View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kcs0001
Joined: 24 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:41 pm Post subject: Eric Holder: Black Panther case demeans "my people" |
|
|
Yeah, how about that diversity...
Can you imagine what would have happened if a white attorney general said this? I guess that pretty much puts to rest that race is a social construct.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/0311/Eric_Holder_Black_Panther_case_focus_demeans_my_people.html
Attorney General Eric Holder finally got fed up Tuesday with claims that the Justice Department went easy in a voting rights case against members of the New Black Panther Party because they are African American.
Holder's frustration over the criticism became evident during a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing as Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas) accused the Justice Department of failing to cooperate with a Civil Rights Commission investigation into the handling of the 2008 incident in which Black Panthers in intimidating outfits and wielding a club stood outside a polling place in Philadelphia.
The Attorney General seemed to take personal offense at a comment Culberson read in which former Democratic activist Bartle Bull called the incident the most serious act of voter intimidation he had witnessed in his career.
"Think about that," Holder said. "When you compare what people endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, and to compare what people were subjected to there to what happened in Philadelphia�which was inappropriate, certainly that�to describe it in those terms I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line, who risked all, for my people," said Holder, who is black.
Holder noted that his late sister-in-law, Vivian Malone Jones, helped integrate the University of Alabama.
"To compare that kind of courage, that kind of action, and to say that the Black Panther incident wrong thought it might be somehow is greater in magnitude or is of greater concern to us, historically, I think just flies in the face of history and the facts.," Holder said with evident exasperation.
In a series of questions and comments earlier in the hearing, Culberson insisted that race had infected the decision-making process. "There�s clearly evidence, overwhelming evidence, that your Department of Justice refuses to protect the rights of anybody other than African Americans to vote," the Texas Republican said. "There's a pattern of a double standard here."
�I would disagree very vehemently with the notion that there�s overwhelming evidence that that is in fact true,� Holder replied. �This Department of Justice does not enforce the law in a race-conscious way.�
Rep. Chaka Fattah, a Democrat from Philadelphia, said the Black Panthers "should not have been there." But he said the GOP was making too much out of a fleeting incident involving a couple of people.
"The most unethical thing a person can do is make allegations based on absolutely nothing," Fattah said. "The only issue of race is singling out this particular decision...That this rises to national significance is bogus on its face."
UPDATE: This post has been updated with minor changes to the syntax of some quotes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: All over the map
|
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 10:51 pm Post subject: Re: Eric Holder: Black Panther case demeans "my people& |
|
|
Quote: |
[quote="kcs0001"]I guess that pretty much puts to rest that race is a social construct. |
Why?
Quote: |
"Think about that," Holder said. "When you compare what people endured in the South in the 60s to try to get the right to vote for African Americans, and to compare what people were subjected to there to what happened in Philadelphia�which was inappropriate, certainly that�to describe it in those terms I think does a great disservice to people who put their lives on the line, who risked all, for my people," said Holder, who is black. |
Sounds like an Israeli response to criticism of their treatment of the Palestinians. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
His people are the American people. The sooner Holder learns that the less he'll get rattled and embarrassed by trolling Congressmen.
Anyway, poppycock and codswallop on Holder for thinking that the Black Panthers intimidating voters in Philadelphia fails to rise to national attention as long as he thinks Oakland, California's desire to tax marijuana dispensaries merits criminal and civil penalties.
Holder is as much a part of the old boy network as anyone else.
Quote: |
Because of his reputation as a reformer, many Democrats see Holder as the perfect candidate to head up Justice.
Others, especially Republicans, question Holder�s decision to help President Bill Clinton pardon longtime fugitive Marc Rich on the last day of Clinton�s presidency. Even Holder thought he would never return to public service after he was plagued by the scandal in 2001. �I�m done,� he pronounced after congressional hearings investigating the Rich pardon. �Public life�s over for me. I had a moment in time. That moment has passed.�
But Holder enjoyed a political resurrection with Obama's election. Despite some controversy over the Rich pardon, his nomination as the first black attorney general was approved without much of a fight.
|
My sense is that Holder purposefully pursues these controversies. Some people will be sympathetic to him if he stands up for 'his people.' Nobody is sympathetic to the memory of his thoughtless and sloppy pardon of Marc Rich. Given his thoughtless and sloppy submission to Clinton, and his even more servile and crouching willingness to go along with the Obama administration's strategy of ignoring the transgressions of the Wall Street elite, I really see him more as an executive branch sycophant than anything else.
He needs to learn that the American people are his people. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Location: All over the map
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kuros wrote: |
I really see him more as an executive branch sycophant than anything else. |
I want to say something here but it would probably go over like a fart in church.
Instead I'll just say that it seems to me that he's an example of a systemic phenomenon/problem - he's got plenty of company of various hues. Race (although it's unfortunately being made into "the issue") is secondary. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
methdxman
Joined: 14 Sep 2010
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
White people complaining about racism yet again. HEY MAN! That's racist! Everything's racist!
Oh just shutup for god's sake.
Wah wah! Koreans are racist! Hey don't say that! That's racist! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Charon
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah yes, Brotha Eric in effect CONDONING what those nutjobs did in Philly with the tried-and-true playing of that old time gospel favorite of Yeah well, so what if these guys DID actually commit something right on par and well-worthy of their white Keep Kansas Klean Brethren? It's inherently justifiable by this AG because of what ma peeps historically went through!
And one would think that the use of the inclusive term "people" by the Attorney General of the United States would refer to the AMERICAN people, and NOT solely and EXCLUSIVELY a particular RACE of people.
Imagine if this had been the KKK at that polling booth in Philadelphia and John Ashcroft had just sort of summarily dismissed it as some kind of insult to "his people."
Think there would have been a media uproar?
Is there wheat in Kansas?
Way to foster that National Unity across Racial lines there, Eric!
Race Card! Don't leave home without it!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geldedgoat
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mises wrote: |
http://dailycaller.com/2011/03/21/critics-contend-assistant-attorney-general-loretta-king-guided-more-by-racial-politics-than-the-law/
As whites move into a minority position, how is the state going to treat them? |
"�In the spring of 2009, Ms. King, who had by then been appointed Acting AAG [assistant attorney general] for Civil Rights by the Obama Administration, called me to her office and specifically instructed me that I was not to ask any other applicants whether they would be willing to, in effect, race-neutrally enforce the VRA [Voting Rights Act],� he testified. �Ms. King took offense that I was asking such a question of job applicants and directed me not to ask it because she does not support equal enforcement of the provisions of the VRA.�"
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Menino80

Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Location: Hodor?
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tell you what, when the Black Panthers have their hooks in every major political organ of a huge region of the country for multiple generations, then we can start making comparisons.
Is what they did in Phillie criminal? Sure.
But the amount of attention it gets from the wingnutters is telling. Dog whistles are out in full force today. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geldedgoat
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Menino80 wrote: |
Tell you what, when the Black Panthers have their hooks in every major political organ of a huge region of the country for multiple generations, then we can start making comparisons. |
Maybe not the Black Panthers, but radical black leaders certainly are in control of most every majority black region of America. And now, apparently, one is heading up the DoJ.
Quote: |
Is what they did in Phillie criminal? Sure.
But the amount of attention it gets from the wingnutters is telling. Dog whistles are out in full force today. |
This is getting no more attention than any cases in the past 20 years in which a white person of authority abused his power to discriminate against a black citizen, the vast majority of which ended poorly for the aggressor. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Menino80

Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Location: Hodor?
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
geldedgoat wrote: |
Maybe not the Black Panthers, but radical black leaders certainly are in control of most every majority black region of America. And now, apparently, one is heading up the DoJ.
|
that's a huge caveat.
This is simply not true. And even if were true, it would not constitute the same reach as the KKK, especially in state government. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geldedgoat
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Menino80 wrote: |
geldedgoat wrote: |
most every majority black region of America |
that's a huge caveat. |
No, it's really not. Millions of people is not something you can hand-wave away. Millions populate New Orleans, Memphis, and DC, and all three of those are currently or until very recently were represented by radical black leaders.
Quote: |
And even if were true, it would not constitute the same reach as the KKK, especially in state government. |
So the abuse of black leaders has to first match that of past white leaders before they're open to criticism? I can only hope that there aren't too terribly many voters who share that particular brand of white-guilt insanity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Menino80

Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Location: Hodor?
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I never said that. You cannot compare the Black Panthers to the KKK, the KKK did much worse for much longer, with much more support from the local government. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mises
Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Location: retired
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The problem is not what the Panthers did. The problem is the government response, and what that reveals about the Balkan future Americans are walking into. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Menino80

Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Location: Hodor?
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It reveals no such thing. It's a minor case with absolutely no legs as voter intimidation is almost impossible to prove.
The fact that a black guy is an executive of a dept or govt is still a tough pill to swallow for Boomers.
Holder's comments were completely justified. When white people go through three hundred years of systemic brualization, forcible repatriation, change their language, religion, and surnames, then they can get a pass for using parochial terms such as "my people". Black identity underwent an attempt of total obliteration for three centuries that didn't' get rolled back until the Civil Rights Act. And no, one generation is not enough. Sorry.
When a black says "my people", my first thought is to roll my eyes and say "come on", but when I hear white guys like you winners on this board getting truly upset and fearful about it (BALKANIZATION? GIVE ME A TRUCKING BREAK), I understand why that black guy says things like that, even though it annoys the !*!& of me.
I was born raised and live on the South Side of Chicago, please don't try to tell me "what its like" out there for race relations or the future of "white America", I see it every day. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|