|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kwangjuchicken

Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Location: I was abducted by aliens on my way to Korea and forced to be an EFL teacher on this crazy planet.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| some waygug-in wrote: |
Not sure if this has been mentioned,
One huge myth that seems to be common in this industry is the idea that because someone is a native speaker of English (or any other language for that matter), one will automatically be a better teacher.
In my ignorance, I first came to Korea believing such stuff as that. It took me a couple of years (perhaps more) to realize that I was not God's gift to the ESL community and that I had a lot to learn. (perhaps I am not finished learning that lesson yet)
I'm not saying that a native speaker can't be a good teacher, just that being a native speaker does not guarantee anything.
What it does seem to guarantee is that you will THINK you are a better teacher, just because you are a native speaker.
While I studied Korean (or tried to) I found that the worst teachers or tutors I could find were native speakers. They had no empathy with me as a student, often re-hashing things I already knew, but were unable or unwilling to explain things I asked about.
I asked myself,"Is this how I come across to my students?"
One thing I agree with Patrick about is that FT's in Korea should study Korean.
Not only to learn the language but to learn how vastly different Korean and English are,
to learn why translation is sometimes necessary for
low level students
and also to learn where too much translation is a hindrance rather than a help.
Also to be able to see where Korean students are coming from and why they have such trouble with certain concepts. |
A native teacher should have a strong background in a foreign language (any language) in order to understand what it is all about to learn a foreign langauge. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kennyftw
Joined: 08 Aug 2011
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kwangjuchicken wrote: |
| some waygug-in wrote: |
Not sure if this has been mentioned,
One huge myth that seems to be common in this industry is the idea that because someone is a native speaker of English (or any other language for that matter), one will automatically be a better teacher.
In my ignorance, I first came to Korea believing such stuff as that. It took me a couple of years (perhaps more) to realize that I was not God's gift to the ESL community and that I had a lot to learn. (perhaps I am not finished learning that lesson yet)
I'm not saying that a native speaker can't be a good teacher, just that being a native speaker does not guarantee anything.
What it does seem to guarantee is that you will THINK you are a better teacher, just because you are a native speaker.
While I studied Korean (or tried to) I found that the worst teachers or tutors I could find were native speakers. They had no empathy with me as a student, often re-hashing things I already knew, but were unable or unwilling to explain things I asked about.
I asked myself,"Is this how I come across to my students?"
One thing I agree with Patrick about is that FT's in Korea should study Korean.
Not only to learn the language but to learn how vastly different Korean and English are,
to learn why translation is sometimes necessary for
low level students
and also to learn where too much translation is a hindrance rather than a help.
Also to be able to see where Korean students are coming from and why they have such trouble with certain concepts. |
A native teacher should have a strong background in a foreign language (any language) in order to understand what it is all about to learn a foreign langauge. |
I disagree.
I hated learning Spanish when I was in high school. I had absolutely NO background whatsoever in ANY foreign language upon arriving in Korea. BUT, I went to college to be a teacher. Furthermore, I like kids, I like to help people and I understand how the young mind thinks. It doesn't take exposure and knowledge of another language to know how to teach ESL. It takes a person who has knowledge of educational techniques and awareness of how the human mind works and takes in knowledge.
I'd also like to add if you don't know to talk slow, use easy or level-appropriate words, and pronounce everything you say clearly before entering ESL--you should have stayed out and done something else. Nothing makes me more angry to see a "teacher" talk way too fast, garble his words and spit them out incomprehensibly even to me. I've known a few in the past and they had NO business teaching English. They should have stayed in basket weaving, or whatever their "career" was before coming to Korea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
carleverson
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
| Quote: |
| 6. Overseas experience looks good on a resume - Well 90% myth, some people may make something out of it. For the majority of people returning home it will be completely non-relevant though, and it doesn't open anymore opportunities than it does for the planeloads of immigrants arriving in your home country. |
Actually this holds true if the person DOES nothing to MAKE this experience useful, relevant and an added bonus to his employability.
A person who plays his cards right can make overseas experience work for him and open quite a few doors.
This of course will require more than sitting in a job doing the minimum to get by and an outlook that goes beyond taking a "year off" to go to asia.
Everyone makes these choices. |
This simply isn't true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
A native teacher should have a strong background in a foreign language (any language) in order to understand what it is all about to learn a foreign langauge.[/quote]
I disagree.
I hated learning Spanish when I was in high school. I had absolutely NO background whatsoever in ANY foreign language upon arriving in Korea. BUT, I went to college to be a teacher. Furthermore, I like kids, I like to help people and I understand how the young mind thinks. It doesn't take exposure and knowledge of another language to know how to teach ESL. It takes a person who has knowledge of educational techniques and awareness of how the human mind works and takes in knowledge.
I'd also like to add if you don't know to talk slow, use easy or level-appropriate words, and pronounce everything you say clearly before entering ESL--you should have stayed out and done something else. Nothing makes me more angry to see a "teacher" talk way too fast, garble his words and spit them out incomprehensibly even to me. I've known a few in the past and they had NO business teaching English. They should have stayed in basket weaving, or whatever their "career" was before coming to Korea.[/quote]
*****************************************************
Not knowing Spanish probably helped you more than you know. When I first entered Korea, I was always trying to answer people in Spanish. (because my brain had to get past the idea of learning yet another language)
I also studied French in university, so I was not unaware about learning languages.
Studying Indo-European languages really doesn't prepare you for what you will face in Asia. Before coming to Korea, I taught EFL in Mexico,
so I wasn't new to teaching either. This is what I was trying to explain, my past experience really wasn't all that helpful in Korea, in fact it gave me more of an ego-complex to get over first.
I agree with what you've said by the way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| carleverson wrote: |
| PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
| Quote: |
| 6. Overseas experience looks good on a resume - Well 90% myth, some people may make something out of it. For the majority of people returning home it will be completely non-relevant though, and it doesn't open anymore opportunities than it does for the planeloads of immigrants arriving in your home country. |
Actually this holds true if the person DOES nothing to MAKE this experience useful, relevant and an added bonus to his employability.
A person who plays his cards right can make overseas experience work for him and open quite a few doors.
This of course will require more than sitting in a job doing the minimum to get by and an outlook that goes beyond taking a "year off" to go to asia.
Everyone makes these choices. |
This simply isn't true. |
Actually it IS true and MANY people can show you how through what they have achieved.
Then again if you choose to believe that its not possible , that is your call. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruce W Sims
Joined: 08 Mar 2011 Location: Illinois; USA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kennyftw wrote: |
I disagree.
I hated learning Spanish when I was in high school. I had absolutely NO background whatsoever in ANY foreign language upon arriving in Korea. BUT, I went to college to be a teacher. Furthermore, I like kids, I like to help people and I understand how the young mind thinks. It doesn't take exposure and knowledge of another language to know how to teach ESL. It takes a person who has knowledge of educational techniques and awareness of how the human mind works and takes in knowledge.
I'd also like to add if you don't know to talk slow, use easy or level-appropriate words, and pronounce everything you say clearly before entering ESL--you should have stayed out and done something else. Nothing makes me more angry to see a "teacher" talk way too fast, garble his words and spit them out incomprehensibly even to me. I've known a few in the past and they had NO business teaching English. They should have stayed in basket weaving, or whatever their "career" was before coming to Korea. |
Though your post is brief I believe it speaks to the heart of the Teaching arts. Despite all of the fancy names and exotic curriculums in Teacher Education, the core of the art is to identify with a student and to guide them as they grow. Waaay too many teachers approach classes as though they are collections of objects to be worked on. Yet other folks approach classes as audiences to be entertained and whose adulation is a goal in itself.
I get pretty nervous when someone advertises a position as "no experience required" as it places a great a amount of faith in the ability of the individual to make do with "native intelligence". This may work at lower levels, but as a student progresses through their education the need to negotiate a hierarchy of increasingly difficult expectations requires coaching from an increasingly more sensitive and perceptive teacher. FWIW.
Best Wishes,
Bruce |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Carbon
Joined: 28 Jan 2011
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kennyftw wrote: |
I'd also like to add if you don't know to talk slow, use easy or level-appropriate words, and pronounce everything you say clearly... |
It's interesting how people take what they believe to be a common-sense approach to teaching, but it turns out to be equally wrong, just for different reasons. The above is a good example. I am sure it makes your job easier in that you get your ideas across, but you may actually be doing the students a disservice.
I am not commenting on your teaching necessarily here, just your rationale.
This makes a good case for how education can help make a teacher more effective. It sounds like your heart is in the right place, but you need to think of things from a learning perspective. What serves students better; slow speech, or natural speech? ('chunking') Easy words, or strong contextual clues facilitating inductive understanding? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shifty
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bruce W Sims wrote: |
Waaay too many teachers approach classes as though they are collections of objects to be worked on. Yet other folks approach classes as audiences to be entertained and whose adulation is a goal in itself.
I get pretty nervous when someone advertises a position as "no experience required" as it places a great a amount of faith in the ability of the individual to make do with "native intelligence".
Best Wishes,
Bruce |
Hi Bruce Baby!!
Koreans have their own ideas.
They want their charges to be inspired by the teacher so that they WANT to learn the language. The rest will follow of its own accord.
They want a teacher that can address an issue peculiar to Asians: Of the choking 'deer in headlights' perfection, when asked to produce something in English.
On both counts a young inexperienced teacher is better qualified to relate to the students and deliver the goods, cheaper to boot.
Let's take an analogy. In South Africa you want a white kid to learn a black language. Do you choose someone that he/she thinks is cool, or do you opt for the stodgy old bore?
Offhand I can tell you, given the cultural divide, the white kid will have the worst of attitudes with the old codger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
wow.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruce W Sims
Joined: 08 Mar 2011 Location: Illinois; USA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the surface, Shifty, your logic would follow, IF the goal of the class were simply communication. Unfortunately, the goal, as I understand it is to learn the English language, one subset of which is communication. In the communicative model that I follow, there are some clear---perhaps even correct---criticisms that the intellectual aspect of English (IE. grammar; syntax; context) take a backseat. I, personally, have not found this to be the case, but have spent time in the company of folks for whom this criticism might find ground. FWIW.
Best Wishes,
Bruce |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I think there is a certain portion of Korean society who would certainly agree with Shifty.
When I started in Korea, I worked at an adult hagwon and that was pretty much the attitude I faced.
I'm not saying it's right or even a good attitude, and neither is Shifty by the way, but it is quite prevalent.
The question becomes, do you give 'em what they want or what they need? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris.Quigley
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 Location: Belfast. N Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I 100% disagree with #6. Overseas experience does look good. The problem is that you have to use it to complement something else. By itself it means nothing.
For example, say I was applying for a job working for a financial services firm in HongKong. I have a masters in finance and 4 years work experience for an investment bank in the United States. Oh, and I lived in Korea for 3 years. (hypothetical)
Do they care that I taught English? No. Do they care that it was Korea? No. Does it say something about me? Yes, actually it might say a lot.
It says that I can adapt to a new environment - something that is important when moving to another country. It says that I can work with people of different cultural backgrounds. It says that I can stick things out when they get difficult.
How do I know this? Because I talk to recruiters for accounting firms (because I am studying accounting). One of the first things they ask me about is Korea. It leads to at least a five minute conversation about what I learned from my experience, what I liked, what I didn't like. It gives me an opportunity to separate myself from the 100 other applicants. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
silkhighway
Joined: 24 Oct 2010 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Chris.Quigley wrote: |
How do I know this? Because I talk to recruiters for accounting firms (because I am studying accounting). One of the first things they ask me about is Korea. It leads to at least a five minute conversation about what I learned from my experience, what I liked, what I didn't like. It gives me an opportunity to separate myself from the 100 other applicants. |
I think once you actually start looking for a job and are talking from a point of view as a prospective employee and not a student being humoured by a recruiter, you're going to have a different perspective. Especially in a field as technical and dry as accounting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shifty
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| some waygug-in wrote: |
I'm not saying it's right or even a good attitude, and neither is Shifty by the way, but it is quite prevalent.
|
Thankyou wayguk-in, for highlighting that it is NOT ME saying it's a good thing. Since there appears to be confusion in some quarters.
Yeah, first law of salesmanship: Find out what the customer wants and give it to him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shifty
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Chris.Quigley wrote: |
| How do I know this? Because I talk to recruiters for accounting firms (because I am studying accounting). One of the first things they ask me about is Korea. It leads to at least a five minute conversation about what I learned from my experience, what I liked, what I didn't like. It gives me an opportunity to separate myself from the 100 other applicants. [/b] |
I'm afraid you'll find the recruiter knows someone that has gone to K or thinking of going, and is displaying a mawkish interest.
As for the lengthy conversation getting you more exposure; I think recruiters are pretty much hard-headed and apparent chumminess is only wishful thinking on your part. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|