|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2003 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Human,
In the larger sense perhaps not. but when you marry someone here that makes thing different. Its not about behaving like them or trying to be like them but about cultural sensitivity.
In my case, my father in law asked me as his son-in-law to participate in the ceremony of his ancestors. I accepted out of respect for him and because I found this to be a good opportunity to learn more about my wife's culture.
The regular bowing, or inclination of the head is just a way to greet each other they use here. I don't think a foreigner doing it is trying to "be korean". Thats an oversimplification.
As for the family and ancestral link, in my case, of course they are not my ancestors but they are my wife's ancestors and that means they are part of my life by extension. My wife feels the same way towards my extended family even if there is no "blood line".
Someone can go too far with this cultural sensitivity of course and that is not good.
but, when you marry someone here, you marry someone with cultural values that are from here, hence you will have to deal with those values and accept some of them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KimSuBok
Joined: 27 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2003 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For those arguing about giving a bow. Don't forget that confucianism teaches an order King above subject. Father before Son. Husband before wife. Elder before younger. These are the rules. A bow is a symbol of submission no matter what you may have perceived it to be.
It is great if in your particular family it feels like something else, but that is the origin. In the past when there was famine you can bet that you might not have received your share of what little food there was if you didn't bow to the right people.
South Korea has softened up in many ways, but one has to look no further than across the DMZ to see how good Koreans are and subordinating themselves to others.
I agree that if you love someone, it is easier to bow to them... but don't forget the historical origins of bowing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiboy_nz_99

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Confusianism sucks dogs balls and is the main reason this country is so backwards ... I call it "Confusionism" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
That was a very insightfull analysis of confusianism kiwi.
It showed you are an astute student of this ancient philosophy and that you have a very open mind to things that permits you to see all facets of a given question or topic.
I mean this is a gem worthy of Jerry Springer:
"Confusianism sucks dogs balls and is the main reason this country is so backwards"
It captures all aspects of the problem. You are an example of non-judgemental behavior that all bedsheet wearing, cross burning people should look to.
Well done indeed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="bucheon bum"][quote="TheUrbanMyth"]
bucheon bum wrote: |
No it doesn't. In your example/analogy, BOTH parties were dealing with religion not just one. The ones giving the meat to the Christians were idol worshipers, ie religous. That giving of the meat was, according to your analogy, considered a religous act by the idol worshipers AND the christians. Meanwhile bowing is only considered religous by the christian, in this case Corporal, not the koreans. Do you understand? Your analogy=both sides viewing it as religous, bowing=one party viewing it as (sacra)religous. |
I understand fine, but it is obvious you don't. I am not talking about the idol worshipers vs. the Christians. I am talking about the two sides of the Christians. One faction (among the Christians) felt there was no harm in eating meat that had been sacrified to idols (Homer). Another faction (among the Christians) felt that there was spiritual harm (Corporal). That is what I meant by using that analogy. It (the analogy) is still widely used today to expose these kinds of factions or divisions between Christians. Read the Bible again. It says nothing about the idol worshipers. Only the Christians and only their opinions. One side thought it was not a religous act and the other did. Homer says bowing is not and Corporal says that it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiboy_nz_99

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
It captures all aspects of the problem. You are an example of non-judgemental behavior that all bedsheet wearing, cross burning people should look to.
Well done indeed.
|
Thankyou Homer, I'm touched and humbled by your tender words.
Confusianism as it has manifested in this country amounts to a fundamentalist-style slavish adherence to heirachical structures. It is indeed one of the main things that is holding this country back. To provide one example, it is the bedrock and legitimisation of the deep-seated male chauvenism in this country. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2003 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="TheUrbanMyth"][quote="bucheon bum"]
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
bucheon bum wrote: |
No it doesn't. In your example/analogy, BOTH parties were dealing with religion not just one. The ones giving the meat to the Christians were idol worshipers, ie religous. That giving of the meat was, according to your analogy, considered a religous act by the idol worshipers AND the christians. Meanwhile bowing is only considered religous by the christian, in this case Corporal, not the koreans. Do you understand? Your analogy=both sides viewing it as religous, bowing=one party viewing it as (sacra)religous. |
I understand fine, but it is obvious you don't. I am not talking about the idol worshipers vs. the Christians. I am talking about the two sides of the Christians. One faction (among the Christians) felt there was no harm in eating meat that had been sacrified to idols (Homer). Another faction (among the Christians) felt that there was spiritual harm (Corporal). That is what I meant by using that analogy. It (the analogy) is still widely used today to expose these kinds of factions or divisions between Christians. Read the Bible again. It says nothing about the idol worshipers. Only the Christians and only their opinions. One side thought it was not a religous act and the other did. Homer says bowing is not and Corporal says that it is. |
Man oh man.. To quote you, "one faction felt there was no harm in eating meat that had been sacrificed to idols
Idol worship is clearly against the 10 commandments is it not?? I don't believe there is anywhere in the bible that says don't bow to anyone. Furthermore, you state (claiming it is from the bible, I'll asume it is) that eating that meat is a religous act (the idol part). One side thought, "oh what the heck, god won't care since I (the christian eater) don't worship idols and he knows this." The other one thought, "God's going to assume that I worship idols because I'm eating this 'tainted' meat provided by those idol worshipers. I shouldn't participate in a religous ceremony performed by heretics."
Now let's apply that to bowing. One side will think, "oh what the heck, god won't care because won't care since he hasn't said anything about bowing." And will the other think, "God's going to assume i'm against him because i'm bowing"? Of course not. Why? Because bowing isn't considered (sacra)religous anywhere in the bible.
My point being this: idol worship is CLEARLY forbidden in the bible while there is nothing about bowing. If there was anything at all in the bible that even INFERED that bowing was inappropriate for a believer, THEN the analogy would work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2003 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="bucheon bum
. Why? Because bowing isn't considered (sacra)religous anywhere in the bible.
My point being this: idol worship is CLEARLY forbidden in the bible while there is nothing about bowing. If there was anything at all in the bible that even INFERED that bowing was inappropriate for a believer, THEN the analogy would work.[/quote]
(sigh) If you actually read the Bible, then you would realize that yes, the topic of bowing to human beings (kings) was considered blasphemy. There are several stories dealing with this topic in the Bible. "Bowing the knee to any man" is forbidden. God reserves that for Himself. Read the books of Esther and Daniel as well as Kings. Human beings and idols were creations. To bow before a creation rather than the Creator is blasphemy. That is why you will see many warnings against bowing to idols in the Bible as well as several cases where believers refused to bow before humans as well.
Sorry but you have lost this argument. There are many many parts of the bible that (to use your word) INFER or directly state that bowing, (usually to an idol) but sometimes to a human being, is wrong.
Now you may disagree with that, but you cannot disagree with that as an article of someone's faith. Unless of course you disagree with religion as a whole...but that is a whole new topic. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2003 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
well had you said that originally (the bible reference) instead of using your analogy, I would have conceeded being wrong much earlier before . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HardyandTiny

Joined: 03 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
sometimes I have to go back and look at these old posts....
there are some classic moments
this is hilarious!~
where's trinny!
Trinny wrote: |
Story about my Korean ex-fiance and his family.
Even before marriage, I had to go to his parents place every weekend. Sometimes, when his aunts and cousins dropped in, I peeled fruits and prepare meals for them, while they sat in a couch and did nothing. They didn't even bother to strike up a conversation with me or be friendly. His first and second cousins were about the same age as I was, but I still have to obey them, because they were my mother-in-law would-be's nieces and that means they were at the top of hierarchy and I was at the bottom of the barrel.
One day I decided to pack up and leave for Canada. That was the best decision I have made yet. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ody

Joined: 27 Jan 2003 Location: over here
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HardyandTiny wrote: |
sometimes I have to go back and look at these old posts....
there are some classic moments
this is hilarious!~
where's trinny! |
yea, i missed this thread due to the fact that at the time i was knee-deep in 10 year olds at summer camp hell!
i also regrettably missed Trinny at the get together during the same time. i too miss her contributions to this board and hope to see her return in the future. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
coolsage
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: The overcast afternoon of the soul
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
While I haven't read every post on this thread, and there are many, I'm still at a loss as to why a western woman would want to hook up with a Korean guy, unless there's some deeply Freudian need for submissiveness. Unless you get both your asses out of Korea, you'll be tied to that family for as long as they live. It's tough enough for a western guy-korean woman match; for the opposite, I wish you well, but that does not bode well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
just because

Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Location: Changwon - 4964
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
coolsage,
A lot of Korean guys are super cool. I could definantly see why a western girl would hook up with one. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
coolsage
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: The overcast afternoon of the soul
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
just because wrote: |
coolsage,
A lot of Korean guys are super cool. I could definantly see why a western girl would hook up with one. |
Perhaps it's my particular demographic, or my geographic location (i.e. not Seoul), but after six+ years in this land, I have yet to meet a hip Korean in Korea. I suspect that the hip ones have gone away and stayed away, and had I been born in this country, I would have done exactly the same. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
coolsage...it all depends what your definition of "hip" is doesn't it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|