| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
LGSakers
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I went to university for 4 years and took out a loan. I majored in philosophy, which is only really useful if I want to head off and get a PhD... But that's ok. I like philosophy, and I had the best 4 years of my life. It certainly was worth the ~22,000 CDN I owe.
With that said, a debt of anything higher than ~40,000 CDN seems impossible to me. I too come from a family where no one attended university and had actually had many monetary problems on the way. Nothing would have swayed my decision, though, partly because I did not want to be stuck on my home town like so many other people have.
Personally I blame the school boards (in Ontario, I can't speak for anywhere else) and the universities. They allow the universities to come to the high schools and sell their school... Which is fine. Except they do not talk to you about debt or finance. They make it sound peachy keen and perfect, easy. By doing so, it is really easy to 'fall in love' with the idea of going to post-secondary. I knew nothing about debt... I had never seen more than a few hundred dollars in my life. Is that the school's fault? Hardly. But there should be some sort of mandatory class in grade 11 and 12 that explains to you what university courses will make you money and what sort of debt you are liking to and what that really means.
All in all, I get what this Schiff guy is getting at... I just can not get behind it 100%. There are a lot of factors when it comes to big decisions. You start high school with the expectation of knowing what your career will be. You're what, 13? 14? Then, in grade 12, you have to know what school to go to and instantly become an adult. It is quite the transition, and anyone who tries to dumb it down into something black and white has forgotten what it is like being teenager. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fox

Joined: 04 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He's far too eager to place the bulk of the blame at the feet of the government. She is mostly to blame for her own predicament. Not the government, not her family, her. She made bad choices, and now she'll pay for them.
I support heavy reform of our current student loan programs; like Bucheon Bum said, you can't change people (at least not easily), but you can change the system, and because the current system causes many people to do themselves harm, the system should be changed. That doesn't mean it's not her fault, though. It just means she needs to be protected from herself (or at least needed to be while in that age range), which in turn mandates a policy change. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blm
Joined: 11 Nov 2010
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| recessiontime wrote: |
no you still don't get it. Schiff is still correct. Australia isn't some exception to the rule. I'm studying in oz right now and tuition is rising because of HECs. It's the same thing, the only difference is oz only has 20m people while the US has 300+ million. That's the only thing that has kept tuition prices lower than in NA.
Here's how it works. Because the government guarantees ANY student loan schools begin raising tuition (because students can pay for it anyway). Then other school raise tuition alongside other schools and everyone follows suit. Tuition rises. This is entirely a situation that the government has produced with disastrous consequences.
That girl IS ignorant and Schiff is at least telling her the truth about her situation. He's the only one that understands the economics behind how this happened. I'll go a bit further and say she is stupid.
Shciff: "I would leave the country. Take that money and buy a plane ticket so you are not a serf."
kelli: ...............................................................................................
her silence says "no I rather stay here and run up my 15 minutes and see if I can pay this 200k lol!" |
It's different in Australia, the university can charge whatever it wants for private students but for the government loan (Hecs) you are talking about the government negotiates with the universities what there contribution is. It's a set amount for all students*
I.e the government decides what the price of education is for those elligible for the Hecs scheme (most Australian's) ... the University is free to charge whatever to those outside the scheme (some mature age students and international students) and so naturally those who pay there own way are preferenced because the universities charge them more.
It sounds like the US system is just agreeing to cover a student for whatever the market rate is.....a sudden influx of people that can pay whatever the Universities will charge is of course going to increase the price.
*actually there are 3 categories based on what degree (e.g a science degree the government gives more to the university) but it's a minor point. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geldedgoat
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| blm wrote: |
| I.e the government decides what the price of education is for those elligible for the Hecs scheme (most Australian's) ... the University is free to charge whatever to those outside the scheme (some mature age students and international students) and so naturally those who pay there own way are preferenced because the universities charge them more. |
Implementing something like this is exactly what we should do, rather than scrapping government assistance, and a more educated populace with it, altogether. It's truly amazing to see the crowd who's usually screaming for government to step away from personal freedom and responsibility so readily abandon that position to attack any government action, as, in this case, that action actually makes available more options for the populace at each individual's own risk. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Space Bar
Joined: 20 Oct 2010
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hugo85 wrote: |
| okelleyas wrote: |
| recessiontime wrote: |
her parents and family never went to college |
She may have blindly heeded advice, but I don't think it takes a college education to know basic personal finance. |
I think everyone should share the blame for having students get into tremendous debts for useless degrees.
The students for lack of common sense. The parents for letting the kids do it. The counselors for encouraging it. The banks for agreeing on it. The government for co-signing it. |
The banks agreed only because the gov't guaranteed it. It's its fault. Without gov't guarantees, it would not have been possible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thomas pars
Joined: 29 Jan 2009
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The interview is a tad misleading. It ignores some of the malfeasance that went on and continues to go on in the Student Loans Office. I won't get into that. It is pretty well documented. As well as the extraordinary exceptions that student loans are afforded. i.e No bankruptcy, usury laws, fair collection practices. etc. etc. etc.
I owe a shit ton of money. Something like 54 K. When i hear her story you walk away with a new perspective. I mean this girl is !@#$ed. She'll never own a house, or be able to start a business. What kind of employer would take someone on with 200K in student loans?
She basically has 2 options. Flee the country and or get into sex work/ stripping. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So you have organization "x" that sell product "q". The culture holds "q" to such a high regard that it is nearly impossible to live a middle class life without obtaining it. Then this other organization "g" says it will guarantee the loans of "X's" customers - to almost any amount and without the possibility of default.
What do we think is going to happen? X will raise prices to the highest upper limit that can be tolerated. Not tolerated by the customer (he/she has a couple decades of pro-Q propaganda and immense cultural pressure) but by the insurer.
The schools and the students are responding to incentives. The incentives are created by the government, no doubt under lobbying from X and loan servicers.
There is responsibility all around, but the buck stops with the government (literally).
...
That woman should go into exile. She should get a trade (on credit) that can be useful somewhere else (nursing or similar). Then leave. America is a nice place to live, but it sure as hell isn't that nice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blade
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thomas pars wrote: |
The interview is a tad misleading. It ignores some of the malfeasance that went on and continues to go on in the Student Loans Office. I won't get into that. It is pretty well documented. As well as the extraordinary exceptions that student loans are afforded. i.e No bankruptcy, usury laws, fair collection practices. etc. etc. etc.
I owe a shit ton of money. Something like 54 K. When i hear her story you walk away with a new perspective. I mean this girl is !@#$ed. She'll never own a house, or be able to start a business. What kind of employer would take someone on with 200K in student loans?
She basically has 2 options. Flee the country and or get into sex work/ stripping. |
Not necessarily, if her annual income is below a certain amount she can qualify for the IBR program where she'll only need to make repayments of about 15% of her income. Also if she works in the public sector after 10 years she can have her loan cancelled completely.
| Quote: |
| What kind of employer would take someone on with 200K in student loans? |
I am not sure why her debt should even matter to an employer, but yet it does. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blade
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mises wrote: |
So you have organization "x" that sell product "q". The culture holds "q" to such a high regard that it is nearly impossible to live a middle class life without obtaining it. Then this other organization "g" says it will guarantee the loans of "X's" customers - to almost any amount and without the possibility of default.
What do we think is going to happen? X will raise prices to the highest upper limit that can be tolerated. Not tolerated by the customer (he/she has a couple decades of pro-Q propaganda and immense cultural pressure) but by the insurer.
The schools and the students are responding to incentives. The incentives are created by the government, no doubt under lobbying from X and loan servicers.
There is responsibility all around, but the buck stops with the government (literally).
|
Kids should be protected from unscrupulous lenders and educational institutions by the government and not the other way round. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It's crazy that someone can give you a $200,000 loan with no collateral prior to your being able to buy a drink. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| northway wrote: |
| It's crazy that someone can give you a $200,000 loan with no collateral prior to your being able to buy a drink. |
Right. How many of these debtors can even calculate debt payments etc?
Reminds me of Fight Club:
| Quote: |
| We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars. But we won't. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
asylum seeker
Joined: 22 Jul 2007 Location: On your computer screen.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The simplest way to reform the student loan system would be to allow such loans to be covered by bankruptcies. With such increased risk of not getting their money back, banks would naturally start to self-regulate how much they loan out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mosley
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do I have sympathy for this girl?
Sure, and you can find it in the dictionary between sh** and syphilis.
In Canada, there are countless grads, some with grad degrees in fact, with craploads of debt-unpaid debt courtesy of the working taxpayer. Too many of these snotnoses defiantly state that they will not pay back the gov.- backed loans. "Well!(insert huffy puffy voice). No one one told me that my degree in post-modernist feminist literature wouldn't get me a $50,000/yr. job following graduation!". Really, Einstein? You spent all those years getting an "education" but couldn't figure out that constant borrowing with no real job prospects following graduation wasn't the best plan in the world?
Just like all those couples in the States(he a Wal-Mart stocker and she a cocktail waitress)who took on quarter million dollar mortgages just because they could(interest rates? What interest rates?).
At least they had an excuse. They probably weren't "educated". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Hammer
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Ullungdo 37.5 N, 130.9 E, altitude : 223 m
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
"It's the government's fault."
"It's my parent's fault."
"It's not my fault."
Yeah, try that BS in the real world and watch yourself get trounced! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LGSakers
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mosley wrote: |
Do I have sympathy for this girl?
Sure, and you can find it in the dictionary between sh** and syphilis.
In Canada, there are countless grads, some with grad degrees in fact, with craploads of debt-unpaid debt courtesy of the working taxpayer. Too many of these snotnoses defiantly state that they will not pay back the gov.- backed loans. "Well!(insert huffy puffy voice). No one one told me that my degree in post-modernist feminist literature wouldn't get me a $50,000/yr. job following graduation!". Really, Einstein? You spent all those years getting an "education" but couldn't figure out that constant borrowing with no real job prospects following graduation wasn't the best plan in the world?
Just like all those couples in the States(he a Wal-Mart stocker and she a cocktail waitress)who took on quarter million dollar mortgages just because they could(interest rates? What interest rates?).
At least they had an excuse. They probably weren't "educated". |
At the same time, how many people abuse the welfare system to death? I agree with you, 100%, but this problem you are talking about - the taxpayers paying for this - goes so deep in Canada it pisses me off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|