| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Globutron
Joined: 13 Feb 2010 Location: England/Anyang
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Google East Sea and see what the top result is. One can guess... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Louis VI
Joined: 05 Jul 2010 Location: In my Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
East of what? East of the Asian mainland. It's a body of water directly east of the Asian continent.
| PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
| Simplest solution seems to be to put both names on maps. |
The East Sea of Japan.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mc_jc

Joined: 13 Aug 2009 Location: C4B- Cp Red Cloud, Area-I
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is what gets me- most map makers, even from those countries that hate the Japanese for one reason or another, name the body of water "The Sea of Japan".
Korea even used the name on its maps for a long time. The controversy surrounding this is only about 10 or so years old.
I mean, many American school children who could identify this body of water will identify it as The Sea of Japan.
I just love how Koreans attempt to change world history and geography to suit their ideas.
I think part of it has to do with their education. Korean students are always taught that it is named The East Sea. But when they go abroad to study, they are surprised to realize that the rest of the world calls it The Sea of Japan. The concept goes against the entire Korean educational indoctrination. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Junior

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Location: the eye
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:31 pm Post subject: Re: East Sea? East of What? |
|
|
| mc_jc wrote: |
Then he told me how much political pressure was put on them to use "The East Sea" instead of "Sea of Japan". |
Like what? By whom? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nukeday
Joined: 13 May 2010
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The name in English is the Sea of Japan. It doesn't matter if it once had several names. It carries as little importance as calling a certain body of water "The Gulf of Mexico." Koreans can call it anything they want in their own language.
And, btw, "east sea" is not a neutral name. Koreans call it east sea because they also call the yellow sea "west sea." It's Korea-centric. It has nothing to do with it being east of the Asian mainland, it has everything to do with them trying to reduce Japan's clout. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mc_jc wrote: |
I mean, many American school children who could identify this body of water will identify it as The Sea of Japan.
|
Hey if American school children can identify it by either name I'm all for that considering the woeful geographical knowledge of America's youth these days. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nukeday
Joined: 13 May 2010
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Templars - Land of the Morning Calm
On a world flight late one night
He left his friends, he left his wife
Far to the east, destination unknown
Doesn't even know where to call his home
Thought he had it bad back on the block
Knocking down pints with no afterthought
Now he's far away in some foreign land
He took for granted all he had
CHORUS
2x Over the Sea of Japan
He left his freedom, he left his land
Over the Sea of Japan
12 beers later and the sun in his face
It's not a bad dream, he's really into this place
365 days to some, but they're not in the land of the morning calm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patrick Bateman
Joined: 21 Apr 2009 Location: Lost in Translation
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It seems both sides of the argument have an equal, yet arbitrary claim to name the body of water.
I propose scrapping both "The East Sea" and "Sea of Japan." In its place, I suggest some alternatives:
1. "The 'Patrick Bateman' Sea" since I was the first to offer this compromise in this thread.
2. Change the name to something not dealing with history or geography.
3. Result to numbers, "Sea Two."
I wonder if a compromise could be reached dealing with The Sea of Japan and Dokdo. What if Korea gets to claim Dokdo, and the body of water is called "The Sea of Japan"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oskinny1

Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Location: Right behind you!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Patrick Bateman wrote: |
It seems both sides of the argument have an equal, yet arbitrary claim to name the body of water.
I propose scrapping both "The East Sea" and "Sea of Japan." In its place, I suggest some alternatives:
1. "The 'Patrick Bateman' Sea" since I was the first to offer this compromise in this thread.
Louis already did this above, and it is the same alternative I give my students.
2. Change the name to something not dealing with history or geography.
3. Result to numbers, "Sea Two."
I wonder if a compromise could be reached dealing with The Sea of Japan and Dokdo. What if Korea gets to claim Dokdo, and the body of water is called "The Sea of Japan"?
Considering it is already called the Sea of Japan, and there is no rightful owner of Dokdo, I think that Japan would be losing out. Now if you want to give Japan all territorial rights to the Sea of Japan minus an island here and there, I am sure they'd go for it. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cj1976
Joined: 26 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| A little tip for foreigners in Korea: Don't bring this up with Koreans. They don't like it very much and you won't ever get them to change their minds. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
creeper1
Joined: 30 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:06 pm Post subject: Compromise |
|
|
How about a compromise? The Koreans get Dokdo and the name "sea of Japan" stands.
OR
The Japanese get Dokdo (and rename it Takeshima or whatever) and the name of the sea is changed to "the East Sea" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Junior

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Location: the eye
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does Germany have any say in the fact Korea calls them "Dog-ill"?
I wonder how south africa feels about being called "Nama-gong". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mc_jc

Joined: 13 Aug 2009 Location: C4B- Cp Red Cloud, Area-I
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I wonder if a compromise could be reached dealing with The Sea of Japan and Dokdo. What if Korea gets to claim Dokdo, and the body of water is called "The Sea of Japan"? |
That's pretty much the status quo right now.
| Quote: |
| Hey if American school children can identify it by either name I'm all for that considering the woeful geographical knowledge of America's youth these days. |
I'm talking about the smart ones  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoholDiver
Joined: 03 Oct 2009 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
독일 is the Korean pronunciation of 2 chinese characters. 독 means independence. 일, I am not sure.
남아공 is also from Chinese characters. It is an abbreviation.
남 means south, 아 means Africa, and 공 means republic.
| Junior wrote: |
Does Germany have any say in the fact Korea calls them "Dog-ill"?
I wonder how south africa feels about being called "Nama-gong". |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patrick Bateman
Joined: 21 Apr 2009 Location: Lost in Translation
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| oskinny1 wrote: |
Louis already did this above, and it is the same alternative I give my students. |
I'm alright keeping my name out of the annals of history for awhile longer, so we can name it the "'Oskinny' Sea." I'm sorry but I cannot accept the "1" part because that's implying you get to name a second sea.
| oskinny1 wrote: |
Considering it is already called the Sea of Japan, and there is no rightful owner of Dokdo, I think that Japan would be losing out. Now if you want to give Japan all territorial rights to the Sea of Japan minus an island here and there, I am sure they'd go for it. |
See, compromise. We can do it this way too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|