|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let's not forget the Philadelphi police bombing of their own city:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOVE
MOVE or the MOVE Organization is a Philadelphia-based black liberation group founded by John Africa. MOVE was described by CNN as "a loose-knit, mostly black group whose members all adopted the surname Africa, advocated a "back-to-nature" lifestyle and preached against technology."[1] The group lives communally and frequently engages in public demonstrations related to several issues.
Since the 1970s, their activities have drawn the attention of the Philadelphia Police Department. A major incident occurred in 1978, when the police raided their Powelton Village home. This raid resulted in the death of one police officer and the imprisonment of nine group members, now known as "The MOVE 9." After this, the group relocated further west to a house on Osage Ave.
In 1985, the group made national news when police dropped a bomb on the Osage house from a helicopter in an attempt to end an armed standoff. The bombing resulted in 11 deaths, including five children and the group's leader, John Africa. Only two occupants survived, Ramona, an adult and Birdie, a child. In addition, 60 homes were destroyed in the resulting fires.[2]
And, please read the wikipedia take on the Kent State Shootings. Their description does not include any aggressive actions including stone throwning into their account.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings
At this point, at 12:24 p.m.,[1] according to eyewitnesses, a Sgt. Myron Pryor turned and began firing at the students with his .45 pistol.[24] A number of guardsmen nearest the students also turned and fired their M1 Garand rifles at the students. In all, 29 of the 77 guardsmen claimed to have fired their weapons, using a final total of 67 rounds of ammunition. The shooting was determined to have lasted only 13 seconds, although John Kifner reported in the New York Times that "it appeared to go on, as a solid volley, for perhaps a full minute or a little longer."[25] The question of why the shots were fired remains widely debated.
A 2010 audio analysis of a tape recording of the incident by Stuart Allen and Tom Owen, who were described by the Cleveland Plain Dealer as "nationally respected forensic audio experts," concluded that the guardsmen were given an order to fire. The original 30-minute reel-to-reel tape was made by Terry Strubbe, a Kent State communications student who turned on his recorder and put its microphone in his dorm window overlooking the campus. It is the only known recording to capture the events leading up to the shootings. In 2007 Alan Canfora, one of the wounded, located a copy of the tape in a library archive. According to the enhanced recording, a male voice yells "Guard!" Several seconds pass. Then, "All right, prepare to fire!". "Get down!", someone shouts urgently, presumably in the crowd. Finally, "Guard! . . . " followed two seconds later by a long, booming volley of gunshots. The entire spoken sequence lasts 17 seconds. Strubbe himself disagrees with the experts' findings, saying, "It was a really bad recording. It�s pure mud."[26] Ronald Snyder who commanded a National Guard unit at Kent State not involved in shootings said "You would never see anything in training that would say 'Guard, do this.' It would be like saying, 'Army, do this.' It doesn't make sense." [27] Further analysis of the audiotape revealed that four pistol shots and a violent confrontation occurred approximately 70 seconds before the National Guard opened fire. According to The Plain Dealer, this new analysis raised questions about the role of Terry Norman, a Kent State student who was an FBI informant and known to be carrying a pistol during the disturbance. Alan Canfora said it was premature to reach any conclusions.[28]
The Adjutant General of the Ohio National Guard told reporters that a sniper had fired on the guardsmen, which itself remains a debated allegation. Many guardsmen later testified that they were in fear for their lives, which was questioned partly because of the distance between them and the students killed or wounded. Time magazine later concluded that "triggers were not pulled accidentally at Kent State". The President's Commission on Campus Unrest avoided probing the question of why the shootings happened. Instead, it harshly criticized both the protesters and the Guardsmen, but it concluded that "the indiscriminate firing of rifles into a crowd of students and the deaths that followed were unnecessary, unwarranted, and inexcusable."[29]
And, not all the people killed were protestors. Two were innocent students just walking to school:
The shootings killed four students and wounded nine. Two of the four students killed, Allison Krause and Jeffrey Miller, had participated in the protest, and the other two, Sandra Scheuer and William Knox Schroeder, had been walking from one class to the next at the time of their deaths. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you don't think rich people won't use violence to maintain and increase their wealth, you just haven't read about the history of the labor movement in the U.S.
For example, please check out the Pinkerton Detective Agency:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinkerton_National_Detective_Agency
During the labor unrest of the late 19th century and early 20th century, businessmen hired the Pinkerton Agency to provide agents that would infiltrate unions, to supply guards to keep strikers and suspected unionists out of factories, and sometimes to recruit goon squads to intimidate workers. The best known such confrontation was the Homestead Strike of 1892, in which Pinkerton agents were called in to enforce the strikebreaking measures of Henry Clay Frick, acting on behalf of Andrew Carnegie, who was abroad; the ensuing conflicts between Pinkerton agents and striking workers led to several deaths on both sides. The Pinkertons were also used as guards in coal, iron, and lumber disputes in Illinois, Michigan, New York, and Pennsylvania, as well as the Great Railroad Strike of 1877.
If economic elites feel threatened, they most definitely will use force. You don't have to look much farther than the Occupy Movement to realize that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Monday, May 4
Quote: |
On Monday, May 4, a protest was scheduled to be held at noon, as had been planned three days earlier. University officials attempted to ban the gathering, handing out 12,000 leaflets stating that the event was canceled. Despite these efforts an estimated 2,000 people gathered[22] on the university's Commons, near Taylor Hall. The protest began with the ringing of the campus's iron Victory Bell (which had historically been used to signal victories in football games) to mark the beginning of the rally, and the first protester began to speak.
Companies A and C, 1/145th Infantry and Troop G of the 2/107th Armored Cavalry, Ohio Army National Guard (ARNG), the units on the campus grounds, attempted to disperse the students. The legality of the dispersal was later debated at a subsequent wrongful death and injury trial. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that authorities did indeed have the right to disperse the crowd.
The dispersal process began late in the morning with campus patrolman Harold Rice,[23] riding in a National Guard Jeep, approaching the students to read them an order to disperse or face arrest. The protesters responded by throwing rocks, striking one campus Patrolman and forcing the Jeep to retreat.[7]
Just before noon, the Guard returned and again ordered the crowd to disperse. When most of the crowd refused, the Guard used tear gas. Because of wind, the tear gas had little effect in dispersing the crowd, and some launched a second volley of rocks toward the Guard's line, too distant to have any effect, to chants of "Pigs off campus!" The students lobbed the tear gas canisters back at the National Guardsmen, who wore gas masks.
When it was determined the crowd was not going to disperse, a group of 77 National Guard troops from A Company and Troop G, with bayonets fixed on their rifles, began to advance upon the hundreds of protesters. As the guardsmen advanced, the protesters retreated up and over Blanket Hill, heading out of The Commons area. Once over the hill, the students, in a loose group, moved northeast along the front of Taylor Hall, with some continuing toward a parking lot in front of Prentice Hall (slightly northeast of and perpendicular to Taylor Hall). The guardsmen pursued the protesters over the hill, but rather than veering left as the protesters had, they continued straight, heading down toward an athletic practice field enclosed by a chain link fence. Here they remained for about ten minutes, unsure of how to get out of the area short of retracing their entrance path (an action some guardsmen considered might be viewed as a retreat)[citation needed]. During this time, the bulk of the students congregated off to the left and front of the guardsmen, approximately 150 ft (50m) to 225 ft (75m) away, on the veranda of Taylor Hall. Others were scattered between Taylor Hall and the Prentice Hall parking lot, while still others (perhaps 35 or 40) were standing in the parking lot, or dispersing through the lot as they had been previously ordered.
While on the practice field, the guardsmen generally faced the parking lot which was about 100 yards away. At one point, some of the guardsmen knelt and aimed their weapons toward the parking lot, then stood up again. For a few moments, several guardsmen formed a loose huddle and appeared to be talking to one another. The guardsmen seemed to be unsure about what to do next. They had cleared the protesters from the Commons area, and many students had left, but some stayed and were still angrily confronting the soldiers, some throwing rocks and tear gas canisters. About ten minutes later, the guardsmen began to retrace their steps back up the hill toward the Commons area. Some of the students on the Taylor Hall veranda began to move slowly toward the soldiers as the latter passed over the top of the hill and headed back down into the Commons.
At this point, at 12:24 p.m.,[1] according to eyewitnesses, a Sgt. Myron Pryor turned and began firing at the students with his .45 pistol.[24] A number of guardsmen nearest the students also turned and fired their M1 Garand rifles at the students. In all, 29 of the 77 guardsmen claimed to have fired their weapons, using a final total of 67 rounds of ammunition. The shooting was determined to have lasted only 13 seconds, although John Kifner reported in the New York Times that "it appeared to go on, as a solid volley, for perhaps a full minute or a little longer."[25] The question of why the shots were fired remains widely debated. |
Oh really no stone throwing?
This excerpt is from YOUR link and includes THREE counts of stone throwing from the protestors before the shooting started. I bolded them for easy reference. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, my bad - strange how I missed that. I'll admit when I am wrong.
Anyway, it was not directly involved - such as a reflex from being hit. And, the commisions questioned how in danger the guard could have been in because they were so far removed from the protestors. And, obviously, the forced used was not appropriate to the situation. And, the fact that innocent people were killed, well...murder is the first thing that comes to mind. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
...unless a student throws a rock at them. Then $%#* 'em.
That, by the way, is my point. |
Is throwing a rock at someone's head lethal force?
I'd rather have be tear gassed, hosed, hit with a rubber bullet. or have a flashbang go off by me than be hit with a rock. All of which get the protesty types howling in rage.
Think about it- A rock to the head.
Quote: |
Your post basically says, "If you do certain things, like throwing a rock, don't be surprised if the government kills you."
That's some rather pessimistic realism. |
That's not pessimistic realism, that's just realism. Sorry, but if you throw a rock at anyone you are risking the violence of the situation escalating substantially. Throwing a rock at someone's head is lethal force. If you use lethal force against someone don't be surprised if they try to murder you. After all, you did just try to murder them.
Quote: |
Personally, i would prefer that my government treats me better than Israel treats the Palestinians. |
Don't worry, it does. If it didn't you would be living in Israel or the West Bank or Gaza.
Quote: |
If you don't think rich people won't use violence to maintain and increase their wealth, you just haven't read about the history of the labor movement in the U.S. |
Don't worry, poor people use violence all the time to steal money from other people, often other poor people.
I don't doubt the rich use violence, however it seems some people buy into the crap of "because they are poor they're an innocent victim." Baloney.
Some rich and some poor are saints and some are scum.
Quote: |
And, the commisions questioned how in danger the guard could have been in because they were so far removed from the protestors. And, obviously, the forced used was not appropriate to the situation |
Sorry, if someone is trying to murder me with a thrown rock and I have a gun, I'm not going to move closer to make it more fair.
Sorry, you throw a rock, your rights are forfeit as long as you make like you are going to keep throwing rocks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What Mr. Steelrails said. Also at least one guardsman was hurt badly enough to require hospitalization.
And let's be very clear on this. It wasn't a bunch of soldiers moving in and shooting everything in their path. The protestors received multiple warnings and choose to disregard it. They pelted the guardsmen with rocks THREE times before bullets were fired And this wasn't the only incident they were involved in.
Two days prior to this the ROTC building was burned down by arson and police officers and firemen were struck by thrown rocks while attempting to fight the fire. (again from the link).
The day before THAT, there was looting and vandalism. When the police showed up some of the protestors threw beer bottles at them.
From the looting to the shooting it was a four day long reign of anarchy. They had days to consider their actions and to avoid this.
It doesn't make it right but it's hardly surprising that it happened either. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
When you justify murder, Urban Myth, you need to take a look at yourself in the mirror.
You should say that to the family of Sandra Scheuer and William Knox Schroeder who were just walking to class and weren't even involved in the protests. Heck, you should say that to the family of Allison Krause and Jeffrey Miller. I'd like to see what they had to say to you.
Even the Nixon administration said the guard went too far:
The President's Commission on Campus Unrest avoided probing the question of why the shootings happened. Instead, it harshly criticized both the protesters and the Guardsmen, but it concluded that "the indiscriminate firing of rifles into a crowd of students and the deaths that followed were unnecessary, unwarranted, and inexcusable."[29]
Note the unwarranted and inexcusable part. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 2:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Steelrails,
I don't have any problem saying that poor people sometimes do terrible things. But, it is almost unheard of that poor people get away with it. On the other hand, it is almost unheard of that rich people don't.
If there were justice, most of the bad behavior by rich and poor people wouldn't happen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:49 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
Quote: |
I'd rather have be tear gassed, hosed, hit with a rubber bullet. or have a flashbang go off by me than be hit with a rock. All of which get the protesty types howling in rage. |
Note to protesters: wear your own riot gear if you can afford it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Unposter wrote: |
Steelrails,
I don't have any problem saying that poor people sometimes do terrible things. But, it is almost unheard of that poor people get away with it. On the other hand, it is almost unheard of that rich people don't.
If there were justice, most of the bad behavior by rich and poor people wouldn't happen. |
Dude, poor people get away with robbing, shooting, or burglarizing folks all the time... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Unposter wrote: |
When you justify murder, Urban Myth, you need to take a look at yourself in the mirror.
. |
The only looking that needs to be done is by you at my last post.
I said quite clearly "It doesn't make it right but it's hardly surprising that it happened either"
What part of "it doesn't make it right" are you incapable of understanding?
Here I'll help you out. It means that the shooting of the students was not right. Got it? However given the stress of the past days and the repeated attacks it is not suprising that the National Guardsmen fired. In other words it is understandable. Which STILL DOES NOT JUSTIFY THEIR INDISCRIMINATE SHOOTING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sorry but I don't see how it is "understandable." And, I think you overstate about the environment. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unposter wrote: |
I'm sorry but I don't see how it is "understandable." And, I think you overstate about the environment. |
The "environment" was from your link. And if you think that having hundreds of people yelling and throwing rocks at you and seeing your buddy taken to the hospital as a result of such rock throwing is not stressful...
That is what I meant by "understandable". When people are under stress they don't always behave as they should.
They were retreating to regroup and some students came after them (again from your link). Sounds like they panicked and opened fire. Remember these were not regular Army troops but 'civilian soldiers' (so more likely to lose their heads in tough circumstances which it would appear is what they did).
And if you want to say "sorry" you could start by apologizing for claiming that I am attempting to justify murder...when I CLEARLY SAID THAT THE SHOOTING WAS NOT RIGHT. Maybe the third time is the charm? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wintermute
Joined: 01 Oct 2007
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steelrails wrote: |
Quote: |
...unless a student throws a rock at them. Then $%#* 'em.
That, by the way, is my point. |
Is throwing a rock at someone's head lethal force? spoiler alert: NO!
I'd rather have be tear gassed, hosed, hit with a rubber bullet. or have a flashbang go off by me than be hit with a rock. All of which get the protesty types howling in rage.
Think about it- A rock to the head. I think it's lucky I'm wearing a helmet.
-snip-
note - you are quoting a different poster here, just FYI
Quote: |
If you don't think rich people won't use violence to maintain and increase their wealth, you just haven't read about the history of the labor movement in the U.S. |
Don't worry, poor people use violence all the time to steal money from other people, often other poor people.
I don't doubt the rich use violence, however it seems some people buy into the crap of "because they are poor they're an innocent victim." Baloney.
Some rich and some poor are saints and some are scum.
Quote: |
And, the commisions questioned how in danger the guard could have been in because they were so far removed from the protestors. And, obviously, the forced used was not appropriate to the situation |
Sorry, if someone is trying to murder me with a thrown rock and I have a gun, I'm not going to move closer to make it more fair.
Sorry, you throw a rock, your rights are forfeit as long as you make like you are going to keep throwing rocks. |
Sorry, but you are wrong. A rock is not a deadly weapon.
Sure, it can kill you, but so can just about everything in an accident of sufficient freakiness, or when brandished with enough enthusiasm.
A knife is a deadly weapon. Even if the intent is not to kill, it can easily open an artery or pierce a vital organ and result in death. This is a special case in which, as a last resort, you can defend yourself with deadly force against an attack that does not have deadly intent. You seem to think the same applies to rocks. It does not. If someone was stabbing a spear at the police ranks or pointing a crossbow at them, then lethal force could be justified.
You are entitled to your opinion, but if you act on it, you would certainly be locked up for murder - not because you are "bad", but because your poor judgement and low threshold for lethal violence make you a danger to society.
I would hope a police force has some way of weeding out people who are inclined to massively overestimate the danger facing them, then start gunning down civilians to save their own skin. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wintermute
Joined: 01 Oct 2007
|
Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
Unposter wrote: |
I'm sorry but I don't see how it is "understandable." And, I think you overstate about the environment. |
The "environment" was from your link. And if you think that having hundreds of people yelling and throwing rocks at you and seeing your buddy taken to the hospital as a result of such rock throwing is not stressful...
That is what I meant by "understandable". When people are under stress they don't always behave as they should.
They were retreating to regroup and some students came after them (again from your link). Sounds like they panicked and opened fire. Remember these were not regular Army troops but 'civilian soldiers' (so more likely to lose their heads in tough circumstances which it would appear is what they did).
And if you want to say "sorry" you could start by apologizing for claiming that I am attempting to justify murder...when I CLEARLY SAID THAT THE SHOOTING WAS NOT RIGHT. Maybe the third time is the charm? |
Can we forget Kent State? Unless we are relating it to a point about the occupy protests, it's a bit of a red herring. Unposter: focus! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|