|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Location: All over the map
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:31 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Captain Corea wrote: |
| caniff wrote: |
| Captain Corea wrote: |
| ontheway wrote: |
Even if they should avoid it, cops should be trained to disarm a healthy 240 pound 20 year old man with a knife - bare handed. |
hahahahhahha
no, wait, are you serious?
Where the heck did you get this fantasy from, movies?? |
I agree they should be trained so that hopefully they will be able to do that. It is possible that for some reason they may be dis-armed during a scuffle and are unable to straight-out shoot the perp.
If they have a firearm, then forget the tazer in that scenario. Just shoot his ***. |
Come on. A bare handed cop against a big young man... taze the effer. Why should a cop risk their life? |
I think you misunderstood my meaning. A cop should be trained in ways to handle such a perp bare-handed in the event they are left with only that option.
A tazer, I believe, would be the first option, but depending on the situation maybe it could be better to just shoot the guy.
(I'm not a cop but I can envision a scenario where it would be more wise to forego the tazer and make the guy eat a bullet.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea
Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Location: Seoul
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sure, bare handed brawling should be trained, but ontheway said it should be the first option, not the last resort. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
