| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Derrek
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 7:26 pm Post subject: What if Korea legalized privates? |
|
|
What if Korea suddenly legalized privates? I mean, if all you had to do was report it for tax or something (doubt that would be a simple process), what would happen to the ESL industry?
Would Hagwons revolt? Would thousands of teachers decend on Korea? Would things just stay the same? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
just because

Joined: 01 Aug 2003 Location: Changwon - 4964
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It won't happen for a long time.
Hagwon owners would strike and say such a system wouyld destroy the young minds of the country(or something to that effect) as how can a Korean child not learn English from a Korean. You know it would happen.
I don't think more teachers would come here, i think you would find the opposite.
To get an E2 you need a sponsor, so if privates were legal there would be less hagwons, hence less sponsors.
For the ones that are here and get a sponsor it would be very lucrative. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kangnamdragon

Joined: 17 Jan 2003 Location: Kangnam, Seoul, Korea
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Those who can afford private lessons will learn better English and the overall quality will improve. The business aspect will be taken care of by supply and demand.
Hagwons would lose business, but most teachers still need sponsorship to be in this country. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think you would notice much of a change at all. For most Koreans, this is not an issue. Hagwan owners might not like it, but they would still insist on exclusivity in their contracts anyway.
The only difference might be that foreigners might not be deported for teaching privates, although they would probably come up with some other reason.
I think that most Koreans assume that we are all teaching privates on the side anyway, so what would be the difference?
I don't think there would be any great influx of teachers, all the other reasons not to come to Korea would still keep people away.
Anyway, that's my wee thoughts on the matter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
discostar23

Joined: 22 Feb 2004 Location: getting the hell out of dodge
|
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2004 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The whole reason the Hogwan industry strated is because of privates. People were trying to learn english and the government wasn't able to monitor how much they were making and also foreigners were charging crazy amounts of money for *private* lessons.
So I don't think they will ever legalize privates |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiboy_nz_99

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It would be terrible, the price would go down ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Homer Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
It would mean a drastic reduction in the number of waeguks doing privates as they would now have to pay tax on the income, hence it would reduce the profitability of the whole thing.
Seriously, it would be a good thing I think.
It would bring them out in the open. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiboy_nz_99

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Location: ...Enlightenment...
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 4:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
So I'm glad it ain't gonna be happening any time soon ...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phaedrus

Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Location: I'm comin' to get ya.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2004 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would only do privates.
I'm here on my wife's sponsorship, so it would mean a great deal of financial and work related independence. I could do some part time work combined with some privates. 30,000+ per hour is much better than 15,000 to 20,000 per hour.
Perhaps I would keep my job, but I would always know I have something to fall back on and I would not have to scramble for a new job if I got fired. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paisleyavenger

Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 5:13 am Post subject: would it make a difference? |
|
|
heaps of foreigners teach privately ... i can't walk down the street without being offered work teaching privately!
my boss lets me teach privately as long as i do it in the school (in my classroom) ... then she tells immigration that it's school business. she lets me do it cause it doesn't affect my regular teaching, it gives me more money (keeping me happy), and doesn't affect her at all ... she doesn't even ask for a percentage.
as long as you're careful, there's always money to be made.
and (in my honest opinion) most hogwans are out to make fast bucks. so if they can make money dishonestly they will! that's why so many hogwans don't pay their teachers.
so why are WE being forced to be so honest when the koreans are lying out of their asses every damn day???? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good grief. You guys are behind the times.
Korea HAS legalized privates. "����" ('private tutoring') has been legal for about two years now. Koreans can teach private lessons legally (mathematics, Korean, English, science, etc.), but must register with their local tax office and pay taxes on their private lesson income. Most don't bother to do so.
Just look around town. You can see '����' notices on telephone poles everywhere, especially around apartment complexes.
Foreigners on E-2 visas can't teach privates legally because it violates their visa. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
phaedrus

Joined: 13 Nov 2003 Location: I'm comin' to get ya.
|
Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
Good grief. You guys are behind the times.
Korea HAS legalized privates. "����" ('private tutoring') has been legal for about two years now. Koreans can teach private lessons legally (mathematics, Korean, English, science, etc.), but must register with their local tax office and pay taxes on their private lesson income. Most don't bother to do so.
Just look around town. You can see '����' notices on telephone poles everywhere, especially around apartment complexes.
Foreigners on E-2 visas can't teach privates legally because it violates their visa. |
What about F2-1 visa holders? I have been trying to discover this for some time.
Of course asking any sort of Korean office the answer is always no, but maybe I should call on Wednesdays or Friday, and not Tuesday, or maybe never the second Thursday unless it is Mr. Park I speak to.
The main problem is that my primary contract forbids doing them, and I'm still not sure I want to put in the extra effort yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gi66y
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
|
Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Manner of Speaking wrote: |
Good grief. You guys are behind the times.
Korea HAS legalized privates. "����" ('private tutoring') has been legal for about two years now. Koreans can teach private lessons legally (mathematics, Korean, English, science, etc.), but must register with their local tax office and pay taxes on their private lesson income. Most don't bother to do so.
Just look around town. You can see '����' notices on telephone poles everywhere, especially around apartment complexes.
Foreigners on E-2 visas can't teach privates legally because it violates their visa. |
The point he's making is what if Korea legalized privates FOR FOREIGNERS...who cares if Koreans can teach privately--they aren't native English speakers.
My view is nothing would happen in terms of rates. In general I find Koreans are more concerned with appearances. If one has a private tutor at 30,000/hour and another has one at 40,000 the assumption made is that the latter is better (whether true or not). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gord

Joined: 25 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gi66y wrote: |
| My view is nothing would happen in terms of rates. In general I find Koreans are more concerned with appearances. If one has a private tutor at 30,000/hour and another has one at 40,000 the assumption made is that the latter is better (whether true or not). |
I can safely assure you that having personally sold more than a million dollars worth of merchandise during my short retail career, that this particular belief is very much alive and well in the western world as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2004 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
>. Has anyone mentioned how privates are apparently "LEGAL" in Japan ???
Having said this, i'm puffing on a cigarette here in the PC Bang where i'm writing this with NO SMOKING signs pasted absolutely everywhere.
Technically illegal yet, ( as compared to a country like CANADA ) generally no problemo
The Prostitution (comfort woman & i'd assume men) industry is another case, as are the technically "illegal" copies of DVDs
flogged in places like YONGSAN.
There are likely countless other examples i'm not aware of where in Korea we quite clearly find what is legislated is one thing while what is ENFORCED is another.
All so oddly arbitrary  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|