View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
legrande
Joined: 23 Nov 2010
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 4:41 pm Post subject: Android fans accuse Apple of Copying Samsung |
|
|
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/04/19/android_fans_accuse_apple_of_copying_samsung_first.html
Android fans accuse Apple of copying Samsung first
By Daniel Eran Dilger
Published: 06:55 PM EST
Immediately after Apple filed suit against Samsung over patent and trade dress infringements, Android enthusiasts have countered that it was Apple that actually copied Samsung from the beginning.
The claim, distributed virally on message boards in the form of a graphic comparing the 2007 iPhone against the Samsung F700, is titled "LOL @ Apple: suing someone you stole the design from to being [sic] with," and portrays an early Samsung phone with a black front, rounded corners and grid of icons, all elements of the complaint by Apple which claims infringement upon its iPhone design by various Samsung products.
The graphic states the Samsung F700 was first shown at CEBIT in 2006, and was released in February 2007, while noting that the iPhone was first shown at Macworld in January 2007 and didn't go on sale until the end of June 2007.
However, the graphic is in error, as Samsung only mentioned plans for the new phone in 2006. It wasn't actually shown until February 2007 at the 3GSM World Congress, held a month after the iPhone's debut. It did not go on sale at that time.
What Samsung actually did
When Apple unveiled the original iPhone in January 2007, Samsung was actually selling a variety of smartphones that looked more like Nokia devices, with a four direction rocker navigation button, six or more buttons for handing calling features, and in most cases, a traditional set of physical number dialing buttons.
The F700 was rushed out to show after the iPhone's debut, and was regarded as an "answer to the iPhone" by reports of the day, one of which observed that it "looks awfully familiar."
However, the F700 also carried a number of notable features that Apple didn't offer until later, including support for 7.2Mbps HSDPA mobile networks (not available until the iPhone 3GS) and a 5 megapixel camera (unmatched until iPhone 4). If anything, it indicates that Apple faced serious technical hurdles in entering the mobile business in competition with much more experienced mobile manufacturers.
What Apple brought to the mobile business wasn't a copy of existing technology, but breakthroughs in original design aimed at usability, with features such as a truly useful mobile browser, tight integration with iPod and iTunes media sync, and a novel app model.
With its Galaxy line of mobile products, Samsung has copied not just the overall look of the iPhone, iPad and iPod touch, but went even further to add a "Touchwiz" layer to Android that makes its devices far more closely resemble Apple's products than other Android licensee have.
After the release of iPad 2, Samsung even publicly admitted needing to redesign its Galaxy Tab to more closely resemble Apple's product.
It was LG, not Samsung, who complained
After the iPhone's debut, it was LG, not Samsung, that complained Apple had copied its design. LG had actually demonstrated its own full-screen smartphone in the fall of 2006, and like the iPhone, it had a largely black, minimalist front. It was first to market with a capacitive touchscreen, the same type subsequently used by the iPhone.
Unlike the iPhone, LG's Prada phone built its user interface using Adobe Flash Lite, with a home screen featuring six round, monochrome icons and a separate menu bar. The phone was intended to sell through Prada stores, at $775.
After Apple unveiled the iPhone, LG's Woo-Young Kwak, who headed its Mobile Handset R&D Center, called a press conference and stated, "we consider that Apple copied the Prada phone after the design was unveiled when it was presented in the iF Design Award and won the prize in September 2006."
The company didn't file a lawsuit however. LG had already shown an affinity for Apple's designs, changing its LG Chocolate phone for the US market to resemble a classic iPod.
Two years later, LG delivered its GM730 phone running Windows Mobile 6.5, with a grid of colored icons above a home row of shortcuts, and rounded corners tipping a hat to the original iPhone. This year, the company is producing an Android-based Optimus X2, which appears closely pattered after last year's iPhone 4.
Filed under : iPhone [ 31 Comments ]
Story topics: Android, Samsung, LG |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RMNC

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laughably stupid nationalism at it's most geeky. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ESL Milk "Everyday
Joined: 12 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Geez... what will the Americans steal from Korea next? Prepackaged mass-marketed style-over-substance pop bands? Blue jeans?
STOP PICKING ON POOR DEFENSELESS KOREAN CORPORATIONS. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RMNC

Joined: 21 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Little known fact: It wasn't ALWAYS called "American" cheese... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carleverson
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LOL, look in the dictionary for the words "copy" or "plagiarism" and you'll find the Samsung logo.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cj1976
Joined: 26 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Copyright infringement is so rife here, and they mostly get away with it. I saw a coffee shop called Starbucks that had nothing to do with the world-famous brand. They didn't even bother to change the spelling. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ESL Milk "Everyday
Joined: 12 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cj1976 wrote: |
Copyright infringement is so rife here, and they mostly get away with it. I saw a coffee shop called Starbucks that had nothing to do with the world-famous brand. They didn't even bother to change the spelling. |
So has anyone been to Starbooks lately? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Radius
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I say Americans boycott Samsung, see how they like it then. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
victorology
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Who said it's Koreans who are complaining? It seems it's mostly Android backers posting comments on articles at TechCrunch, Mashable and other tech sites. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
definitely maybe
Joined: 16 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ESL Milk "Everyday wrote: |
cj1976 wrote: |
Copyright infringement is so rife here, and they mostly get away with it. I saw a coffee shop called Starbucks that had nothing to do with the world-famous brand. They didn't even bother to change the spelling. |
So has anyone been to Starbooks lately? |
Starbutts? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cj1976
Joined: 26 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The most unexpected misuse of an existing famous name I've seen here was The Bill Cosby Bar. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Koreadays
Joined: 20 May 2008
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Radius wrote: |
I say Americans boycott Samsung, see how they like it then. |
maybe 20 years ago this would have been possible. but now America is begging to South Korea for business and Korea knows it.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
victorology wrote: |
Who said it's Koreans who are complaining? It seems it's mostly Android backers posting comments on articles at TechCrunch, Mashable and other tech sites. |
That's what I'm wondering. Nothing but Android backers, nothing said about Koreans. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crescent

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Location: yes.
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Radius wrote: |
I say Americans boycott Samsung, see how they like it then. |
That means boycotting almost all products that have LEDs.. Ironically, Apple is one of Samsung's biggest customers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Drew10
Joined: 31 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cj1976 wrote: |
The most unexpected misuse of an existing famous name I've seen here was The Bill Cosby Bar. |
In a military town i saw an office called "Obama Realty".
They have since renamed it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|