|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
sirius black
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
|
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dismiss China at your own peril. Meteoric rise to second largest econonmy in such a very very short time. They are buying or stealing our technology. Their stealth plane and the ability to send nukes to Hawaii and western America soon if not already is evidence of that. They are sending plane loads of students to our best unis. Especially the hiigh tech, math and engineering schools of Cal Tech, MIT, Chicago, etc.
They are funding research at these and other unis under the proviso they have first access to any new discoveries and technology. They are allowing tech companies to enter their market only if they get access to technology.
One can simply not dismiss the number 2 economy. Also, America is not helping its own cause. Two huge events happened in the first decade of this century that showed just about no crisis will make us get our act together. 911 was used as an excuse to bring us two wars, a deficit and an erosion of civil liberies. The '08 financial crisis showed that our government is bought and paid for by the powers that be since they were the ones that got bailed out and the people that were suffering were left to fend for themselves.
We have been replaced by some of our traditional biggest trade partners by China. Korea, Japan, India, Brazil. We used to be their biggest trade partners now its China.
China won't have to do much to catch us. We're declining on our own to make us an easy target.
My guess is India will replace us as the check against China. Will China have recessions, etc? Sure. So did we while we were surging forward. We had some doozies. Near collapses along the way in the late 1800s and a big 'un in 1907. Not to mention the depression. As it stands now its a matter of when not if China will be the world's biggest economy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 7:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rollo wrote: |
I read this gibberish in the New York Times and I really do not know why they published it. It brings up no new ideas and like all the other poorly written papers written by Chinese academics it relies on alluding to some long past dynasty as some paradise instead of the feudal hell it actually was. Just rubbish. Even the title betr.ays that the author is limited intellectually. He or his family bought him a degree and a professorship. What is meant by defeat the U.S. In a war? The Olympics? Just high schooli
sh crap. About what is expected of a society which throws away it's best and brightest in favor of ideological purity. |
Well, the T'ang Dynasty was not a feudal hell for everyone, and it was the vanguard civilization of its time
And you're right, Chinese academics don't prize coming up with new ideas. They prize recalling the old, good ones. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
travel zen
Joined: 22 Feb 2005 Location: Good old Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Remember they hype about Japan over a decade ago ??
This is just bigger hype. I don't know how you can't see that already.
The West swallows every type of new fashon, new fad. Keeps them from being too bored.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sirius black
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
|
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| travel zen wrote: |
Remember they hype about Japan over a decade ago ??
This is just bigger hype. I don't know how you can't see that already.
The West swallows every type of new fashon, new fad. Keeps them from being too bored.  |
Europe said we were all hype a few hundred years ago as well. The common thought at that time was that a republic was just a history lesson about some form of government the greeks tried and we were deemd an experiment that was bound to fail.
Japan was still the number 2 economy. They were very unlikely going to be the number one economy for all kinds of reasons. China has the numbers to be. China may falter but there is no guarantee and the evidence points away from them faltering and the evidence points to us faltering. They have the same advantages America did on its way up, huge population, cheap labor, access to natural resources and if they stay out of wars and concentrate on business like america did potentially they have a great future. China has proven it can change and it has been changing. Its no where similar to the china of 10 and 20 years ago.
Its perhaps a bit of bias and subjectivity to dismiss them outright. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I also would not undestimate our government's ability to scare us:
If it is not Russia, Communism and the Red Scare, it is Y2K, Social Security, Retirement, Obama Death Panels, Terrorists, Sadam Hussein, Osama bin Laden and now China.
It is always something.
Personally, I think many American companies are making a lot of money in China or selling cheap Chinese goods in the U.S. as well as the U.S. Government benefiting from the Chinese buy up of dollars and treasury bonds.
The most dangerous thing about China is their slave labor. It is destroying the American middle class. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rollo
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: China
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh yes the Tang dynasty. When the truly significant advancement of taxing the cooking utensils of the peasant was invented . Truly a glorious time especially for the thousands of slave.
But yeah the big China scare is a joke. I lived in a village where the biggest danger was not auto traffic but the water buffalo.
In the Tang dynasty a few thousand lived in luxury while the vast majority lived in unbelievable poverty. nothing changes.
In the 60 famine the party bosses hoarded grain until the price was high enough then made a fortune. While millions starved kindly old Mao said" If this continues we will all drive Rolls Royces" Nothing changes
I saw in area in Guiyang, mostly mud brick houses, people plowing with buffalo, but the housing for the party leaders first class. Interesting to see the district leader tooling around in his new range rover. nOTHING CHANGES.
The tang emperor kept a few pet scholars to write about the glories of his reign. Nothing changes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 6:47 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
Yay! A meaty thread.
| Quote: |
The problem I see is that what has made Chinese successful is autocratic rule, lack of any enforceable regulations to the point where many foods and manufactured goods are dangerous and even lethal and de facto slave labor.
|
I wouldn't challenge that description, but what it brings to mind is the US around the turn of the century (19th-20th). Citing child labor and the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire ignores the massive development that was taking place. Do the Chinese really want toys painted with lead and so on? No. It will be dealt with over time.
As Yata points out, there was a time when crappy goods in America were labeled Japanese, and the Japanese, eventually in turn, would call a crappy camera a Korean camera. Things change (and cameras was just an example. Don't jump all over me about that)
| Quote: |
| Basically China will kill any future parity it could obtain with the west with its ridiculous cultural sensitivities and its resentment over being backwards for centuries like all asian countries. |
I associate some of this far more with Korea than China. In smaller countries, I've encountered a lot more of the fishing for compliments: What is your favorite country (with the underpinning hope you will say theirs). The Chinese, in my experience in Taiwan and the Mainland, tend not to do that. Their central role in the whole history and culture of Asia is something so pervasive that, again in my experience, they don't tend to bring up. IOW they're very comfortable in their cultural identity and anything you'd care to call backward has a flipside to it.
Of course, the guy Kuros is quoting may not be the best example of that, but, at the same time, I think what he's on about is not entirely different from people talking about the founding fathers in the US and should only be taken as such. He's clearly trying to inspire his people, and it should be taken about as seriously as Glenn Beck.
In terms of Asian backwardness, a great book to read on the subject is:
Can Asians Think? Understanding the Divide Between East and West by
Kishore Mahbubani
http://www.amazon.com/Asians-Think-Understanding-Divide-Between/dp/158642033X
He dishes it out, but you'd be surprised by how much Westerners get served in the process.
In sum, we're all a bunch of dolts who could do much better.
Which brings us to:
| Quote: |
| They'll all immigrate to the West. |
I'd have to say this era is slowly drawing to a close.
Of course, western universities are still high in demand, but I don't think people are still so keen as they were in the past to come play "American Dream". Moreover, I think the notion of everyone loving to come join us has been overplayed for a long time, especially in terms of the far east.
Perhaps not so much the case for India. I'd say this: Go visit Mumbai, then go to Shanghai. The difference is painfully obvious. Shanghai is/does/can compete with the likes of New York and London. In fact, there is a profound similarity if you consider Beijing-Shanghai vis a vis NYC and DC; Beijing just has a severe pollution issue). Mumbai is a friggin' mess. Haven't been to New Delhi, so can't comment, but reports indicate...
But that brings us to:
| Quote: |
| I agree that the Chinese people would benifit a lot from deomocracy but I think it would ruin their current economic advantage and niche in the world market. |
First, let us not abuse that poor word "democracy" when none of us have it. We have a representative government. IOW, we have a republican government (small "r", not big "R"), but your point about a shift in Chinese government still stands.
I'm fairly confident that the Chinese look at India more than the west when pondering such changes.
Moreover, I'm far from sure that, unlike our western viewpoint, most Chinese are just itching and scratching to have "democracy".
And it does beg the question of how truly different it is to have factions within a one-party system as compared to the two-party stranglehold that the US has.
a) Deng Xiaoping was twice imprisoned before coming to power and opening up China to the world, which started in the early 80s
b) In Korea, our "democratic" friend, martial law and military dictatorship persisted until the late 80s. (I don't say that to criticize Korea, but we can all look back at the history of this and see that it is true)
I strongly believe that the Chinese perception, unlike the western media's, is to discern between different eras of "the party" based on who was in control rather than to lump-sum look at it as all one single, continuous entity.
Can you imagine the United States history being judged simply as "what the government did"? It would be a) hysterical and b) horribly simplistic.
| Quote: |
| China works as a forced labor camp but it is nowhere near ready to compete in the highly skilled markets. |
Where they aren't still living on a sustenance basis as farmers, I think people move to the factory work as a way out of that. They may be far from their destination, but how does their position compare with the likes of Thais, Filipinos, or Indonesians?
My answer: far better.
The essential problem that capitalist societies face is that capitalism thrives on expansion. Otherwise, it stagnates.
A long long time ago, I thought that China would only rise "on the shoulder of giants", meaning any foreign investment they received would only bolster the western entities providing it. I'm of a very different view now. The West needs to expand into China, but China doesn't need the West to expand into it. With its population, China has plenty of room to expand within its own borders and a good reason to do so: their own internal expansion is not governed by the WTO. China is large enough to use Wal-Mart-esque tactics of dumping within its own boundaries. Galant, an appliance company, dumped its microwaves on its own local market to undersell other companies abroad. That's a huge luxury other countries don't have. And, as much as you can hate its reputation, Chinese knock-offs also guard the country. IKEA came in, enjoyed a brief period of success, and then got thrashed. The Chinese can make affordable Swedish furniture for a lower price locally and with impunity.
| Quote: |
| Japan has been seriously set back by environmental disasters. |
Yer, they've also pretty much made it a national holiday to fire their prime minister. Nice "democracy" they got goin' there, too.
| Quote: |
I saw in area in Guiyang, mostly mud brick houses, people plowing with buffalo, but the housing for the party leaders first class. Interesting to see the district leader tooling around in his new range rover. nOTHING CHANGES. |
But the party official in a Range Rover is a massive difference.
And, just as a reality check, these are countries massively invested in becoming bilingual while, back home, what's happening? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rgil627il
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| young_clinton wrote: |
Basically China will kill any future parity it could obtain with the west with its ridiculous cultural sensitivities and its resentment over being backwards for centuries like all asian countries. Both of those issues are used by asian politicians to mantain the status quo and to keep thier place at the top of the system. If China ever guaranteed its people the right to pursue happiness within the established norms that are common to the west then I don't think there would be any problems. In fact an economically succesfull Chinese population with the majority of the population able to live reasonably well would only bring about more prosperity for the rest of the world. But there will always be an autocracy in China that relies on stealing and graft to bring about money for its cronies.
In terms of technological ability the West is not losing to China but is rapidly widening the gap. Ironically it's the smart educated asians immigrating to the West that are bringing this about. |
agreed! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rollo
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: China
|
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good post RGI. I agree with everything you wrote. You can see the best and the brightest in china , not in the Universities or offices but in the factories and construction sites. There is no means of advancement unless you are born into a rich family or a "party" family. The mediocrity of the ruling class has always been China's weakness. China is a simmering pot, there is a strong current of discontent. But no one wants turmoil, this is the longest period of stability for China in almost 200 years. No civil wars, growing economy, no foreign intervention, but it is not enough. The really sad thing is that instead of loosening up the government is cracking down.
I think it was Sir Robert Hart who said" No westerner can imagine how the Chinese want to be ruled" they are a difficult people to rule and how they prefer to be ruled also seems mysterious. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sirius black
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
|
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2011 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Japan has been suffering stagnation for quite a while and were still the number 2 economy the whole time. Germany, UK, no one else surpassed them. They may not have usurped the U.S. as the biggest economy but they didn't go away either.
China is now the 2nd and are pulling away quckly from Japan and getting closer to America. If its being argued that they will never catch the U.S. it can be argued both ways. However, if its being argued they'll fail and not even stay number 2, hmmm it seems a bit more farfetched. Do they have problems? Sure. Tons of them. So did America in its rise. It seems some on this forum have this glossy view of America in its history when it became the world's biggest economy. America had a huge gap in the rich and poor. Massive amounts of corrption in local, state and federal government (Tammany Hall, the Grant adminstiration, at least another administration, Chicago ward politics, hell, a national election-JFK was probably stolent). The rich and powerful bought off police and politicians as well. America went through a civil war and came very close to economic collapse a few times in the 1800s as well as in the 20th century (1907 panic).
China may go through such similar things as well. Furthermore its not like America is doing anything to stay ahead of China. The country is getting worse. Mired in party politics, our goverment controlled by big corporations and special interest. With Homeland Security and the Patriots Act, which government is being oppressive? Sounds like both are and America is getting worse. China has been opening up more and more while America, especially since 911 has been heading in the other direction.
China may implode one day but its not evident right now and I believe some of you dismissing China are doing so partially if not mostly out of western bias and pride. All this talk from the Republican candidates as forcing the Chinese to do this an that is pure unadulterated campaign rhetoric. They'll come in and eventually kiss azz as Biden did on the tour. Some of you have this skewed view of American power. Its waning. All the talk of denying China the Olympics because of human rights violations Tibet, etc. went no where. They flexed their power and got whatever the hell they wanted. They had numerous countries scared to attend the Nobel Peace prize. American power was centralized on the east coast as well for many decades and the rest of the country was 2nd fiddle. China is going through the same process. Lots of similarities between their rise and ours that are ignored. America was build on slave and cheap labor. Pretty much ever nation in history that ruled its era was built on the backs of slave and/or cheap labor.
Learn mandarin is my suggestion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rollo
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: China
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well said Black! I do not think anyone should write off China. I have my doubts about the sustainability of the economy or the government but they are a strong people who know how to overcome adversity. Probably the aging of China will slow the economy down a bit and failure to invest in people by upgrading social programs will certainly handicap them. I think the boom is over but they are still a force in the world and will remain one. The government should become more democratic over time at least this is what everyone counts on. Remember Mao closed the Universities in the 70's and that generation did not get the benefit of education , theyve's had to learn on the fly and i think some of the oppression is insecurity based on self doubt. China deserves a place in the world. One of the great cultures and people who have given the world so much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Floating World
Joined: 01 Oct 2011 Location: Here
|
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 5:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
rollo - for the ingnoranti like myself could you explain what 'so much' exactly China has given the world?
Not meant as a flame btw, just curious.
cheers.
tfw |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rollo
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: China
|
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2011 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would off the top of my head say that the Chinese opened up Europe to the "other". The creation of the trade routes , known as the silk road was made possible by the creation of a Chinese- Mongol state that extended through central Asia and the middle east. The Chinese always welcomed trade. Inventions like gunpowder, printing were transmitted to the WEst from China. The rise of Europe is closely tied to contact with the Chinese. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|