View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
carleverson
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:53 am Post subject: Cell Phones - KT vs SK ? |
|
|
So what are the pros and cons of each? I know SK has more of the latest and greatest phone models coming out including the Google Nexus and the Droid Razr. SK also seems to have the more powerful models of the Galaxy S2 - the LTE HD (1.5Ghz processor, 4.65" screen 1280x720 resolution). Humble KT's best phone is the HTC EVO 4G.
So does KT or SK offer better 4G service? Which has better coverage??
And why does KT offer such a crappy selection of phones???  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think there's much between them. It's really about which phone you want.
Korea is a small, heavily populated country so the 4G service will cover everywhere pretty soon. It remains to be seen who will implement it better. KT or SK.
I'd probably go for KT because I've heard their English customer service is way better than SK's. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xhaktmtjdnf
Joined: 20 Mar 2011
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't know about 4G, but I've had both KT and SK phones and call quality seemed to be about the same. I agree Korea is a small enough country where ever you are you get good service and speed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canada42
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's really not much difference between them service-wise. However, from my experience KT has far better English support than SK. Between the English support lines and the KT Global stores they're far more convenient. They really go out of their way to capture the foreigner market. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carleverson
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just bought the HTC EVO 4G+. It's a great phone and best of all I get unlimited data usage on my pay plan. Wibro is quite fast in most areas. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
craigmcc1982

Joined: 07 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How does the battery hold up on the EVO 4G+?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
carleverson
Joined: 04 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 4:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
craigmcc1982 wrote: |
How does the battery hold up on the EVO 4G+?? |
Battery is fine, but keeping the 4G(Wibro) or Wifi on along with live wallpapers will drain the battery pretty quickly. Simply turn those off when you're done with them and the battery is fine. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
socialjeebus
Joined: 30 Jun 2011 Location: Yeoksam-dong
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You seem to get better public wifi coverage with KT (Olleh) than SK (T-World) unfortunately for me (as an SK customer). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wishfullthinkng
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if wi-fi is your game then kt all the way. they've got most major areas of the city blanketed. in fact, for the super cheapskates out there one could theoretically use an ipod touch or the like and just get the kt wi-fi plan for a pittance of a monthly rate and just communicate amongst other cheapskates via skype/other voip apps and kakao. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pkang0202

Joined: 09 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
From my experience KT's wifi has lots of coverage, but the connection is horrible.
Its widely believed taht SK's network is more reliable than KT's. That's mainly due to SK having over a 50% of the market, and thus has had the money over the years to have the more solid infrastructure.
KT used to be the small guy until the Iphone came out, and they grew very quickly, along with experiencing the growing pains. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dwenjoen88
Joined: 10 Jan 2012
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pkang0202 wrote: |
From my experience KT's wifi has lots of coverage, but the connection is horrible.
Its widely believed taht SK's network is more reliable than KT's. That's mainly due to SK having over a 50% of the market, and thus has had the money over the years to have the more solid infrastructure.
KT used to be the small guy until the Iphone came out, and they grew very quickly, along with experiencing the growing pains. |
Agreed. everyone I know who has had both chooses SK for quality connections. Prices are only slightly different.
LG Uplus is said to be taking off. Anyone have experience with them? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pkang0202

Joined: 09 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dwenjoen88 wrote: |
pkang0202 wrote: |
From my experience KT's wifi has lots of coverage, but the connection is horrible.
Its widely believed taht SK's network is more reliable than KT's. That's mainly due to SK having over a 50% of the market, and thus has had the money over the years to have the more solid infrastructure.
KT used to be the small guy until the Iphone came out, and they grew very quickly, along with experiencing the growing pains. |
Agreed. everyone I know who has had both chooses SK for quality connections. Prices are only slightly different.
LG Uplus is said to be taking off. Anyone have experience with them? |
LG UPlus has a rather lukewarm perception. Its neither good nor bad. Because of the smart blunders in the past few years (refusing to jump on Galaxy or Iphone) LG has taken a beating. They do have the best LTE network, so I think LG is starting to make a comeback. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jhicks99
Joined: 04 Mar 2009 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've heard KT and SK piggyback on the same 3G network but I have to question this.
Last week at a ski resort I was able to stream the Giants/Niners game on my SK GSII where as my friend with the same phone on KT sitting next to me using the same streaming site had his connection constantly get interrupted. I can always seem to get solid 3G data streams where as his is usually spotty at best, whether in Seoul or on the road. Maybe it's his handset... maybe it's the networks. If you speak Korean or have a Korean willing to help out I'd go with SK based on my experiences. If not, KT seems to be better since they have global stores. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Drew10
Joined: 31 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
jhicks99 wrote: |
I've heard KT and SK piggyback on the same 3G network but I have to question this.
Last week at a ski resort I was able to stream the Giants/Niners game on my SK GSII where as my friend with the same phone on KT sitting next to me using the same streaming site had his connection constantly get interrupted. I can always seem to get solid 3G data streams where as his is usually spotty at best, whether in Seoul or on the road. Maybe it's his handset... maybe it's the networks. If you speak Korean or have a Korean willing to help out I'd go with SK based on my experiences. If not, KT seems to be better since they have global stores. |
I speak English, and my shop just recently received a dealer code for SK.
If it helps I'm also in HBC. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|