|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nfld_chingu
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
NYC_Gal 2.0 wrote: |
Sexy language exchange is worse than seeing a hooker? At least these western guys doing language exchange (for the most part)
a) don't have to pay for it and
b) wrap it up |
Don't hookers in most countries use condoms nowadays?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
misher
Joined: 14 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
You are being very naive Misher, most females base their partner choices on economics. That is why you don't see doctors and pilots going on singles sites. Choosing a mate that has money or the ability to earn money is just as important amongst western women as it is amongst Asian women. Women will have sex with someone famous just to get a story in the newspaper - pride and dignity be dammed! Call it programming from prehistoric times but that is how it is and how it always will be.
Don't think that your Korean girlfriend would have looked at you twice if you had been a binman Misher! Get with programme matey! Some of it may be that she is attracted to you (its very superficial - get a job scrubbing floors with the same face and see how long it would take your girl to disappear out of your life) but if you hadn't had the potential to be able to keep her in a certain lifestyle then you wouldn't have been in the hunt in the first place. And yes - same goes for me as well... |
I never said women don't marry for economics. OF COURSE THEY DO. Biologically they want a good chance of their offspring surviving and coupling with a guy who can provide and ensure their young will survive the next famine is a no brainer.
Women ALSO subconsciously want sex with tall good looking men that have healthy immune systems. These guys are the jerks, the flatterers, the players. Why? because these guys get all the sex with many women and are biologically successful in spreading their genes. Subconsciously women know this and therefore conclude that their offspring will also be able to have a lot of sex and continue the gene spreading. You think the bald fat guy with his Thai princess is successful in a biological sense? He is a failure in the sperm wars because the only girl he can get is the one he basically is supporting. No other woman would look at him twice FOR SEX. And no hookers don't count.
There is a conflict here, and humans are all about conflict. My dick says do this but mind says says stop. Women are no different. They yearn for sex too and increasingly at an older age. Part A is satisfied. She has passed on her genes and has had assistance with her provider. The other part of her body is still saying have sex so she is naturally going to want sex not with her husband if she was never physically hot for him in the first place.
I'm talking about sex here and what makes a 40 year old women want it. You seem to be naive about certain things as well. It isn't just all about having the bucks or not. There are other parts of the equation.
And in terms of my gf of course if I were living on the street she wouldn't look at me. However that doesn't mean she wouldn't be PHYSICALLY attracted to me if I was given a chance. There would be conflict because of the "provider" thing you mention.
If it is all about money and providing then how come there are loads of men out there who do not have a lot of dough yet get all the ladies? I certainly know a few back home. They won't stick around and would be absolutely horrible fathers. See the second paragraph I wrote.
It is all about CONFLICT. There is the provider side (which you ONLY point to and say I am naive of) and then there is the what makes me hot side (You seem oblivious to this). And we WERE talking about asian women being prudish once they hit 40 with their husbands. I merely am trying to provide an explanation and that is they DO want sex. Just not with the men they married.
I think the ideal situation for a woman biologically is having her hunter out gathering and then having some nookie with the caveman playboy. She ensures that her kid is provided for by her hunter yet her kid will get more of the "tall good looking, playboy flatterer" genes and be able to spread his genes more easily to many more females. It is maybe why experts have theorized men subconsciously always check to see if their kid is theirs by immediately inspecting the newborns face. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wiganer
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
misher wrote: |
I never said women don't marry for economics. OF COURSE THEY DO. Biologically they want a good chance of their offspring surviving and coupling with a guy who can provide and ensure their young will survive the next famine is a no brainer. |
Well you said Asian women Misher - make that all women and you are correct - second time goes a charm.
Quote: |
Women ALSO subconsciously want sex with tall good looking men that have healthy immune systems. |
Good looking women are at a premium back home at the west so they can have tall, good looking men, good body and the wealth and career prospects that some of them have. Fat ugly women with little education don't have those same opportunities with the same men as their better looking counterparts ... you agree?
Quote: |
These guys are the jerks, the flatterers, the players. Why? because these guys get all the sex with many women and are biologically successful in spreading their genes. |
Some are and some aren't. From what I know - the man who has sex with lots of quality women is rich or successful in their own right some way. Yes - I know guys who have had lots of sex with lots of women and have no money or prospects but the quality is iffy to say the least. Look at this guy... he has had more sex with more women than all us put together but I wouldn't want any of them, the women he gets are on par with his social and economic worth.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1313410/Now-babies-women-Britains-feckless-father--cost-taxpayer-1-5m-time-theyve-grown-up.html
Quote: |
Subconsciously women know this and therefore conclude that their offspring will also be able to have a lot of sex and continue the gene spreading. You think the bald fat guy with his Thai princess is successful in a biological sense? He is a failure in the sperm wars because the only girl he can get is the one he basically is supporting. No other woman would look at him twice FOR SEX. And no hookers don't count. |
But what about Hugh Hefner? Couldn't the same be said for him? Donald Trump? Michael Douglas? Ronnie Wood? There are lots of men who are old and successful and get women 30-40 years younger than them. Why does that not count? Course it counts! The same rules apply all over the world, it is easy to rely on racist stereotype and accuse Thai and Filipinas of being goldiggers and merecenary but the reason none of us see it back home is because none of us are high enough up the financial food chain to see it.
Quote: |
There is a conflict here, and humans are all about conflict. My dick says do this but mind says says stop. Women are no different. They yearn for sex too and increasingly at an older age. Part A is satisfied. She has passed on her genes and has had assistance with her provider. The other part of her body is still saying have sex so she is naturally going to want sex not with her husband if she was never physically hot for him in the first place. |
There is more chance of it happening the other way round Misher, there is more chance that after the kids come round and your beautiful slim, young girlfriend becomes fat and ugly, that you stop having sex with her and start looking somewhere else. You and me and everyone else on here have picked our partners on certain conditions - beauty, attractiveness, compatibility - being compatible enough so you don't have to kill them - there are certain conditions that have to be met - if your girlfriend gained 70 pounds and started growing ginger brillo pad hair from her head and pubic areas - you would be out of there as would I. And we come with conditions also - it is just that the conditions differ between men and women. (As you know...)
Quote: |
I'm talking about sex here and what makes a 40 year old women want it. You seem to be naive about certain things as well. It isn't just all about having the bucks or not. There are other parts of the equation. |
The reason usually that a woman is pining for it is because the man has lost interest in her. Usually...
Quote: |
And in terms of my gf of course if I were living on the street she wouldn't look at me. However that doesn't mean she wouldn't be PHYSICALLY attracted to me if I was given a chance. There would be conflict because of the "provider" thing you mention. |
You don't have to go so far as 'living on the street' Misher, having a low paid job will do. It's OK - same with my wife also - she has standards and she had choices before she met little me, I am sure your girlfriend is the same. You needed something to attract her and keep her - education, prospects, money making abilities - being physically attracted to you on it's own won't seal many deals. I know lots of good looking guys going out with some horrific women back home because they are not financially viable. Despite their good looks and game - they can't get better than what they have. Again - an ugly doctor, professional sportsman or a pilot with a national carrier will never have a problem with women 'out of their league'.
Quote: |
If it is all about money and providing then how come there are loads of men out there who do not have a lot of dough yet get all the ladies? |
Not that many I am telling yer. And they won't be quality either. That is what I know of it, they might strike lucky once in awhile with a nice looking woman but she will be gone once a better prospect turns up.
Quote: |
I certainly know a few back home. They won't stick around and would be absolutely horrible fathers. See the second paragraph I wrote. |
Listen Misher, if your mates aren't economically viable then they won't be getting laid with anything decent. Nice looking women have choices in this life, their looks make it so. On the same token, successful men also have choices in regards sexual partners - thats the way the world works... tell you a small (true) story that I read one day a few years ago in a newspaper.
A handsome male model was at a VIP party at a top London nightclub with his beautiful fiancee who he was about to marry the month after and guess who comes over to chat her up - Mick Jagger - the male model tried to warn off Jagger coming onto his girlfriend with his corny chat up lines but Jagger just got his bouncers to throw the boyfriend out of the club, as he was outside expecting his fiancee to follow him out of the club, Jagger took this guys fiancee back to his hotel and shagged the brains out of her - the next day - the fiancee called the boyfriend to tell her the wedding was off - and though Jagger had a brief fling with this woman that last a matter of weeks - she never went back to the male model. Thai or Swedish, women are women all over the world. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
The cracker jack box social and anthropological analysis in this thread is hilarious!
I wonder why none of you are touring the world giving conferences on human behavior based on gender.
Good grief a lot of this is lame beyond comprehension. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wiganer
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
The cracker jack box social and anthropological analysis in this thread is hilarious!
I wonder why none of you are touring the world giving conferences on human behavior based on gender.
Good grief a lot of this is lame beyond comprehension. |
If you want to have a good look at 'lame' Homer - just have a peek in the mirror.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
misher
Joined: 14 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:33 am Post subject:
The cracker jack box social and anthropological analysis in this thread is hilarious!
I wonder why none of you are touring the world giving conferences on human behavior based on gender.
Good grief a lot of this is lame beyond comprehension |
Then please take some of the advice you've given other posters in your long and distinguished history on this board: Enlighten us, contribute or don't read the thread.
Quote: |
Good looking women are at a premium back home at the west so they can have tall, good looking men, good body and the wealth and career prospects that some of them have. Fat ugly women with little education don't have those same opportunities with the same men as their better looking counterparts ... you agree? |
Of course I agree. I said that women want men in the context of a healthy immune system in an attempt to explain why certain women in their 40s don't desire their husbands anymore.
QUality is besides the point. Our goal is to spread our genes as much as possible. Sex is sex.
Quote: |
But what about Hugh Hefner? Couldn't the same be said for him? Donald Trump? Michael Douglas? Ronnie Wood? There are lots of men who are old and successful and get women 30-40 years younger than them. Why does that not count? Course it counts! The same rules apply all over the world, it is easy to rely on racist stereotype and accuse Thai and Filipinas of being goldiggers and merecenary but the reason none of us see it back home is because none of us are high enough up the financial food chain to see it. |
Yep it counts. The women get them as their providers. That doesn't mean they get turned on by their old wrinkly bodies or that their bodies won't desire a fit muscular tall guy. Whose to say that their young wives aren't boinking their fit massage therapist at the same time?
Quote: |
There is more chance of it happening the other way round Misher, there is more chance that after the kids come round and your beautiful slim, young girlfriend becomes fat and ugly, that you stop having sex with her and start looking somewhere else. You and me and everyone else on here have picked our partners on certain conditions - beauty, attractiveness, compatibility - being compatible enough so you don't have to kill them - there are certain conditions that have to be met - if your girlfriend gained 70 pounds and started growing ginger brillo pad hair from her head and pubic areas - you would be out of there as would I. And we come with conditions also - it is just that the conditions differ between men and women. (As you know...) |
I don't really understand what point you are trying to make. I just made a point that women have 2 sides to them. They want a provider but also a tall muscular guy. I'm talking about their urges and "needs" here. This whole thing started about middle aged men and their "needs" and how their wives aren't providing it. I merely said why they may not be providing it. They aren't attracted to their husbands in that "satisfying my needs" way. The provider thing is done. Finito. She has the money, the environment and has reared offspring. Now the other side comes into play and low and behold, her old balding fat husband doesn't measure up. What a surprise.
Quote: |
Quote:
I'm talking about sex here and what makes a 40 year old women want it. You seem to be naive about certain things as well. It isn't just all about having the bucks or not. There are other parts of the equation.
The reason usually that a woman is pining for it is because the man has lost interest in her. Usually.. |
Well in the case we are talking about, the men are whining about no sex and the wives aren't giving it. Can we please stick to this case and trying to figure out why it is the way it is? You keep bring in other situations and variables to pick me a part. And most of the things you say I agree with, but they don't apply to the situation in the OP.
Quote: |
You don't have to go so far as 'living on the street' Misher, having a low paid job will do. It's OK - same with my wife also - she has standards and she had choices before she met little me, I am sure your girlfriend is the same. You needed something to attract her and keep her - education, prospects, money making abilities - being physically attracted to you on it's own won't seal many deals. I know lots of good looking guys going out with some horrific women back home because they are not financially viable. Despite their good looks and game - they can't get better than what they have. Again - an ugly doctor, professional sportsman or a pilot with a national carrier will never have a problem with women 'out of their league'. |
And AGAIN I agree but I'm not talking about coupling here. I'm talking about sex. That is it. The OPs problem is about sex ONLY. A woman will have urges to romp with the good looking waiter in the restaurant. Marry? no probably not as you would agree. Sex?, sure you bet. All of the other stuff you wrote is erroneous.
Quote: |
Not that many I am telling yer. And they won't be quality either. That is what I know of it, they might strike lucky once in awhile with a nice looking woman but she will be gone once a better prospect turns up. |
Quality for a man is again erroneous. A man who has sex with 500 average to below average women is much more successful biologically than a man who has sex with 10 knockouts.
Quote: |
Listen Misher, if your mates aren't economically viable then they won't be getting laid with anything decent. Nice looking women have choices in this life, their looks make it so. On the same token, successful men also have choices in regards sexual partners - thats the way the world works... tell you a small (true) story that I read one day a few years ago in a newspaper.
A handsome male model was at a VIP party at a top London nightclub with his beautiful fiancee who he was about to marry the month after and guess who comes over to chat her up - Mick Jagger - the male model tried to warn off Jagger coming onto his girlfriend with his corny chat up lines but Jagger just got his bouncers to throw the boyfriend out of the club, as he was outside expecting his fiancee to follow him out of the club, Jagger took this guys fiancee back to his hotel and shagged the brains out of her - the next day - the fiancee called the boyfriend to tell her the wedding was off - and though Jagger had a brief fling with this woman that last a matter of weeks - she never went back to the male model. Thai or Swedish, women are women all over the world. |
Uh I agree, again?
Ok so McJagger took the guys fiance, girlfriend, whatever. She sees Jagger as a guy to provide and elevate her status for the protection of her offspring. If it was just sex then she never would have left her hubby right? Practically she may know it won't happen (coupling with jagger) but instinctively it is what she wants. Ok fine. I can understand that perfectly. (but you keep lecturing me that I don't) But after the children are reared how do you know she won't want some loving from the hunk pool boy? She will want it. It is just a question of whether she will do it. Society has been rigged against women for a long time and of course she will probably hold back fearing the repercussions of being called a *beep*. If it was the caveman days she definitely would have done it. Anyway, at that point sex with Jagger will be....well...a chore. A service, much like these Korean women in the OP see sex as.
Last edited by misher on Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:23 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
toonchoon

Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
red_devil wrote: |
Hookers are NASTY, would never go for that. We all know Korean dudes don't use condoms. Hookers here are a veritable biological petri dish. Besides plenty of Korean girls looking for "language exchange".  |
and I hear plenty of stories about creepy, ugly, fat, socially and physically awkward foreign (English teacher) guys going into a language exchange thinking it's a date, so they're touching the girl, and being creepy.
on the other hand, while there are LOTS of SE Asian women hooking up with western dudes in hope of getting out of their current situation, I don't think that's so much the case with Korea. i have a lot of friends married to Korean women here in Korea, and not one pair has even hinted at the prospect of moving back to the States or Canada.
also, the fact that Korean women DO sometimes marry foreigners from all over the world, this also supports my theory that they're not looking for a way out.
what I do see is some Korean women getting up in age (30+) chasing foreign guys. this is cos if they were to find a Korean guy, the guy that would want to marry them would be close to 40 years old, and with foreigners and all that stuff we've been taught about "equality" in the west, chances are she could score a 30 year old, if not younger, western guy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
misher
Joined: 14 Oct 2008
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Korean women are definitely not that type. This entire society is not the most accepting of mixed marriages and it is well reflected in the attitudes of most Korean women. The interest just isn't there subconsciously because of the pressure society puts on them to do it the "Korean" way.
It is why Korean women marrying foreign men is a small drop in the bucket in terms of mixed marriages in the ROK.
A HUGE thing for me with my gf is that she A. Does not want to speak ENglish nor improve it and therefore yammers at me in Korean. B. Has no interest in living in Canada.
Both of these things would be deal breakers for most but for me I feel good about that. Does she expect me to provide? Of course. Is that basically ALL SHE SEES ME AS like the 25 year old does with the rich 55 year old? Hell no. If that was her top priority then there is no way in hell she would want to marry a waegook ESL teacher that will max out at a whopping 4 million won a month.
Quote: |
on the other hand, while there are LOTS of SE Asian women hooking up with western dudes in hope of getting out of their current situation, I don't think that's so much the case with Korea. i have a lot of friends married to Korean women here in Korea, and not one pair has even hinted at the prospect of moving back to the States or Canada. |
This was maybe the case in the 1960's where poor women with broken families married American GIs. Given the conditions (GDP of Afghanistan?) of south korea at that time I'm surprised there wasn't more of it. Korea was and is still very wary of marriage with non koreans. Economics be damned.
In poor areas of CHina and the Philippines it is the opposite. Parents practically push their daughters in the direction of a foreign guy hoping that she gets pregnant. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wiganer
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
misher wrote: |
I don't really understand what point you are trying to make. I just made a point that women have 2 sides to them. |
Well, you didn't Misher, if you go back and have another look at your original post you made the claim that most Asian partners within a multi-racial marriage are only in these relationships because of security and money and not out of any real desire and affection for their partner. I argued that is complete rubbish and that most western women would put security and money high on the list so it is not just Asian women, it is all women. You go onto make the claim that many Asian wives do not want to have sex with their foreign husbands and they find them sexually unappealing which is complete balderdash - where did you get this from? Your silly racist, bigot Korean male friends - most who have yet to pop their cherry and still live with mum and dad? Read your first paragraph - it's complete unsubstantiated bullshit!
My point, and it is really simple. Women are practical, they make sure that the guy they are with have all bases covered. That the guy has prospects, has earning potential and can improve their life wherever socially, spiritually or economically. Good looks on their own are not enough. If you are a handsome beggar then the beauties that are on your level are going to be out of your reach. And that goes for Asian women, European women and women from Guatemala.
As for the Jagger story, you missed the point - the reason she didn't go back with the male model when Jagger dumped her after their oh-so brief affair because she got an orgasm off the wrinkly old rocker for the first time in her life! Mr male model never ever gave her the big 'O'! You associate sexual nous, know how and how to please a woman with youth - you are looking from it from a young male perspective. When a woman goes with an older man, it is not the same reason you would go with an older woman. Sure economics plays a big part in it and it would be a fool that denies it but also there are other reasons that might engineer these realtionships. Your 'one reason fits all' doesn't match up with the truth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pa Jan Jo A Hamnida
Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Location: Not Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep but that's limited life experience coupled with an Internet connection for you.
PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
The cracker jack box social and anthropological analysis in this thread is hilarious!
I wonder why none of you are touring the world giving conferences on human behavior based on gender.
Good grief a lot of this is lame beyond comprehension. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hondaicivic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Location: Daegu, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wiganer wrote: |
misher wrote: |
I don't really understand what point you are trying to make. I just made a point that women have 2 sides to them. |
Well, you didn't Misher, if you go back and have another look at your original post you made the claim that most Asian partners within a multi-racial marriage are only in these relationships because of security and money and not out of any real desire and affection for their partner. I argued that is complete rubbish and that most western women would put security and money high on the list so it is not just Asian women, it is all women. You go onto make the claim that many Asian wives do not want to have sex with their foreign husbands and they find them sexually unappealing which is complete balderdash - where did you get this from? Your silly racist, bigot Korean male friends - most who have yet to pop their cherry and still live with mum and dad? Read your first paragraph - it's complete unsubstantiated bullshit!
My point, and it is really simple. Women are practical, they make sure that the guy they are with have all bases covered. That the guy has prospects, has earning potential and can improve their life wherever socially, spiritually or economically. Good looks on their own are not enough. If you are a handsome beggar then the beauties that are on your level are going to be out of your reach. And that goes for Asian women, European women and women from Guatemala.
As for the Jagger story, you missed the point - the reason she didn't go back with the male model when Jagger dumped her after their oh-so brief affair because she got an orgasm off the wrinkly old rocker for the first time in her life! Mr male model never ever gave her the big 'O'! You associate sexual nous, know how and how to please a woman with youth - you are looking from it from a young male perspective. When a woman goes with an older man, it is not the same reason you would go with an older woman. Sure economics plays a big part in it and it would be a fool that denies it but also there are other reasons that might engineer these realtionships. Your 'one reason fits all' doesn't match up with the truth. |
Speaking of international marriage of Korean women and foreign men, you might want to take a look at this chart below. The first two countries will surprise you guys.....
http://www.index.go.kr/egams/stts/jsp/potal/stts/PO_STTS_IdxMain.jsp?idx_cd=2430
Statistics indicated: the number of international marriages [Unit:]
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Korea Women +
Foreign men 4504 6025 9535 11,637 9094 8980 8041 8158
- Japan 2032 2250 3118 3423 3412 3349 2743 2422
- China 263 1190 3618 5037 2589 2486 2101 2617
- United States 1204 1222 1332 1392 1443 1334 1347 1312
- Canada 172 219 227 283 307 374 371 332
- Australia 90 109 132 101 137 158 164 159
- UK 86 88 120 104 136 125 144 166
- Pakistan 126 130 100 219 150 134 117 104
- Germany 81 94 109 85 126 98 115 110
- Other 450 723 779 993 794 922 939 936
Also, you might want to read this article as well....
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2027678 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
machoman

Joined: 11 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hondaicivic wrote: |
wiganer wrote: |
misher wrote: |
I don't really understand what point you are trying to make. I just made a point that women have 2 sides to them. |
Well, you didn't Misher, if you go back and have another look at your original post you made the claim that most Asian partners within a multi-racial marriage are only in these relationships because of security and money and not out of any real desire and affection for their partner. I argued that is complete rubbish and that most western women would put security and money high on the list so it is not just Asian women, it is all women. You go onto make the claim that many Asian wives do not want to have sex with their foreign husbands and they find them sexually unappealing which is complete balderdash - where did you get this from? Your silly racist, bigot Korean male friends - most who have yet to pop their cherry and still live with mum and dad? Read your first paragraph - it's complete unsubstantiated bullshit!
My point, and it is really simple. Women are practical, they make sure that the guy they are with have all bases covered. That the guy has prospects, has earning potential and can improve their life wherever socially, spiritually or economically. Good looks on their own are not enough. If you are a handsome beggar then the beauties that are on your level are going to be out of your reach. And that goes for Asian women, European women and women from Guatemala.
As for the Jagger story, you missed the point - the reason she didn't go back with the male model when Jagger dumped her after their oh-so brief affair because she got an orgasm off the wrinkly old rocker for the first time in her life! Mr male model never ever gave her the big 'O'! You associate sexual nous, know how and how to please a woman with youth - you are looking from it from a young male perspective. When a woman goes with an older man, it is not the same reason you would go with an older woman. Sure economics plays a big part in it and it would be a fool that denies it but also there are other reasons that might engineer these realtionships. Your 'one reason fits all' doesn't match up with the truth. |
Speaking of international marriage of Korean women and foreign men, you might want to take a look at this chart below. The first two countries will surprise you guys.....
http://www.index.go.kr/egams/stts/jsp/potal/stts/PO_STTS_IdxMain.jsp?idx_cd=2430
Statistics indicated: the number of international marriages [Unit:]
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Korea Women +
Foreign men 4504 6025 9535 11,637 9094 8980 8041 8158
- Japan 2032 2250 3118 3423 3412 3349 2743 2422
- China 263 1190 3618 5037 2589 2486 2101 2617
- United States 1204 1222 1332 1392 1443 1334 1347 1312
- Canada 172 219 227 283 307 374 371 332
- Australia 90 109 132 101 137 158 164 159
- UK 86 88 120 104 136 125 144 166
- Pakistan 126 130 100 219 150 134 117 104
- Germany 81 94 109 85 126 98 115 110
- Other 450 723 779 993 794 922 939 936
Also, you might want to read this article as well....
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2027678 |
interesting to see which countries the korean men are marrying to compared to which countries the korean women are getting married to. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hondaicivic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Location: Daegu, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
machoman wrote: |
hondaicivic wrote: |
wiganer wrote: |
misher wrote: |
I don't really understand what point you are trying to make. I just made a point that women have 2 sides to them. |
Well, you didn't Misher, if you go back and have another look at your original post you made the claim that most Asian partners within a multi-racial marriage are only in these relationships because of security and money and not out of any real desire and affection for their partner. I argued that is complete rubbish and that most western women would put security and money high on the list so it is not just Asian women, it is all women. You go onto make the claim that many Asian wives do not want to have sex with their foreign husbands and they find them sexually unappealing which is complete balderdash - where did you get this from? Your silly racist, bigot Korean male friends - most who have yet to pop their cherry and still live with mum and dad? Read your first paragraph - it's complete unsubstantiated bullshit!
My point, and it is really simple. Women are practical, they make sure that the guy they are with have all bases covered. That the guy has prospects, has earning potential and can improve their life wherever socially, spiritually or economically. Good looks on their own are not enough. If you are a handsome beggar then the beauties that are on your level are going to be out of your reach. And that goes for Asian women, European women and women from Guatemala.
As for the Jagger story, you missed the point - the reason she didn't go back with the male model when Jagger dumped her after their oh-so brief affair because she got an orgasm off the wrinkly old rocker for the first time in her life! Mr male model never ever gave her the big 'O'! You associate sexual nous, know how and how to please a woman with youth - you are looking from it from a young male perspective. When a woman goes with an older man, it is not the same reason you would go with an older woman. Sure economics plays a big part in it and it would be a fool that denies it but also there are other reasons that might engineer these realtionships. Your 'one reason fits all' doesn't match up with the truth. |
Speaking of international marriage of Korean women and foreign men, you might want to take a look at this chart below. The first two countries will surprise you guys.....
http://www.index.go.kr/egams/stts/jsp/potal/stts/PO_STTS_IdxMain.jsp?idx_cd=2430
Statistics indicated: the number of international marriages [Unit:]
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Korea Women +
Foreign men 4504 6025 9535 11,637 9094 8980 8041 8158
- Japan 2032 2250 3118 3423 3412 3349 2743 2422
- China 263 1190 3618 5037 2589 2486 2101 2617
- United States 1204 1222 1332 1392 1443 1334 1347 1312
- Canada 172 219 227 283 307 374 371 332
- Australia 90 109 132 101 137 158 164 159
- UK 86 88 120 104 136 125 144 166
- Pakistan 126 130 100 219 150 134 117 104
- Germany 81 94 109 85 126 98 115 110
- Other 450 723 779 993 794 922 939 936
Also, you might want to read this article as well....
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2027678 |
interesting to see which countries the korean men are marrying to compared to which countries the korean women are getting married to. |
It shows that korean women are more likely to married those within the east asian region than outside of it. I guess WE ARE in luck Machoman!
Also, the second article shows you that a lot of them are hooking up with gyopo guys these days. Feel sorry for the gyopo girls though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
toonchoon

Joined: 06 Feb 2009 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Also, the second article shows you that a lot of them are hooking up with gyopo guys these days. Feel sorry for the gyopo girls though. |
i have a couple of Korean girl friends that married Kyopo dudes... interestingly enough, the Kyopo dudes expect them to stay home and raise the kids, cook, clean etc.
I also have some Kyopo girl friends that REFUSE to date/marry Korean dudes.
Go figure...
Well, if those statistics above are correct then looks like I was wrong, hehe... then again, a lot of those marriages COULD also be to Kyopos (who are counted as "foreigners"). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hondaicivic
Joined: 01 Jul 2010 Location: Daegu, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
toonchoon wrote: |
Quote: |
Also, the second article shows you that a lot of them are hooking up with gyopo guys these days. Feel sorry for the gyopo girls though. |
i have a couple of Korean girl friends that married Kyopo dudes... interestingly enough, the Kyopo dudes expect them to stay home and raise the kids, cook, clean etc.
I also have some Kyopo girl friends that REFUSE to date/marry Korean dudes.
Go figure...
Well, if those statistics above are correct then looks like I was wrong, hehe... then again, a lot of those marriages COULD also be to Kyopos (who are counted as "foreigners"). |
- If the gyopo guys are under 30, then it's highly unlikely they would expect their wives to stay home, cook, raise the kids, and clean by themselves. My gyopo guy friends are definitely not like that. I can vouch for them.
- Like I said, I feel sorry for the gyopo girls because many of them are not consider "desirable" by the gyopo guys. Honestly, if you ask me... I think if you were to compared korean girls to gyopo girls, you would see a huge difference and not just in looks.
- I have an ethnically japanese friend going out with a korean girl in daegu. He can easily passed as a korean though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|