Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Less Friends vs. Fewer Friends
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
brento1138



Joined: 17 Nov 2004

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 4:27 pm    Post subject: Less Friends vs. Fewer Friends Reply with quote

So, I heard from another teacher that saying "less friends" or "less people" in any sentence is incorrect. It should always be "fewer." But is this correct? I thought that saying "less friends" is fine...

How can I check into this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PigeonFart



Joined: 27 Apr 2006

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 4:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

I can't tell you the answer because i don't know. In fact, i'd guess that most english speakers don't know.

But i'm pretty sure there's a pedantic person out there who cares about such matters, and he's just the kind of person who would have "less" or "fewer" friends. Smile

sorry i couldn't answer your question.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ajosshi



Joined: 17 Jan 2011
Location: ajosshi.com

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 4:49 pm    Post subject: Re: Less Friends vs. Fewer Friends Reply with quote

brento1138 wrote:
So, I heard from another teacher that saying "less friends" or "less people" in any sentence is incorrect. It should always be "fewer." But is this correct? I thought that saying "less friends" is fine...

How can I check into this?


Fewer. If you can count 'em, it's fewer. If you can't, it's less. Make sense?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Draz



Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Location: Land of Morning Clam

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 5:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Less Friends vs. Fewer Friends Reply with quote

ajosshi wrote:
brento1138 wrote:
So, I heard from another teacher that saying "less friends" or "less people" in any sentence is incorrect. It should always be "fewer." But is this correct? I thought that saying "less friends" is fine...

How can I check into this?


Fewer. If you can count 'em, it's fewer. If you can't, it's less. Make sense?


This is true in written English but in conversational English, most people say less for both countable and uncountable nouns.

This comes straight from my conversation class textbook so it's got to be true. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
brento1138



Joined: 17 Nov 2004

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 6:00 pm    Post subject: Re: Less Friends vs. Fewer Friends Reply with quote

Cool, thanks everyone! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mmstyle



Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Location: wherever

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fewer. Countable nouns. Draz, no disrespect, but most people I know don't say less, even in spoken English. But maybe it's just because I correct them. It's a peeve of mine. Like people who say "lieberry" instead of "library."

Hmmm, thinking of a thread.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldtrafford



Joined: 12 Jan 2011

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 6:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And you need to take a chill pill for goodness sake. Do you go around saying 'what's up'?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garybliss123



Joined: 03 Oct 2009

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mmstyle wrote:
Fewer. Countable nouns. Draz, no disrespect, but most people I know don't say less, even in spoken English. But maybe it's just because I correct them. It's a peeve of mine. Like people who say "lieberry" instead of "library."

Hmmm, thinking of a thread.


Friends that correct all of their friend's mistakes probably aren't as well liked as they think they are.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldtrafford



Joined: 12 Jan 2011

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Too rate Gary la!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darkeru



Joined: 21 Apr 2010
Location: England

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I want to say less. Reading fewer seems okay, but saying it sounds like I'm quoting a textbook.

One thing my TESOL teacher used to say is that if everyone says it, it's the correct way, even if the grammar is wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reise-ohne-Ende



Joined: 07 Sep 2009

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, seriously. "Fewer" vs. "less" is a big pet peeve of a LOT of educated people. I'm all for descriptive linguistics, but you should *not* be teaching Korean students that "less people" is okay, because it isn't.

Countable nouns use 'many', 'few', and 'fewer':

How many carrots do you want?
Not too many. Just a few.
I want fewer carrots than she has.


Uncountable nouns use 'much', 'little', and 'less':

How much milk do you want?
Not too much. Just a little.
I want less milk than she has.


If you wouldn't say, "How much people were there?" then you shouldn't say "There were less people than yesterday." 'Person' is a countable noun, therefore you should use 'many', 'few', and 'fewer'.

ETA: No one I know says, "Less people came to school today." If anything, people usually say things like, "Not as many people...". If I heard "less people", my first instinct would be to assume that the person was uneducated. Which doesn't mean they're wrong (all native English speakers are by definition speaking English correctly), but those forms are not the ones we should be teaching second language learners.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jinks



Joined: 27 Oct 2004
Location: Formerly: Lower North Island

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PigeonFart wrote:
Hi,
I can't tell you the answer because i don't know. In fact, i'd guess that most english speakers don't know.
But i'm pretty sure there's a pedantic person out there who cares about such matters, and he's just the kind of person who would have "less" or "fewer" friends. :)
sorry i couldn't answer your question.


You are probably right, but don't you think that English teachers should know?

As others have said, it is boorish to correct your friends' mistakes, but being an ENGLISH TEACHER and not knowing simple English grammar is pretty shameful. Saying that someone who has a working knowledge of his/her craft is "pedantic" is clearly ridiculous. Would you condone a similar lack of professional knowledge from chefs, drivers, nurses or computer programmers?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
winterfall



Joined: 21 May 2009

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jinks wrote:
PigeonFart wrote:
Hi,
I can't tell you the answer because i don't know. In fact, i'd guess that most english speakers don't know.
But i'm pretty sure there's a pedantic person out there who cares about such matters, and he's just the kind of person who would have "less" or "fewer" friends. Smile
sorry i couldn't answer your question.


You are probably right, but don't you think that English teachers should know?

As others have said, it is boorish to correct your friends' mistakes, but being an ENGLISH TEACHER and not knowing simple English grammar is pretty shameful. Saying that someone who has a working knowledge of his/her craft is "pedantic" is clearly ridiculous. Would you condone a similar lack of professional knowledge from chefs, drivers, nurses or computer programmers?


You sound very Korean Smile. This is a very, very minute point. And its not appropriate either to apply an across the board generalization. It's not like this is a case with a nuclear physicist that miscalculated .00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 and blew up a reactor dooming the world as we know it. Neither does incorrectly teaching this in anyway effect the future livelihood of the students. In a written format, even college admissions people will strike it off as a stylistic form of writing and as another poster mentioned, people wouldn't pick it up in conversation where grammar rules typically don't apply.

Not everyone is born perfect
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sirius black



Joined: 04 Jun 2010

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think its right to teach common speech that is grammatically incorrect as if its correct.

The student needs to be told that the common way is not grammatically correct if it isn't. When that student takes a grammar test in English they will get it wrong. Its unfair to the student.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
winterfall



Joined: 21 May 2009

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sirius black wrote:
I don't think its right to teach common speech that is grammatically incorrect as if its correct.

The student needs to be told that the common way is not grammatically correct if it isn't. When that student takes a grammar test in English they will get it wrong. Its unfair to the student.


True but doesn't that mean your crippling the student by focusing on grammar? I'm assuming your referring to the korean context where grammar is everything. Every where besides East Asia, grammar is not the beginning, middle, and end. Take for example, conjunctions. Grammatically, you should never start a sentence with a conjunction. But, from a written stand point. It is both necessary and encouraged to emphasize a contrasting view on a similar line of thought. The only informal rule for bending grammatical law is to not use it too often.


Last edited by winterfall on Mon Apr 04, 2011 3:52 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International