Korean Job Discussion Forums

[Chokse]

You used the global warming issue to illustrate the evils of Murdoch and Fox. Fair enough, but in doing so you opened the issue to debate. If you don't want people discussing it, then don't bring it up.

Second, I made a post specifically about Murdoch and your issue with rich people you don't agree with, but I guess you missed it.

Seems that Hindsight (Ass-sight?) is the one that can't read, and he didn't even have to follow any links.

Tell you what. I'll post the comment again so you can read it, OK?

________________________________

Now, about Murdoch. Hate him if you want. Hate anyone if you want. Boycott whatever you want, but don't get all pissy when other people don't agree with your agenda or don't give a crap about it.

I will keep living my life exactly the way I have been living it, and if some of my money goes to Murdoch, so what? Plenty of my money goes to far worse people on a regular basis.

If you plan to avoid giving your money to anyone who is less than honorable, then you're not going to be able to spend your money anywhere. If you'd like, I can send you a bank account number and you can deposit your monthly pay directly to me... seeing as you can't spend it anywhere without helping some rich guy somewhere who is screwing anyone he can.

Do you not realize how many bad people there are out there in the world, doing exactly the kinds of things Murdoch does? What's your big plan for them? I'm all ears. Wake up to the reality of the world.


_________________________

So, I ask again. You seem to have the Murdoch bug up your ass, but what about all the other rich, powerful people who are exactly like him? What are you going to do about them. Are you planning to boycott all of them? If not, you're nothing but a poser with an agenda.

[Hindsight]

[Chokse]

So, are you afraid to answer the question, or just unable to answer it?

Either way, you've proven my point. You've got a vendetta against a single individual, rather than a cause about a larger issue.

[Hindsight]

[Chokse]

Wow. It took you almost a week to gather your thoughts enough to come up with this? Pathetic!

I don't believe in any organized religion, nor am I a member of one. I have not been inside a church or any other place of worship in over 25 years. Sorry to disappoint, but I'm not part of any silly religion, especially a Korean one (talk about nuts in the nuthouse!). And unlike the Moonies, I really don't care much for the majority of Koreans.

Now that I have answered your asinine question about my religious affiliation (or, as it turns out, lack there of), perhaps you can answer the now 9-day-old question of why you are ONLY targeting Murdoch. I have been clear that I don't particularly like the guy (I guess you were too daft to pick that sentence up in one of my previous posts), but I also said that HE IS ONLY ONE OF THOUSANDS out there who are lying and cheating their way to the top. You mention the Rev. Moon but don't suggest people boycott his businesses the way you strongly suggest people avoid Murdoch's businesses. I guess I have to give you a bit of credit for at least coming up with a single name in 9 days of searching, but I'm afraid that's not good enough, as the person you chose doesn't really rank up there with the likes of Murdoch. In fact, I think pairing the Rev. Moon with Murdoch is a bit of an insult to Murdoch.

So, let's go back to the question that has stumped you for over a week. Why are you only concerned with Murdoch? Why are you not criticizing the companies owned by other rich, powerful people- companies that do equally immoral and dangerous things, and the owners themselves. Hell, we can even find many of them here in Korea.

Am I going to have to wait another week for you to pull an "Assinine" answer out of your buttocks, Mr. Sight?

[Fat_Elvis]

I think Rupert Murdoch's behaviour goes above and beyond the usual level of anti-social and manipulative behaviour displayed by the rich and powerful. He has tried and often been successful in manipulating politics in Anglo-Saxon countries for years now, and actively edits the news in his own organisations for his own benefit - Keith Olbermann's recent revelations about why he was fired from the Fox sports channel is a good example of this. Also, the recent phone hacking scandal is a great example of the depths which the Murdoch media will plummet to in order to move units.

[Chokse]

Sounds like Nixon. So, my question remains, "Is he the only one?"

[TheUrbanMyth]

[Carbon]

You got passion, Hindsight...I'll give you that. A lot of off-topic banter in this thread despite your caustic efforts to keep it tight. It's contentious...people can't help themselves, as usual.

And what with me being a people, let me add some flavor to one pot and stir another.

On topic: Fox is the perpetrator of outright lies and sensationalism at best and one of the more egregious criminals, selling propaganda as journalism. Murdoch is a soulless sack of filth. One of many. Not the top of my 'if-I-were-invisible-who-would-I-pee-on' list, but a full bladder and a quick mention...

Off-topic: Global warming is a sham. Follow the money kids....one of the greater swindles of a generation.

Global warming is happening, but not for the reasons we are being sold. Bear in mind that man-made global warming is only a theory, where real scientific evidence points elsewhere. Read some Richard Lindzen. The more firmly one believes in this story, the more victimized by Murdoch and the ugly iceberg below him you are.

The latest few generations are growing up in a completely fabricated world that simply does not reflect reality, with global warming reasoning being illustrative. Young people are so distracted; I always smile thinking of the 19 year-old, buying some 'cool', 'gotta-have' item, as decided by a room full of old men.

What I am waiting for are the correlates between tree-hugging gullibility and Apple loyalty.

I digress.

[Sergio Stefanuto]

[Fat_Elvis]

[Sergio Stefanuto]

[TheUrbanMyth]