Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Teaching material that is clearly over the kid's heads...
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
myenglishisno



Joined: 08 Mar 2011
Location: Geumchon

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:09 am    Post subject: Teaching material that is clearly over the kid's heads... Reply with quote

I've been teaching for quite awhile but this is the first time I've had to follow a relatively strict curriculum.

I'm free to approach the textbooks any way that I want but I have a time limit for how long I'm supposed to spend on the material and my co-teachers usually want the kids to answer the question pages of the textbooks in class. The questions are usually pretty concise and draw on vocabulary, grammar and ideas directly from the reading passages.

This is all fine and good however all classes use the same material regardless of their level. It's all one stream.

This is a problem I've been having since I've been in Korea. In my first month teaching here, my hagwon owner approached me and told me that the kid's mothers wanted me to teach them a Shakespeare sonnet. Problem was, the kids were second graders (in Elementary) and their level reflected that (before the Shakespeare sonnets I had been working on simple verbs and the past tense).

Why do so many parents want to teach materials that are so much over the kid's heads? Don't they realize that it's better to find material for the students level? Sometimes, the material would be too difficult for kids the same age in our home countries.

I saw the same thing in public school too. I saw what some of the other teachers were teaching and I wondered what the F they were trying to do considering the kids were still having a lot of difficulty forming basic sentences (ie: "Seongsangnim, me toilet is go, okay?!")

It just doesn't make sense to me. Then again, a lot of the Korean education system doesn't make sense to me. Does anyone know why this is and also, how do you deal with it? This is the first time I've really been forced to teach a specific way so any coping mechanisms would be great. The kids seem to be overwhelmed by the material and many of them are tuning out regardless of how much I dumb it down (and it's hard to dumb it down too much given the time constraints and requirements).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tatertot



Joined: 21 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't offer any suggestions, but I can commiserate with you. I often ponder this very thing. The only thing I can think of is that Korean culture somehow enables an ability to kind of "buy-in" to (what I, at least, consider to be) obviously false delusions.

The parents somehow believe that if their children take more difficult classes then they will learn more. In actuality, students will learn optimally by being placed at the appropriate level. I can't understand what the parents are thinking. I want to go on one of those variety/talk shows and tell all the parents that their kids will learn better if they just go to an appropriately difficult class and put effort into learning.

The Korean "brute force" approach to learning isn't very effective or efficient.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Cosmic Hum



Joined: 09 May 2003
Location: Sonic Space

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:40 am    Post subject: Re: Teaching material that is clearly over the kid's heads.. Reply with quote

myenglishisno wrote:
I've been teaching for quite awhile but this is the first time I've had to follow a relatively strict curriculum.

I'm free to approach the textbooks any way that I want but I have a time limit for how long I'm supposed to spend on the material and my co-teachers usually want the kids to answer the question pages of the textbooks in class. The questions are usually pretty concise and draw on vocabulary, grammar and ideas directly from the reading passages.

This is all fine and good however all classes use the same material regardless of their level. It's all one stream.

This is a problem I've been having since I've been in Korea. In my first month teaching here, my hagwon owner approached me and told me that the kid's mothers wanted me to teach them a Shakespeare sonnet. Problem was, the kids were second graders (in Elementary) and their level reflected that (before the Shakespeare sonnets I had been working on simple verbs and the past tense).

Why do so many parents want to teach materials that are so much over the kid's heads? Don't they realize that it's better to find material for the students level? Sometimes, the material would be too difficult for kids the same age in our home countries.

I saw the same thing in public school too. I saw what some of the other teachers were teaching and I wondered what the F they were trying to do considering the kids were still having a lot of difficulty forming basic sentences (ie: "Seongsangnim, me toilet is go, okay?!")

It just doesn't make sense to me. Then again, a lot of the Korean education system doesn't make sense to me. Does anyone know why this is and also, how do you deal with it? This is the first time I've really been forced to teach a specific way so any coping mechanisms would be great. The kids seem to be overwhelmed by the material and many of them are tuning out regardless of how much I dumb it down (and it's hard to dumb it down too much given the time constraints and requirements).


You are teaching a student with more than one head?
Wicked cool. Cool
Maybe the fact that the kid has more than one mother has something to do with the multiple heads.
I wonder if this has anything to do with Hwang OoSuck...messing with genetics...interesting results...wasn't he a bit of an overachiever, too?

Perhaps the mothers are justified in their high aspirations...it isn't every kid that has more than one head. It could be that the mothers firmly believe in the old expression...two heads are better than one.Very Happy


How do others deal with it?
...humor goes a long way to keeping you sane.
Just do your best and laugh off the insanity.
All in good fun...best of luck with your situation.


Last edited by The Cosmic Hum on Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
some waygug-in



Joined: 25 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

who's on the desk?

Shakespeare's on it.


That's lesson 1.


Lesson 2:

Who's on the sofa?


Shakespeare's on it.


Lesson 3:

Who's on crack?

The mother who requested this must be on it.


Best to agree with them, but then do what you think is best.

Korean parents never change.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SeoulNate



Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Location: Hyehwa

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had this problem at a former school I worked at where I wasn't allowed to choose my own books and material.

The best solution that I could come up with was to briefly cover the topic in the book for the day by doing simple conversation or writing exercises, then giving the students the answer sheets for the books to do for homework and then teaching whatever level appropriate material that I wanted.

This seemed to satisfy the other teachers and parents who just wanted to see that little Seok-ho had finished all of his work but actually came away with advanced English ability.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WadRUG'naDoo



Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Location: Shanghai

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:48 am    Post subject: Re: Teaching material that is clearly over the kid's heads.. Reply with quote

The Cosmic Hum wrote:
myenglishisno wrote:
I've been teaching for quite awhile but this is the first time I've had to follow a relatively strict curriculum.

I'm free to approach the textbooks any way that I want but I have a time limit for how long I'm supposed to spend on the material and my co-teachers usually want the kids to answer the question pages of the textbooks in class. The questions are usually pretty concise and draw on vocabulary, grammar and ideas directly from the reading passages.

This is all fine and good however all classes use the same material regardless of their level. It's all one stream.

This is a problem I've been having since I've been in Korea. In my first month teaching here, my hagwon owner approached me and told me that the kid's mothers wanted me to teach them a Shakespeare sonnet. Problem was, the kids were second graders (in Elementary) and their level reflected that (before the Shakespeare sonnets I had been working on simple verbs and the past tense).

Why do so many parents want to teach materials that are so much over the kid's heads? Don't they realize that it's better to find material for the students level? Sometimes, the material would be too difficult for kids the same age in our home countries.

I saw the same thing in public school too. I saw what some of the other teachers were teaching and I wondered what the F they were trying to do considering the kids were still having a lot of difficulty forming basic sentences (ie: "Seongsangnim, me toilet is go, okay?!")

It just doesn't make sense to me. Then again, a lot of the Korean education system doesn't make sense to me. Does anyone know why this is and also, how do you deal with it? This is the first time I've really been forced to teach a specific way so any coping mechanisms would be great. The kids seem to be overwhelmed by the material and many of them are tuning out regardless of how much I dumb it down (and it's hard to dumb it down too much given the time constraints and requirements).


You are teaching a student with more than one head?
Wicked cool. Cool
Maybe the fact that the kid has more than one mother has something to do with the multiple heads.
I wonder if this has anything to do with Hwang OoSuck...messing with genetics...interesting results...wasn't he a bit of an over achiever, too?

Perhaps the mothers are justified in their high aspirations...it isn't every kid that has more than one head. It could be that the mothers firmly believe in the old expression...two heads are better than one.Very Happy


How do others deal with it?
...humor goes a long way to keeping you sane.
Just do your best and laugh off the insanity.
All in good fun...best of luck with your situation.


How do you achieve an over? And what is an over?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
myenglishisno



Joined: 08 Mar 2011
Location: Geumchon

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:18 am    Post subject: Re: Teaching material that is clearly over the kid's heads.. Reply with quote

WadRUG'naDoo wrote:

How do you achieve an over? And what is an over?


It's the opposite of an under, of course. Duh.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
soupsandwich



Joined: 20 May 2011

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
From fairest creatures we desire increase,
That thereby beauty's rose might never die,
But as the riper should by time decease,
His tender heir might bear his memory:
But thou contracted to thine own bright eyes,
Feed'st thy light's flame with self-substantial fuel,
Making a famine where abundance lies,
Thy self thy foe, to thy sweet self too cruel:
Thou that art now the world's fresh ornament,
And only herald to the gaudy spring,
Within thine own bud buriest thy content,
And tender churl mak'st waste in niggarding:
Pity the world, or else this glutton be,
To eat the world's due, by the grave and thee.



Yeah...best of luck teaching that to second graders whose first language is not English. I'm not saying it can't be done....but, it would be beyond me.



soupsandwich
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
soupsandwich



Joined: 20 May 2011

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok kids, today we are going to learn about.....iambic pentameters!!!!!!



Hip Hip...Hor.............ray?




soupsandwich
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fishead soup



Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Location: Korea

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't teach it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They have to master situational English conversation. Shakespear is something that University students have problems with.
Even in University I used Coles Notes.
It sounds like you need an intervention with a Kyopo(Korean who lived most of their life abroad)

You're employer lives in an Ivory Tower and needs to be told that he/she does.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
nathanrutledge



Joined: 01 May 2008
Location: Marakesh

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's it mean "to teach?" You want the kids to learn the meaning of the sonnet and be able to explain it in detail? Or do you just want them to memorize it and be able to recite it? Plenty of kids back home learn a famous quote or passage or speech when they are young and say it from memory at a school event.

I'd say don't take it so seriously and do it. Make it fun by having the kids put a lot of emotion into parts. They'll probably get a kick out of it, if you do it right (big hand gestures, loud voice/soft voice, etc).

Now, if you're talking about getting them to be able to understand it and explain it and doing this with many difficult texts - no, big waste of time. But if you're only talking 1 piece 1 time, make it into a couple of lessons. First lesson, introduce it and practice getting them to read/say the words. Get them to memorize the parts. Second lesson, actually talk about the meaning. Sure, not going to be useful for much other than making mom happy, but it's not impossible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
meangradin



Joined: 10 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 6:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Problem was, the kids were second graders (in Elementary) and their level reflected that (before the Shakespeare sonnets I had been working on simple verbs and the past tense).



that's an accomplishment for a second grader, so well done.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Geumchondave



Joined: 28 Oct 2010

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 6:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Teaching material that is clearly over the kid's heads.. Reply with quote

myenglishisno wrote:
WadRUG'naDoo wrote:

How do you achieve an over? And what is an over?


It's the opposite of an under, of course. Duh.



Bloody americans....... what is an over indeed, an over is the exact amount of time it takes the finish a pimms and lemonade whilst watching people throw a cricket ball around
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Juregen



Joined: 30 May 2006

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tatertot wrote:


The parents somehow believe that if their children take more difficult classes then they will learn more. In actuality, students will learn optimally by being placed at the appropriate level.


Personally I prefer a n+1 approach.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
winterfall



Joined: 21 May 2009

PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Welcome to Korea Laughing

On a more serious note, Korean perception is that they already know all the "Easy" words like "Car, tree, house, weekends" That this isn't something that should be taught. Because they already "Know" it. If any of us talked to them we both know they don't know it.

Its a cultural thing. And chances are their parents also learned this way, obscure very high level situationally specific vocabulary like "Excrement" but they usually bypass the ability to use it right. Like "I toilet excrement" Who in the world says that whenever they've got to douche???? Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International