|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
darkjedidave

Joined: 19 Aug 2009 Location: Shanghai/Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:07 pm Post subject: Don't Touch my Junk! |
|
|
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/11/tsa-investigating-passenger/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/15/john-tyner-videos_n_783678.html
It was only a matter of time until someone flipped out over this. Full body scans that leave nothing to the imagination, and now groin checks?
Quote: |
Due to privacy and health concerns, Tyner opted out of the scan in favor of a pat-down. But when the TSA agent explained in detail the agency�s new policy for �enhanced� pat-downs � which includes using the front of hands and fingers to touch passengers in their groin � Tyner balked.
�If you touch my junk,� he told the agent, �I�ll have you arrested.�
The agent called his supervisor, who told Tyner that if he wasn�t comfortable with the enhanced pat-down �we can escort you back out and you don�t have to fly today.�
Tyner told the agent, �I don�t understand how a sexual assault can be made a condition of my flying.�
When the agent replied that a pat-down was not considered a sexual assault, Tyner said, �It would be if you were not the government.� |
Apparently John Tyner didn't want his junk touched! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gom
Joined: 05 Oct 2010
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does this 'enhanced pat down' apply to both men and women? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ThingsComeAround

Joined: 07 Nov 2008
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
darkjedidave

Joined: 19 Aug 2009 Location: Shanghai/Seoul
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The massively undignified policy of scanning or physically searching passengers is bad enough, but the really horrific thing in my estimation is this:
Quote: |
He was on his way out of the airport when a man in a sport coat approached and told him he could not leave the airport until he�d completed the security screening, even if he had no intention of getting on an airplane. The man, whom Tyner believes was with the TSA, told him that he�d be subject to prosecution and a civil fine if he left without being screened. Tyner told the man to sue him and walked out of the airport. |
I think it's all summed up fairly nicely by this comment:
Quote: |
The TSA supervisor told him, �By buying your ticket you gave up a lot of rights." |
This is unacceptable. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Space Bar
Joined: 20 Oct 2010
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 is NATIONAL OPT-OUT DAY!
It's the day ordinary citizens stand up for their rights, stand up for liberty, and protest the federal government's desire to virtually strip us naked or submit to an "enhanced pat down" that touches people's breasts and genitals in an aggressive manner. You should never have to explain to your children, "Remember that no stranger can touch or see your private area, unless it's a government employee, then it's OK."
The goal of National Opt Out Day is to send a message to our lawmakers that we demand change. We have a right to privacy and buying a plane ticket should not mean that we're guilty until proven innocent. This day is needed because many people do not understand what they consent to when choosing to fly.
Here are the details:
Who?
You, your family and friends traveling by air on Wednesday, November 24, 2010. Remember too, as the TSA says, "Everyday is opt-out day." That is, you can opt out any time you fly.
What?
National Opt-Out Day. You have the right to opt-out of the naked body scanner machines (AIT, or Advance Imaging Technology, as the government calls it). All you have to do is say "I opt out" when they tell you to go through one of the machines. You will then be given an "enhanced" pat down. This is a right given to you by the TSA.
Where?
At an airport near you!
When?
Wednesday, November 24, 2010. We want families to sit around the dinner table, eating turkey, talking about their experience - what constitutes an unreasonable search, how forceful of a pat down will we allow on certain areas of our body, and that of our children, and how much privacy are we will to give up for flying? We hope the experience then propels people to write their Member of Congress and the airlines to demand change.
Why?
The government should not have the ability to virtually strip search anyone it wants without cause. The problem has been compounded in that if you do not want to go through the body scanner, the TSA has made the alternative perhaps even worse by instituting "enhanced" pat downs. There are reports from travelers across the country about how the TSA now touches the genitals and private areas of men, women and children in a much more aggressive manner. We do not believe the government has a right to see you naked or aggressively touch you just because you bought an airline ticket.
How?
By saying "I opt out" when told to go through the body imaging machines and submitting to a pat down. Also, be sure to have your pat down by TSA in full public - do not go to the back room when asked. Every citizen must see for themselves how the TSA treats law-abiding citizens. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Panda

Joined: 25 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
.It depends on which you give a primary importance.
Your privacy or your security.
I don't think any officers in the airport ENJOY touching anybody's junk, obviously this is the painful choice of the government. (even there is single time the officer let a terrorist pass, the whole country will blame the government).
To me this guy is a waste of tax payers' time and money. America should spend more time doing something else more important...( dont tell me its for liberty, thats illusion, you never satisfy everyone).
I kinda think it bullshit once you are a lawyer, you sue everything that has two legs... all you want is actually some public attention and a reputation for a good lawyer ( and no body can blame you becasue you are a fighter for justice and liberty, oh yeah~!)
Last edited by Panda on Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:46 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
TSA is incompetent. Last month I took a trip to New Orleans with my gf at the time. Her last name on the airline ticket was wrong. It wasn't even remotely close to the last name on her ID. No one said anything or questioned her, she just walked on through. So FYI to Al-Qaeda: recruit short, chubby hispanic women! TSA won't notice them apparently.
The only times I've been taken aside by the TSA was once when I had a few rolls of quarters in my carry-on (super dangerous!) and when I had a tube of toothpaste with bengali writing on it. It was more than the 3 oz. allowed but since it didn't list ounces, the TSA dude let me keep it. I have a hunch if I weren't a pale face and/or my name was Mohammed, I wouldn't have been as fortunate. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
madoka

Joined: 27 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you Muslim extremists!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Panda wrote: |
It depends on which you give a primary importance.
Your privacy or your security. |
No it doesn't. These measures don't make us statistically safer at all. They're pure humiliation with no meaningful payoff. People who are willing to blow themselves up to blow up others are statistically virtually nonexistent, and they're just as able to self-detonate in other crowded places in order to be unaffected by airport security.
The real question is which you value more: your dignity, or the illusion of security. Anyone who supports these scans is willing to trade dignity for an illusionary safety blanket. If people self-detonating on airplanes were a serious epidemic, it would be worth having a discussion about whether or not measures like these are required. It's just not particularly a problem, though, especially since the real risk -- the potential for people to hijack airplanes -- was more or less completely addressed by reinforced doors and new protocols for airplane staff regarding keeping those doors locked. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pikkle
Joined: 17 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fox wrote: |
The real question is which you value more: your dignity, or the illusion of security. |
Got through security (AND ONTO A UNITED PLANE!) with a box cutter in my pocket that I had forgotten to take out after work! Not very "secure"... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They should invite those guys running the airport in Tel Aviv to show them how airport security is really done. I also think it would help if airport security guys were actual professionals, instead of some guy who applied for the job. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
darkjedidave

Joined: 19 Aug 2009 Location: Shanghai/Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jvalmer wrote: |
They should invite those guys running the airport in Tel Aviv to show them how airport security is really done. I also think it would help if airport security guys were actual professionals, instead of some guy who applied for the job. |
My thoughts exactly. The TSA has no idea how to to correctly profile people for threat analysis. In Israeli airports, security personal simply walk through the lines, talk to people and observe behavior. They're specially trained in spotting people who pose potential risk. No naked scans, no crotch checks, and the whole process take about half the time.
Considering Israel is one of the most targeted places on earth for terrorism, and Ben Gurion airport has not had a security breach since 2002 (SeaTac airport in Seattle has 100 since 2002), I'd say their system works. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Confused Canadian

Joined: 21 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting coincidence that I stumbled on this post this morning after reading this thread. Think it's from 2002...
http://www.pennandteller.com/03/coolstuff/penniphile/roadpennfederalvip.html
Quote: |
Federal V.I.P Penn - 11/13/02
Last Thursday I was flying to LA on the Midnight flight. I went through security my usual sour stuff. I beeped, of course, and was shuttled to the "toss-em" line. A security guy came over. I assumed the position. I had a button up shirt on that was untucked. He reached around while he was behind me and grabbed around my front pocket. I guess he was going for my flashlight, but the area could have loosely been called "crotch." I said, "You have to ask me before you touch me or it's assault."
He said, "Once you cross that line, I can do whatever I want."
I said that wasn't true. I say that I have the option of saying no and not flying. He said, "Are you going to let me search you, or do I just throw you out?"
I said, "Finish up, and then call the police please."
When he was finished with my shoes, he said, "Okay, you can go."
I said, "I'd like to see your supervisor and I'd like LVPD to come here as well. I was assaulted by you."
He said, "You're free to go, there's no problem."
I said, "I have a problem, please send someone over." |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
T-J

Joined: 10 Oct 2008 Location: Seoul EunpyungGu Yeonsinnae
|
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So what would happen if you get to security and stripped down naked?
I'm tempted to fly wearing a bathrobe, slippers and nothing else. As soon as I hit the security screening area the bathrobe and the slippers go in the bin.
"Just trying to make your job easier" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|