| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ED209
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Steelrails wrote: |
| Now this is police misconduct. I don't know about the shooting, but there is absolutely no reason to confiscate and smash videos recording the incident. The cops responsible should be charged with destruction of property and assault. |
Unless someone didn't pay their student loans. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Steelrails wrote: |
| Now this is police misconduct. I don't know about the shooting, but there is absolutely no reason to confiscate and smash videos recording the incident. The cops responsible should be charged with destruction of property and assault. |
I believe some states have laws regarding video taping people without their consent.
/shrug |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
soupsandwich
Joined: 20 May 2011
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Oh, so now we just imagine whatever is necessary to justify police brutality? There is NOTHING to suggest contradiction of ANY of the negatives ontheway listed. |
Watch..the..video........you don't see what happened before the the the guy started filming.
Nobody knows... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ontheway
Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| soupsandwich wrote: |
| Watch..the..video........you don't see what happened before the the the guy started filming. |
That's quite astute. Every time you watch a video, you don't see what happened before the guy started filming. Call the Nobel committee, I smell laurels.
| soupsandwich wrote: |
| Nobody knows... |
It's only possible that nobody knows if nobody was there. But, wait a minute, there were people there. So, people do know. There were witnesses who saw the man, the car and the cops.
But, no witness claims that the man had a gun, held a gun, or waved a gun and no witness claims that he refused to leave the car. The man had no reasonable, prudent opportunity to leave the car. He was gunned down in cold blood by a gang of blue suited thugs pretending to be police officers.
The witnesses, and there were many, will tell the tale. There could even be other videos. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
soupsandwich
Joined: 20 May 2011
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| by a gang of blue suited thugs pretending to be police officers |
That actually makes more sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ED209 wrote: |
| Steelrails wrote: |
| Now this is police misconduct. I don't know about the shooting, but there is absolutely no reason to confiscate and smash videos recording the incident. The cops responsible should be charged with destruction of property and assault. |
Unless someone didn't pay their student loans. |
Seizing property is perfectly acceptable when it comes to non-payment of loans. Willfully not paying is tantamount to fraud.
Completely different ideas at work here. An innocent bystander documenting a public event involving action of the state should NEVER have their camera confiscated by the state. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SeoulFinn

Joined: 27 Feb 2006 Location: 1h from Seoul
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Watch..the..video........you don't see what happened before the the the guy started filming.
Nobody knows... |
There's another video out there filmed from different angle.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gDs-Wp_TN2c
Not sure whether the guy or the police shot those earlier rounds you can hear on the video, but I think that the 1st shots forced the fugitive to stop. Maybe there were shots fired even earlier? Why else would someone video the street for nothing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|