you, but they will underreport your earnings so as to reduce the pension they pay in. There are many variations on this theme.

The National Pension Office actually promoted a 30% reduction, which used to be legal, and hundreds of public school teachers along with many hogwan teachers had their pension amounts legally reduced under this plan. Many were never aware of this and never knew that they were getting less than other teachers at more honest hogwans. A handful of public school teachers noticed and got the rate corrected. The rest never noticed. This is no longer allowed, but many schools still try to use this or other means to underreport and underpay their share of the pension cost.


Fourth, about 1 or 2% of schools refuse to enroll their teachers in the National Pension plan at all, even though they know its the law and their employees are not "independent contractors." You do not want to fight with these people as they will use almost any means to avoid paying, and although you could win some judgement, you might still never collect and the lengthy battle is not worth it.


Finally, you should not sign a contract that does not have the proper tax withholding , according to the national tax service website (income tax is not a flat rate, it's progressive from 0 to 36%), the proper pension, and the proper health insurance rates spelled out in some way.

When these items are missing, it is generally a good indication that the school does not want to pay, and may use some method to avoid paying these items


Just one reference to anything that stated in the above regarding e-2/independent contractors, the 1-2% BS you keep spewing, even this other thread that you claim debunks the 'myth'?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International