|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
calendar
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Location: being a hermit
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NYC_Gal 2.0 wrote: |
| calendar wrote: |
| Quote: |
You're funny if you don't think it's discrimination. Or maybe you just don't know the culture.
|
It isn't. Some people have preferences and that isn't discrimination. It is intent that detemines the action, not the perception. |
"I prefer white doctors."
"I prefer to employ only white maids."
"I prefer my child to learn from a white teacher."
Try saying this in any of the 7 countries from which we come. |
There is no law against saying it and it may be the truth. But if you make a law enforcing it, then you would be in some trouble. I was going to give you all an example but considering the poor minsdset here where everyone takes things personally or declares racism, when it is not, it would be useless.
You all like your little boxes you have constructed regardless of which innocent person you hurt. You all would sue a hagwon owner (if you could) and ruin him financially simply because he didn't hire the people you wanted him to hire.
It is his business and it is his choice whom he wants to hire. But you do not care about that fact, you want your way no matter what, even if it takes enough money from him so he can't feed his family. You have to have your ideals forced upon others (even though you hate having things forced upon you). Is that right? Of course not. If you want to hire people of color then start your own school and hire to your heart's content.
At no time do you have the right to dictate to a business owner who he has to hire. If his customers want white teachers, then he hires white teachers, if they do not care then he is free to hire anyone. A business man is in business to make money, and to make money/stay in business he needs to please his customers. You all aren't his customers and are not paying him a dime, so you have no say in whom he hires. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZIFA
Joined: 23 Feb 2011 Location: Dici che il fiume..Trova la via al mare
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| midwesty8 wrote: |
| do you know about other countries such as taiwan or japan? |
From what I hear all the preferred destinations are swamped right now including Japan and Taiwan.
You can get a reasonable deal in China. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CaliUSA
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Princeton Review is a very good company to work for and, as far as I can tell, they prefer Asian-American college graduates. They have positions in both ESL teaching and in regular test prep (mainly SAT). On the other hand, they hire a lot of short-term people in the summer, and go with a smaller staff the rest of the time, so I don't know how easy it would be to "break in" with them during the off-season. One note: they seem to prefer people with degrees from well-known universities, since that's part of their sell to parents ("our teachers got high SAT scores and went to Ivies, and so will your kids"), but this isn't a rigid criterion for employment. If you worked at TPR over the summer, it would look good on your resume and might enable you to break in with some other hagwon. Maybe what I'm saying about this co. would apply to other test-prep-oriented places as well? Anyway good luck |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iRock
Joined: 08 Nov 2010
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| it might not be a law but its still discrimination |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
What you don't realize is
they are actually doing you a favor by the hiring practices they have.
Do you really want to work for someone who thinks of you as an
inferior sub-species?
Ask some of the whities they hired about their "experiences".
Yes, what a pleasure to have a bunch of screaming brats trying to rip your clothes off and or poke their fingers up your bum. Whooooohoooo!!!
Let the fun begin.
There are many people of color who have gotten employment in Korea, in all levels. (hagwons, public schools, universities)
Not everyone has discriminitory hiring practices. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pest2

Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
From Webster's dictionary:
Discrimination: treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit: racial and religious intolerance and discrimination.
Racial: of, pertaining to, or characteristic of one race or the races of humankind.
Do Korean parents and hakwon owners treat job applicants, with respect to hiring them, different on the basis of their race-- ie, do they usually prefer to hire whites over other ethnicities? Do Korean teachers in Hakwons get paid less than white, NES teachers? Would Korean parents usually rather their daughters and sons marry Koreans rather than people from any other ethnic groups? Do Koreans generally reserve the worst jobs for people who are Asian but not Korean? Come on, it's not hard to see that Koreans love to discriminate, racially. The fact that they didn't pass a law to restrict such discrimination is neither here nor there. In fact, that very fact makes them even worse in this regard; in the West, we generally realize this kind of thing is bad and try to limit it with rules and laws. Koreans are like natural racists, letting racial discrimination flourish and grow in the dark light of ignorant minds.
It probably has more to do with the "segregation" mindsets in Korea than the "racially oriented" ones. Koreans love to divide, chop, and segregate every thing in every kind of way imaginable. Men sit on one side, women sit on the other. Old people over here, middle aged there, youngest over there. Working class here, white collar there. Join this social club or group, be excluded from this and that one. They seem to love to create these kinds of exclusions and are masters at making their own lives a living hell as a result thereof.
To the OP, I'd offer this advice: Everywhere in East Asia is more or less the same in terms of racial discrimination -- that is to say, it is rampant everywhere here. But Korea is probably the most extreme in this way (and many others). I'd hit up China, for sure. There is huge market emerging there as the economy continues to develop, and the market rate for pay and benefits has gotten better, recently. Now, you can get an apartment and almost as much as you would have gotten in Korea 15 years ago (taking into account lower cost of living in China, etc). From what I have seen personally (which may not exactly be a scientific study but its better than nothing), they are not as unwilling to hire non-whites in China. Check it out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calendar
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Location: being a hermit
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Discrimination: treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit: racial and religious intolerance and discrimination.
|
But that definition is very broad and canopen the door to reverse dicrimination. So Korean parents say to their children, you must marry a westerner over a Korean, is that not discrimintion according to the definition?
Single , white men have now become the most discriminated goup in the west. Even if they are qualified for a job, they don't gt it because the employer has to hire a woman or a person of color first.
Where does this discrimination line stop? In reality, it doesn't matter what a person does because someone can always claim'discrimination'. We have white men on here complaining of female only jobs, or they are considered too old for the position.
Why must an employer be told whom they can or cannot hire? They are taking the risks already by opening a business and it is their money and their customers. Why can't they have a preference and use it?
Most do-gooders do not stop and think of the whole picture. They take one aspect of it, then campaign for change even though their change leads right back to what they were fighting against in the beginning. Only now, the group has changed.
The solution of course is that the do-gooders open their own business, take the risks, spend their own money and hire whom they want. They don't because it is easier to force others to do what you do not want to do yourselves. (general usage of you, yourselves)
I would never tink to tell the hagwon owners on this board who they have to hire. It is their business and their choice. Businessmen do not give up the right of free choice when they open a business. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pest2 wrote: |
From Webster's dictionary:
Discrimination: treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit: racial and religious intolerance and discrimination.
Racial: of, pertaining to, or characteristic of one race or the races of humankind.
(1) Do Korean parents and hakwon owners treat job applicants, with respect to hiring them, different on the basis of their race-- ie, do they usually prefer to hire whites over other ethnicities?
(2) Do Korean teachers in Hakwons get paid less than white, NES teachers?
(3) Would Korean parents usually rather their daughters and sons marry Koreans rather than people from any other ethnic groups?
(4) Do Koreans generally reserve the worst jobs for people who are Asian but not Korean?
. |
I numbered your points for easier reference.
1. Some do and some don't. At my last two hakwon jobs I worked with African American native speakers for example. Other people have those experiences as well. At the many P.S orientations and meetings I have attended there are people from several different ethnicities represented. Plus you are aware that people can also get a visa for teaching Chinese and Japanese? How many white people are among those?
2. Supply and demand. There are far more Koreans working in hakwons then white teachers. Plus it's up to the Koreans to challenge this. You get the best deal you can for yourself. In addition that is not always true.
3. Generally speaking the people who have married Koreans here seem to have either ok, good or so-so relations with the parents. At least according to this board and others. Sure there are some that don't get along but they seem to be much in the minority whenever this topic comes up. Some do and some don't. Korean parents are not much different from parents the world over...they want their children to be happy and sucessful. Sure there are some racists here...same as the world over.
4. This point is garbage. They can reserve all the jobs they want...but no one is forced to take them. And no there are Koreans working those kinds of jobs as well. Plus there are non Korean Asians working in companies, education and other jobs rather than the DDD sector.
If you are going to post about something you only have a superficial understanding of...don't. It just makes you look as xenophobic as the people you are complaining about. Making sweeping generalizations about 50 million or so people the vast majority of whom you've never met is just plain ignorant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| calendar wrote: |
| Quote: |
Discrimination: treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit: racial and religious intolerance and discrimination.
|
But that definition is very broad and canopen the door to reverse dicrimination. So Korean parents say to their children, you must marry a westerner over a Korean, is that not discrimintion according to the definition?
Single , white men have now become the most discriminated goup in the west. Even if they are qualified for a job, they don't gt it because the employer has to hire a woman or a person of color first.
Where does this discrimination line stop? In reality, it doesn't matter what a person does because someone can always claim'discrimination'. We have white men on here complaining of female only jobs, or they are considered too old for the position.
Why must an employer be told whom they can or cannot hire? They are taking the risks already by opening a business and it is their money and their customers. Why can't they have a preference and use it?
Most do-gooders do not stop and think of the whole picture. They take one aspect of it, then campaign for change even though their change leads right back to what they were fighting against in the beginning. Only now, the group has changed.
The solution of course is that the do-gooders open their own business, take the risks, spend their own money and hire whom they want. They don't because it is easier to force others to do what you do not want to do yourselves. (general usage of you, yourselves)
I would never tink to tell the hagwon owners on this board who they have to hire. It is their business and their choice. Businessmen do not give up the right of free choice when they open a business. |
You're right, Jim Crow was fantastic. Who were we to tell anyone to integrate their schools? And busses! As a white male, I truly object to not having a seat guaranteed to me on busses in the States. But you're right, here, we should have to give up our seats to Koreans, as they're not discriminating, it's just the way it is, and not being Korean we have no right to say otherwise.
Seriously though, this Captain Apologist spiel is a bit much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pest2

Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Obviously, some kinds of discrimination are necessary to appropriately fill jobs with the right people. For example, sports teams discriminate against people who cannot play the sport (which is most people). Hotels discriminate against people who do not have good customer service skills (except, here in Korea, you have to wonder sometimes if that actually happens) in not hiring those people. If you're not skilled in IT, what happens? As a class of people who are unskilled in IT, you won't get a job in IT. No big surprise.
But generally, discriminating on the basis of race is arbitrary to the intent of placing an able person in a job. If there are two people, one Asian and one Caucasian, with equal language skills and credentials, all things being equal, hiring the Caucasian will not bring a better employee to a job teaching English. As a matter of fact, there are very few cases in which hiring on the basis of ethnicity will purport to a better outcome insofar as work performance in any job.
No one said reverse discrimination is good, either. That is still racial discrimination and it, too, is definitely a problem. There are various kinds of ways to address the causes of reverse discrimination, ie doing away with hiring on the basis of filled quotas, enlightening and educating employers about the evils of hiring on the basis of race in any capacity, etc. In case, "anyone can just claim racial discrimination" in case they don't get hired, they must show clearly that a prospective employer has not hired them specifically because hiring them as such would not fill a hiring quota in most cases. But given that companies and employers might occasionally have a propensity to hire on the basis of race, there is no easy way, using rules and laws, to completely stop discrimination or reverse discrimination on the basis of race. At best, we can use rules and laws to change ideas and values to get employers to do the right thing.
However, two wrongs don't make a right. We can't say that we should just allow racially discriminatory hiring practices because proscribing such practices will result in reverse discrimination. Rather, the best route might be to take the bull by both horns and try to pull it to the ground.
And that's exactly what has NOT happened, in almost any way whatsoever, in Korea. Whereas other countries have at least attempted to address the problems associated with racial discrimination, Countries in East Asia and especially Korea have not. Rather, racism and racial discrimination is "off the radar" for most people. It's the kind of thing that is taken for granted in every day life like the sun rising in the East.
And come on! Families in Korea actually forcing their daughter to marry a white guy!!!?? That'll be the day. But I think, at any rate, it would be nice if the families would back off and let those women marry whomever they want, don't you? Then maybe Korean women wouldn't be so annoying! (but thats another topic)
| calendar wrote: |
| Quote: |
Discrimination: treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing based on the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit: racial and religious intolerance and discrimination.
|
But that definition is very broad and canopen the door to reverse dicrimination. So Korean parents say to their children, you must marry a westerner over a Korean, is that not discrimintion according to the definition?
Single , white men have now become the most discriminated goup in the west. Even if they are qualified for a job, they don't gt it because the employer has to hire a woman or a person of color first.
Where does this discrimination line stop? In reality, it doesn't matter what a person does because someone can always claim'discrimination'. We have white men on here complaining of female only jobs, or they are considered too old for the position.
Why must an employer be told whom they can or cannot hire? They are taking the risks already by opening a business and it is their money and their customers. Why can't they have a preference and use it?
Most do-gooders do not stop and think of the whole picture. They take one aspect of it, then campaign for change even though their change leads right back to what they were fighting against in the beginning. Only now, the group has changed.
The solution of course is that the do-gooders open their own business, take the risks, spend their own money and hire whom they want. They don't because it is easier to force others to do what you do not want to do yourselves. (general usage of you, yourselves)
I would never tink to tell the hagwon owners on this board who they have to hire. It is their business and their choice. Businessmen do not give up the right of free choice when they open a business. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pest2 wrote: |
.
And that's exactly what has NOT happened, in almost any way whatsoever, in Korea. Whereas other countries have at least attempted to address the problems associated with racial discrimination, Countries in East Asia and especially Korea have not. Rather, racism and racial discrimination is "off the radar" for most people. It's the kind of thing that is taken for granted in every day life like the sun rising in the East.
And come on! Families in Korea actually forcing their daughter to marry a white guy!!!?? That'll be the day. But I think, at any rate, it would be nice if the families would back off and let those women marry whomever they want, don't you? Then maybe Korean women wouldn't be so annoying! (but thats another topic)
] |
You need to stop making up stuff to suit your agenda and actually do some reading. Currently a bill that would specifically outlaw racial discrimination is underway in Korea. One would pay a fine and get two years in jail for violating it. While it may not pass into law this time around it still represents a big step forward and (if history is any indication, eventually pass. They've already outlawed age discrimination and have set up a system to complain about discrimination at any company with over 100 employers. So it is getting there.
And nobody said that families in Korea were forcing their daughter to marry a white guy. The fact remains that many families are perfectly okay with this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calendar
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Location: being a hermit
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| And nobody said that families in Korea were forcing their daughter to marry a white guy. The fact remains that many families are perfectly okay with this. |
Will you people please learn what an example is.
| Quote: |
You're right, Jim Crow was fantastic. Who were we to tell anyone to integrate their schools? And busses! As a white male, I truly object to not having a seat guaranteed to me on busses in the States. But you're right, here, we should have to give up our seats to Koreans, as they're not discriminating, it's just the way it is, and not being Korean we have no right to say otherwise.
Seriously though, this Captain Apologist spiel is a bit much. |
It is their country. If you do not like their definition of 'racism/ discrimination' you know where the planes are to go home. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
northway
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| calendar wrote: |
| Quote: |
You're right, Jim Crow was fantastic. Who were we to tell anyone to integrate their schools? And busses! As a white male, I truly object to not having a seat guaranteed to me on busses in the States. But you're right, here, we should have to give up our seats to Koreans, as they're not discriminating, it's just the way it is, and not being Korean we have no right to say otherwise.
Seriously though, this Captain Apologist spiel is a bit much. |
It is their country. If you do not like their definition of 'racism/ discrimination' you know where the planes are to go home. |
Morally reprehensible is morally reprehensible. I'm actually pretty chilled out on this issue, as I understand why Koreans do it (misguided though I think they are), but by your logic Robert Mugabe is a great world leader. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calendar
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Location: being a hermit
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I think they are), but by your logic Robert Mugabe is a great world leader. |
Your logic and leaps to a conclusion are quite bad. it isnot up to you or any FT to change Korea. That is not your job or purpose here. There are 50,000,000 Koreans who have a rightful say in how their country should be run and what definitions should be used. It is up to them to change.
Keep in mind, America's civil war was not started by other nations or their people sticking their nose into America's sovereign affairs. It was the Americans themselves who got together and decided that something had to be done.
The Koreans do not have to go to war but it is up to them to change their own country. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cj1976
Joined: 26 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Wow, who wrote that article in the KT? The author seems like an absolute joke. What a complete tool. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|