|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kheldar
Joined: 26 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Chokse wrote: |
| I will not invite you to find an "actual" virus (not a trojan horse) that has infected any Mac running OSX. Go ahead and start looking. I'll be waiting. |
I'm glad you won't invite me because I already posted a Mac virus earlier that infected up to 50 Macs - almost half of all Macs ever produced! If you click on the link I provided, you can read all about it and you wouldn't have to be waiting.
Just so you know, Chokse, most hackers today use various forms of "malware" such as trojans, worms, and spyware to exploit security holes in both PCs and Macs. Viruses are a somewhat dated attack that was common when the intent was to annoy the user or damage files on a computer whereas today, malware is used to steal personal information over the internet making it much more dangerous than a common virus. If someone wants to exploit a Mac (like they did last week), I'm sure it would be through malware, not necessarily a virus although the term is basically interchangeable.
Get off the virus obsession already! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chokse
Joined: 22 May 2009
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Typo. Should have been "now".
And yet, there are still hundreds if not thousands of "viruses" released for Windows each year, so I guess they are not exactly extinct as you would have us believe. So, no thanks, I will not get off of it.
And, once again, according to your math, every single PC in the world has been infected by viruses thousands of times each, since there are only 7,600 PCs in the world.
I have never had a virus or a malware attack. No one in my family has either. We all use Macs. None of my friends who have Macs have ever experienced a virus or malware attack.
Yet, many of my friends have. My wife uses a PC and gets some kind of virus or malware attack at least twice a year, and she uses Avast antivirus. I can count at least 20 personal friends who have had viruses on their PCs, and I know of many others through different forums who have complained online about a virus affecting their PCs.
Why on Earth would I want to be part of the group that is constantly complaining about viruses attacking them. I'm much happier being with the group that doesn't seem to ever get these problems... except for the mysterious person online who claims that it has happened. Real numbers speak volumes.
And, we look better too with our shiny, expensive machines. We also get all the hot chicks cause they dig a guy with money to burn! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kheldar
Joined: 26 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Chokse wrote: |
| I have never had a virus or a malware attack |
Me neither. I've been using PCs since 1990.
| Chokse wrote: |
| Real numbers speak volumes. And, we look better too with our shiny, expensive machines. We also get all the hot chicks cause they dig a guy with money to burn! |
That last sentence speaks volumes about you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chokse
Joined: 22 May 2009
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can't say "me neither" to a string of words taken out of context.
Or, are you saying that you know absolutely no one who has ever experienced a virus or malware attack on his/her PC.
I doubt you can honestly say that, and as such saying "me neither" makes you seem obtuse or that you just don't get the meaning and nuances of the English language.
And about me, yes, guilty as charged. Money, toys, and hot girls (or guys if that's your thing) make life better. You'll get no apology from me about that, since it's a pretty universal concept. But, the point that was lost on you is that I have never seen a girl strike up a conversation with a guy because he was using a PC.
I have, however, seen it happen several times when a guy was sitting there with his MacBook. Back in my single days, I met quite a few girls who came over to talk because they thought Macs looked great and wanted to see one up close. Even dated a few of them. It was a great way to meet girls, though I can't say the same would work for the average guy sitting there with a plastic PC.
So, imagine that, I was able to get all of my work done, I was able to avoid all viruses and malware, and I was able to meet girls.... all with my "shiny" machine made by Apple.
Sounds like a pretty damn good deal to me! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crescent

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Location: yes.
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kheldar wrote: |
| I'm glad you won't invite me because I already posted a Mac virus earlier that infected up to 50 Macs - almost half of all Macs ever produced! If you click on the link I provided, you can read all about it and you wouldn't have to be waiting. |
You don't even know what a virus is. You posted a code that was directly implanted into "up to" 50 computers.
Don't you think Symantec, if this were actually true, would know the exact number of infected computers, instead of just guessing an approximate number, albeit extremely negligible.
They sell Antivirus, and they found hackers who wrote a concept code, and here you are taking it as the real thing.
If you want to make a point, at least get some proof it really exists. At least know what you are talking about if you're going to keep arguing about it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kheldar
Joined: 26 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| crescent wrote: |
| Don't you think Symantec, if this were actually true, would know the exact number of infected computers, instead of just guessing an approximate number, albeit extremely negligible. |
Don't you think if it wasn't a virus, Symantec wouldn't list it as one? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crescent

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Location: yes.
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kheldar wrote: |
| crescent wrote: |
| Don't you think Symantec, if this were actually true, would know the exact number of infected computers, instead of just guessing an approximate number, albeit extremely negligible. |
Don't you think if it wasn't a virus, Symantec wouldn't list it as one? |
Please learn to read. Then, go back to the Symantec link, and read the three little words in the Macarena description that you have repeatedly been ignoring even though I defined them for you. If you don't believe me, try this neat little search engine out there called Google to see what those three words actually mean.
I'm confident you can handle this.
Now, to handle your question as to why Symantec (only one of many antivirus companies) is passing off a "virus" from 2006 as a CURRENT threat.... well, if the answer doesn't strike you in a few minutes then it's time you find something else to argue about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kheldar
Joined: 26 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| crescent wrote: |
Please learn to read. Then, go back to the Symantec link, and read the three little words in the Macarena description that you have repeatedly been ignoring even though I defined them for you. If you don't believe me, try this neat little search engine out there called Google to see what those three words actually mean.
I'm confident you can handle this. Don't let us down.
Now, to handle your question as to why Symantec (one of many antivirus companies) is listing a "virus" from 2006 as a CURRENT threat.... well, if the answer doesn't strike you in a few minutes then it's time you find something else to argue about. |
Yes, I can read. It says: "It's a virus." If you think you can convince people your definition of a "virus" trumps Symantec's, the world's largest security software company, you really are living in a fantasy world.
One of the earliest viruses was the "stoned" virus where it caused a message to say "Your PC is stoned!" Ironically enough, a different version of it affected older Macs (so there's another virus for you). Pretty harmless but it was still a "virus" according to the definition of a virus. Since then, that virus, along with thousands of others, no longer affect current Windows machines much like OSX.Macarena no longer affects current Macs.
Mac instructions written by Apple clearly states not only can Macs be infected with viruses, they recommend an anti-virus software like Symantec. This was probably written by your master, Steve Jobs. Are you going to DEFY your master? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crescent

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Location: yes.
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kheldar wrote: |
| crescent wrote: |
Please learn to read. Then, go back to the Symantec link, and read the three little words in the Macarena description that you have repeatedly been ignoring even though I defined them for you. If you don't believe me, try this neat little search engine out there called Google to see what those three words actually mean.
I'm confident you can handle this. Don't let us down.
Now, to handle your question as to why Symantec (one of many antivirus companies) is listing a "virus" from 2006 as a CURRENT threat.... well, if the answer doesn't strike you in a few minutes then it's time you find something else to argue about. |
Yes, I can read. It says: "It's a virus." If you think you can convince people your definition of a "virus" trumps Symantec's, the world's largest security software company, you really are living in a fantasy world.
Mac instructions written by Apple states not only can Macs be infected with viruses, they recommend an anti-virus software like Symantec. This was probably written by your master, Steve Jobs. Are you going to DEFY your master? |
Woa, you let me down. I though you could handle this. You did well with the reading part, but I see you still need help with the Googling part. I never expected you to take my word for it.
And before you go twisting things even more, I'll spell this out again for you again. I have never said Mac cannot get a virus. I said there are no Mac viruses in the wild. And, I'm not doubting where you found that information posted by Apple, but care to show a link?.. because you don't seem to be doing well in the comprehension part of things.
Lastly, for the record... I think Steve Jobs is a total dickhead. Did you get that? However, he's done the industry a world of good, and I am not going to act as childish as the lot who refuse to by Apple on the premise that Jobs is an ass. If something better comes along, I will be the first to dump my Mac like I dumped my PC running that bloated copycat OS.
I'll be waiting for that link if you want to continue wasting my time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kheldar
Joined: 26 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know all you Mac fans need constant attention but I thought I was responding to this.
| Quote: |
| Again, show me an actual "virus" (not trojan horse) out there right now that can affect the Mac OS. I'll wait while you find one |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chokse
Joined: 22 May 2009
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is neither crescent's definition nor is it Symantec's definition. It is THE definition of a computer virus. Here you go:
Computer Virus: A program that enters a computer�usually without the knowledge of the operator. Computer viruses spread from machine to machine on disks or, more commonly, over the Internet.
So, now do you understand what a "virus" is? If not, feel free to crack open the dictionary and read more about it. We'll wait. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chokse
Joined: 22 May 2009
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It says "out there right now". Do you understand what that means? There is no virus "out there" that affects the Mac. Trojan horses maybe, but not viruses.
Dude, we're basically saying that smallpox has been eradicated and you're saying no, it's alive and present because a few governments have live samples of the disease in freezers somewhere.
Its the same argument. If there is nothing actually affecting any computers, then it is nothing more than a concept and is not a reality.
So again, find me one that is "OUT THERE" right now, or even within the last several years (and a proof of concept virus does not count because it is not a real virus). Again, we'll wait for you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chokse
Joined: 22 May 2009
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Edit: Double Post.
Jeez, Dave's is really getting slow these days. Has anyone else noticed that. It sometimes takes a couple of minutes after submitting before a post goes through. It used to be right away. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kheldar
Joined: 26 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Chokse wrote: |
It says "out there right now". Do you understand what that means? There is no virus "out there" that affects the Mac. Trojan horses maybe, but not viruses.
Dude, we're basically saying that smallpox has been eradicated and you're saying no, it's alive and present because a few governments have live samples of the disease in freezers somewhere.
Its the same argument. If there is nothing actually affecting any computers, then it is nothing more than a concept and is not a reality.
So again, find me one that is "OUT THERE" right now, or even within the last several years (and a proof of concept virus does not count because it is not a real virus). Again, we'll wait for you. |
In that case, why invest time and money developing future vaccines because according to your theory we're already immune from any future outbreaks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chokse
Joined: 22 May 2009
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We predict the future by studying history. Did you miss that lesson in school too? History shows us that there have been many viruses, trojan horses, and worms on Windows. Therefore, by looking at the past, virus companies see the need to continue developing vaccines for Windows.
Meanwhile, most big name antivirus makers have sold very few copies of their programs on the Mac platform. In fact, there is so little money to be made (why would Mac users waste money on this?) that several antivirus makers have abandoned software for the Mac platform as their software is essentially obsolete. Even Symantec stopped making a Mac version for a few years.
And finally, why do you think Apple would suggest that Mac users get an antivirus software? The answer is simple and it's the reason this whole thread started. There are trojan horses, and if Apple has suggested that all users run antivirus software and the users don't, then Apple does not need to help those users when they bring their trojan horse infected computer to the Apple Center, as Apple has already instructed those users to run some software to prevent trojan horses.
So, in the end, Apple was right to deny service to these people because, according to the link you found, Apple had already warned users that malware was possible and that users should do something to prevent it.
Congratulations, you just made the argument needed to prove Apple did the right thing in denying service to these people since the people had already been warned. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|