Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Grammar Question about "from which"
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
koreatimes



Joined: 07 Jun 2011

PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
In fact, I kind of felt that it supported Chimie's logic:


Chimie's logic is to accept both as being 100% valid, and then promote their intepretation.

Quote:
Do you want the castle to be the theme of the sentence? Is the view from the base of the river what you're trying to explain or just that the castle commands a spectacular view. For the former, I'd use "from which" and the later, "where"


If you are accepting both as possible interpretations, then neither is more correct than the other.

There is a similar "movement" to replace "which" with the word "that". We have yet to reach that stage. Right now, it is purely subjective. ("Do you remember the store which/that we went to last Christmas?")

http://www.english-test.net/forum/ftopic40900.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
premiummince



Joined: 23 Jan 2010

PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With the 'which/that' rule 'which' is for clauses that you can omit. 'That' is for those you can't.

As for the 'from which/from where', both are OK. And they are both referring to the river bank.

As for a difference, 'which' is used more formally in that situation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Privateer



Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Location: Easy Street.

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The relative pronoun 'where' refers to a place in cases where the words 'here' or 'there' can substitute for the place in question in an independent clause.

For example:

This is the cafe.
+
We are supposed to meet them here (i.e. at this cafe).
=
This is the cafe where we are supposed to meet them.


This shows that the word 'where' does not substitute simply for the place noun 'cafe' but for the (locative?) prepositional phrase 'at this cafe'. This means a preposition placed in front of 'where' is redundant. The relative pronoun 'which', on the other hand, does simply stand for a noun, so we can and do say 'in which', 'from which' etc.

The same is true for the words 'here' and 'there': they cannot function as subject or object pronouns (much to the confusion of Korean students), but stand for prepositional phrases. Hence it's incorrect to add a preposition in front of the words 'here' or 'there' - except when talking about enclosed spaces as in "Put the knives and forks in there".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
premiummince



Joined: 23 Jan 2010

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Missed it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Cosmic Hum



Joined: 09 May 2003
Location: Sonic Space

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For sake of argument�I will go with �from where� as being most easily defensible from my position�though it doesn�t make it right.

Rewriting the sentence makes it clearer.

From where it rests above the bank of the river, the castle commands a spectacular view.

To use the original OP�using �from where�
The castle rests above the bank of the river, from where it commands a spectacular view.

To break down the dependent prepositional adverbial clause.
(from) - proposition (where) - adverbial of location - above the bank of the river
form where (it) -anaphoric pronoun (antecedent - castle)
With direct substitution�
From (above the bank of the river) (the castle) commands a spectacular view.

From above the bank of the river, the castle commands a spectacular view.

He looked down from above with an angelic smile.

As a mlutiple preposition...it is common enough...and not necessarily redundant.

Fortunately, a lot of good information has already been shared in this thread, and I don�t want to step on anyone�s toes�as most of the information about this topic has been raised by one poster or another.

One point is though�that this is definitely a regional usage debate�as Privateer has mentioned.
Depending on where you are from�either one of these constructions is likely to sound quite odd.
I am not familiar with �from which� in that context, so if someone is more familiar with that construction, perhaps they could break it down as well and show how it also works.

Another point is as KT briefly mentioned early on� an abstract vs. physical referencing problem.
Both �from which� and �from where� are best used in today�s English when the context is referencing an abstract idea.

From where I am sitting, it looks like I could get screwed on this analysis. (from where�not literal�abstract)


There has been much discussion about subjective opinion�and this is also a good point�as both �from which� and �from where� are older English constructs without too much practical application in today�s English�in the context of the OP.

From where do you come?

The never-end-a-sentence-in-a-preposition-rule�which was only ever a prescriptionist�s wet dream�never really a rule�has been long abandoned by today�s grammarians. However, we still have the association in formal grammar�so we get people using �from where� and �from which� leaning on formality�rather than clarity.

Which is why some hear �from where� in the OP and think�wtf�way too formal�even archaic.
In the OP, where doesn�t require a preposition...it isn�t an abstract construction.

Another interesting association here is collocative�and an example may help.
This apartment, which commands a great view, is awesome.
Luxurious cottages that command a great view are yours for the renting.

The whole �commanding a great view� expression(collocation)�again, another old expression being used in both restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses further complicates the issue.
Of course either �which� or �that� can be used...depending on the restrictiveness of the clause.
�which� is the more formal and can be used in both��that� typically only in restrictive clauses.
When this line of thinking is applied to the OP�it is just natural to link the grammar and take �from which� as the more formally prescriptive answer�but not necessarily true.

My undying apologies for such a long post�I didn�t have time to write a short one. (now 2:30am ...must go to bed)
However, if you read this far�I will end with an old grammar joke�timely for this post.

A sweet old lady from the country side goes into her little town to catch a bus into the big city to see the sights and do some shopping. The bus arrives full of people from far and wide. The sweet old lady sees a well dressed young lady�obviously a well educated city girl� she thinks to herself, and she sits down next to her hoping to chat and learn a few things about big city life.
The sweet old lady leans over and kindly introduces herself and asks the young lady, �Where are you from?�
�Well�, says the young lady, �Where I am from, we use proper English grammar and never end a sentence with a preposition.�
The sweet old lady leans back in her seat for a moment to reflect on her comment and recalls her days of learning proper English grammar�she blushes with embarrassment at her mistake and makes another attempt.
The sweet old lady leans over to the young lady again and asks,
�So, where are you from bitch?�

Wink

Hope this is useful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raewon



Joined: 16 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Cosmic Hum - Thank you so much for such a detailed reply. It was indeed helpful. It's also interesting that you made the point about the regional usage debate. I have found that this is the case in many situations (even when dealing with trivial things such as prepositions). The problem is that
many native speakers are not familiar with regional usages. I think it's important not to judge something as being "wrong" simply because it sounds extremely unnatural.

The joke made my day as well. Smile

Thanks for all of the replies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Birder



Joined: 21 Oct 2011

PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Where I come from (place and education) I'm inclined to think that if we used "from which," it wouldn't work.

"The castle rests above the bank of the river, _______ it commands a
spectacular view."

To me, that sounds like the castle has a pair of eyes on the river, eyes that have a great view. Perhaps it's not, but "from which" almost sounds like a misplaced modifier. To me, in this case, using "which" seems to point to the river, but "where" seems to point to the place the castle is located.

But perhaps we're just dealing with an ambiguously phrased sentence. "The castle, resting above the bank of a river, commands a spectacular view." "The castle rests above the bank of a river and commands a spectacular view." "The castle, which rest above the bank of a river, commands a spectacular view." There are always a thousand and one ways to say something; always look for the least ambiguous ways to say it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Cosmic Hum



Joined: 09 May 2003
Location: Sonic Space

PostPosted: Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Birder wrote:
Where I come from (place and education) I'm inclined to think that if we used "from which," it wouldn't work.

"The castle rests above the bank of the river, _______ it commands a
spectacular view."

To me, that sounds like the castle has a pair of eyes on the river, eyes that have a great view. Perhaps it's not, but "from which" almost sounds like a misplaced modifier. To me, in this case, using "which" seems to point to the river, but "where" seems to point to the place the castle is located.

But perhaps we're just dealing with an ambiguously phrased sentence. "The castle, resting above the bank of a river, commands a spectacular view." "The castle rests above the bank of a river and commands a spectacular view." "The castle, which rest above the bank of a river, commands a spectacular view." There are always a thousand and one ways to say something; always look for the least ambiguous ways to say it.


Excellent post Birder...great insights.

It isn't that we can't defend 'from which' ...it's just that it rests on a type of formal grammar from a bygone era
...soon to go the way of the Dodo...not soon enough as far as I am concerned.

As for it's defense...it also comes with a literal ambiguity.
(from which) as a lexical unit...basically means the same as from where in this context
...although not so much as a literal place, but rather an intangible thing
...a thing which bestows the majestic view...sticking with the whole regal command lingo...not really a problem...just odd from my perspective.

But here's the thing...it could also be taken literally...in that...the castle is commanding the bank of the river to give the castle a spectacular view.
Most don't even realize the literal meaning is there. And if that is one of the possible messages...it only clouds the issue further.
As for the actual intent of the message...it could be written with much less cryptic grammar.

It is too easy to get lost in formalities when clarity would be so much better.

As you have eloquently pointed out Birder...there are many ways to express that very sentiment but with much more approachable language.

Thanks for the input. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Birder



Joined: 21 Oct 2011

PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

*blushes*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Privateer



Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Location: Easy Street.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I knew if I stuck my neck out someone would hack through it. 'From where' is fine. 'From which' too.

E.g: Revelation, 2:5

Quote:
New International Version (�1984)
Remember the height from which you have fallen! Repent and do the things you did at first. If you do not repent, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place.

English Standard Version (�2001)
Remember therefore from where you have fallen; repent, and do the works you did at first. If not, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place, unless you repent.

New American Standard Bible (�1995)
'Therefore remember from where you have fallen, and repent and do the deeds you did at first; or else I am coming to you and will remove your lampstand out of its place-- unless you repent.

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent.


The odd thing to me is that all these look correct, and The Cosmic Hun's sentence "From where it rests above the bank of the river, the castle commands a spectacular view" also looks fine, but..."The castle rests above the bank of the river, from where it commands a spectacular view" still doesn't feel right to me. Now I'm wondering why.

Can't help thinking there must be a deeper explanation for this than that it's just the usage I'm accustomed to...but damned if I can see it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Cosmic Hum



Joined: 09 May 2003
Location: Sonic Space

PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Privateer wrote:
I knew if I stuck my neck out someone would hack through it. 'From where' is fine. 'From which' too.

Can't help thinking there must be a deeper explanation for this than that it's just the usage I'm accustomed to...but damned if I can see it.


I agree that they are both grammatically acceptable.
But do you not agree that it's not just usage?

Not sure there needs to be a deeper explanation than the ones already posted.
Though you could very well be right...there are likely to be several more reasons that we have yet to examine...absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

I get the feeling that to some 'from which' is a more academic answer with its history and formality.
Again, as already mentioned...taking the view to be an intangible yet majestic asset that has been bestowed upon the castle in all its grandeur.
On the other hand 'from where' does seem rather pedantic in its formulation...grammatically and acoustically.
Given this type of reading...it is not difficult to see why some find 'from which' more appealing in the context of the OP.

Personally, I don't find either of them appealing...the grammar is fine...the style is rather antiquated...in my opinion.
The modifications that have been offered read and sound much better.

By the way...this was by no means a hack at your insight...really only offering some flexibility and alternative thoughts to those that had been mentioned.

Grammar yoga in action. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International