|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| asutrack wrote: |
Do you think really think Immigration has a "paper trail" for 25-30,000 teachers being here illegally? If there were I can't help but imagine there would be large numbers of daily arrests/deportations being conducted and that would definitely be on the front page DAILY. I am sure there are MANY illegal teachers here but 20-30,000?
I am thinking there classification of "illegal" teachers might be a bit loose. |
TUM is citing statistics that are five years old. On top of that, as you point out, it would be a much bigger deal if half the teachers here were here illegally. In addition, if there were a paper trail they'd likely be able to catch these offenders. Finally, when you're saying that 50% of NETs are here illegally, anecdotal evidence actually does come into play, as it's such a high number that it would be impossible to live here for very long without encountering a large number of illegal workers.
I'm guessing there's also a broad definition in play, i.e. counting anyone who has worked illegally (moonlighting, privates) as illegal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| asutrack wrote: |
Do you think really think Immigration has a "paper trail" for 25-30,000 teachers being here illegally? If there were I can't help but imagine there would be large numbers of daily arrests/deportations being conducted and that would definitely be on the front page DAILY. I am sure there are MANY illegal teachers here but 20-30,000?
I am thinking there classification of "illegal" teachers might be a bit loose. |
It's possible...but there are many methods to track illegals. If someone has no visible means of support yet continues to live here...if someone does visa runs every few months, if someone works at a place he has no proper documentation for...
As for why doesn't Immigration do anything about it? Every so often (as my link shows) they do some token arrests. But they have consistently complained about a lack of manpower and resources for this problem. And there are politics at play too. You start turning "tourists" away from your borders (some of whom might be legitimate) and other countries might start returning the favour or tightening up visa regulations. And if all illegals left tomorrow...there would simply not be enough warm bodies left to fill all the jobs available. Plus you never know...that foreigner you are hassling might be the private tutor of the daughter of Samsung's CEO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| northway wrote: |
| asutrack wrote: |
Do you think really think Immigration has a "paper trail" for 25-30,000 teachers being here illegally? If there were I can't help but imagine there would be large numbers of daily arrests/deportations being conducted and that would definitely be on the front page DAILY. I am sure there are MANY illegal teachers here but 20-30,000?
I am thinking there classification of "illegal" teachers might be a bit loose. |
TUM is citing statistics that are five years old. . |
As I pointed out already. Now we have more than 7800 legal teachers...is it such a stretch to assume that we have more than 20,000 illegals? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| northway wrote: |
[s. Finally, when you're saying that 50% of NETs are here illegally, anecdotal evidence actually does come into play, as it's such a high number that it would be impossible to live here for very long without encountering a large number of illegal workers.
I'm guessing there's also a broad definition in play, i.e. counting anyone who has worked illegally (moonlighting, privates) as illegal. |
Unless you actually checked out their passport or asked to see their alien card how would you be able to tell if they were illegal or not? Isn't it true that for all you know a good proportion of the foreigners you met over your time here may have well been illegal?
Very few people are going to admit to a perfect stranger or to anyone except close friends that they are here illegally. So what kind of "anecdotal evidence" would you expect there would be? Seriously...? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
1) It's well-known fact that immigration has tightened things up a lot. I don't understand why you're operating on the assumption that said tightening has accomplished nothing in terms of changing the numbers. Immigration wasn't particularly stringent about visas before, and as such it's understandable that more teachers would have been here illegally. I don't think it would fly these days.
2) I'm pretty sure I would've noticed if huge numbers of people were heading to Japan or China every three months or so.
3) I'm not denying that there are large numbers of illegal teachers, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say there's no way in hell that it's 50%. Given how many public school and uni teachers there are, and that fact that it's awfully difficult for such teachers to be here illgally, the vast majority of hagwon teachers would have to be here illegally in order for your highly speculative assessment to be correct. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
danwom
Joined: 31 May 2011
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
It seems like this thread has gone tangent from the original post but I'd like to ask a question: What kind of credentials would you need to land a 3.2M job?
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
earthquakez
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Personally I have found that monocultural countries where immigration is not the norm tend to use 'statistics' as propaganda to keep their countries free of the movement of peoples that is normal in multicultural countries or countries that have real immigration intakes regardless of how low they are compared to western countries' intakes.
What the Urban Myth is forgetting is that it wasn't so long ago that self righteous Immigration offices such as that in Daejon which hounded foreigners and did so fairly recently in posters plastered around warning English teachers 'we are watching you' (a few years back) were noted for corruption. Bribes were normal in the 90s.
While certainly Immigration offices in Korea have cleaned up their acts they are not above misinforming the Korean public and openly lying about the so called problem of English teachers. I'd be surprised if the numbers of 'illegal' teachers are even a quarter of what is claimed. I can't believe the naivety of any foreign teacher who takes all this at face value.
It's like the 'statistics' on foreign English teachers supposedly abusing children etc. When you get to the bottom of it, you find out that the 'foreigners' were mostly Korean teachers, foreigners with Korean ethnicity etc have been the accused or guilty parties more than the standard non Korean ethnicity English teacher.
Given the laws governing alien registration etc which have been strict for foreign English teachers for about a decade or so, it's hard to see how all these so called illegal English teachers are living and working here. Koreans certainly put foreigners under much more intensive surveillance than in Japan for example and the fact that you cannot own your own working visa makes the so called 'statistics' even harder to believe.
As for people supposedly running in and out of the country to teach illegally - in your dreams. Korean Immigration is harsher than that of many countries I've lived and travelled in. It's propaganda and we will hear more of it as the economy gets worse, globalisation increases, and Koreans start to feel more and more xenophobic as they see more foreign faces in their country despite the fact that they feel entitled to live in our countries and not on year to year working visas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| northway wrote: |
1) It's well-known fact that immigration has tightened things up a lot. I don't understand why you're operating on the assumption that said tightening has accomplished nothing in terms of changing the numbers. Immigration wasn't particularly stringent about visas before, and as such it's understandable that more teachers would have been here illegally. I don't think it would fly these days.
2) I'm pretty sure I would've noticed if huge numbers of people were heading to Japan or China every three months or so.
3) I'm not denying that there are large numbers of illegal teachers, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say there's no way in hell that it's 50%. Given how many public school and uni teachers there are, and that fact that it's awfully difficult for such teachers to be here illgally, the vast majority of hagwon teachers would have to be here illegally in order for your highly speculative assessment to be correct. |
1. This "tightening" is only for legal teachers and only for those on an E-2. Could you perhaps list some of the ways this "tightening" has been accomplished and why illegal teachers couldn't have ducked it the way they did before? Specifics please.
2. You work at the airport and ferry terminals then? Also consider that not every illegal teacher would or needs to go on a visa run. If they are including people who do privates for example but who are here on an E-2...that would negate the need for said visa run.
3. Except it's not MY assessment...it's Immigration's assessment. I'm just going with their figures. Seriously I don't understand the need (with nothing other than a gut feeling to back it up) to deny that there are a huge amount of illegal teachers over here. They are not all from the Big Seven either. I've personally met Germans, Russians and one Turkish guy teaching at hakwons. There have also been a couple of threads a few years back about Russians/East Europeans teaching at English villages and passing themselves off as Americans/Canadians.
It's a multi-trillion won business...more than just a few people would like their share of that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| earthquakez wrote: |
Personally I have found that monocultural countries where immigration is not the norm tend to use 'statistics' as propaganda to keep their countries free of the movement of peoples that is normal in multicultural countries or countries that have real immigration intakes regardless of how low they are compared to western countries' intakes.
What the Urban Myth is forgetting is that it wasn't so long ago that self righteous Immigration offices such as that in Daejon which hounded foreigners and did so fairly recently in posters plastered around warning English teachers 'we are watching you' (a few years back) were noted for corruption. Bribes were normal in the 90s.
While certainly Immigration offices in Korea have cleaned up their acts they are not above misinforming the Korean public and openly lying about the so called problem of English teachers. I'd be surprised if the numbers of 'illegal' teachers are even a quarter of what is claimed. I can't believe the naivety of any foreign teacher who takes all this at face value.
It's like the 'statistics' on foreign English teachers supposedly abusing children etc. When you get to the bottom of it, you find out that the 'foreigners' were mostly Korean teachers, foreigners with Korean ethnicity etc have been the accused or guilty parties more than the standard non Korean ethnicity English teacher.
Given the laws governing alien registration etc which have been strict for foreign English teachers for about a decade or so, it's hard to see how all these so called illegal English teachers are living and working here. Koreans certainly put foreigners under much more intensive surveillance than in Japan for example and the fact that you cannot own your own working visa makes the so called 'statistics' even harder to believe.
As for people supposedly running in and out of the country to teach illegally - in your dreams. Korean Immigration is harsher than that of many countries I've lived and travelled in. It's propaganda and we will hear more of it as the economy gets worse, globalisation increases, and Koreans start to feel more and more xenophobic as they see more foreign faces in their country despite the fact that they feel entitled to live in our countries and not on year to year working visas. |
Oh please. What more intensive surveillance have you been subjected to? Immigration following you around in unmarked cars? Police keeping tabs on what bars you visit? Come on give us the details.
And in doing so maybe you would like to source links for your claims above as well. Start with clear proof that Immigration is lying about the size of the illegal teacher population and not just your say-so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
1. This "tightening" is only for legal teachers and only for those on an E-2. Could you perhaps list some of the ways this "tightening" has been accomplished and why illegal teachers couldn't have ducked it the way they did before? Specifics please.
2. You work at the airport and ferry terminals then? Also consider that not every illegal teacher would or needs to go on a visa run. If they are including people who do privates for example but who are here on an E-2...that would negate the need for said visa run.
3. Except it's not MY assessment...it's Immigration's assessment. I'm just going with their figures. Seriously I don't understand the need (with nothing other than a gut feeling to back it up) to deny that there are a huge amount of illegal teachers over here. They are not all from the Big Seven either. I've personally met Germans, Russians and one Turkish guy teaching at hakwons. There have also been a couple of threads a few years back about Russians/East Europeans teaching at English villages and passing themselves off as Americans/Canadians.
It's a multi-trillion won business...more than just a few people would like their share of that. |
1) The article you cited shows a tightening. My understanding is that in the past immigration didn't really check on schools, whereas now they do.
2) You're double-counting. You said:
| Quote: |
| There are around 30,000 legal teachers from the Big Seven and (Korean Immigration estimates) about as many again who are illegal |
I wouldn't be at all surprised if 50% of the teachers here engage in illegal side work. That's not the same thing as being in the country illegally.
3) Those are immigration's numbers from six years ago, prior to Christopher Neil, prior to immigration cracking down. They are not immigration's current numbers. Your number of 30,000 is speculative extrapolation from immigration's outdated speculation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
maladict23
Joined: 17 May 2011
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| northway wrote: |
| maladict23 wrote: |
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
| sirius black wrote: |
[Sorry, strongly disagree with this statement. Not sure of the number but I think there are less than 20,000 teachers in South Korea or there abouts. These are the total from 7 countries. Millions of graduates in total.
. |
Agreed that not that many people come to Korea out of the millions of graduates..but you are a bit off. There are around 30,000 legal teachers from the Big Seven and (Korean Immigration estimates) about as many again who are illegal. So that would make around 50-60 thousand teachers in S.K. |
Pmsl, I can't believe no one has pulled you up on that. You just 'think' there are an extra 20 or 30 thousand teachers without any statistical data to back you up. Did you know that 79% of statistics are made up on the spot? |
Yeah, somehow I don't think that half the foreigners I meet are working here illegally. |
Stop being a tit. I did not read Urban Myth's post properly, and I hold my hands up. Immigration did quote that number like he said.
No need or you to jump in two footed and put the boot in on him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| maladict23 wrote: |
Stop being a tit. I did not read Urban Myth's post properly, and I hold my hands up. Immigration did quote that number like he said.
No need or you to jump in two footed and put the boot in on him. |
...in 2005. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
maladict23
Joined: 17 May 2011
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| northway wrote: |
| maladict23 wrote: |
Stop being a tit. I did not read Urban Myth's post properly, and I hold my hands up. Immigration did quote that number like he said.
No need or you to jump in two footed and put the boot in on him. |
...in 2005. |
pmsl, you weirdo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| northway wrote: |
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
1. This "tightening" is only for legal teachers and only for those on an E-2. Could you perhaps list some of the ways this "tightening" has been accomplished and why illegal teachers couldn't have ducked it the way they did before? Specifics please.
2. You work at the airport and ferry terminals then? Also consider that not every illegal teacher would or needs to go on a visa run. If they are including people who do privates for example but who are here on an E-2...that would negate the need for said visa run.
3. Except it's not MY assessment...it's Immigration's assessment. I'm just going with their figures. Seriously I don't understand the need (with nothing other than a gut feeling to back it up) to deny that there are a huge amount of illegal teachers over here. They are not all from the Big Seven either. I've personally met Germans, Russians and one Turkish guy teaching at hakwons. There have also been a couple of threads a few years back about Russians/East Europeans teaching at English villages and passing themselves off as Americans/Canadians.
It's a multi-trillion won business...more than just a few people would like their share of that. |
1) The article you cited shows a tightening. My understanding is that in the past immigration didn't really check on schools, whereas now they do.
2) You're double-counting. You said:
| Quote: |
| There are around 30,000 legal teachers from the Big Seven and (Korean Immigration estimates) about as many again who are illegal |
I wouldn't be at all surprised if 50% of the teachers here engage in illegal side work. That's not the same thing as being in the country illegally.
3) Those are immigration's numbers from six years ago, prior to Christopher Neil, prior to immigration cracking down. They are not immigration's current numbers. Your number of 30,000 is speculative extrapolation from immigration's outdated speculation. |
The article I cited shows no such tightening. Immigration checks were occuring well before that. My first hakwon back in 2001 was checked up on.
As for double-counting I believe that it was your suggestion that Immigration was counting those who moonlight (like doing privates). I was merely conceeding that that was a possibility. But IF( and that's a big if) that is the case then that's Immigration's double count not mine.
As for speculation... I should think Immigration would have a better handle on the influx of foreigners than some posters on a message board. Yes Immigration has cracked down, yet this only affects legal teachers. Illegal teachers never bothered with the regulations before so more regulations aren't going to bother them that much. There are still illegal teachers here, so obviously they can still find loopholes to get through.
I'm still waiting for ONE link backing up a SINGLE thing the naysayers have said. I've done that, now it's your turn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Netz

Joined: 11 Oct 2004 Location: a parallel universe where people and places seem to be the exact opposite of "normal"
|
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ahhh..... the randomness of Dave's.
I guess this tthread didn't stray too far, since the OP was using code (F2) for "a warm body", and apparently found one.
You know, I never thought I'd be backing up TUM, but..... in all the time I've been here, easily half of the "teachers" I've met have been illegal. Albeit, most of them were working part time jobs that few people here are actually qualified to take (F visas), it did make them easier to spot.
I have to agree with the numbers that TUM and Immi are giving, based on my own "anecdotal" experience, because even to this day, a large number of people I meet in the ESL biz are working illgally, to one degree (or lack of degree) or another.
If you haven't been here long, or don't get out much, it's easy to dismiss these figures based on your own limited view, but the truth is there has been, is, and probably always will be, a large number of illegals working in ESL here.
Furthermore, as TUM noted, how would you ever really know, unless you saw their passport. The only way you would find out, is to report suspicious activity, and when that person "dissappears", I'd say you have your answer.
Again, this type of thing doesn't happen so much in the full time hagwon/PS circuit, but there's a boatload of PT jobs that practically cater to illegals, and because they are usually with large K Corps, or in the "fringe" area of ESL work, Immi looks the other way, and they have done so for a long, long time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|