Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Discrimination against Asian-Americans in college admissions
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
madoka



Joined: 27 Mar 2008

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:47 am    Post subject: Discrimination against Asian-Americans in college admissions Reply with quote

Lanya Olmstead was born in Florida to a mother who immigrated from Taiwan and an American father of Norwegian ancestry. Ethnically, she considers herself half Taiwanese and half Norwegian. But when applying to Harvard, Olmstead checked only one box for her race: white.

"I didn't want to put 'Asian' down," Olmstead says, "because my mom told me there's discrimination against Asians in the application process."
For years, many Asian-Americans have been convinced that it's harder for them to gain admission to the nation's top colleges.

Studies show that Asian-Americans meet these colleges' admissions standards far out of proportion to their 6 percent representation in the U.S. population, and that they often need test scores hundreds of points higher than applicants from other ethnic groups to have an equal chance of admission. Critics say these numbers, along with the fact that some top colleges with race-blind admissions have double the Asian percentage of Ivy League schools, prove the existence of discrimination.
. . .

Asian students have higher average SAT scores than any other group, including whites. A study by Princeton sociologist Thomas Espenshade examined applicants to top colleges from 1997, when the maximum SAT score was 1600 (today it's 2400). Espenshade found that Asian-Americans needed a 1550 SAT to have an equal chance of getting into an elite college as white students with a 1410 or black students with an 1100.

Top schools that don't ask about race in admissions process have very high percentages of Asian students. The California Institute of Technology, a private school that chooses not to consider race, is about one-third Asian. (Thirteen percent of California residents have Asian heritage.) The University of California-Berkeley, which is forbidden by state law to consider race in admissions, is more than 40 percent Asian � up from about 20 percent before the law was passed.

Steven Hsu, a physics professor at the University of Oregon and a vocal critic of current admissions policies, says there is a clear statistical case that discrimination exists.
. . .

Yale, Harvard, Princeton and the University of Pennsylvania declined to make admissions officers available for interviews for this story. Kara Miller helped review applications for Yale as an admissions office reader, and participated in meetings where admissions decisions were made. She says it often felt like Asians were held to a higher standard.

"Asian kids know that when you look at the average SAT for the school, they need to add 50 or 100 to it. If you're Asian, that's what you'll need to get in," says Miller, now an English professor at the University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth.

The full article can be found here:

http://news.yahoo.com/asians-college-strategy-dont-check-asian-174442977.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nukeday



Joined: 13 May 2010

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

When it happens to Asians, it's discrimination.

When it happens to Caucasians, it's affirmative action.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kheldar



Joined: 26 Jun 2008

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nukeday wrote:
When it happens to Asians, it's discrimination.

When it happens to Caucasians, it's affirmative action.



Did you even read the article? Affirmative action hurts Asian students much more than whites. Schools that don't use affirmative action (like UC Berkeley) have more than 40% Asian even though they only make up 6% of the population.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captain Corea



Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm curious - are those little boxes for your ethnicity optional?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DIsbell



Joined: 15 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's an unfortunate situation and I don't think there's a solution that'll make everyone happy. But I think it's important to note that the effect is more pronounced at the top schools in the country. Also, in respect to the oft-cited Princeton study, it kind of frames it as those elite schools just accepting any black kid with an 1100, but the reality is a bit different: blacks make up a lower percentage of applicants than their percentage of the population. So it's more like, in effect a black kid could get an 1100 and have the same chance to get a spot as an Asian kid with a 1510, but that effectual score is influenced heavily by the number of applicants.

I'm also curious about the role of extra-curriculars. Test scores are not the be-all-end-all of college admissions in America. Clubs, sports, awards, and life experiences make or break admissions in places like Harvard, which gets thousands of kids with 1400+ SAT scores applying every year.

That said, the Asian community in America are generally fantastic at ensuring their kids do well in school, so I can see the frustration at facing disadvantages when applying to dream schools. Ideally all American kids would have similar academic support growing up, and would have a basic socioeconomic situation, but we know that's still a pipe dream, sadly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
rollo



Joined: 10 May 2006
Location: China

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bull hockey!!! Since many American Universities are investing in recruiting students in China. Duke University is opening a branch in Shanghai. That would seem to mean they are seeking Asian students.
As another poster pointed out many elite schools look at other things besides test scores and grades. I think this article is directed at Harvard and Yale both of which often look at "intangibles" in the admission process.

Being a "grind" does not guarantee admission to some schools.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 10:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rollo wrote:
Bull hockey!!! Since many American Universities are investing in recruiting students in China. Duke University is opening a branch in Shanghai. That would seem to mean they are seeking Asian students.
As another poster pointed out many elite schools look at other things besides test scores and grades. I think this article is directed at Harvard and Yale both of which often look at "intangibles" in the admission process.

Being a "grind" does not guarantee admission to some schools.


Any statistics to back up your claim that Asian-American students have less participation in clubs, events, and sports?

I agree that the desire for foreign students, particularly those from rising power China, makes it clear that Asian students are not undesirable. College policies don't seem to have Affirmative Action when it comes to rich international students.

The reason Asian-Americans are "discriminated" isn't because they are Asian, it is simply because Affirmative-Action is meant to help Latino and African-American students gain access to higher education. Since there are only a limited number of spots, well that's the consequence.

This is all because Affirmative-Action is a policy and in order to comply with policy sometimes you have to do things a certain way. I don't think the board at Yale is sitting in a smoke filled room and twiddling their mustaches as they plot ways to screw over Asian students. More like a bunch of stressed people trying to balance things and making sure they don't get sued by the people or fired by their boss.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
northway



Joined: 05 Jul 2010

PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 12:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rollo wrote:
Bull hockey!!! Since many American Universities are investing in recruiting students in China. Duke University is opening a branch in Shanghai. That would seem to mean they are seeking Asian students.
As another poster pointed out many elite schools look at other things besides test scores and grades. I think this article is directed at Harvard and Yale both of which often look at "intangibles" in the admission process.

Being a "grind" does not guarantee admission to some schools.


Any elite private school considers intangibles in admissions, not just a few Ivies. Now, I'm all for having a diverse student body, so I'm not necessarily opposed to admissions officers basing some decisions on race. That said, all the Asian kids I went to school with were heavily involved in a variety of extracurricular activities. You have the typical Asian pursuits like music and student government, but there are plenty of Asian-American kids who invest a lot of time in sports as well. You're playing right into a stereotype that doesn't have a ton of legitimacy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zulethe



Joined: 04 Jul 2008

PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Any white person who checks their "race" when applying for anything is officially the dumbest of the dumb. There is only one race biologically and then there are different ethnic backgrounds which are grounded in culture.

If I had checked "white" on my most current college application I would still be in Korea which isn't a bad thing but I'm glad I didn't cause I want a future.

It's not a discriminatory practice when you consider that colleges want a diverse group because it's the politically correct thing to have. Ideally, organizations want their population to be representative of the population of the general public but I think if anybody is going to get a bad rap it's going to be hispanics.

Since they are becoming the majority minority in many states, they are becoming the new white except that they historically do poorly in school hence their increasing numbers are actually going to hurt their chances of getting any type of break when it comes to admissions because they are no longer the "minority" in many cases.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kwangjuchicken



Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Location: I was abducted by aliens on my way to Korea and forced to be an EFL teacher on this crazy planet.

PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rollo wrote:
Bull hockey!!! Since many American Universities are investing in recruiting students in China. Duke University is opening a branch in Shanghai. That would seem to mean they are seeking Asian students.
As another poster pointed out many elite schools look at other things besides test scores and grades. I think this article is directed at Harvard and Yale both of which often look at "intangibles" in the admission process.

Being a "grind" does not guarantee admission to some schools.


Yes. And one of the things they look at is the evaluation the applicant had based on an interview with someone who had graduated from the university to which the person is applying. So, no matter what box you check, they do see you. I know. I applied to all of the "elite ones" when I was in High School, and then they find a graduate closest to you for the interview.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zdrav



Joined: 08 Dec 2010

PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nukeday wrote:
When it happens to Asians, it's discrimination.

When it happens to Caucasians, it's affirmative action.


Whites benefit from legacy policies, athletic recruitment in "useless" sports that only whites play, and connections (which is mainly limited to rich whites).

You're right if you're talking about poor whites, though. Still, Asian-Americans have to score higher than BOTH blacks and whites in order to be considered equal.

My point is that whites aren't the ones that are being discriminated against the most.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zdrav



Joined: 08 Dec 2010

PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rollo wrote:
Being a "grind" does not guarantee admission to some schools.


Who said all Asians are "grinds"? That's a prejudiced assumption on your part.

There are many accounts of Asian-Americans that score sky-high SATs in addition to being involved in sports and volunteer activities, yet striking at all the top schools. Meanwhile, a black kid gets in due to AA, and a white kid gets in because he attends Deerfield and his dad is squash buddies with one of the deans at Princeton.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hugo85



Joined: 27 Aug 2010

PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

zdrav wrote:
nukeday wrote:
When it happens to Asians, it's discrimination.

When it happens to Caucasians, it's affirmative action.


Whites benefit from legacy policies, athletic recruitment in "useless" sports that only whites play, and connections (which is mainly limited to rich whites).

You're right if you're talking about poor whites, though. Still, Asian-Americans have to score higher than BOTH blacks and whites in order to be considered equal.

My point is that whites aren't the ones that are being discriminated against the most.


The point is that if asians required 1400 and white 1550, there's wouldn't be much of an issue as it would be "affirmative action". When the discrimination is against a minority there is an issue, but against the majority is pretty much politically correct.

Where I did my Mechanical Engineering degree there were about half the scholarships attributed to girls... while they made up about 8% of students. All of them received scholarships to promote women in engineering. Meanwhile male nursing students were a far cry from getting a scholarship even if the situation was pretty much the opposite.

Anyways, I don't like sex/race-based affirmative actions for college admission and scholarship.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pkang0202



Joined: 09 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think there is a misconception that Asians just study and don't do clubs/sports/etc...


Completely false. Asians know that colleges look at MORE than just grades for entry. Its been made VERY VERY CLEAR for over DECADES that colleges also emphasize extra curriculars. Asian parents KNOW THIS and they have there kids engage in clubs, activities, volunteer, etc...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zdrav



Joined: 08 Dec 2010

PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hugo85 wrote:
zdrav wrote:
nukeday wrote:
When it happens to Asians, it's discrimination.

When it happens to Caucasians, it's affirmative action.


Whites benefit from legacy policies, athletic recruitment in "useless" sports that only whites play, and connections (which is mainly limited to rich whites).

You're right if you're talking about poor whites, though. Still, Asian-Americans have to score higher than BOTH blacks and whites in order to be considered equal.

My point is that whites aren't the ones that are being discriminated against the most.


The point is that if asians required 1400 and white 1550, there's wouldn't be much of an issue as it would be "affirmative action". When the discrimination is against a minority there is an issue, but against the majority is pretty much politically correct.

Where I did my Mechanical Engineering degree there were about half the scholarships attributed to girls... while they made up about 8% of students. All of them received scholarships to promote women in engineering. Meanwhile male nursing students were a far cry from getting a scholarship even if the situation was pretty much the opposite.

Anyways, I don't like sex/race-based affirmative actions for college admission and scholarship.


Discrimination against Asian-Americans is hardly a hot topic issue in America. Most people don't care.

Meanwhile, you basically have an entire political party, the GOP, pandering to addressing white grievances (some real, but mostly imagined).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International