|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
superNET
Joined: 08 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| And to that I question the individual who chooses to fly more than 10 hours to a foreign country to only maintain a "profession |
So you would say that those who participate in Doctors Without Borders are not professionals then? A person who signs up to be a teacher is part of a profession, and in my opinion, the locale does not matter, nor the length of service.
| Quote: |
| Doctors don't just sign a 1 year contract with a hospital |
Really. I think you might want to research that a bit or broaden the scope of the example.
| Quote: |
I think it will be very hard to extinguish the fires of complaints while we only contract for 1 year. Another aspect to this profession/not profession debate is that I don't know any other profession where you go in with an agreement you will leave after one year.
|
So all the temporary teachers in the west who have to find a new school after 1 year aren't really professional then? Sorry but to me, length of service does not mean one is not professional. Sure after 1 year you leave a locale but you do not neccessarily leave the profession |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As the person who said that a professional photographer is a person who makes a living doing photography, a hakwon teacher can say that he or she is a "professional."
Yes, yes, yes, one could say that a McDonald's chef is a professional too but we don't.
We generally do say that "teachers" are professionals. That is good enough for me.
In the end, much depends on what you think you are. And, much might also depend on how you behave.
If you think you are a professional, and you want to be a professional, don't listen to the doom and nay sayers. Their opinion doesn't really mean anything.
If you don't want to be a professional, I don't think anyone in Korea would be surprised. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| those who participate in Doctors Without Borders are not professionals then |
I don't see the parallel here.
"Doctors and nurses volunteer to provide urgent medical care in countries to victims of war and disaster regardless of race, religion, or politics."
1) Are you a "professional" teacher in US, volunteering your time in another country?
2) Are you not here for other purposes beyond donating your time and "expertise" which may not be anything other than the fact you were bred an American, Briton, Canadian, Australian, etc...?
| Quote: |
| Sure after 1 year you leave a locale but you do not neccessarily leave the profession |
The point is that I would want an ongoing agreement, there are other things tied to this. I would want rent beyond the year, I would want to collect severance, etc.. at different times, etc...
There are other variables besides simply qualifications which should be considered here.
I see you are asking questions, but I don't see you answering my questions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
edwardcatflap
Joined: 22 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Quote:
In my experience the only people who say this kind of thing are those who have never got any qualifications. Go away, do an BED, MA TESOL or CELTA/DELTA then come back and say it didn�t make you a better teacher and people might listen.
First off, people who say things like this just do not get responded to.
Second, such qualifications does not mean you can teach, in fact most cannot teach after getting those certificates because they lost what is important to teaching.
|
So now you seem to be saying people with qualifications become worse teachers after training. Still without having done any of this training yourself. Are you an experienced teacher trainer? Presumably you have observed these teachers� classes before and after the training took place and measured their performances according to some pre- decided procedure based on internationally recognized assessment criteria? Otherwise how would you possibly know?
Using the fact that according to your, let�s face it, ill-informed opinion, some people you know with qualifications are not very good teachers is a pretty lame excuse for not getting qualified yourself .
Anyway please tell us what is important to teaching that these people have lost by getting qualifications. Extreme arrogance perhaps? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superNET
Joined: 08 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| ill-informed opinion |
When you resort to insults and a superiority complexes I stop responding. Suffice it to say, there are many examples of paper holding westerners who A. can't teach and B. leave Korea because of either A. or they just can't adapt to the system here.
The system isn't wrong here, the problem lies with the person who cannot adapt. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
edwardcatflap
Joined: 22 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You're saying certain qualifications, which you do not hold, are unneccesary. How can that opinion be anything else except ill-informed? It was not meant to be rude. Until you have taken these qualifications yourself, you simply cannot have a valid opinion on this subject. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superNET
Joined: 08 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| You're saying certain qualifications, which you do not hold, |
Who said I do not hold them? I haven't.
Plus you forget that I have also worked with those who hold such pieces of paper and saw first hand that they could not teach nor adapt, save for one.
| Quote: |
| Until you have taken these qualifications yourself, you simply cannot have a valid opinion on this subject. |
Sure one can, even students can see that they can't teach or adapt. One does not need to have such certificates to hold a valid opinion or have analytical skills. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="superNET"]
| Quote: |
Y
Plus you forget that I have also worked with those who hold such pieces of paper and saw first hand that they could not teach nor adapt, save for one.
. |
Except your personal experience does not cover all the thousands of people who have got such certificates. The reason that these certificates have become a standard is that MOST people who have them can teach and adapt. If they didn't work they wouldn't have become a standard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
edwardcatflap
Joined: 22 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Sure one can, even students can see that they can't teach or adapt. One does not need to have such certificates to hold a valid opinion or have analytical skills. |
As well as what urban Myth says, In order for your original argument to hold water you would have to show that these people had not improved as a result of gaining these qualifications or had got worse. Simply observing that a teacher is bad, from your own criteria (whch you haven't really explained) and then noticing he holds a qualification does not in any form of an argument mean that ergo the qualification is useless. Maybe he was an even worse teacher before he took the qualification |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superNET
Joined: 08 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Except your personal experience does not cover all the thousands of people who have got such certificates. The reason that these certificates have become a standard is that MOST people who have them can teach and adapt. If they didn't work they wouldn't have become a standard. |
NO, that is a superficial position that ignores the reality that there are many,many people who cannot teach or use such credentials for other nefarious purposes and if you checked, i would bet you would find that the majority of people here are sans BEds and teachers diplomas
| Quote: |
| In order for your original argument to hold water you would have to show that these people had not improved as a result of gaining these qualifications or had got worse. Simply observing that a teacher is bad, from your own criteria (whch you haven't really explained) and then noticing he holds a qualification does not in any form of an argument mean that ergo the qualification is useless |
This is a two way street and applies to you and your critical analysis of those who hold non-BEds and teachers diplomas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
languistic
Joined: 25 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hagwon workers are not professionals simply by virtue of where they work. They may be personally professional, in that they engage in self-development, actively strive to be better teachers and actively desire to be a teacher, with a full set of academic knowledge and applied skills; this makes one a professional and would make such claims valid.
Korean hagwons offer a unique situation where dictionary definitions do not apply; it is a rare scenario where one can actually attain what in any other situation would be a job reserved for those with formal training to engage in their trained activity for sustenance - A.K.A. professionals.
Where else (but in EFL/ESL) can one be a 'teacher' with a BA in an unrelated discipline? EFL in Korea, at the hagwon level, is such that one need not have special training to satiate the set requirements for the position, but one must also accept that no, they are not a professional simply because they are referred to as "teachers" by the culture. It is only a name for Koreans to refer to you as something, not someone (in the culture, not a race thing), but it does not carry the weight of the word in other contexts.
It is as I said earlier, glorified unskilled labor and if that changes or not is completely in the hands of each individual worker.
Last edited by languistic on Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:33 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
edwardcatflap
Joined: 22 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| This is a two way street and applies to you and your critical analysis of those who hold non-BEds and teachers diplomas |
I hold some of those qualifications so I know from personal experience they have improved my teaching skills a lot. You, assuming you are not qualified, do not. And, as I said before your argument about the merits of them is really pretty irrelevant until you do. In the end I don't care whether you ever get qualified or not as if anything it decreases any opposition I might face in the future for certain jobs. You, however, may be cutting off your nose to spite your face by arguing yourself out of the chance for self improvement and better jobs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
languistic
Joined: 25 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You people aren't really interested in answers, are you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 3:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
For what it is worth, I don't think one need to "experience" something to analyze its benefits.
Certainly, democracy doesn't work that way. We don't have to be professionals to have an opinion of something or to vote on an issue. Should there be free trade? Well, we all have a say. If I am not informed, maybe others won't listen to me, but we all state opinions about things we might not have any direct experience of or are experts in.
Even academics way-in on topics which are not their field of expertise. But, they don't lack in intelectual skills to make a contribution.
I don't think everyone who wants to be a teacher can just show up and teach. But, I also think some people can.
I think one of the key skills to teach anything - is knowledge of the subject. I don't think this is the case of many ESL/EFL teachers but I know from growing up in my school system there were teachers there that might have been "professional" teachers but they didn't know much about their subject matter. They had studied Education but they had not studied History or Math or Science or whatever
The thing is - when we are talking about teaching "English Conversation" - what is the subject? Well, there are a lot of people who don't have fancy degrees that are actually quite knowledgeable. It is not rocket science. I know - I know - there is so much more to it than that. Maybe, it is true. But, 90% of the people who are hired to teach English are here to be a living language lab for students to interact with.
Ask most successful language learners where did you learn to speak a foreign language and many will say they learned it from going out and using the language. The classroom may be a great starting place but it is out in the world that people really learn to use language. The problem is there is no world out there for Korean students to use English, at least not in Korea. So, English has become so vital and the market has become so big Koreans have brought the world here by bringing in English teachers.
Teaching English is not easy. There are a lot of qualities that a good English teacher in Korea needs to have. There are people who are quite successful and there are people who aren't. The people who succeed and earn a living doing it, if they so desire, may take the mantle of "professional." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superNET
Joined: 08 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| You, assuming you are not qualified, do not |
This tells me everything I need to know about you so I will stop conversing with you. You have a superiority complex problem and an arrogance that makes it impossible to logically and rationally talk to you.
| Quote: |
| Hagwon workers are not professionals |
People who say this merely want inferiors to look down upon.
| Quote: |
| I don't think everyone who wants to be a teacher can just show up and teach. But, I also think some people can. |
That includes those who hold credentials and those who do not. I knew a BEd. who cleared out every class he inherited and could not keep a student when the owners tried to create classes for him. The dumb thing was, they renewed him for a second year |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|