Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

How would you improve the English language?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, if we're going to start being snobby about it:

All Romance languages = badly spoken dialects of Latin

English = once a robust and precise Germanic language, now a simplified mishmash of Germanic plus Latin that resembles no other language but itself and relies on word order and context to be clear. Eye drops off shelf, church helps rape victims, stud tires out, enraged cow injures farmer with axe. Book early! Only context and familiarity in this ambiguous language tells you that book is the imperative form of the verb to book (and whether it's singular or plural imperative nobody knows) while early here is an adverb, not an adjective.

And Latin itself was a pretty rough language too. The name Septimus = seven. Res publica = public thing. Lots of other examples I can't think of now.

Now, if we want to truly use a common language that is not only precise and impressive but also common to a large majority of the world, go with this. Something tells me Fox would like it.

http://dnghu.org/en/Grammar-Indo-European-Language/

If we had to pick a creole to be a world language though I would go with Papiamentu.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
NYC_Gal 2.0



Joined: 10 Dec 2010

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Esperanto?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How about this?

http://cosmoglotta.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
NohopeSeriously



Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Location: The Christian Right-Wing Educational Republic of Korea

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:
How about this?

http://cosmoglotta.blogspot.com/


Interesting conlang.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NohopeSeriously wrote:
mithridates wrote:
How about this?

http://cosmoglotta.blogspot.com/


Interesting conlang.


It's one of my favourites. Turning all the images on the �sterreiche Nationalbibliothek into pdfs and uploading them here took me a bit over a month. Occidental was the first really prominent naturalistic (= hopes to be as understandable as possible without prior study to a certain audience) auxlang, and IMO much better than the later Interlingua. The problem with Interlingua is that it's not even as easy to properly read as Spanish, and everything ends up being much too long too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:
How about this?

http://cosmoglotta.blogspot.com/


What about a link to your blog? I lost it awhile back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Koveras



Joined: 09 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:

English = once a robust and precise Germanic language, now a simplified mishmash of Germanic plus Latin that resembles no other language but itself and relies on word order and context to be clear. Eye drops off shelf, church helps rape victims, stud tires out, enraged cow injures farmer with axe. Book early! Only context and familiarity in this ambiguous language tells you that book is the imperative form of the verb to book (and whether it's singular or plural imperative nobody knows) while early here is an adverb, not an adjective.


Scraps of poor English don�t prove that English is a poor language. Are you confident enough in your Latin, old English, and PIE to say that they�re somehow foolproof against mots mal choisi? What makes relying on order and context worse than relying on correct declension?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Draz



Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Location: Land of Morning Clam

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:


English = once a robust and precise Germanic language, now a simplified mishmash of Germanic plus Latin that resembles no other language but itself and relies on word order and context to be clear.


English has evolved into the perfect language. I wouldn't change a thing. Flexible and expressive, absorbing other languages while being absorbed into them at the same time. Glorious.

A fixed and elegant grammatical structure isn't what makes a language awesome. Well, maybe it is for the rigid and humorless. I'd rather have some fun with my language. "church helps rape victims" is an example of why English is great, not a downside.

NohopeSeriously wrote:

Or learning English-based creoles that often have a down-to-earth approach to grammar. English should be more simplified for the sake of the world population.


Shock, horror! All the dialects of English developed through need and use. The idea of replacing all of them with a random one suitable for one specific group of people purely based on its grammatical simplicity is silly.

If I need to talk to someone with limited English, I can dumb it down for them. That doesn't mean all the English in the world should be dumb. Er, "simplified".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Koveras wrote:
mithridates wrote:

English = once a robust and precise Germanic language, now a simplified mishmash of Germanic plus Latin that resembles no other language but itself and relies on word order and context to be clear. Eye drops off shelf, church helps rape victims, stud tires out, enraged cow injures farmer with axe. Book early! Only context and familiarity in this ambiguous language tells you that book is the imperative form of the verb to book (and whether it's singular or plural imperative nobody knows) while early here is an adverb, not an adjective.


Scraps of poor English don�t prove that English is a poor language. Are you confident enough in your Latin, old English, and PIE to say that they�re somehow foolproof against mots mal choisi? What makes relying on order and context worse than relying on correct declension?


My point was that every language has flaws, not that English is a poor language.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
mithridates wrote:
How about this?

http://cosmoglotta.blogspot.com/


What about a link to your blog? I lost it awhile back.


That one linked there is one of mine, the other one is a lot bigger but the section on Occidental is here:

http://www.pagef30.com/search/label/occidental
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
NohopeSeriously



Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Location: The Christian Right-Wing Educational Republic of Korea

PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Draz wrote:
Shock, horror! All the dialects of English developed through need and use. The idea of replacing all of them with a random one suitable for one specific group of people purely based on its grammatical simplicity is silly.

If I need to talk to someone with limited English, I can dumb it down for them. That doesn't mean all the English in the world should be dumb. Er, "simplified".


Funny. English used in Voice of America is often described as simplified. Oh, the horror. As my French linguistics professor back in university said "bad English grammar may be a blessing in disguise."

So I would encourage people to speak English with a poor grammar for the sake of spreading English in a good way. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NohopeSeriously



Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Location: The Christian Right-Wing Educational Republic of Korea

PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:
My point was that every language has flaws, not that English is a poor language.


English has become so widespread that it seems that it's losing its values. That's another aspect how English could be a "poor" language.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Slowmotion



Joined: 15 Aug 2009

PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

After being in Korea for a few years, I really came to appreciate the awesomeness of English.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DejaVu



Joined: 27 Jan 2011
Location: Your dreams

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Make English French.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NohopeSeriously



Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Location: The Christian Right-Wing Educational Republic of Korea

PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DejaVu wrote:
Make English French.


Approximately 1/3 of the English vocabs is French, specifically Medieval Norman French words. We're proudly 33% "cheese-eating monkeys" by linguistics heritage. Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International