Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

'Captain America' Title Changed In Russia, Ukraine, South Ko
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rainism



Joined: 13 Apr 2011

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

same allegation can be made about the movie and book Shogun.

yet, once again Blackthorne is based on an actual whitey character who lived in Japan during those times and stayed there for the duration of his life.

and Toranaga is just as much the hero of the story as Blackthorne is, as the master manipulator of all pieces on the chessboard. Blackthorne, valuable as he was, was merely a chess piece.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shifter2009



Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Location: wisconsin

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rainism wrote:
shifter2009 wrote:
cj1976 wrote:
You don't need to be Korean or anti-American to realise what a cheesy, cringeworthy concept Captain America really is. The comic was created a long time ago, and world has changed.


The character was created in world war 2 and the movie is largely set there. It works. PC jerks can ruin anything anymore.


I'm as ANTI politically correct as one can get but to portray Capt America as standing up for all that's "good" is America's propaganda counterpart to the Nazi office of Joseph Goebbels. Thing is, the Nazis were destroyed yet the spirit of Goebbels lives in today's Amerikka, as evidenced by names such as "the Patriot act" , " Homeland Security". etc.

I'd be far more interested in a movie about this Capt America comic book story:

Quote:
In the 2006-2007 "Civil War" crossover, Captain America opposes mandatory federal registration of all super-powered beings, which he sees as an erosion of civil liberties for the superhero community, and leads the Anti-Registration faction and resistance movement.


Yeah, but the current captain america is all about being a man out of time. The great warrior of the greatest generation lost in a world were there are so many shades of grey. Captain America represents American ideals which are awesome, its our fall through that sucks so bad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shifter2009



Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Location: wisconsin

PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2011 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Triban wrote:
As for The Last Samurai:

HE WAS ALREADY A SOLDIER TRAINED IN THE ART OF WARFARE.

HE USED BRUTAL TACTICS.

HE FOUGHT IN GENERAL CUSTER'S ARMY.

HE WAS A MILITARY OFFICER, WHICH BACK THEN, MEANT YOU HAD BALLS OF CAST IRON AND WIN.

He also practices every day. EVERY DAY.

I think I have made my point.

P.S. HE IS THE WHITE TIGER FFS

Frankly, I'd be more concerned with how he mastered the Japanese language so quickly


There is a difference between trained as a US Calvary soldier and a f'n Samurai. Knowledge of how to use a Calvary sabre just isn't going to be the same as a Katana. Yeah he practices every day for six months against guys who practiced everyday FOR THE ENTIRE LIVES! Tom Cruise would never get REAL ultimate power in 6 months. Takes at least seven.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
djloekee27



Joined: 08 Sep 2010

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 12:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rainism wrote:
shifter2009 wrote:
cj1976 wrote:
You don't need to be Korean or anti-American to realise what a cheesy, cringeworthy concept Captain America really is. The comic was created a long time ago, and world has changed.


The character was created in world war 2 and the movie is largely set there. It works. PC jerks can ruin anything anymore.


I'm as ANTI politically correct as one can get but to portray Capt America as standing up for all that's "good" is America's propaganda counterpart to the Nazi office of Joseph Goebbels. Thing is, the Nazis were destroyed yet the spirit of Goebbels lives in today's Amerikka, as evidenced by names such as "the Patriot act" , " Homeland Security". etc.

I'd be far more interested in a movie about this Capt America comic book story:

Quote:
In the 2006-2007 "Civil War" crossover, Captain America opposes mandatory federal registration of all super-powered beings, which he sees as an erosion of civil liberties for the superhero community, and leads the Anti-Registration faction and resistance movement.

Captain America 2 will be based in the present time, Marvel said that the first Cap will be the only period piece that they want to make (excluding any changes of mind that they might make in the future).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Triban



Joined: 14 Jul 2009
Location: Suwon Station

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 12:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

shifter2009 wrote:
Triban wrote:
As for The Last Samurai:

HE WAS ALREADY A SOLDIER TRAINED IN THE ART OF WARFARE.

HE USED BRUTAL TACTICS.

HE FOUGHT IN GENERAL CUSTER'S ARMY.

HE WAS A MILITARY OFFICER, WHICH BACK THEN, MEANT YOU HAD BALLS OF CAST IRON AND WIN.

He also practices every day. EVERY DAY.

I think I have made my point.

P.S. HE IS THE WHITE TIGER FFS

Frankly, I'd be more concerned with how he mastered the Japanese language so quickly


There is a difference between trained as a US Calvary soldier and a f'n Samurai. Knowledge of how to use a Calvary sabre just isn't going to be the same as a Katana. Yeah he practices every day for six months against guys who practiced everyday FOR THE ENTIRE LIVES! Tom Cruise would never get REAL ultimate power in 6 months. Takes at least seven.


You a basing this off of a normal human. Tom Cruise is white tiger incarnate.

/thread
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rainism wrote:
Furthermore, I don't have a problem with Hollywood telling stories from a whitey American point of view because I think it's driven by pure economics rather than any racist tendencies. They make their biggest bank in America and America remain overwhelmingly white.


nukeday wrote:
At least Americans don't VOICE their white pride over those movies.

"OMG, older sister! I'm totally going to watch Glory because it's starring a white guy like me, Matthew Broderick!"

Unlike how Koreans feel about, say, "Ninja Assassin" and to a lesser extent, "GI Joe." I probably would've never heard of "Ninja Assassin" if I didn't live in Korea.


Well, one of you is right, but not both.

I'll agree with rainism on this way. Nothing wrong in appealing to your audience.

I mean, I think the American audience is one of the more jingoistic out there.

If 'Glory' or 'The Last Samurai' or had all ethnic casts they'd be relegated to at best 'Waiting to Exhale'/'Friday'/'Crouching Tiger' territory where they get moderate interest from non-ethnic viewers.

To say nothing of the fact that I'm guessing a good 60% of Americans will not watch subtitled movies and can count the number of foreign films they've seen on one hand. Roger Ebert mentions this

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100324/REVIEWS/100329996/0/reviews04

Now consider the fact that the movie theaters are packed here with people watching subtitled Hollywood films starring people who don't look like them, and you really have to wonder about which audience is more jingoistic.

Quote:
You a basing this off of a normal human. Tom Cruise is white tiger incarnate.


True, plus if Morgan Freeman was alive in the Civil War he could just speak and people would follow because he has 'the Voice'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tiger fancini



Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Location: Testicles for Eyes

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 5:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steelrails wrote:
At least its getting released here. Somehow I doubt it's being released in say, Pakistan.

That being said, Hollywood is as guilty as anyone for these kind of antics.

The Mexican, starring Brad Pitt.

The Last Samurai, starring Tom Cruise.

Amistad, starring Matthew McCounaghy

Glory, starring Matthew Broderick

Notice anything about those?


Robin Hood, Prince of Thieves, starring Kevin Costner.

He didn't even try to sound British. Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
nukeday



Joined: 13 May 2010

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 7:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now consider the fact that the movie theaters are packed here with people watching subtitled Hollywood films starring people who don't look like them, and you really have to wonder about which audience is more jingoistic.

[/quote]

C'mon, man. So basically, every single country on Earth is less jingoistic than America because they watch Hollywood films but not many Americans watch foreign films. And, actually, in my opinion people who do watch American films tend to over-praise them, seemingly for the mere fact that they are foreign. For example, I fell asleep during "Chaser," but it got pretty good reviews. "Easily the best cop thriller since The Departed." Yikes!

If Korea had a movie industry that could pump out mindless CGI-driven action movies like Transformers with an all-Korean cast and soundtrack, they would never look back. Unfortunately, the best they could do in that genre was D-war and Goemul...and those big releases are often years apart. Other than that, what other American movies do they watch?

A better question is, how many non-Korean OR American movies do Koreans watch? Find me a Korean who knows who Werner Herzog is. Hopefully he'll use a Korean actor soon.


Last edited by nukeday on Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tiger fancini wrote:
Steelrails wrote:
At least its getting released here. Somehow I doubt it's being released in say, Pakistan.

That being said, Hollywood is as guilty as anyone for these kind of antics.

The Mexican, starring Brad Pitt.

The Last Samurai, starring Tom Cruise.

Amistad, starring Matthew McCounaghy

Glory, starring Matthew Broderick

Notice anything about those?


Robin Hood, Prince of Thieves, starring Kevin Costner.

He didn't even try to sound British. Sad


Unlike some other Robin Hoods . . .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Old fat expat



Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Location: a caravan of dust, making for a windy prairie

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 12:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The question was not about movies though.

The question was about marketing of a particular brand.

Why did (I'm guessing) a high profile marketing company make that decision as it directly relates to the USA brand?--South Korea's most important defense partner.

Really, I genuinely wanted to understand the reasoning. I still don't really know how to think about this.

But straight away the defensive stance. Americans do the same thing blah blah. I'm not interested in the States at this point. I have a fairly good take on what goes on there and why the movie was made.

What I don't know is the thinking that went on here-in Korea. I was hoping Capt. Korea would have talked to his friend.

Apology for grumpyness, can't get the Super 15 to stream. Oh! the humanity. think I'll open another Monthieths.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captain Corea



Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 12:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I didn't see him or his kid at the apt playground of late. I've talked to him about his biz before, but never about the specifics in choosing titles and such.

Now that the rain has let up, maybe I'll run into him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Old fat expat



Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Location: a caravan of dust, making for a windy prairie

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

apologies for the mis-spell Captain Corea
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captain Corea



Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 3:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Old fat expat wrote:
apologies for the mis-spell Captain Corea


Hell, most people spell it Captain Apologist. So I'm just happy that in your grumpy state, you even tried to get the name right. lol
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Sat Jul 09, 2011 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nukeday wrote:
Now consider the fact that the movie theaters are packed here with people watching subtitled Hollywood films starring people who don't look like them, and you really have to wonder about which audience is more jingoistic.



C'mon, man. So basically, every single country on Earth is less jingoistic than America because they watch Hollywood films but not many Americans watch foreign films. And, actually, in my opinion people who do watch American films tend to over-praise them, seemingly for the mere fact that they are foreign. For example, I fell asleep during "Chaser," but it got pretty good reviews. "Easily the best cop thriller since The Departed." Yikes!

If Korea had a movie industry that could pump out mindless CGI-driven action movies like Transformers with an all-Korean cast and soundtrack, they would never look back. Unfortunately, the best they could do in that genre was D-war and Goemul...and those big releases are often years apart. Other than that, what other American movies do they watch?

A better question is, how many non-Korean OR American movies do Koreans watch? Find me a Korean who knows who Werner Herzog is. Hopefully he'll use a Korean actor soon.[/quote]

I have seen plenty of French and Italian films here while channel surfing. Classics too.

And a lot of people here are really into classic film stars as well. Audrey Hepburn has a huge following. Gene Kelly does pretty well as well.

But yes, they will generally watch CGI stuff from American films. I mean we are talking about masses of people for that.

Heck Americans break down their movies along racial lines even when the same language is being spoken.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joe Boxer



Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Location: Bundang, South Korea

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Captain Corea wrote:
Old fat expat wrote:
apologies for the mis-spell Captain Corea


Hell, most people spell it Captain Apologist. So I'm just happy that in your grumpy state, you even tried to get the name right. lol
Well, I think you should change your handle to "The First Ajossi".
Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International