Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Transitioning to a Mac
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Technology Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sheriffadam



Joined: 10 May 2010
Location: Busan

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 5:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="methdxman"]
Chokse wrote:


You can argue all you want about how innately "good" their products are, but that's not even the point.

Their marketing is very effective, their products are designed very well, and they know how to make their customers sticky. No other company can touch them in this regard. Who cares if their products are technically better than the other companies? Do you think they care? Do you think their stockholders care? Do their customers care? No.

This is a business folks.



This confuses me, what is the point to apple then? You mention it's not the technology, that the customers and shareholders and the company themselves don't even care about, but the marketing. I'm supposed to like them because they try to saturate my life with depressing adverts?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
methdxman



Joined: 14 Sep 2010

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 5:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="sheriffadam"]
methdxman wrote:
Chokse wrote:


You can argue all you want about how innately "good" their products are, but that's not even the point.

Their marketing is very effective, their products are designed very well, and they know how to make their customers sticky. No other company can touch them in this regard. Who cares if their products are technically better than the other companies? Do you think they care? Do you think their stockholders care? Do their customers care? No.

This is a business folks.



This confuses me, what is the point to apple then? You mention it's not the technology, that the customers and shareholders and the company themselves don't even care about, but the marketing. I'm supposed to like them because they try to saturate my life with depressing adverts?


iPod - first device to do MP3 playback simply and well and first to make it attractive for the average consumer to buy. Apple knew that illegal MP3s would drive their device purchases. Sony, since they were a major record label, decided not to let you playback MP3s on their first devices. Huge mistake.

But Apple wasn't done yet. Their plan all along was to control everything from not only the device but the management of your music. So a few months later (after the launch of the iPod) they launched iTunes, which quickly became the easiest way to manage all your music.

Apple was only interested in managing your music for one reason, which was to later on introduce a Music store.

In this way, they controlled how you purchased music, how you managed it, and how you listened to it.

They didn't stumble upon these things on accident. Everything was a master plan from day one from our friend Steve Jobs. Another genius move was to placate record companies with DRM files thinking that they would bite and later decide to slowly phase out DRM which is what has happened.

Now they are the biggest music retailer in the U.S., they sell 75% of ALL portable music devices. They make way more margin (profit) from their music devices than any other company by far, not only because of cost savings from such massive volume, but because they were able to design their products so effectively that people would pay a fortune for accessories.

Apple gets a cut on every legal iPod accessory that is sold, so that is just pure profit for them without having to add any production capacity.

It doesn't matter how technologically advanced the iPod is. I'm sure there's probably a Sony player out there with better audio quality and perhaps battery life. There could be. But it doesn't matter. Apple has built such a strong media ecosystem that it is almost impossible for anyone who loves their iPod to switch to another music system.

Everyone is trying now to create music stores, etc. but they're too late. Everyone else is fighting for their scraps. This is why Apple are business geniuses.

Now when it comes to movies and TV content, they're not doing the best. Netflix is also a great company which successfully adapted their business model to the times. They're started to do stuff that youtube only dreamed of and they're changing the way visual media is being distributed.

Apple can't win at everything, but they're damn close. Once they got people hooked on iPods and iPhones... here comes the App store. Now they've revolutionized the way applications are delivered to you.

Sure STEAM had this idea a long time ago by delivering games to people, etc. Good ideas are aplenty. In business it's all about execution. I don't care if Apple copied the idea (they probably didn't, there were people probably before Steam who had similar ideas) but they locked in people to their products and thus locked them into application delivery. What is everyone else doing? Following suit and getting spanked. Blackberry, Android and other mobile platforms have sorry application downloads per users compared to Apple.

Now they're one of the largest companies in the world and the largest tech company in the world having surpassed Microsoft.

Who cares about Apple fanboys, how great their products are, etc. Products aren't everything. Products become commodities sooner or later anyway, you have to build your businesses around different ideas/things and that was Apple has done so brilliantly.

Before anyone calls me an Apple fan boy, I recently chose to buy a Samsung Galaxy over an iPhone 4 because I liked the phone better. But business wise, Apple is a once in a lifetime company that has done things in the consumer / media space that no one would have ever imagined.

Facebook and Google are also brilliant companies with brilliant people working for them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sheriffadam



Joined: 10 May 2010
Location: Busan

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 5:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the post, very informative of your viewpoint. Not a negative post here, was good to see the perspective there Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sector7G



Joined: 24 May 2008

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 6:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

By the way, I have always heard that Macs don't get as many viruses as PCs. Why exactly is that? Can anyone explain it to a non-techie like me?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sheriffadam



Joined: 10 May 2010
Location: Busan

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Previously mac had a 0.001% market share so it wasn't worthwhile hackers writing virus to attack them, now that % is shifting that will change substantially. Possibly also now eased by most mac users cluelessly installing apps like they would on an iphone etc?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cdninkorea



Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A few of you have mentioned buying a refurbished Mac; can this be done in Korea? How and where? Are there any disadvantages or problems with buying a used one?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jrwhite82



Joined: 22 May 2010

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Transitioning to a Mac Reply with quote

god of English wrote:
Captain Corea wrote:
When making the switch from PC to Mac, what were the biggest issues you encountered?

In Korea, internet banking. Install VirtualBox and Windows... problem solved. With all the crapware that Korean websites install, Windows should be quarantined anyway.

Less software overall but as other people have alluded to, the options available tend to be more consistent and higher quality. There are some really great independent and boutique developers that develop exclusively for the mac. Panic and OmniGroup come to mind.


Also, if you use the Hansoft/Hanguel suite regularly you'll need to either install Windows or get Parallels or similar software.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cj1976



Joined: 26 Oct 2005

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you just want to try out OS X, then you should think about a Hackintosh. It's not for the technically inexperienced, but once it's set up it runs like a real Mac.
That way you can save money until you decide to splurge on the real thing.
Check out insanelymac for info.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chokse



Joined: 22 May 2009

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sheriffadam is wrong about the viruses because I don't think he understands the difference between a virus and a trojan horse.

He is right that 10-15 years ago Macs had a smaller market share (but not 0.001%). Actually, it was about a 2% market share 15 years ago. Over the last 15 years, the market share has increased about 5x to where it sits now, at about 10%.

Here's the thing though. According to Sheriffadam's logic, we should have seen a 5x increase in the number of viruses written for the Mac - more users = bigger target. That hasn't happened.

There are NO viruses on the Mac. Yes, you heard that right, there are none. THERE ARE a couple of known trojan horses out there that will affect the Mac, but there are no viruses. A virus is something that attacks the computer without any aid by the user. For example, an EXE file hiding in an email that runs as soon as the email is opened and read. That is a virus. What happened recently in Korea, where users unknowingly installed a trojan horse via ActiveX, allowing hundreds or thousands of computers to become "zombies", is not an example of a virus. It is a trojan horse. A trojan horse is installed by the user; a virus is not.

Early versions of Windows (XP and earlier) were horrible about viruses because of the DOS underpinnings. Windows 7 is much better, but still not nearly good enough. It needs to be better because no one should have to waste system resources running any kind of virus software.

The Unix underpinnings on the Mac are much harder to break through, and this is why we have not seen viruses on the Mac. Yes, it is partly due to smaller numbers, but it is mostly due to the fact that it takes far less time for a virus maker to make a virus for Windows than it takes to make one for the Mac. The virus makers are working smarter, not harder. By focusing on Windows, they can make viruses more easily and can hit a larger number of computers.


Last edited by Chokse on Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:50 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chokse



Joined: 22 May 2009

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cdninkorea:

Yes, there is an Apple refurbished store in Korea. I have bought over 10 Macs this way and have never had any problems or issues.

The worst you can expect are a few small blemishes on the outside of the computer. These will not be serious and will not affect the function of the computer in any way. Also, any blemishes or scratches must be cosmetic only. You will never get a screen with a blemish or scratch.

At best, you will actually get more than you paid for. A little over 2 years ago, I ordered a 15 inch MBP with a 2.66 Ghz Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM, and a 320 GB hard drive. I paid 2.1 million won for what would have been a 2.6 million won computer if it were new. When it arrived, Apple had sent me an upgraded model with a 2.93 Ghz Core 2 Duo, 4GB of RAM, and a 500 GB hard drive.

This doesn't happen often (In over 10 times purchasing refurbished, I have only gotten an upgraded computer 3 times), but it does seem to happen around the time new models are shipping. Apple seems to clear out old inventory by channeling it into refurbished sales.

Anyway, you will never get less than that is advertised and can sometimes get more.

Refurbished computers are exactly like new computers. You will get the full, one-year warranty and can also buy the 3-year AppleCare during the first year.

Honestly, I wouldn't buy a Mac any other way. Why pay more for exactly the same thing (and PC users can just shut up now... A PC is most definitely NOT the SAME thing)?

The only negative I can think of is that Korea's refurbished store is not as good as the US or Canadian ones. Korea doesn't have much inventory at any given time, so you have to check back often, and, most of the inventory centers around the Apple laptops. There are never many iMacs, MacMinis, or MacPros up for sale.

You can check it out by going to Apple Korea's main store page at:

http://store.apple.com/kr

Then, scroll down to the bottom and look to the left. You should see a blue colored price tag with the Korean words for "Sale" (sorry, I don't type Korean) written on it. Just to the left of that price tag you'll see "Refurbished Mac". Click that and it will take you to the page with the refurbished computers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cdninkorea



Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If this were Facebook, Chokse, I would definitely "Like" your post. Thank you!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The OSes are, for all intents and purposes, equally easy to use. But don't be surprised when your Mac crashes. I spent a summer editing and (mostly) rendering huge amounts of video on a G4 and managed to crash it a few times. Nothing like losing an hour of editing and four hours of rendering due to a crash.

To be fair, I was pushing the thing pretty hard around the clock, and this was closer to the beginning of OSX's life. I don't know how much of a resource hog Cintiq is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Chokse



Joined: 22 May 2009

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those old G4 processors used to get really hot. They were horrible about that. The G5s were not much better, but the G4s were probably the hottest and most unstable processor Apple ever used. Also, with a G4 processor, you must have been running something like OS 10.1.

The new Intel multi core processors are so much better than any of the old G3/G4/G5 processors or Pentium/Centrino processors.

I would imagine that if you had been doing the same work on a more modern Mac, you would have had fewer problems or crashes.

I'm also sure that if you were doing the same work on a Pentium 3 system running Windows 98 or XP SP1, you would have had as many, if not more crashes.

Not sure it's fair to blame a Mac for crashing when you are using hardware and software equal to a PC with a Pentium 3 and Windows 98.

Macs crash. Of that there is no doubt. But the modern Macs only tend to crash the application causing the problem, rather than the whole system. I think Windows now does the same. It is a nice advancement for each OS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ThingsComeAround



Joined: 07 Nov 2008

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've had a crash on my mac, twice or three times.

On a PC however, much much higher.

I've lost data on a mac as well. Hard disks do fail. But on the PC, BSOD so many times I wondered why it matters if scandisk runs when I had to restart for the third time in the day.

CC, you won't be upset about the investment you make in a mac. And buy refurbished, if it meets your specifications. Refurbished doesn't mean "used" like a "Certified Pre-owned BMW".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refurbishment_%28electronics%29
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
methdxman



Joined: 14 Sep 2010

PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Underwaterbob wrote:
The OSes are, for all intents and purposes, equally easy to use. But don't be surprised when your Mac crashes. I spent a summer editing and (mostly) rendering huge amounts of video on a G4 and managed to crash it a few times. Nothing like losing an hour of editing and four hours of rendering due to a crash.

To be fair, I was pushing the thing pretty hard around the clock, and this was closer to the beginning of OSX's life. I don't know how much of a resource hog Cintiq is.


Windows 7 is a solid, solid operating system. No qualms against it. I actually wish I had it at work instead of XP.

I'm not sure if they are equally prone to crash. I've used a Mac now for 3 years with two different systems (Macbook Pro and iMac) and I remember only having to hard reboot like maybe 3 times max over a period of 3 years.

And I think two of those times was because I was too lazy to wait for it to recover from the crash.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Technology Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 3 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International