Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

What if you really thought she was 17?

 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Abe Scrap



Joined: 01 May 2011

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2011 5:04 am    Post subject: What if you really thought she was 17? Reply with quote

In a statutory rape case, Texas court is actually considering to allow the defense to claim that, by really believing a minor was 17, the accused did not have the mens rea necessary for him to be guilty. Such consideration has ben a long time coming.

Ironically, the male judge on the Court of Appeals is concerned with protecting females, while the two female judges are concerned about the lack of protection for males.


Defense for the Unwitting?

What if you really did think she was 17?

By Jordan Smith, Fri., April 15, 2011

..At issue is whether a state statute pertaining to sexual assault of a child is unconstitutional because it does not require the state to prove a defendant's culpable mental state � that is, a defendant's knowledge of whether the alleged victim was a minor � neither does it allow for an affirmative defense based on the defendant's belief that the relationship was with an adult (that is, in Texas, at least 17 years old).

Mark Alexander Fleming was 24...when he began a relationship with Kari Minesinger. Minesinger...told him she'd gotten his number from a friend at a bar. She was 22, he said she told him. He checked out her Facebook and MySpace pages, which seemed to confirm her story: She represented herself as a University of North Texas student seeking a degree in criminal justice. The two communicated by phone for a couple of weeks before going on a first date. He took her home around midnight; when asked if she had a roommate, she allegedly told him that her mother and stepfather were living with her because the couple had "lost their house." After a second date, Minesinger spent the night with Fleming; in the morning the couple had sex...As the relationship went on, two of Fleming's friends were also convinced that Minesinger was of age. As such, it came as quite a surprise when Fleming was arrested and charged with sexual assault of a minor. As it turned out, she was just 14...

Fleming challenged the charges, arguing that the state should have to prove that he intended to have sex with a minor, or that he should at least be allowed to present evidence that Minesinger intended to deceive him into believing she was an adult. The court rejected his challenge. Fleming pleaded "no contest" to the charges and was ultimately sentenced to 10 years probation � ironically, that sentence isn't allowable under the statute, but was agreed to by prosecutors after a member of Fleming's jury came forward to tell the court that his son had also had a "dating" relationship with Minesinger. ... Last week the CCA heard the case. Fleming's attorney Richard Glad�den argued that the statute as written, without a protection for the defendant � either by having the state prove culpability or by allowing a so-called mistake-of-fact defense � violates due process and, in fact, is out of step with federal law, which generally requires proof of a culpable mental state for a similar prosecution.

... Johnson noted that some adolescent girls appear much older and are able to obtain fake IDs to "prove" their age. If the law is meant to protect these underage girls, she asked, "what about protecting [our] boys?"

Cochran noted that a Kaiser Family Foun�dation study revealed that more than half of all females have had a sexual experience by the age of 17. If that's the case, she wondered aloud what the statute actually accomplishes...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nw25th



Joined: 15 Feb 2009
Location: Daejeon

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2011 7:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

that stupid little girl should be thrown in jail
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2011 10:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The law is strict liability.

Abe Scrap, you are asking the Court of Appeals to overturn law enacted by the legislature. Absent Constitutional restrictions, which do not apply here, that is something it cannot do.

Quote:
Cochran noted that a Kaiser Family Foun�dation study revealed that more than half of all females have had a sexual experience by the age of 17. If that's the case, she wondered aloud what the statute actually accomplishes...


The statute protects minors from rape being dressed up as consensual sex. If minors have sex with other minors, the law does not apply.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Abe Scrap



Joined: 01 May 2011

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2011 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
The law is strict liability.

Abe Scrap, you are asking the Court of Appeals to overturn law enacted by the legislature. Absent Constitutional restrictions, which do not apply here, that is something it cannot do.

I am not asking the court to do anything. Anyway, courts invalidate laws all the time. I know you are not saying the Constitution (either state or federal in this case) does not apply here, so what are you saying?

Quote:
Quote:
Cochran noted that a Kaiser Family Foun�dation study revealed that more than half of all females have had a sexual experience by the age of 17. If that's the case, she wondered aloud what the statute actually accomplishes...


The statute protects minors from rape being dressed up as consensual sex. If minors have sex with other minors, the law does not apply.

If two persons, at least one of whom is a minor, mutually willingly engage in sex the only reason it is not "consensual" is because at least one is below the legal age of consent, in which case it would be very simple to make it consensual: repeal the law.

And you should well know that many states do not have close-in-age exemptions. I can give you any number of cases of minors prosecuted for sex with other minors, starting with the case of the 13-year-old girl charged as BOTH VICTIM AND OFFENDER in the same case involving her 12-year-old boyfriend.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
caniff



Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Location: All over the map

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2011 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your new username is like a word jumble. I came up with "rape scab" but I'm sure there must be countless other possibilities.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Abe Scrap



Joined: 01 May 2011

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2011 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

caniff wrote:
Your new username is like a word jumble. I came up with "rape scab" but I'm sure there must be countless other possibilities.

I kinda like "cab rapes" better, but finfac you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sirius black



Joined: 04 Jun 2010

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2011 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its a shame. It could happen to any of us, especially in Korea where EVERYONE under 30 looks young.

If a guy makes a reasonable effort to verify the age and the girl lies by furnishing a fake ID and her internet page relfects she is of age and a guy can still go to jail then its a bad law.

Then there are the social (and employment) repurcussions of having to register as a sex offender where ever you live.

If that happened to me I'd have to leave the country and start over some where else.

When I was in college, the local HS girls would routinely go the frat parties on campus and pass themselves off as coeds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Porksta



Joined: 05 May 2011

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2011 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like "rape cabs".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
caniff



Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Location: All over the map

PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2011 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Abe's crap?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Abe Scrap



Joined: 01 May 2011

PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2011 10:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can be sure my next nic will be different.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
caniff



Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Location: All over the map

PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Abe Scrap wrote:
You can be sure my next nic will be different.


What language are you mixing into the English?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Enrico Palazzo
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 11 Mar 2008

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2011 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Porksta wrote:
I like "rape cabs".



Guys, play by the rules, and let's try to keep the board clean.
It's not a suggestion.

Locking...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International