Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

English doomed as a global language...
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
hondaicivic



Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Location: Daegu, South Korea

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:18 pm    Post subject: English doomed as a global language... Reply with quote

http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2010/12/28/2010122800274.html

^I guess we can say goodbye to the hagwons and EPIK Smile . Maybe the government will introduce CPIK (chinese program in Korea). Gotta brush up on my chinese soon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chris_J2



Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Location: From Brisbane, Au.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:26 pm    Post subject: Demise of English Reply with quote

Many schools in Korea already teach Chinese. Can't see English disappearing anytime soon. It's been around more or less in it's current form roughly 900 years or more, & still evolving.

From the article:
Quote:
As for English, some 300 million out of the 7 billion people in the world have English as their primary language,


I'd dispute that figure. There are over 300 million people in the US alone. (307,006,550 - Jul 2009). The majority speak English & the minority speak Spanish or more often, English AND Spanish or a 2nd or third language. Then there are other primarily English speaking countries like the UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, much of RSA, Philippines etc. English is also the lingua franca of India and many African States. Many Europeans (Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Italy eg), also use English as their 2nd language.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Anglospeak(800px)Countries.png

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_language


Last edited by chris_J2 on Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:52 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
southernman



Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Location: On the mainland again

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Considering the languages that the author considers as International at one time are Aramaic, Phoenician and Persian I don't really think you can take him seriously.

They may well have been important a couple of thousand years ago in the Mediterranean region and beyond but he seems to have a very etho-centric view of International. Just because people invaded the known world and ruled it back in the day, doesn't allow for the fact that there was a huge amount of countries/areas they didn't know about

I think I'll be good to go teaching English as long as I want to Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lowpo



Joined: 01 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

southernman wrote:
Considering the languages that the author considers as International at one time are Aramaic, Phoenician and Persian I don't really think you can take him seriously.

They may well have been important a couple of thousand years ago in the Mediterranean region and beyond but he seems to have a very etho-centric view of International. Just because people invaded the known world and ruled it back in the day, doesn't allow for the fact that there was a huge amount of countries/areas they didn't know about

I think I'll be good to go teaching English as long as I want to Very Happy


My school has been teaching Chinese to the students on Saturdays for about 3 years now. There are more parents in Korea that want their kids to learn Chinese and English.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
southernman



Joined: 15 Jan 2010
Location: On the mainland again

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lowpo wrote:
southernman wrote:
Considering the languages that the author considers as International at one time are Aramaic, Phoenician and Persian I don't really think you can take him seriously.

They may well have been important a couple of thousand years ago in the Mediterranean region and beyond but he seems to have a very etho-centric view of International. Just because people invaded the known world and ruled it back in the day, doesn't allow for the fact that there was a huge amount of countries/areas they didn't know about

I think I'll be good to go teaching English as long as I want to Very Happy


My school has been teaching Chinese to the students on Saturdays for about 3 years now. There are more parents in Korea that want their kids to learn Chinese and English.


If I was a Korean parent I'd have my children learning both Chinese and English. It's only going to increase their future job and earning prospects. I know of a Korean lady who is fluent in about 5 languages ( English and Chinese included) whose pulling in 12 Mil a month.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ttompatz



Joined: 05 Sep 2005
Location: Kwangju, South Korea

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Better not tell the Chinese. They are importing English teachers as fast as they can find them.

I think that with more than 25% of the countries on the planet (54 in the commonwealth of nations + the USA and Philippines) and a combined population exceeding 2 billion (2005 estimated populations) - having English as either the primary language or at least listed as an official language the odds of it losing status as the lingua franca in the near future are small.

That is NOT however to discount the fact that Mandarin will be useful.

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Radius



Joined: 20 Dec 2009

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I heard IF the Chinese DO emerge as a global economic power, the business language of commerce would take some time to change...I'd say at least 20-25 years from now (and we'll all be on the verge of retiring anyway).
If you're China, good luck doing business with America then, too, because you know those American kids aren't going to put in the time to study the Chinese language. Wink
Things like this takes decades to transition (barring any total and irreversable catastrophe to America or their ecomony---oh wait, too late...) Furthermore, I believe NY and D.C will get nuked one of these days, and then yeah, that'll usher the end of the once great empire (although I believe we're collapsing from within, and that'll crush us far more than any war). Crying or Very sad It happens to everyone, ask England and Rome.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lifeinkorea



Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Location: somewhere in China

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's only location based. There is no way people are going to learn Chinese at the same magnitude as English. Spanish or Arabic would seem more practical to use.

When they report people learning Chinese, are they referring to fluent speakers or people who take a few courses in Chinese and then stop? How many Chinese characters do they know?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Riker



Joined: 28 Dec 2010

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chinese will never be a world language for many reasons.

Firstly, Chinese writing has undergone multiple revisions to make written Chinese simpler but it is still not enough.

Secondly, English is used for research publications around the world, that is not going to change.

Honestly, Vietnamese and Hindi are easiest languages to read because they are so close to being perfectly phonetic. Vietnamese grammar is simply the easiest on the planet, period.

Hindi script ( Devanagari ) was designed to be picked up by a child easily. I learned how to read and write the alphabet in about 2 hours - In fact Devanagari means "childlike" - "easy"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
liveinkorea316



Joined: 20 Aug 2010
Location: South Korea

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would have liked to have seen some dates in that article when he expects English to be replaced.

I could not imagine another language topping English due to Economic reasons for at least the next 30 years or maybe more.

Every year that English is the Lingua franca the longer it becomes harder to replace. Replacing it with chinese incurs major costs for many non-chinese countries and they would not suddenly switch without the perceived benefits reaching a very high level.

It is the lingua franca in Europe and many countries and will remain so there whether or not China is the global super power.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Caffeinated



Joined: 11 Feb 2010

PostPosted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Riker wrote:
Honestly, Vietnamese and Hindi are easiest languages to read because they are so close to being perfectly phonetic. Vietnamese grammar is simply the easiest on the planet, period.

Hindi script ( Devanagari ) was designed to be picked up by a child easily. I learned how to read and write the alphabet in about 2 hours - In fact Devanagari means "childlike" - "easy"


No, you are in Korea and the answer to the above is Korean.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jvalmer



Joined: 06 Jun 2003

PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, you guys sound like the French. The French despise english ever since english became the dominant international language. Every language has it's time in the sun and then it fades, english included.

However, I don't see english fading for at least the next century. If China lives up to it's hype it will take until the next century when Chinese starts to replace english. That is if, a big IF, huge portions of the world, outside of China, deems Chinese worthy of prime international lingua franca status.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stalin84



Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Location: Haebangchon, Seoul

PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 12:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chinese business transactions are already mostly conducted in English. Let's not forget, English is not a hard language to learn from Chinese and vice versa. I've met Chinese people that studied "a little bit" of English in High School that could speak in circles around my Korean co-teachers.

Considering how much time and effort China has been putting into learning English and considering that Chinese people speak English very well, English will remain the lingua franca. Let's not forget, the population of English speakers in China is soon to surpass the total number of English speakers in the United States. India will too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Space Cowboy



Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Location: On the blessed hellride

PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Honestly, I hope we wind up with the kind of Chinese-infused English they used in Firefly. Neither language will be going anywhere any time soon.

And surprise, surprise: another MIT linguistic crackpot. I love that he didn't even consider Latin or Greek (or the influence of Chinese on other Asian languages, for that matter). Nothing like creating a nice convenience sample to cook your data in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
northway



Joined: 05 Jul 2010

PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 6:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Riker wrote:
Honestly, Vietnamese and Hindi are easiest languages to read because they are so close to being perfectly phonetic. Vietnamese grammar is simply the easiest on the planet, period.


Bahasa Indonesia?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International