|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2003 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Most of the bodies of water in East Asia were traditionally named by the Chinese. I believe the East Sea and Sea of Korea were the most common names used before the Japanese went on their colonial quest. When Korea was under Japanese rule, western map makers just started calling it the the Sea of Japan. Now, I don't think the Chinese really care what they call the it. But, BOTH Japan and Korea or bickering over it. I think one Korean academic proposed calling it the Asian Sea, but Japan shot that one down pretty quickly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Sunny Glendale, CA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2003 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I've noticed that whereas Koreans tend to be outspoken about patriotism, Japanese are subtle, but often times just as stubborn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2003 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Yellow sea (on the west side of Korea), goes to around 45m deep. The East sea (on the East side), goes to 3000m in depth. Bet you didn't know that, did you?.
Strangely the Yellow sea is colder than the East sea. So, you're better off hitting the surf in Sokcho than on Ganghwhado.
Just some interesting facts for you... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
matko

Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: in a world of hurt!
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2003 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm still in favor of calling it the Blue sea.
However, I read something somewhere (maybe it was here) that if Japan did not exist there would be no sea. It would just be the Pacific ocean. So in fact, it is called the sea of Japan for that reason. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dogbert

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: Killbox 90210
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2003 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| matko wrote: |
They call it Nihon-Kai which means "Sea of Japan"
The general term for sea is "umi" but when referring to a specific body of water they use "kai"
In a previous thread about this topic someone mentioned renaming it "Blue Sea"
I think that's a good idea.
BTW, anyone know what the Russians call it? |
The recent Russian maps I've seen have all referred to it as the "Sea of Japan".
The same is true of a recently-printed Chinese (PRC) map I have. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2003 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If they renamed it the" East Sea", the japs would be offended and call it the"west sea". How about "untitled sea"? or "oriental sea". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2003 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| How about calling it the East Japan Sea, just to play with little Japanese kids' minds when they are learning their directions and geography? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buddy bradley

Joined: 24 Aug 2003 Location: The Beyond
|
Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 6:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rapier wrote: |
| The Yellow sea (on the west side of Korea), goes to around 45m deep. The East sea (on the East side), goes to 3000m in depth. Bet you didn't know that, did you?. |
We'll see if my middle-schoolers know this on Friday when I slap it on their test in the form of a question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lush72
Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: I am Penalty Kick!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Lemon

Joined: 11 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not more East Sea foolishness....!
According to today's Korea Times, the Korean government has commissioned a team of scholars to examing old maps in the US Library of Congress, the British Library, and other esteemed libraries, to find examples where "sea of Japan" is not used. The purpose of this exercise is to "promote the idea that the East Sea has a far more historical precedent and is neutral in sound, replacing Sea of Japan".
The Korea Times informs us that the "National Geographic... have decided to refer to the body between Korea and Japan as the East Sea". This would be news to the National Geographic, which continues to label the sea as "Sea of Japan" as its "commonly recognized" name, with the Korean title in small print and parentheses.
Who exactly are these people fooling? Doesn't the Korean government have anything better to do, like contend with their crazy cousins who have 200,000 cannons aimed at Seoul, only 70km away? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alphaville, in their 80's hit "big in japan", called it the "east sea'.
So, its official.
*regarding water temperatures, the yellow sea is colder in winter precisely because it is shallower- yet conversely it warms up faster in the summer.
In winter the east sea is warmer due to the fact it holds its temperature longer, and is influenced by warm Pacific currents.
The yellow sea is shallow and has many large estuaries/tidal mudflats around its edges, because (in geographical time) it is an only recently-submerged sediment floodplain.
*The fertile mudflats around the coasts of the yellow sea are home and spawning ground to a vast reserve of seafood. Which is why korea is crazy, to be currently reclaiming all its estuaries on the west coast for building land. (Short-sighted emulation of japan knows no limits.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Lemon

Joined: 11 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 4:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rapier wrote: |
Alphaville, in their 80's hit "big in japan", called it the "east sea'.
So, its official.
|
Lessee...
| Quote: |
When your big in Japan, tonight
Big in Japan, be tight
Big in Japan where the eastern sea's so blue
|
Well, close, but not quite...
But anyway, DON'T TELL THE KOREANS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shakuhachi

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
This "controversy" has to be one of of the most foolish that the Koreans could come up with (there is at least one other that is even worse though).
Except for South and North Korea, no country's maps refer to the "sea of Japan" as the "East sea". The Koreans display breathtaking ignorance in the naming conventions of seas. When seas are seperated from oceans, the name of the sea comes from the archipelago or peninsula that seperates them. The Japanese archipelago is the key feature that separates the North Pacific Ocean from this sea, and is therefore called "the sea of Japan".
The first reference to the "Sea of Japan" in 1602AD by european Matteo Ricci. No other country refers to that sea as the "east sea" because it is not east of any country except Korea.
The idea of foreigners taking this laughable ultra-nationalist chauvinism seriously beggars belief. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wylde

Joined: 14 Apr 2003
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| shakuhachi wrote: |
This "controversy" has to be one of of the most foolish that the Koreans could come up with (there is at least one other that is even worse though).
Except for South and North Korea, no country's maps refer to the "sea of Japan" as the "East sea". The Koreans display breathtaking ignorance in the naming conventions of seas. When seas are seperated from oceans, the name of the sea comes from the archipelago or peninsula that seperates them. The Japanese archipelago is the key feature that separates the North Pacific Ocean from this sea, and is therefore called "the sea of Japan".
The first reference to the "Sea of Japan" in 1602AD by european Matteo Ricci. No other country refers to that sea as the "east sea" because it is not east of any country except Korea.
The idea of foreigners taking this laughable ultra-nationalist chauvinism seriously beggars belief. |
| Quote: |
East Sea in Use for 2,000 Years
References to Korea: Most Frequently Found on Old Maps of the World
Old Maps in the World by Periods
Even Japan Once Used Sea of Joseon (Korea) Instead of Sea of Japan
Japan��s Claims Are Neither Compelling Nor Justifiable
Korea Asks for concurrent Use of East Sea / Sea of Japan
Major Mapmakers Increasingly Use Name East Sea |
| Quote: |
The first record of the name East Sea can be traced back to a description of King Dongmyeong of the Goguryeo Kingdom in ��The History of the Three Kingdoms.�� The period corresponds to 37 B.C.
The name East Sea also appears on the epigraph of a monument in Jian, on the north side of mid-Amnokgang (Yalu River), northeast of China. King Jangsu erected this memorial to his late father, King Gwanggaeto, in A.D. 414.
The appellation Sea of Japan first appeared in 1602 in a map dubbed ��Mappamondo (Complete Map of the World)�� by Matteo Ricci, an Italian Catholic missionary based in Beijing. Therefore, the name Sea of Japan was first used about 1,600 years after the Koreans began calling the sea area, the East Sea.
Korea��s old maps, most of them produced after the 16th century, carry the name East Sea. For example, the name East Sea is clearly indicated on ��Paldo Chongdo (Map of Eight Provinces of Korea)�� in ��Sinjeung Dongguk Yeoji-seungnam (Newly Expanded Survey of the Geography of Korea)�� published in 1531.
The world academic community consistently maintains that ��history and representation�� should serve as the standards for geographical names.1) Following this principle, the sea area lying between Korea and Japan should be called the East Sea, which has represented the sea area for over two millennia, while the name Sea of Japan is barely 200 years old |
1709 - england
http://www.gracegalleries.com/images/ASIA/ASIA109.jpg
1774 - france
http://www.gracegalleries.com/images/ASIA/ASIA107.jpg
| Quote: |
Since the ancient times, Korea called the sea between Korea and Japan as "East Sea" (Dong Hae). Korean archives and archeological monuments clearly prove this fact. The evidence can be found, for example:
(a) The stone monument of King Kwanggaeto's Tomb erected in 414 AD
(b) The Sam-guk-sagi (the Chronicle of the Three Kingdoms: Koguryo, Paekje and Silla) of 1145 AD
(c) The "Sam-guk-yusa (The Anecdotal History of the Three Kingdoms) compiled in 1432 AD
(d) The Sin-jung-dong-guk Yoji-sung-ram (The New Enlarged Geographical Guide of the Eastern Nation - Korea) written in 1530 AD.
Since the 17th century, European geographers called the sea as "Sea of Korea", "East Set" or "Oriental Sea". The sea had been called "Sea of Corea" from the early 18th century through the mid 19th century. This fact is supported by historical archives.
For example, "Carte des Indes et de la Chine," made in 1705 by a prominent French geographer, Guillaume de Lisle under the patronage of the Royal Academy of Sciences, named the sea "Sea of Korea," and this name continued to appear on subsequent maps.
Typical of these maps are:
(a) "Carte de l'Asie" drawn by Robert de Vaugondy in 1751
(b) "Carte des iles du Japan et Pays Voisins" made by Jacque Nicolas Bellin in 1752
(c) "Carte de l'Asie" made by Jean Janvier in 1760
(d) Britain's "ENCYCLOPEDM BRITANNICA" of 1771 and 1778 editions
(e) "The Map of the Empire of Japan" printed in Britain in 1794
(f) "Carte de L'Asie" made by J. A. de Zauche in 1800, and
(g) "Carte de l'Asie" made by Felix de Lamarche in 1811.
Even on the maps printed in Japan at that time, the sea was clearly named "Sea of Korea". For example:
(a) "Map of Asia" drawn by Katsuragawa in 1784
(b) The revised edition of "World Atlas" by Takahashi in 1810
(c) "New World Atlas" by Kisaku in 1847, and
(d) "Map of the Great Empire of Korea" published in 1908 by the "Japan-Korea Printing Company", whose share was held by the Japanese |
do some more research bro...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Lemon

Joined: 11 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2004 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
do some more research bro...  |
Wylde- In this case, "bro", you'd do well to provide a reference for your information. You've failed to do so. And this was a critical oversight.
...Because, where did Wylde's information come from?
Well, Google reports that it was written by that bastion of truth and impartiality,
THE GOVERNMENT OF NORTH KOREA.
http://www.kimsoft.com/1997/nk-un2.htm
And in this case, it matters greatly who's doing the storytelling. Pure propaganda.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|