|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
calicoe
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK, yeah, you talked me into it; I'm gonna get the organic variety. You can find it at the supermarkets in department stores: Galleria, Lotte, et al.
I will try the French Onion recipe, but I'll need to substitute the butter with oil. I was dreaming of the old school variety, with bread and a baked cheese topping - yum! I'll have to settle for the new version. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
drydell
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
there is no evidence the gladiators were fat.
What there is is evidence that the gladiators were vegans.
Now this clearly shocked the paleo-pathologist who unearthed this because it's still widely believed that you can't be muscular and vegan - so his own bias crept into findings at Ephesus and he came up with the 'theory' that they must have actually been fat vegans... it's the only theory that makes sense isn't it? - we all know vegans are skinny pale skinned emo kids yes?
But look at original depictions of gladiators and it certainly doesn't show fat gladiators ...
http://www.utexas.edu/courses/ancientfilmCC304/lecture32/detail.php?linenum=7
http://www.utexas.edu/courses/ancientfilmCC304/lecture32/detail.php?linenum=28
Fact = gladiators were vegan
Theory = they must have been fat....
In the world of competitive sports more athletes are taking plant-based diets much more seriously....just read about Brendan Brazier and Scott Jurek for triathlon and ultra marathon running.. not to mention mixed fighters etc - even Mike Tyson went vegan recently... people (especially in the US) who know about fitness and nutrition are no longer buying into the old diet myths anymore
http://www.veganbodybuilding.com/?page=bios (here's a bunch of skinny pasty vegans to laugh at)
Now this is one that blew my mind and i have to show other people about it- this chap is a fruitarian and he ran the Leadville 100 mile this year - and with a pretty respectable finish...but then........ just 2 days later - yes that's 2 days later he was feeling so bouncy he ran a 26 mile race with 5-600 other runners in Rockville New York and he won!! - the other runners were completely stunned when they all found out he had just run the Leadville 2 days before .... what a LEGEND! - go kickass fruitarians! hehe (it's all about recovery times - loads of fruit recovers body much quicker)
to read the full epic tale go here (i really recommend this)......
http://www.30bananasaday.com/profiles/blogs/the-leadville-100-mile |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
metalhead
Joined: 18 May 2010 Location: Toilet
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Man you vegan types sure go to a lot of effort to try and prove that vegans can be almost the same, physically, as normal people that eat meat. What a pity no one cares really. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NYC_Gal 2.0

Joined: 10 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 2:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
The butter really does make the soup taste better. I tried making it with oil substitute, and it just didn't taste right. I ended up giving the whole batch to a vegan coworker in my office who loved it.
If you want the true taste, how about mixing some butter with the non-butter alternative? If it's only a little, would that make you ill? If so, use the oil. If you can get away with a tablespoon or two in a big pot of soup, I say mix some in with the oil. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calicoe
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| drydell wrote: |
there is no evidence the gladiators were fat.
UM, yes there is and I already posted it. If you don't like the results, you can take it up with the Paleo-pathologist scientists that submitted remains for bone analysis and could pretty much tell what they ate for breakfast. I'm sure they've already seen the art work.
What there is is evidence that the gladiators were vegans.
Now this clearly shocked the paleo-pathologist who unearthed this because it's still widely believed that you can't be muscular and vegan - so his own bias crept into findings at Ephesus and he came up with the 'theory' that they must have actually been fat vegans... it's the only theory that makes sense isn't it? - we all know vegans are skinny pale skinned emo kids yes?
No, that's your theory, his is substantiated research. You weren't there to talk to him to know what his biases were. Do you see the difference?
Now this is one that blew my mind and i have to show other people about it- this chap is a fruitarian and he ran the Leadville 100 mile this year - and with a pretty respectable finish...but then........ just 2 days later - yes that's 2 days later he was feeling so bouncy he ran a 26 mile race with 5-600 other runners in Rockville New York and he won!! - the other runners were completely stunned when they all found out he had just run the Leadville 2 days before .... what a LEGEND! - go kickass fruitarians! hehe (it's all about recovery times - loads of fruit recovers body much quicker)
Yeah, that guy is amazing. But, just to be clear, he is a raw foodist. I already stated my opinion on raw food diets above (they are incredibly healthy). That is not really the same as a vegan diet, which generally incorporates a lot of GRAINS, which is what the fat gladiators were eating, to pack on subcutaneous fat.
And, they had their "calcium supplements" as well: "... But a diet of barley and vegetables would have left the fighters with a serious calcium deficit. To keep their bones strong, historical accounts say, they downed vile brews of charred wood or bone ash, both of which are rich in calcium. "
|
*edit: And no, NYC gal, I can't eat butter. It gives me a vicious migraine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NYC_Gal 2.0

Joined: 10 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ah no worries then. Just try to find the most "butter tasting" alternative for the best flavor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
drydell
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| calicoe wrote: |
| drydell wrote: |
there is no evidence the gladiators were fat.
UM, yes there is and I already posted it. If you don't like the results, you can take it up with the Paleo-pathologist scientists that submitted remains for bone analysis and could pretty much tell what they ate for breakfast. I'm sure they've already seen the art work.
What there is is evidence that the gladiators were vegans.
Now this clearly shocked the paleo-pathologist who unearthed this because it's still widely believed that you can't be muscular and vegan - so his own bias crept into findings at Ephesus and he came up with the 'theory' that they must have actually been fat vegans... it's the only theory that makes sense isn't it? - we all know vegans are skinny pale skinned emo kids yes?
No, that's your theory, his is substantiated research. You weren't there to talk to him to know what his biases were. Do you see the difference?
Now this is one that blew my mind and i have to show other people about it- this chap is a fruitarian and he ran the Leadville 100 mile this year - and with a pretty respectable finish...but then........ just 2 days later - yes that's 2 days later he was feeling so bouncy he ran a 26 mile race with 5-600 other runners in Rockville New York and he won!! - the other runners were completely stunned when they all found out he had just run the Leadville 2 days before .... what a LEGEND! - go kickass fruitarians! hehe (it's all about recovery times - loads of fruit recovers body much quicker)
Yeah, that guy is amazing. But, just to be clear, he is a raw foodist. I already stated my opinion on raw food diets above (they are incredibly healthy). That is not really the same as a vegan diet, which generally incorporates a lot of GRAINS, which is what the fat gladiators were eating, to pack on subcutaneous fat.
And, they had their "calcium supplements" as well: "... But a diet of barley and vegetables would have left the fighters with a serious calcium deficit. To keep their bones strong, historical accounts say, they downed vile brews of charred wood or bone ash, both of which are rich in calcium. "
|
*edit: And no, NYC gal, I can't eat butter. It gives me a vicious migraine. |
I don't think you really understand which part of this was the factual discovery - and which part was the conjecture based upon this discovery...
They looked at the mineral content of the bones unearthed and found the bones had a low-zinc high strontium content which indicated that their diet was very plant based (compared to the bones of the non-gladiators buried nearby)...that much is factual..
What the archaeologists then did was develop a theory for why the "barley men" (gladiators) ate this way
He believed that because some gladiators fought with little more than their bare hands, they could have "cultivated layers of fat to protect their vital organs from the cutting blows of their opponents". - ....fairly speculatory don't you think it? - archaeologists or paeleo-pathologists are not immune from prejudices of their time - I think this is probably a good example.
All of the news stories and web sites ran with this theory by Grossschmidt - about eating barley to become fat - because he needed an explanation why the gladiators were not high-protein meat eaters (and also how they got enough calcium)- all the links will circle back to this theory he made up...but this part is the most tenuous. Once again if you can find any historical mosaics made in the time of the gladiators depicting sumo-like men fighting I will be willing to accept it was possible.. all the pictures ive been looking at show stocky muscular gladiators...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gladiators_from_the_Zliten_mosaic_3.JPG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Borghese_gladiator_1_mosaic_dn_r2_c2.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mosaic_museum_Istanbul_2007_011.jpg
What i originally wrote stays the same -
Fact= gladiators were vegetarian
theory = they were so to become fat...! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poltergeist
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
1. Vegans can be raw or cooked; raw foodists can be vegan or nonvegan. Some vegans use caffeine, alcohol, tobacco, sugar, salt, white flour, etc.; others don't. There are too many generalizations in this thread.
2. I agree that some people face greater challenges than others and having food sensitivities must really suck. But some people with these challenges do manage to live vegan lives: http://www.foodallergysurvivalguide.com/authors.html
3. Here's an article about the blood-type diet: http://www.vegsource.com/klaper/diet.htm
4. This thread was split off from another thread in which certain posters perpetuated offensive misconceptions about plant-based diets. No one said all flesh-free diets were healthier than all flesh-inclusive diets or vice versa. No one claimed any diet was a panacea. At issue is whether the absence of flesh on a person's plate is a "risk" factor for any disease or condition, and so far no one has established that it is.
Last edited by Poltergeist on Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:06 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calicoe
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
drydell:
Yes, all the other articles circle back to this one, because they are the batch of chemistry and pathologist scientists that conducted the research and reported the findings.
However, you are being too selective in how you are interpreting and representing the article. Your quote above, "... they could have cultivated layers of fat ..." etc., is referring to their possible REASONS and motivation for fattening up with grains, not questioning WHETHER they did so or not.
It is obvious that a successful gladiator needed the poundage in the arena to sustain blows and sword wounds, and they were able to bulk and fatten up before battles with GRAINS.
There were two different kinds of gladiators, and quite frankly, some of those figures in the drawings do look fat. They are not obese, but they are definitely "stocky" and plump without definition, except in chisled sculpture. They are sort of like the bulky athletes or American football players who eat and eat for sheer size, without the weightlifting. What happens to those guys when they stop lifting weights? Yeah, they get fat.
On the other hand, some vegans might use weights to build bulk.
I don't have anything against vegans, vegs, or the whole lot, but do not try to hold up gladiators as some "elite athlete" because they were not. They were slaves that basically stuffed themselves with grains like cattle, so they could sustain blows and put on a good show.
edit:
Yes, I have been looking at websites for vegan and vegetarian celiacs. You found one website. There are many that stay vegan or vegetarian, but there are also many that start eating meat because of their illness as well.
I hope you guys are not confusing me with the people who denigrates plant-based diets, because I don't. I think raw foodism is one of the healthiest diets you could follow. But, I would need limited amounts of animal protein, because I don't eat grains. THAT is my point. You need to get readily absorbed B12 and iron from somewhere, and the easiest absorbed is from animal proteins, which is significant for a malabsorption problem.
*And I know all about vegans and raw foodists, veg and non-veg, etc. I am not making generalizations, except to say that by simply stating you are a vegan does not make you a raw foodist.
It's funny you mention generalizations, because I feel that's exactly what many vegans and vegetarians do about diets that include animal protein. My point is: it can be just as healthy if not healthier than a grain-consuming vegan diet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poltergeist
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
1. I don't find it necessary to avoid grains, but I'm not forcing grains on anyone who doesn't want them.
2. I'm sure my diet could be much healthier, but that's beside the point.
3. The link was posted as an example of two people who faced much greater health challenges than the average person, but still found ways to manage their conditions without throwing away their values. I'm not sure what relevance your counterexamples have to this discussion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calicoe
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Poltergeist wrote: |
I'm not sure what relevance your counterexamples have to this discussion. |
Well, probably about as much relevance as your posting a link that doesn't work, on people with "food sensitivities" which is itself another vast generalization, staying true to their "values" when the title of the thread is about "HEALTHY" or not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poltergeist
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not responsible for the title of the thread--that was TUM's idea. However, the thread was a continuation of another discussion and it offends me that you've misrepresented the nature of that discussion.
I don't know why the link didn't work, but it seems to be fixed. I hope anyone reading this who may be considering eating animal products as a quick fix to a health problem will do everything they can to exhaust other options.
Edit: 1. I never said I was a raw foodist. (Far from it!!!)
2. You could have just said, "The link didn't work." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calicoe
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:17 am Post subject: Re: Vegetarian...healthy? |
|
|
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
Vegetarian lifestyle...healthy?
This thread is an offshoot of the vegetarian in Korea thread so not as to derail the original one.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12460231
This study shows that not only iron but B12 as well can be compromised by a vegetarian diet.
That said, if you supplement your diet with certain vitamins and minerals a vegetarian diet can be quite healthy. But as the study shows, not everyone does that. |
Here's the original post of this thread. My first response in this thread talks about my struggle with this very topic, and in particular how the lack of animal-derived B12 and iron can compromise some specific health problems and certain body types. The rest of the posts were in response to a dialogue of other posts on the topic, as threads on the internet are prone to do.
If you are so easily offended then I suggest that the source of your problems lie elsewhere.
edit: Ok, you edited your post, which changes the meaning of your post, and, at least makes it a bit more honest, in my opinion.
I never called you a raw foodist. I think I explained my reference to raw food well enough already.
2. Now I understand the source of your ire. Your values are offended, which I stated in my earliest post, I respect. I respect the ethics of veganism and vegetarianism tremendously. However. I am posting on this thread to voice the fact that, it is not necessarily the healthiest choice for all people, and I have already explained why.
It is not up to people like you, to cast judgment on people like me, who need to eat a certain way not out of choice, but by necessity.
And "food sensitivities" is an incredibly general statement. Celiac Disease is an autoimmune condition and an inability to absorb certain nutrients, and not just a mere sensitivity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poltergeist
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:07 pm Post subject: Re: Vegetarian...healthy? |
|
|
| calicoe wrote: |
edit: Ok, you edited your post, which changes the meaning of your post, and, at least makes it a bit more honest, in my opinion. |
WTF? I corrected a link that didn't work. I said nothing dishonest.
| Quote: |
| I never called you a raw foodist. I think I explained my reference to raw food well enough already. |
You implied 1) that it was impossible to be both vegan AND raw, and 2) that all vegans were either claiming to be raw foodists or offering a quick fix for people's health problems. That's not the case. Some vegans use cooked food, processed food, tobacco, alcohol and/or cocaine, just as some nonvegans do. Vegans can be as healthy or as unhealthy as they want in their food/drug/other lifestyle choices. I don't have the willpower to be a raw vegan, but I think it's a great idea. Also, most people in this society eat grain, regardless of what else they eat, so your anti-grain crusade seems out of place in a thread about the alleged health benefits of flesh eating.
I wasn't making any kind of statement about your condition, general or otherwise--there are many conditions that make it harder for people to plan their diets and yours is one of them. I think some people with Celiac would find that link helpful. You obviously don't. Fine.
I don't know why you would feel singled out for any more judgment than other people. Ninety-nine percent of the population doesn't share my values--I can't take them all on in one conversation. I'm responding to your posts because they're misleading and alarmist. Most people on these boards don't have a serious condition that will put them in hospital if they eat a bowl of rice. I think your posts could deter ordinary, non-sick people from attempting veganism, and could push them toward fad diets that are totally unsupported by any reliable evidence. I also hope people who are sick will seek out reliable information and not look to fad diets as quick fixes.
The thread is really about iron, not about the gladiators or your flat stomach. I suspect it's harder for me to absorb iron than it is for most people, and that means I need to be more careful than most people. What I don't need is some preacher (not you, I'm referring to another poster who commented in the previous thread) posting a condescending lecture about phytates. That is why this thread started. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Poltergeist wrote: |
| I'm not responsible for the title of the thread--that was TUM's idea.." |
If I am not mistaken this thread came about as an offshoot of another thread where people were talking about the lack of iron in a plant-based diet. I would say that falls under the umbrella term "healthy". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|