|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:35 pm Post subject: 10 Reasons why the state should not have murdered Troy |
|
|
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/sep/21/troy-davis-10-reasons
| Quote: |
In 2007 the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, the body which has the final say in the state on whether executions should go ahead, made a solemn promise. Troy Davis, the prisoner who is scheduled to die by lethal injection at 7pm local time on Wednesday, would never be put to death unless there was "no doubt" about his guilt.
Here are 10 reasons why the board � which decided on Tuesday to allow the execution to go ahead � has failed to deliver on its promise and why a man who is very possibly innocent will be killed in the name of American justice.
1. Of the nine witnesses who appeared at Davis's 1991 trial who said they had seen Davis beating up a homeless man in a dispute over a bottle of beer and then shooting to death a police officer, Mark MacPhail, who was acting as a good samaritan, seven have since recanted their evidence.
2. One of those who recanted, Antoine Williams, subsequently revealed they had no idea who shot the officer and that they were illiterate � meaning they could not read the police statements that they had signed at the time of the murder in 1989. Others said they had falsely testified that they had overheard Davis confess to the murder.
3. Many of those who retracted their evidence said that they had been cajoled by police into testifying against Davis. Some said they had been threatened with being put on trial themselves if they did not co-operate.
4. Of the two of the nine key witnesses who have not changed their story publicly, one has kept silent for the past 20 years and refuses to talk, and the other is Sylvester Coles. Coles was the man who first came forward to police and implicated Davis as the killer. But over the past 20 years evidence has grown that Coles himself may be the gunman and that he was fingering Davis to save his own skin.
5. In total, nine people have come forward with evidence that implicates Coles. Most recently, on Monday the George Board of Pardons and Paroles heard from Quiana Glover who told the panel that in June 2009 she had heard Coles, who had been drinking heavily, confess to the murder of MacPhail.
6. Apart from the witness evidence, most of which has since been cast into doubt, there was no forensic evidence gathered that links Davis to the killing.
7. In particular, there is no DNA evidence of any sort. The human rights group the Constitution Project points out that three-quarters of those prisoners who have been exonerated and declared innocent in the US were convicted at least in part on the basis of faulty eyewitness testimony.
8. No gun was ever found connected to the murder. Coles later admitted that he owned the same type of .38-calibre gun that had delivered the fatal bullets, but that he had given it away to another man earlier on the night of the shooting.
9. Higher courts in the US have repeatedly refused to grant Davis a retrial on the grounds that he had failed to "prove his innocence". His supporters counter that where the ultimate penalty is at stake, it should be for the courts to be beyond any reasonable doubt of his guilt.
10. Even if you set aside the issue of Davis's innocence or guilt, the manner of his execution tonight is cruel and unnatural. If the execution goes ahead as expected, it would be the fourth scheduled execution date for this prisoner. In 2008 he was given a stay just 90 minutes before he was set to die. Experts in death row say such multiple experiences with imminent death is tantamount to torture.
|
What an absolute nightmare. I've followed this a little, hoping sanity and reason would prevail. Sadly it didn't.
Can't an advanced society like America do better than that? And why aren't that many people in uproar about it (I'm talking proportionally). This is why I will never support capital punishment. Too easy to murder someone who may be innocent. And apparently, in Georgia, too difficult to deter an execution of someone who in all likelihood was innocent. The wheels were set in motion, and it couldn't be stopped. Ridiculous. And terrifying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| There's a huge uproar about it. I'm actually surprised it's gotten as much press as it has, considering the state of the economy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I also oppose the death penalty. However, I think it's important to remember murder is a state, not a federal, crime. Here are the states that do not have capital punishment, with the year that state abolished it in parentheses.
Alaska (1957)
Hawaii (1957)
Illinois (2011)
Iowa (1965)
Maine (1887)
Massachusetts (1984)
Michigan (1846) *Michigan has never had capital punishment
Minnesota (1911)
New Jersey (2007)
New Mexico (2009)
New York (2007)
North Dakota (1973)
Rhode Island (1984)
Vermont (1964)
West Virginia (1965)
Wisconsin (1853)
ALSO
- Dist. of Columbia (1981)
17 jurisdictions out of 51 don't have capital punishment.
For cultural context: The last executions in the United Kingdom, by hanging, took place in 1964, prior to capital punishment being abolished for murder (in 1969 in Great Britain and in 1973 in Northern Ireland). Although not applied since, the death penalty remained on the statute book for certain other offences until 1998...
A November 2009 television survey showed that 70% favoured reinstating the death penalty for at least one of the following crimes: armed robbery, rape, crimes related to paedophilia, terrorism, adult murder, child murder, child rape, treason, child abuse, or kidnapping. However, respondents only favoured capital punishment for adult murder, the polling question asked by other organisations such as Gallup, by small majorities or pluralities: overall, 51% favoured the death penalty for adult murder, while 56% in Wales did, 55% in Scotland, and only 49% in England.(Wikipedia)
I think it's quite difficult to get a legislative majority to vote against public majorities.
In the last week, the US Supreme Court granted stays twice and considered granting one to Troy Davis. It's clear something is afoot in the Court.
Two smart articles by Dahlia Lithwick:
The Slow Death of Certainty
In the debate over capital punishment, the desire for certainty is finally beginning to carry as much weight as the need for finality. Americans are asking not so much whether this particular prisoner should be killed as whether this whole capital system is fair...That question�why and how many of us are willing to tolerate error to achieve finality�is the real dispute here. And it's why, in the Davis case as in almost all death penalty cases, the two sides have talked past each other for so long.
http://www.slate.com/id/2304140/
A Killer Issue
In recent weeks, leading Republicans have made plain they don't believe in government-run health care (lo, even unto death). They don't believe in inoculating children again HPV (lo, even unto death). They don't believe in government-run disaster relief (ditto, re death), the minimum wage, Social Security, or the Federal Reserve. There is nothing, it seems�from protecting civil rights to safeguarding the environment�that big government bureaucracies can't foul up.
But there is one exception: killing people. These same Republicans who are dubious of government's ability to do anything right have an apparently bottomless faith in the capital-justice system. Everything is broken in America, they claim�except the machinery of death.
http://www.slate.com/id/2303922/
Having said all that, I find it very hard to object to the execution of Lawrence Russell Brewer who was executed Wednesday. (He was one of the three who dragged that man to death behind a pickup truck.)
Last edited by Ya-ta Boy on Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:02 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stilicho25
Joined: 05 Apr 2010
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The uproar bothers me. I have no idea if this guy was guilty, and the wikipedia article didn't make the case any more clear. However, I think liberals will use this opportunity to spread their awful anti-capital punishment propaganda. Luckily, most americans are much like me, and support for this is double the opposition, and hardcore support is triple hardcore opposition. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I am strongly opposed to the death penalty. The state cannot be trusted to such a power, and neither do I trust a jury to judge whether a man should live or die. I remain confident that within several generations the US Supreme Court will declare the death penalty unconstitutional. But in the meantime . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| to spread their awful anti-capital punishment propaganda |
Why 'awful'?
I prefer to not execute the Lawrence Russell Brewers of the world so we do not execute the Troy Davises and Cameron Todd Willinghams of the world. I want certainty. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigverne

Joined: 12 May 2004
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I find it very hard to object to the execution of Lawrence Russell Brewer who was executed Wednesday |
One wonders if you would feel this way if the races of the victim and perpetrator were reversed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is truly a bizzare case and I don't understand why someone could have stepped in (let's say the governor and at least commute his sentence to life in prison).
Yesterday was a very, very sad day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stilicho25 wrote: |
| The uproar bothers me. I have no idea if this guy was guilty, and the wikipedia article didn't make the case any more clear. However, I think liberals will use this opportunity to spread their awful anti-capital punishment propaganda. Luckily, most americans are much like me, and support for this is double the opposition, and hardcore support is triple hardcore opposition. |
Foolish liberals, opposing the death of (potentially) innocent individuals.
| bigverne wrote: |
| Quote: |
| I find it very hard to object to the execution of Lawrence Russell Brewer who was executed Wednesday |
One wonders if you would feel this way if the races of the victim and perpetrator were reversed. |
Consider | | |