View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
hellofaniceguy

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: On your computer screen!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rkc76sf
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rkc76sf
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Louis VI
Joined: 05 Jul 2010 Location: In my Kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SAFETY NOT A TOP PRIORITY IN SOUTH KOREA
Quote: |
The course driving part of the driver�s test, in which an applicant has to navigate a set course, will be cut... |
Quote: |
The amendments include getting rid of unnecessary steps in the aptitude test for potential drivers. |
Why make people practice in a country which leads the world in percentage of drivers who get into traffic accidents and traffic fatalities?
Quote: |
Applicants will be able to substitute the written exam for 10 additional hours of driver�s education classes. |
The assumption being those ten hours of instruction were doing no good?
Quote: |
The ministry is also planning to limit the frequency applicants can take the test to just once a week, and those who fail the test three times or more will be subject to an additional five hours of driving practice in classes on the road. |
So, no practice required, fail the test each of the previous two weeks but bare pass it this week and all is okay? And if you fail the third time then we are all subjected to five hours of that driver learning ON the road?! Stay waaay clear of learner cars then, if they go from no experience to the road with no parking lot training and only when failed road test twice!!
This is not a good development for anyone except the chaebols who sell cars and government which employ road testers.
Last edited by Louis VI on Tue Dec 28, 2010 2:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nathanrutledge
Joined: 01 May 2008 Location: Marakesh
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have you SEEN the tests they use? They are a joke. The lousy driving in this country is not because of the testing, it's because of the lack of law enforcement and arcane driving system. Cutting the tests and training requirement will only reduce safety IF they help make people safer drivers. IMO, they don't. Those driving schools are so completely unrealistic that the people who benefit from this are EVERYONE EXCEPT the driving schools. It's about time.
Now, if they can only do something to IMPROVE driving, THAT would be impressive. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hellofaniceguy

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: On your computer screen!
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nathanrutledge wrote: |
Have you SEEN the tests they use? They are a joke. The lousy driving in this country is not because of the testing, it's because of the lack of law enforcement and arcane driving system. Cutting the tests and training requirement will only reduce safety IF they help make people safer drivers. IMO, they don't. Those driving schools are so completely unrealistic that the people who benefit from this are EVERYONE EXCEPT the driving schools. It's about time.
Now, if they can only do something to IMPROVE driving, THAT would be impressive. |
Not so much lack of enforcement but more related to stupid drivers who think the rules of society do not apply to them.
Even the cops drive bad. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ticktocktocktick

Joined: 31 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I learned to drive here a few years ago, I found the driving course tutition invaluable, as it lets you get to grips with the vehicle in a safer environment. It was also the hardest section to pass. The road driving test, on the other hand, was ridiculously easy, to the point where I couldn't believe they gave a licence afterwards just for passing it.
This change is just lunacy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ippy
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
|
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i just finished the whole process and im with ticktocktocktick, it was a complete joke (though mine was automatic so its probably supposed to be). Great for me, but heres what i did:
1. Completed the written test with no support (other than the mangled english) and no official english book to help (its been discontinued). Still scored 67% because most of it is pure common sense.
2. Went to my driving hagwon where i realised on my second lesson that i could pass the course test already. The lessons were supposed to last 50 minutes (technically 1 hour including the ten minute instructor break). Instead each lesson lasted about 20-25 minutes. Nevertheless i had to complete them all because its a legal requirement (i couldnt change to manual either).
3. EVEN THOUGH i completed my written test, i stilll had to punch in for five hours of driving theory education (though i was allowed to go home and come back to clock back in).
4. Passed the course test with absolutely no problem. Once i learned how to self correct on the parallel parking it was a cinch (definitely that course test is very handy not so much for most of it, but for learning how to correct mistakes in a specific act by practicing it over and over).
5. Practiced for the road test. My training looked like this:
arrive
hang about for ten minutes.
drive the 5km course
drive back
(aprox 15 minutes)
"take a rest".
Clock out at the correct time.
Hell, one of my lessons (which i paid 10,000won overtime so they could book me in for my test a week earlier), consisted of sitting in a restaurant with my instructor because he was really tired and had been teaching all day.
Most of the time it was spent playing with the doggies at the driving school, or helping the matriarch of the school clean pots for kimchi. I spent more time not driving than driving.
Not that i needed to anyway. After day 1 i told them the test was too stupid and wouldnt prepare me for driving anywhere and was (rightly) told by the guy who actually does the test (a nice guy by the way who really wanted me to pass), that once i get my own car i can make up as many courses as i like, but until then i just need to drive to the test.
None of the test forced me to use almost any of the techniques i learned on the course. There was no hillstart, no 3 point turn, no parallel park.
Test 1 taught me the problems
Test 2 taught me about proper gear changing (automatic so not for me), signalling, checking your mirrors, and maintaining speed and watching for possible hazards.
Independantly, the two would be great, but ONLY IF there were a THIRD test that integrated the pair of them into a proper course. It feels like ive done half of the test i really expected to be doing in truth. It also feels like im completely unprepared to drive on the roads. It might just be luck of the draw though... maybe if your school is in the middle of seoul you learn how to handle the misery of driving in seoul. My place was countryside so it was literally 3kms down an expressway at 60kmh with 2 traffic lights), and 2km down a small (2 lane) back road with almost no real obstacles.
Ah well, now i get to make my own courses so what the hey. Still, i would have rather my time was spent learning how to drive effectively rather than learning how to drive a specific course perfectly, but if you set a specific test, then people will teach to it so what you gonna do? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Crockpot2001
Joined: 01 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
For Sale: One 63cm custom road bicycle, full Shimano Dura-Ace and some carbon goodies. Owner weary of new DL changes and suspect of Korean trauma care. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|