View previous topic :: View next topic |
What kind of smoking provision are you for? |
Complete smoking ban in any public place with bans in private clubs and bars also |
|
42% |
[ 21 ] |
Ban in public places but bars with 'smoking licenses' allowed |
|
20% |
[ 10 ] |
Bars etc with smoking and non smoking sections |
|
22% |
[ 11 ] |
I'll smoke wherever the heck I like. |
|
16% |
[ 8 ] |
|
Total Votes : 50 |
|
Author |
Message |
LDJS
Joined: 22 Aug 2010 Location: Earth
|
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:48 pm Post subject: What kind of smoking provision are you for? |
|
|
I'm for 3 but would conceed hapilly to 4 as most of my freinds would fall in same category so I could still hang out with them in 'smoking allowed bars / clubs' and not much would have changed (apart from the odd non smoker hottie or two.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NYC_Gal

Joined: 08 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
#2
This is what is done in NYC. I don't know the exact percentage, but a "smoking bar" has to make a large percentage of its money from smoking (cigars, hookas, etc) and the rest can be alcohol or whatever.
Most bars are flat-out non smoking, though, and the smokers got over it really quickly. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DeMayonnaise
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
|
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So much ignorance on this subject...
You can still hang out with your friends at non-smoking bars. They'll just step outside for 3 minutes to have a cigarette every now and then. It's no different than someone who broke the seal getting up to go to the bathroom every now and then.
Number 2 is kind of vague in my mind. I'd go for that, but be very stingy with the smoking licenses, meaning, only for hooka bars or cigar bars, not regular ol bars and restaurants. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LDJS
Joined: 22 Aug 2010 Location: Earth
|
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DeMayonnaise wrote: |
So much ignorance on this subject...
You can still hang out with your friends at non-smoking bars. They'll just step outside for 3 minutes to have a cigarette every now and then. It's no different than someone who broke the seal getting up to go to the bathroom every now and then.
Number 2 is kind of vague in my mind. I'd go for that, but be very stingy with the smoking licenses, meaning, only for hooka bars or cigar bars, not regular ol bars and restaurants. |
I want to smoke my cig with a pint in my hand, without having to step outside whilst continuing my game of pool.
That so hard for you to believe?
Anything other than that = not fun for me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
interestedinhanguk

Joined: 23 Aug 2010
|
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The righteousness of smoking bans aside (private business etc.), the smoker did seem to get over it real fast as NYCgirl mentioned. The complain for the time leading up to the ban, and for about a week after. Then they realize they can step outside for a few minutes. I do really hate the smoking in bars, but it's often the place my friends insist on going.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd be happy if they'd actually enforce the smoking ban close to public buildings and at universities. It won't happen though. Neither do I ever see them putting any tighter regulations on smoking in restaurants or in public.
It would be interesting if anyone could find a recent study on the % of Korean males that smoked and a break down by age.
On a lighter note, my father-in-law quit about 3 years ago after being diagnosed with cancer. He'd smoked all his life. I was so happy he was able to give it up.
To be clear I am a non-smoker. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sallymonster

Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Location: Seattle area
|
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think for bars and clubs it should be the business's choice whether or not to allow smoking. However, I think smoking should be banned in restaurants open to the public (and bars within those restaurants). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DeMayonnaise
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
|
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LDJS wrote: |
DeMayonnaise wrote: |
So much ignorance on this subject...
You can still hang out with your friends at non-smoking bars. They'll just step outside for 3 minutes to have a cigarette every now and then. It's no different than someone who broke the seal getting up to go to the bathroom every now and then.
Number 2 is kind of vague in my mind. I'd go for that, but be very stingy with the smoking licenses, meaning, only for hooka bars or cigar bars, not regular ol bars and restaurants. |
I want to smoke my cig with a pint in my hand, without having to step outside whilst continuing my game of pool.
That so hard for you to believe?
Anything other than that = not fun for me. |
No I get it. You smoke like 2 packs in a typical night out, lighting up one cigarette after another (like so many chain smokers in Korea), so you'd likely be spending the whole night outside. Well, congrats, you're weird and have a smoking problem. I shouldn't have to accommodate that. Most people are fine with a smoke every hour or so, and understand that it bothers non-smokers.
I'm sorry you have only one prescribed way you can have fun when you go out. Must suck if people are already using the pool table. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alphabet_Stew

Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Location: Earth
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I remember the good old says
"2003" I would smoke in the boys bathroom at the Public middle I was teaching at - whilst the middle school boys also smoked in the same bathroom.
"2005" the male teachers at the Public elementary school I taught at would smoke in the school playground during the breaks.
"2008" The High school behind my elementary school has a smoking room on the fourth floor - I heard it still does.
"2009" would smoke on the roof of my Public schools with the other male teachers.
These days people are content to stand at bus stops and breathe in all the truck/car fumes and smog - but "smokers'! Oh NO! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
When I worked at a high school last year, I caught one of my co-teachers smoking in the bathroom. I just gave him a hard time about it jokingly of course. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
actionjackson
Joined: 30 Dec 2007 Location: Any place I'm at
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Option 3 always makes me laugh. How does the saying go, a bar with smoking/non smoking sections is like a pool with peeing/non peeing sections? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ttompatz

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Location: Kwangju, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
actionjackson wrote: |
Option 3 always makes me laugh. How does the saying go, a bar with smoking/non smoking sections is like a pool with peeing/non peeing sections? |
LOL.
Could we get space in the non-peeing section please?
My friends can just step over to the peeing section when necessary.
We all know that the 2nd-hand pee won't cross over into the non-peeing section, WILL IT?
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I second the non-peeing zone. The police really need to enforce the decency laws and arrest people for peeing in public. Even as a non-Korean I can always find a bathroom (even if it is a dump) to relieve myself.
Several years ago I was in a subway station (I believe it was Seoul National University of Education and there was a guy peeing on one of the columns in the middle of the station. I proceeded to give him an earful in English about his behavior and the poor guy was just embarrassed as hell.
We now return this thread to it's regularly scheduled topic... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crossmr

Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Location: Hwayangdong, Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
you're missing an option..
*complete and utter outlaw of cigarettes
unfortunately no government has the stones to do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kaypea
Joined: 09 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
With a little hesitation, I said complete ban... for selfish reasons.
I have a smoking problem, and I know it's disgusting. I don't like it... I do smoke when it's convenient. I returned from SE Asia 10 days ago, and while I was there I smoked *everywhere*. I haven't been smoking these days (8 days), but I know that if I go to a bar that I will *probably* smoke.
When they banned smoking in Canadian bars, I eventually stopped thinking that smoking was part of the bar experience. Maybe, maybe I'd leave the bar for a couple of smokes, but I wasn't totally chainsmoking like I do here sometimes.
Personally, convenience does influence my smoking habit. It's not convenient for me to smoke at work (I'm a female PS teacher), so I don't. I haven't been smoking at home either, because I'd just... rather not. But I'll probably still smoke at the bar until it's banned. The bar could be a much nicer place for non-smokers if smoking were banned, and the smokers could get used to it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|