| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Menino80
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Location: Hodor?
|
 Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 10:06 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| visitorq wrote: |
| Menino80 wrote: |
| Abe Scrap wrote: |
^ Do you guys never tire of attacking the messenger?
OK, you can't rebut what was said. Got it. |
It is not worth the time to rebut what you say. What you say is below rebuttal. |
Then why don't you just do everyone a huge favor and shut up already? |
Back at you big guy. Conspiracy theories clutter up this board to the point where you and your buddy have completely crapped on nearly every thread with your paranoid and poorly written rants. I'll stop posting snark when you two stop crapping on threads with complete junk. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visitorq
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
|
| Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Menino80 wrote: |
| visitorq wrote: |
| Menino80 wrote: |
| Abe Scrap wrote: |
^ Do you guys never tire of attacking the messenger?
OK, you can't rebut what was said. Got it. |
It is not worth the time to rebut what you say. What you say is below rebuttal. |
Then why don't you just do everyone a huge favor and shut up already? |
Back at you big guy. Conspiracy theories clutter up this board to the point where you and your buddy have completely crapped on nearly every thread with your paranoid and poorly written rants. I'll stop posting snark when you two stop crapping on threads with complete junk. |
I realized I was just feeding the troll and tried to delete my last post before you would reply (but alas, it seems I was too late and have to engage you more after all)...
Anyway... there is a reason we have this thing called a "debate": it's so that points can be brought up, discussed, expounded upon or refuted. Ultimately the purpose is to learn something new from the discussion. You, on the other hand, contribute nothing but snarks and insults. Basically, it's pretty obvious that you couldn't debate your way out of a paper bag and resort to snarks for attention (like a troll). It isn't clever or amusing. It's just obnoxious and annoying.
Bottom line is if you have nothing of substance to contribute, you should really just get lost (I won't hold my breath though)... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Menino80
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Location: Hodor?
|
| Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Let me sum you up: "Rockefeller caused diabetes through his manipulation of ground water tables. I'm not going to debate the facts of this, I've already established this in other threads.
WHY WON'T YOU TAKE MY OPINIONS SERIOUSLY!?!?!?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visitorq
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
|
| Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Menino80 wrote: |
Let me sum you up: "Rockefeller caused diabetes through his manipulation of ground water tables. I'm not going to debate the facts of this, I've already established this in other threads.
WHY WON'T YOU TAKE MY OPINIONS SERIOUSLY!?!?!?" |
When all else fails, resort to a ridiculous straw man. You fail at debating. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
catman
Joined: 18 Jul 2004
|
| Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just to reiterate:
You guys previously claimed that SITE was responisble for the Al-Qaeda message. In fact it appeared on numerous militant websites.
Please source that SITE was responsible for the AQ message. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Abe Scrap
Joined: 01 May 2011
|
| Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| catman wrote: |
Just to reiterate:
You guys previously claimed that SITE was responisble for the Al-Qaeda message. In fact it appeared on numerous militant websites.
Please source that SITE was responsible for the AQ message. |
You haven't linked to any of these alleged "militant websites" for comparison, but in any event, just to reiterate (as you can see from my earlier post) my source was CNN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrwhite82
Joined: 22 May 2010
|
| Posted: Mon May 23, 2011 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Abe Scrap wrote: |
| catman wrote: |
Just to reiterate:
You guys previously claimed that SITE was responisble for the Al-Qaeda message. In fact it appeared on numerous militant websites.
Please source that SITE was responsible for the AQ message. |
You haven't linked to any of these alleged "militant websites" for comparison, but in any event, just to reiterate (as you can see from my earlier post) my source was CNN. |
I think CNN actually said that SITE acquired it from AQ. Not that SITE made it. So which is it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
geldedgoat
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
|
| Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jrwhite82 wrote: |
| I'm just saying what the White House's stance on it is. They are trying to claim they threw OBL in the ocean so as to keep with OBL's Muslim traditions. |
Except it's not in accordance with Muslim traditions. That's yet another reason why 'deathers' are skeptical of the hasty dumping... also yet another reason why the raid was so abhorrent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jrwhite82
Joined: 22 May 2010
|
| Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| geldedgoat wrote: |
| jrwhite82 wrote: |
| I'm just saying what the White House's stance on it is. They are trying to claim they threw OBL in the ocean so as to keep with OBL's Muslim traditions. |
Except it's not in accordance with Muslim traditions. That's yet another reason why 'deathers' are skeptical of the hasty dumping... also yet another reason why the raid was so abhorrent. |
Well, being that Obama is a secret Muslim. I'm pretty sure he knows Muslim traditions better than any of us. So I'll defer to his expertise.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
| Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| For the "theorists" here, what difference does it make to you how the body was (supposedly) disposed of? After all, you think the man's still alive! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visitorq
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
|
| Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CentralCali wrote: |
| For the "theorists" here, what difference does it make to you how the body was (supposedly) disposed of? After all, you think the man's still alive! |
Because if the story doesn't add up, it proves they're lying. Duh. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Abe Scrap
Joined: 01 May 2011
|
| Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CentralCali wrote: |
| For the "theorists" here, what difference does it make to you how the body was (supposedly) disposed of? After all, you think the man's still alive! |
If you'd been paying attention, you'd have noticed that this was the ninth time OBL was reported as having died in one forum or another.
Anyway, best evidence is that he died in December 2001. Watch the interview with Dr. Steve Pieczenik. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jodemas2
Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
December 13, 2001 to be exact.
US OPENLY ACCEPTS BIN LADEN LONG DEAD
BIN LADEN NEVER MENTIONED IN McCHRYSTAL REPORT OR OBAMA SPEECH
�HUNT FOR BIN LADEN� A NATIONAL SHAME
By Gordon Duff/STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
Conservative commentator, former Marine Colonel Bob Pappas has been saying for years that bin Laden died at Tora Bora and that Senator Kerry�s claim that bin Laden escaped with Bush help was a lie. Now we know that Pappas was correct. The embarrassment of having Secretary of State Clinton talk about bin Laden in Pakistan was horrific. He has been dead since December 13, 2001 and now, finally, everyone, Obama, McChrystal, Cheney, everyone who isn�t nuts is finally saying what they have known for years.
However, since we lost a couple of hundred of our top special operations forces hunting for bin Laden after we knew he was dead, is someone going to answer for this with some jail time? Since we spent 200 million dollars on �special ops� looking for someone we knew was dead, who is going to jail for that? Since Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney continually talked about a man they knew was dead, now known to be for reasons of POLITICAL nature, who is going to jail for that? Why were tapes brought out, now known to be forged, as legitimate intelligence to sway the disputed 2004 election in the US? This is a criminal act if there ever was one.
In 66 pages, General Stanley McChrystal never mentions Osama bin Laden. Everything is �Mullah Omar�now. In his talk at West Point, President Obama never mentioned Osama bin Laden. Col. Pappas makes it clear, Vice President Cheney let it �out of the bag� long ago. Bin Laden was killed by American troops many many years ago.
America knew Osama bin Laden died December 13, 2001. After that, his use was hardly one to unite America but rather one to divide, scam and play games. With bin Laden gone, we could have started legitimate nation building in Afghanistan instead of the eternal insurgency that we invented ourselves....
The bin Laden scam is one of the most shameful acts ever perpetrated against the American people. We don�t even know if he really was an enemy, certainly he was never the person that Bush and Cheney said. In fact, the Bush and bin Laden families were always close friends and had been for many years... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Menino80
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Location: Hodor?
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
^
There is not a single shred of actual evidence in that entire story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jodemas2
Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ^ Fine, if you don't want to believe the Senior Editor of Veterans Today, don't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
