Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

what was the first genocide? - before jews and even Armenian
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 2:17 pm    Post subject: Re: what was the first genocide? - before jews and even Arme Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:
How has Christianity made the world any better than any other religion's impact on the world??

'
I feel obligated to defend Christianity here because I mocked it a bit elsewhere in off-topic.

Christianity is a universal religion, as opposed to all the pagan tribal religions (Islam is a strange hybrid). This means that Christians generally, although occasionally confused particularly, believed in the equality of man beneath the Grace of God. Christianity was a fundamental and necessary precursor to Western notions of democracy and equality.

Here's just one example of the beneficial impact of Christianity: the Roman world was built on slavery. The Christian-medieval complex was built on serfdom, a pretty huge social advance over slavery.

Now, the Christian West wasn't hostile to slavery at all times everywhere. Certainly, Cortes' Mexico tried to have slavery. But there was a big conflict between the Catholic Church and the Spanish crown over slavery there, which the Catholic Church eventually won.

I don't claim that Christianity was the best religion, Buddhism and even Confucianism (the latter in Korea, especially) has had progressive impacts in Asia. But it seems to me the 'Christianity was barbaric' canard is a modern Leyenda Negra.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 6:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with pretty much everything you said. Just going to say that serfdom/fuedal system can be more or less traced back to Diocletian. When he 'modernised' the trade unions he made it cumpulsory for sons to follow fathers in their trades, hence fuedalism. His reoganisation of the empire into dioceses and more fort based defense is also a precursor to midieval times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UknowsI



Joined: 16 Apr 2009

PostPosted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:03 pm    Post subject: Re: what was the first genocide? - before jews and even Arme Reply with quote

creeper1 wrote:
What was the first genocide? Well probably there have been ones that we don't know about. Tribes often wipe each other out but I guess you need big numbers for it to qualify as a genocide

I don't know history that well, but I was very surprised that the first genocide supposedly happened in the 1900's. While I don't know the exact definition of genocide, the Third Punic War is the first that comes to my mind. While the Romans didn't kill everyone, their intent was to "destroy Carthage" and not just to defeat them.

The Mongolian conquests also seems to have some elements of genocides in them and I assume that there have happened undocumented genocides which has not been well documented in history. The Aztec empire seemed to have a culture which could perform such acts, sacrificing thousands of prisoners from foreign cultures.
Kuros wrote:

Christianity is a universal religion, as opposed to all the pagan tribal religions (Islam is a strange hybrid). This means that Christians generally, although occasionally confused particularly, believed in the equality of man beneath the Grace of God. Christianity was a fundamental and necessary precursor to Western notions of democracy and equality.

I think the ground principles of Christianity has many good points which has been largely twisted to fit rulers' interests. The misdeeds which has been carried out in the name of Christianity would have been done under a different flag if Christianity didn't exist. However, I find it hard to believe that Christianity was a necessity for democracy since democracy preceded Christianity and I don't find equality particularly unique for Christianity. If anything Animism takes equality one step further.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
travel zen



Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Location: Good old Toronto, Canada

PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Kuros wrote:

Christianity is a universal religion, as opposed to all the pagan tribal religions (Islam is a strange hybrid). This means that Christians generally, although occasionally confused particularly, believed in the equality of man beneath the Grace of God. Christianity was a fundamental and necessary precursor to Western notions of democracy and equality.



A large load of Western Supremacy.

Christianity was spread through conquest by Europeans mainly. Chistianlty endorses slavery as well as equality. Islam actually gives blessings on those who release slaves. Democracy has NOTHING to do with Christianity. Fascism can be comfortable with it as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 11:32 am    Post subject: Re: what was the first genocide? - before jews and even Arme Reply with quote

UknowsI wrote:

Kuros wrote:

Christianity is a universal religion, as opposed to all the pagan tribal religions (Islam is a strange hybrid). This means that Christians generally, although occasionally confused particularly, believed in the equality of man beneath the Grace of God. Christianity was a fundamental and necessary precursor to Western notions of democracy and equality.

I think the ground principles of Christianity has many good points which has been largely twisted to fit rulers' interests. The misdeeds which has been carried out in the name of Christianity would have been done under a different flag if Christianity didn't exist. However, I find it hard to believe that Christianity was a necessity for democracy since democracy preceded Christianity and I don't find equality particularly unique for Christianity. If anything Animism takes equality one step further.


Modern democracy doesn't resemble Athenian democracy. But, you're right to bring it up. My statement was perhaps a little too broad in retrospect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Koveras



Joined: 09 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

travel zen wrote:
Democracy has NOTHING to do with Christianity.


Hear, hear! Democracy is the twisted offspring of Schism and Revolution. The Church will have nothing to do with it! Ecrasez l'infame!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just here to point out that "decimate" means to reduce by one tenth and that it is often actually an understatement of the effects of European colonization on indigenous populations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
ThingsComeAround



Joined: 07 Nov 2008

PostPosted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:40 pm    Post subject: Re: what was the first genocide? - before jews and even Arme Reply with quote

creeper1 wrote:
What was the first genocide? Well probably there have been ones that we don't know about. Tribes often wipe each other out but I guess you need big numbers for it to qualify as a genocide

Here is the fourth installment of a tv show called "civilisation." I am warning you if you are of African origin you might get very angry.
Please watch to the end.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_x4GPmL9MI&feature=channel_video_title


Something funny about that link

In the opening 40 seconds there were errors in the narration.

Quote:
in the 19th century Western civilization spread southwards to secure control of a vast and mysterious continent... Africa

to overcome its inhospitable terrain and climate, its grinding poverty and in particular, its terrifying repertoire of tropical diseases would require an unprecedented effort.


Just with that line alone, I would argue that it was the West that brought poverty to Africa, with their demand for ivory, gold, and silver. Tropical diseases? They weren't a problem before when the locals healed themselves- only when this new civilization tried to discredit tried and true medical practices for their own did this become a new problem. And finally, why would they seek to 'control' Africa? Was it because they became enlightened and didn't want to kill each other- rather kill someone far, far away.. or spread Christianity to the savages of the dark continent?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JMO



Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Underwaterbob wrote:
Just here to point out that "decimate" means to reduce by one tenth and that it is often actually an understatement of the effects of European colonization on indigenous populations.


Yea it was a roman thing. Draw lots and the guy who gets the short stick gets killed by 9 of his buddies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
young_clinton



Joined: 09 Sep 2009

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JMO wrote:
I agree with pretty much everything you said. Just going to say that serfdom/fuedal system can be more or less traced back to Diocletian. When he 'modernised' the trade unions he made it cumpulsory for sons to follow fathers in their trades, hence fuedalism. His reoganisation of the empire into dioceses and more fort based defense is also a precursor to midieval times.


Keep in mind though, escaped slaves in Rome were hunted down and slaves were generally worked like animals. Serfs had to be treated somewhat reasonably or they just did a midnight run to the Lord next door or somewhere else, and nothing could be done about it. This kind of system led to some serfs eventually being villains, that is they could work on whatever property they wanted to on thier Lords manor and could actually manage groups of property. If the Lord's arrangement was unacceptable the skilled villian just fled somewhere else and got a better deal. Some villians lived and ate better than thier Lords. Some villians sent thier kids to Oxford or other universities. This was not likely to ever happen in Rome. When Rome fell good riddance. I'm suprised people think it was a catastrophe, because the standard of living in the dark ages for the common man (serf and peasant) was better than the common man in Rome. I am pretty sure that has been studied and that is the conclusion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
young_clinton



Joined: 09 Sep 2009

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:13 am    Post subject: Re: what was the first genocide? - before jews and even Arme Reply with quote

Christianity is a hybrid too. Greek Mysticism and Judaism. What I like about Christianity is universal decency for all because God says you are no better than me, God says only he is better than you or me. You don't see that kind of ethics elsewhere. There's always some religous justification that someone can pull up to state that he is superior than you.
You should hear some of the crap in the Bangkok Post justifying misery and problems people have because they are inferior spiritually.

" I don't have any food to eat and I am sick and have nothing"

and the useful response............

"Remember all life is suffering and you must be suffering more because you have bad Karma, you have to wait untill the next life to be like me"

In Christianity all suffering is caused by sin, which everybody has and God wills it to be otherwise, because God created life and it has value. This most basic concept is far better. Even though I believe in evolution and question the concept of sin.

Nobody gives a crap about the Hill tribes in Northern Thailand except the missionaries, nobody gives a crap about the tribesmen in Papua New Guinea except the missionaries. And then you hear people criticisizing them for ruining the culture. So I guess they should still make women cut off thier fingers when thier husbands die? or that the hill tribes should be underfed because its part of the culture? Total Bull. Food, education and resources are vastly more important than culture. Anybody who disagrees with that, why not just live malnourished, uneducated and with zip resources including medicine, like they do and see what it is like. I won't and I don't expect anybody else to want to live under conditions of extreme poverty and other things for any reason, these people are human beings just like me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
earthquakez



Joined: 10 Nov 2010

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Question Is your topic question serious? Nearly all of the world's peoples have engaged in systematic killing of rivals or perceived rivals who did not belong to their immediate kin or tribe. Later it took the form of attempting to destroy the culture associated with those outsiders of different kin, tribe or ethnicity/race. It's as old as humankind.

Before the crusades against the Arabic and other Muslim peoples in Jerusalem and the Middle East, the Muslim invasions and attempted invasions of the western Byzantine Empire and other non Muslim cultures had enslaved countless European Christians. BEFORE. The Spanish consorts Isabella and Ferdinand drove the Muslims out of Spain AFTER Muslims had conquered and enslaved the Spanish.

Read a book by the people who run Disinfo com "Everything you know is wrong". One of the writers gives an accurate and fascinating insight into how Europeans who are not Muslim unlike those natives of Easter Europe for example who are today managed to escape the deliberate and cruel slave trading of Muslim peoples who invaded Europe before Europeans went on crusades. Arabic speaking peoples also kept up slave trading of Blacks while the British navy roamed the seas after 1807 to combat slave traders and pirates.

Many people need to read European history from original sources and look to historians who don't run agendas like some do now and some populist, politically correct sources do now to portray world history for the last 14 centuries or so as somehow revolving around European crimes. The distortion of history has gone from the rah, rah, weren't European countries civilised and didn't they build up great empires biased slant to another biased slant of opposite ideology.

As somebody who has Caribbean ancestry some way back and is the descendant of Black slaves on one side of the family, I think it's unfortunate that many people do not know about the anti slavery movement in England in the 18th century and they do not attempt to understand just who and what forces were behind the abominable practice.

The tendency to lump all Europeans and their nations into one oppressor basket overlooks the white opposition to what southern whites did in establishing the slave trade in the US and Arabic peoples' (not all of them) custom of slave trading that continues til today. Just ask Sudanese people from the south about the reality of their enslavement for centuries up til recently from the Arabic cultured Northern Sudanese.

As for the Rwanda genocide, how many of you know that it wasn't just about the Hutu and the Tutsi being enemies? Among the ethnic group that committed the killings (forget whether it was the Hutu or the Tutsi) were people who then decided to kill their neighbours of the same tribe to gain their land.

Being the victim of genocide is not limited at all to a few groups of people in history. As the history of England in Ireland shows, the concerted effort to wipe out the language and culture of a people while taking their property in almost its entirety and punishing by law any reminders of the original culture shows cultural genocide committed by whites against whites. The potato famine that came some centures after these cultural genocidal laws were enacted wiped out many of the Irish - and that famine was due directly to the genocidal laws enacted a few centuries before that attempted to wipe out the Irish culture in all aspects.


Last edited by earthquakez on Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:38 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rumdiary



Joined: 05 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JMO wrote:
Underwaterbob wrote:
Just here to point out that "decimate" means to reduce by one tenth and that it is often actually an understatement of the effects of European colonization on indigenous populations.


Yea it was a roman thing. Draw lots and the guy who gets the short stick gets killed by 9 of his buddies.
Roman Roulette?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
earthquakez



Joined: 10 Nov 2010

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Re the Catholic Church/Christian churches, there were Roman and Greek colonies in Africa, mostly Northern Africa, during the Roman Empire. The early Christian churches did not treat Black converts (we're talking about free converts, not the ones missionised during the peak of European colonialism much later) as lesser people. Discrimination against Black Christians and what later became Black Catholics was not a feature of Christianity and its authorities and members during its developing stages and then the establishment by Constantine of the Roman Catholic Church as the Roman Empire's religion.

An interesting fact about slavery in the Carribean - Irish and Scots who refused to accept their country being ground under by the English invaders could be and were sent to the Caribbean as slaves.

Getting back to the ignorance of historical events that involved people and cultures whom most whites and black people know little about, how about the Mongolian tribes as somebody mentioned before?

Funny how we don't hear about the Huns and other Central Asian nomadic horseman-based tribes such as those from Mongolia who went on expeditions to loot and destroy the cultures of western Europe as well as to kill their males who posed problems of resistance, and enslave their women and other of the males. These were incredibly rapacious and destructive, deliberately planned events on a big scale.

Even more interesting is that the Huns are the ancestors of many of the Koreans who are the descendants of Central Asian nomadic tribesmen. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
young_clinton



Joined: 09 Sep 2009

PostPosted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Huns? Do you mean the Magyars? The Huns aren't around anymore. Hungarians (Magyars) speak a Uralic language, but are mostly Germanic in ancestry not Uralic. The same with the Finns and Estonians.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International