|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You sure do seem to like to exaggerate, Mr Blackcat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| strange_brew wrote: |
| Adventurer wrote: |
| I thought I would add that my first hagwon closed shop in 2006, but I still got my salary, but only after going to the Labour Board. In my case, I got money even after someone's business folded. |
How long did it take? |
Good question. I would say it took me two stressful months. Eventually, she caved in and paid me. She wanted to end the drama and saw that I wasn't backing down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| crescent wrote: |
| PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
| This simply NOT true. Each copy of the contract holds legal value and in fact both copies need to be identical. |
No. The English version is the primary legally binding document. The Korean version does not need to be identical, but doe have to contain the same basic parameters such as contract period, salary, etc. The Korean version is kept on file at immigration for their own purposes.
I managed a string of institutes for 4 years, so i dealt with contract issues on a weekly basis.
That being said, BlackCat is obviously just ranting without knowledge of how things actually work. I doubt that he has the experience he says he has, because I think there would be something else in his posting history that alludes to such a serious event happening to him. |
Good to know then, thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mr. BlackCat wrote: |
[q
I'm not going to argue point by point on this, because I don't even think we're disagreeing that much. I made a post that basically outlined a commonly accepted fact that in a capital-labour relationship, the labour's only source of power is to withdraw. It's pretty much accepted in Capitalist, Socialist, Communist, everything-ist theory.
And still, after all of this, if your employer has broken the contract then why would you still feel responsible for holding up your end of the agreement? I think the French have a word for that. I believe it's "Le Sucker". |
Just a couple of things...since we seem to have come to an agreement on most everything else.
In Korea withdrawing your labor (unless instructed to do so by the labor board) is regarded as defacto quitting. More than one foreign teacher has messed up his chances of winning by doing so.
Secondly I never said that if the employer has broken the contract that we should feel obligated to keep holding up the end of our agreement. I said we should go about seeking recompense in accordance with the legal standards of the country we are in (Korea's legal standards).
If that (as in some cases) includes working a few more days...then that is what we should do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gclancy51
Joined: 21 Nov 2011 Location: North East Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, as a 24 year old Hagwon teacher in my first year in Korea there's a quite remarkable amount of condescension from other teachers on this thread. Sure there's a large amount of unscrupulous hagwon owners, as well as asinine young teachers without any sense of responsibility, but whats being neglected here is the fact that a majority (at least in my, albeit limited experience) seem to have a rather positive reltionship with their employers.
As regards to this "needing to be said", shouldn't the other case also need to be said?
And one more thing, to all those preposterous comments on employers not meeting up to somebodies specific credentials, please dear god get a larger perspective cultural differences, if you are as employable as you think you are why don't you go back to horrendously failing economies we all come from (bar Ozzies) and see how far that attitude of entitlement gets you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captain Corea

Joined: 28 Feb 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gclancy51 wrote: |
| if you are as employable as you think you are why don't you go back to horrendously failing economies we all come from (bar Ozzies) and see how far that attitude of entitlement gets you? |
Did the Canadian economy crash and I missed it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. BlackCat

Joined: 30 Nov 2005 Location: Insert witty remark HERE
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| crescent wrote: |
| PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
| This simply NOT true. Each copy of the contract holds legal value and in fact both copies need to be identical. |
No. The English version is the primary legally binding document. The Korean version does not need to be identical, but doe have to contain the same basic parameters such as contract period, salary, etc. The Korean version is kept on file at immigration for their own purposes.
I managed a string of institutes for 4 years, so i dealt with contract issues on a weekly basis.
That being said, BlackCat is obviously just ranting without knowledge of how things actually work. I doubt that he has the experience he says he has, because I think there would be something else in his posting history that alludes to such a serious event happening to him. |
Ah, the old "I disagree with what you said so therefore your experiences aren't real" trope. Thanks for that. All because I didn't divulge all the details of a personal employment matter on a public forum must mean that I am making it up. Yes, I see. Actually, if you go through my post history of 6.5 years (as I'm sure you did to come to this conclusion) you'll see there are lots of things in my personal life I haven't discussed with anonymous people on a random internet forum. I guess those things haven't happened to me, either. As I'm sure you've detailed every single thing that has happened to you in your Korean life here on dave's.
I also love the idea that what I said is dismissed as some fictitious rantings because I'm just some guy writing on the internet, yet other people are fine with taking your word on your credentials and quote your knowledge. I guess it's just a coincidence that they happen to agree with you.
This is all a joke. I quoted apparently wrong information I was given years ago and have since apologized and admitted the mistake. Yet people keep bringing that and other small details up and ignore the basic argument that I was making which was the labourer's labour is the only chip he has in the contract. Yes, I've said close to a million times now (how's that for exaggeration) that you have legal recourses as well. But if you are in a very bad situation there is no shame in withdrawing your labour and moving on. While I will admit again for the slow learners that I seem to have been wrong on the contract issue, it is about .5% of the point of was trying to make and yet that's really all you can come up with. That's all I have to say. I'm sorry some of you can't see the forest full of trees.
You know it's bad when Urban Myth is the most reasonable person in the discussion. Actually, after seeing him in the contract thread it's not that hard to believe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gclancy51
Joined: 21 Nov 2011 Location: North East Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Captain Corea wrote: |
| gclancy51 wrote: |
| if you are as employable as you think you are why don't you go back to horrendously failing economies we all come from (bar Ozzies) and see how far that attitude of entitlement gets you? |
Did the Canadian economy crash and I missed it? |
Sorry, forgot Canada (as is wont to happen!) It's pretty stagnant though, right? Have friends who moved over there and found jobs hard to come by (part of the Irish diaspora, by-the-by). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zyzyfer

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Location: who, what, where, when, why, how?
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mr. BlackCat wrote: |
| I'm sorry some of you can't see the forest full of trees. |
...can't see the forest for the trees.
That's all. No criticisms.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crescent

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Location: yes.
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mr. BlackCat wrote: |
Ah, the old "I disagree with what you said so therefore your experiences aren't real" trope. Thanks for that. All because I didn't divulge all the details of a personal employment matter on a public forum must mean that I am making it up. Yes, I see. Actually, if you go through my post history of 6.5 years (as I'm sure you did to come to this conclusion) you'll see there are lots of things in my personal life I haven't discussed with anonymous people on a random internet forum. I guess those things haven't happened to me, either. As I'm sure you've detailed every single thing that has happened to you in your Korean life here on dave's.
I also love the idea that what I said is dismissed as some fictitious rantings because I'm just some guy writing on the internet, yet other people are fine with taking your word on your credentials and quote your knowledge. I guess it's just a coincidence that they happen to agree with you.
This is all a joke. I quoted apparently wrong information I was given years ago and have since apologized and admitted the mistake. Yet people keep bringing that and other small details up and ignore the basic argument that I was making which was the labourer's labour is the only chip he has in the contract. Yes, I've said close to a million times now (how's that for exaggeration) that you have legal recourses as well. But if you are in a very bad situation there is no shame in withdrawing your labour and moving on. While I will admit again for the slow learners that I seem to have been wrong on the contract issue, it is about .5% of the point of was trying to make and yet that's really all you can come up with. That's all I have to say. I'm sorry some of you can't see the forest full of trees. |
Having to recoup unpaid salary is not a trivial personal detail. It's odd for a regular user of this forum not to use it when in serious need, and it's hard to believe that one in such a situation would not take advantage of a forum where users may have been in the same situation. Even looking at previous threads from 8 years ago, one would be able to conclude that what the labour board apparently told you was false.
I've been called on wrong info here before. If you say the LB told you that, I'll take your word for it then. Just doesn't add up.
As for not seeing the forest FOR the trees... er, you planted some pretty tall trees. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I do not profress to be knowledgeable about Korean law and maybe laws have changed but I was always told (admittedly by Korean bosses and often it is worded in the contract this way) that if there is any discrepency between the English and the Korean wording of the contract, the Korean version is always accepted as correct.
There seems to be this grasping at if the Hakwon has treated the FT "fairly" and the FT still runs than it is wrong. Fair enough. But, how often has this happened? Whose side of this story are we to believe? There is so much evidence out there to suggest that many hakwon, maybe even most hakwons, don't treat their employees "fairly" that I think this rare paragon of hakwon fairness deserves to be the "other side" of teaching in Korea.
I think we can do better. And, have even suggested we look at the number of FT success stories. But, I bet very, very few became "successful" only working in hakwons. They may have been stepping stones but, well, honest people know what really go on at most of them.
My own personal experience with hakwons was a daily dose of dishonesty, psychological abuse and manipulation. It was an experience that deeply colored my early perspective of Korea. Fortunately for me, I met some good people and have found that not all of Korea and Koreans are like that. But, from my experience and the experience of many people I know and the stories I have read say that such experiences are rampant in hakwon life.
I personally believe that if Koreans really cared about national branding they would do something about what goes on in many (not all) Korean hakwons. I think they produce a lot of people who leave Korea saying well, not so nice things. Obviously, there are many nice things about Korea. But, if a fair number of people don't experience things outside of hakwon life, they are going to leave with a very bad taste in their mouths.
I get the sense that the Korean government does care some because labor board protections have become much more prominent since I first started here. As far as I can tell things ARE BETTER. But, I do not doubt that there is plenty of bad out there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That was a very well presented response Unposter. Thanks for posting it.
On Hakwons I would say that "fair" is relative. What I mean is that every person is different and react differently to their work environment. What is fair to someone (ex: being asked to stay longer on occasion) is unfair to another. See what I mean?
The bulk of Hakwons are entry-level jobs of sorts. They typically hire younger applicants (especially those schools that cater to kids). They do not mind the turnover in teachers all that much. They offer market value and teachers take the offers or they do not. Thats the basic reality of it.
Then Korean culture comes into play. More specifically, Korean work culture and this in my experience is the #1 cause for friction between foreign staff and Korean staff/management. Some Korean employers do not get how foreign staff tick and conversly a lot of us have no clue what korean work culture is like and as a result missunderstand a lot of things. Thats a learning experience for both sides and sometimes it happens while other times one side refuses to adapt and bang you got problems.
I worked for a couple of Hakwons when I first came to Korea (even if I was certified, it was my preference initially) and was treated well and fairly by each school. The majority of foreign teachers I knew had a good experience with their hakwons but like me experienced frustrations that come with ANY teaching position! The biggest difference I noticed was that people who had either worked as teachers before or who had held a full time job before coming to Korea were better equipped to deal with issues at work vs inexperienced fresh grads for whom this was the first real experience of full time work that can be demanding.
What I am saying is that while there are some bad hakwons out there (and some are real floating turds) it would be foolish to say most are bad or treat their employees unfairly because frankly speaking that would be a guess. Its also a bad habit by some to extrapolate from their own personal bad experiences and apply a bad judgement to a broader context (ex: my Hakwon cheated me = all hakwon owners are bad).
Now I have known (heck still know many) people who have done exceedingly well working exclusively for Hakwons. They get good pay, decent conditions and are treated fairly (again, whats fair to you may be unfair to me or to the guy you see down the street).
One of my longstanding friends has lived in Seoul for the better part of 13 years. He worked 2 Hakwons in that time. He is still at the second one today. The first one closed when the owner died of cancer and it was not reopened so he moved to another school.
Finally, my perspective on this is clearly affected by my past professional history and personal history. I lived abroad before going to Korea for example. As a full time school teacher in Canada I had a frame of reference when I came to Korea. For example, teaching in Canada involved a lot more grading (heck it was numerous evenings a week) which was done on my own time and not paid extra (no OT). Thats not fair or unfair, its the way it is when you teach! I routinely put in 10-15 hours per week on top of my regulr duties at the school. Why? Because I loved my work and sometimes ModEdit happened. We had to deal with parents (that ate up a lot of time) and most of us created extra-classes to assist students who needed help.
Just saying...fair can be very, very relative! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: Retired
|
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
What I am saying is that while there are some bad hakwons out there (and some are real floating turds) it would be foolish to say most are bad or treat their employees unfairly because frankly speaking that would be a guess. |
The first "contract sticky" thread was over 200 pages
The second "contract sticky" thread is now 73 and counting.
For much of the first at least the last hundred pages or so...I was the only one replying on a consistent basis. I've literally vetted hundreds of contracts and I use the standards as per Korea's own labor laws for determining what is a good hakwon and what is a bad one. I'd say at least a thousand over the years here. These also include many more as a fair number of these contracts were CHAIN hakwons...meaning that the contract by and large applies to all their schools or almost all...not just the one I critiqued. Now given there are about 70,000 hakwons (as of 2010.)..that's still a fairly big sample and as a percentage it's larger than most percentages that are used by mainstream polling groups.
So I'd say as a sample it's fairly accurate. Therefore meaning we can make an informed statement such as most hakwons are indeed bad. Most do not offer or even mention pension which is flat out illegal (unless one is S.A). Many more do not offer insurance. Again most employ chicanery in their accounting standards. For example if you work part of the month (for whatever reason) they calculate your pay like this. They take your usual monthly salary and divide it by 30. Problem with that is...you don't teach or work 30 days of the month. It should be divided by the number of working days. Not illegal but certainly unfair. And then there's the issue of teaching hours vs actual 60 minute hours. Unethical hakwons can have you teach extra classes above the 120 or so you were led to believe without paying extra with a deft juggling of these terms. Again not illegal but unfair. And these practices are wide-spread among the hakwon industry. OT tends to be rather low...in many cases lower than your average hourly pay for regular classes.
And it was an extremely rare contract that didn't in some way violate or break the labor laws. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
corkgirl
Joined: 30 Mar 2010
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 12:00 pm Post subject: Re: Foreigner lays herself and some issues on the line |
|
|
| Draz wrote: |
What's "off" is that you'd think someone with an MA would be a little brighter than this.
| Stout wrote: |
Of course my job is not perfect. The working hours are far from ideal � 2pm until 10pm. Vacation time is short, only 10 working days per year, which have to be booked and fought for months in advance. Teaching 30 hours per week can also be difficult and exhausting at times.
On the plus side, my boss is decent and fair, if sometimes a little unapproachable. My Korean co-workers are friendly and incredibly helpful, my accommodation is good, the school is new and well-equipped and I have never been paid late � once even receiving an advance from my boss when I was a little strapped for cash.
But even if there weren�t all these pros to balance out the cons |
Being paid on time is not a "pro". It's part of the bare minimum anyone should expect from their job.
An example of a real pro would be if you didn't have to fight for your contractual vacation time. Wait, no it wouldn't. That also fits under the minimum that should be accepted and this job doesn't even have that.
| Quote: |
| In my opinion, having worked at the school for nearly two years now, one answer is that we are hiring the wrong sort of teachers. |
People who want to be paid a fair wage for their work? People who won't compare their jobs with other people and figure out how much they are being short-changed? People who have more intelligence than misguided loyalty? You'd have to be dumb as a post or just very very timid to stay at a job like this for longer than a year. |
I graduated with an LLM not an MA. I get paid more than fairly for the work that I do, and for some reason I don't expect to be treated the same way that I do at home in Ireland because...um.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
corkgirl
Joined: 30 Mar 2010
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Modernist wrote: |
| Quote: |
| A masters degree in international human rights law, but not a law degree? Curious that such a thing exists. |
And you wonder why she is working at a kinder or elem hagwon in Korea for 2 years plus? That kind of degree is all too common in many countries, and completely worthless [UNLESS you already have a job in the field and are doing it for career development AND are being reimbursed at least part of the cost by your employer].
They sell those degrees to idealistic kids right out of striver undergrad programs with IR or PS or history majors, wave the UN flag around and talk about working for Human Rights Watch or Transparency International or whoever and being a 'global citizen' and such. These people aren't about money, you see, they want to 'make a difference.' As long as they're okay with working for free for years at a time, or had the connections they generally don't have, maybe they actually could. But the programs don't mention that part of the deal.
They spend too much time reading Foreign Policy and the job ads in the front of the Economist and Idealist.org and they think some shiny master's degree will kick open the doors for them. Then after 8-10 months of increasingly desperate resume flinging and 'networking' they either take a fundraising--sorry, I mean 'development'--job, try to manage the old actor trick of using a bartender job to finance their unpaid 'internships' or end up here trying to get third graders to pronounce the 'r' sound correctly.
This writer might be a little bitter about her fate, and so not really too interested in the problems that lead her co-workers to flee. One of those 'life's no party for anyone, but we suck it up' types rooted in the disappointment of her own experiences. |
I admire the confidence of a person who can make so many judgements on a person based on a few hundred words. Nicely done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|