|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Stan Rogers
Joined: 20 Aug 2010
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Swampfox10mm wrote: |
We're required to flunk our students if they miss class more than 4 times. Late marks can also add up to this.
I find that most students who have missed 4 times are already doing poorly, anyway. |
+1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Carbon
Joined: 28 Jan 2011
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Stan Rogers wrote: |
| Carbon wrote: |
| RMNC wrote: |
| I've never taken attendance. Secondary education is voluntary, not compulsory. |
What then when one willingly enrolls in a course that will also assess attendance and punctuality? I believe these good characteristics to build in young people. Tight structure is necessary in freshman university courses; many are barely high school grads when they enter uni.
I think that for the average Korean university-aged student, it is the reverse of what you say that is true, making assessed punctuality an even greater lesson.
Interestingly, I have seen a certain trend over the years; no matter how many points freshmen students secure via assessment, through punctuality point deductions alone, 1/3 of the students will be dipping down into the B0/B+ range. You can't save them for themselves. Tough stuff, but still fair and reasonable. I think it should be done and should not be seen as a waste of time at all. |
Are you saying you give a B or B+ to students who seldom or never show up for class? |
No. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
denverdeath
Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: Boo-sahn
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Stan Rogers wrote: |
| Carbon wrote: |
| RMNC wrote: |
| I've never taken attendance. Secondary education is voluntary, not compulsory. |
What then when one willingly enrolls in a course that will also assess attendance and punctuality? I believe these good characteristics to build in young people. Tight structure is necessary in freshman university courses; many are barely high school grads when they enter uni.
I think that for the average Korean university-aged student, it is the reverse of what you say that is true, making assessed punctuality an even greater lesson.
Interestingly, I have seen a certain trend over the years; no matter how many points freshmen students secure via assessment, through punctuality point deductions alone, 1/3 of the students will be dipping down into the B0/B+ range. You can't save them for themselves. Tough stuff, but still fair and reasonable. I think it should be done and should not be seen as a waste of time at all. |
Are you saying you give a B or B+ to students who seldom or never show up for class? |
You do realize that for a lot of lower-tier unis in korea that a B or B+ is quite a low grade, don't you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ajuma

Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Location: Anywere but Seoul!!
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
You know, a lot depends on the student. While it's true that USUALLY students who don't come to class are the ones who are doing poorly anyway, it's not always the case.
I had one student who had perfect attendance and one of the top 3 participation grades in the class. He got 18/20 on the mid-term. No mean feat as I make my mid-terms for first semester freshmen SUPER hard!
Sounds like he could have aced the class, right? Well, for some reason, he missed the final exam!! His team (my final is done in groups of 3 or 4) had tried to contact him with no success.
After the exam, I called him...he said he "was sick".
If he would have had a GOOD reason for missing the exam (and, believe it or not, there ARE a FEW good reasons!), I would have worked something out for him. But since he didn't make an effort to call, I went straight by his grades...and he ended up with a C+!!!
I used to be much tougher on attendance than I am now. It used to be that I counted attendance as 30% of their grade! One absence (taking into account mid-term, final, first class, last class and the inevitable "sports day" and MT) was -5%! Sure separated the sheep from the lambs! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
offtheoche
Joined: 21 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ajuma wrote: |
After the exam, I called him... |
It should be the student calling you, and groveling,.......not the other way round. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ajuma

Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Location: Anywere but Seoul!!
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| offtheoche wrote: |
| ajuma wrote: |
After the exam, I called him... |
It should be the student calling you, and groveling,.......not the other way round. |
99.9% of the time, this is true, but when a stellar student misses an exam, I worry! Maybe s/he was in a car accident, or a parent was...and the last thing they're thinking about is school. Doesn't hurt to give them a call. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Swampfox10mm
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ajuma, I do the same.
I always tell my students not to expect me to call them if they miss a quiz or a test, but sometimes I will to find out what happened. Sometimes they disappear because they got accepted to a better school. If they just missed it out of sheer stupidity, then I can do whatever I want with their score, anyway.
Should I do this? Maybe/maybe not. The truth is, however, that our school seems to like it when we "care" so much about our students. In the end, I've been at this job for many years, so I must be doing something right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
legrande
Joined: 23 Nov 2010
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Carbon wrote: |
| RMNC wrote: |
| I've never taken attendance. Secondary education is voluntary, not compulsory. |
What then when one willingly enrolls in a course that will also assess attendance and punctuality? I believe these good characteristics to build in young people. Tight structure is necessary in freshman university courses; many are barely high school grads when they enter uni.
I think that for the average Korean university-aged student, it is the reverse of what you say that is true, making assessed punctuality an even greater lesson.
Interestingly, I have seen a certain trend over the years; no matter how many points freshmen students secure via assessment, through punctuality point deductions alone, 1/3 of the students will be dipping down into the B0/B+ range. You can't save them for themselves. Tough stuff, but still fair and reasonable. I think it should be done and should not be seen as a waste of time at all. |
+1
Korean students are a different breed from uni students in the west. Not taking their attendance sends the wrong message. 'Course if you're looking for shortcuts no worries, it's just your students who end up with the short end of the stick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OP, you've pretty much made up your mind you aren't going to take attendance and that's your right.
At all of the universities I've taught at taking attendance is mandatory and at the end of the term I was required to turn it in. It may be that your uni doesn't have that requirement, which is fine.
However, attendance is usually part of the student's grade (again this is university policy). Assuming most students that aren't showing up are "self-studying" is a little naive. If the student isn't showing up they are doing one of two things a) sleeping or b) studying for another class which they feel is more important. The truth is that most student view having to take English class as a nuisance because it is required.
Also at the end of the term, attendance can factor in big if a student is close to a higher grade. When I look at the percentages, I pay specific attention to the ones who are boarder line and whether I can bump them up a grade.
Yes, taking attendance is time consuming. I recommend having a class captain and letting them do it. I count the number of people in the class while he/she is taking attendance and verify the number once the role sheet is handed back to me. The Korean student taking attendance in Korea is generally pretty quick. I am also able to keep the noise down to make sure everyone is accurately counted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PRagic

Joined: 24 Feb 2006
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I tell them that attendance is 5% of their grade, and that every missed class equates to a 1% reduction in their final average. I also tell them that I will not be taking attendance every time; miss at your own risk. Works like a charm. I just make sure that I call ranks at least 5 times over the course of the semester.
You get the best of both worlds: they are adults and should be coming to class, and if they miss class when I call attendance, they must take responsibility for their actions. I also don't have to waste time at the beginning of every class. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Young FRANKenstein

Joined: 02 Oct 2006 Location: Castle Frankenstein (that's FRONKensteen)
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cdninkorea wrote: |
| my professors never took attendance, yet they still wanted students to come to class. Are professors at universities in Canada, who almost never take attendance, lazy? Why would I be any different? |
False analogy. Attendance was not part of our grade in Canada.
| Quote: |
| I would think that students who always come to class, does poorly on the exam, and fails the course would complain more than a student who never comes, does poorly on the exam, and fails the course. |
Thanks for the biggest laugh of my week. That was awesome. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cdninkorea

Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Young FRANKenstein wrote: |
| False analogy. Attendance was not part of our grade in Canada. |
If I don't take attendance, I wouldn't make it part of their assessment. Therefore it's not a false analogy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Young FRANKenstein

Joined: 02 Oct 2006 Location: Castle Frankenstein (that's FRONKensteen)
|
Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cdninkorea wrote: |
| Young FRANKenstein wrote: |
| False analogy. Attendance was not part of our grade in Canada. |
If I don't take attendance, I wouldn't make it part of their assessment. Therefore it's not a false analogy. |
Doesn't matter. If your university requires an attendance score, whether you take attendance or not, you will have to give an attendance score when entering grades on the website. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|