Guajiro
Joined: 04 Dec 2008
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:48 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| northway wrote: |
| Guajiro wrote: |
| northway wrote: |
| Wildbore wrote: |
I wish people would do some research. It CLEARLY STATES on the korean "hikorea" immigration website that non-RCMP checks that state "National Repository of Criminal Records" are ok. People can now stop asking this question over and over.
| Quote: |
<주요 국가 범죄경력증명서 발급기관 및 명칭 등(예시>
미국 : FBI(Federal Bureau of Investigation)범죄경력서, 주정부(State) 범죄경력증명서(미국 전역의 범죄경력이 포함되어 발급된 경우)
캐나다 : Royal Cannadian Mounted Police 발급 RCMP, National Repository of Criminal Records 등
영국 : Home Office, Police(Criminal Records Bureau, Disclosure Scotland, Access Northern Ireland, ACPO Criminal Records Office)등이 발급한 Basic Disclosure, Request for Information, ACPO Criminal Records Office Authentic Document 등
호주 : AFP(Australian Federal Police)발급 Standard Disclosure, National Police Certificate 등
남아프리카공화국 : South African Police Service 발급 Clearance Certificate 등
아이랜드 : The national police of the Republic of Iland 발급 Police Certificate 등
뉴질랜드 : Ministry of Juistice 발급 범죄경력서 |
http://www.hikorea.go.kr/pt/InfoDetailR_kr.pt |
Except they can't, because it's highly unlikely that recruiters will stop being stubborn, inconsistent, and flat out incorrect in their demands. |
I've been told by several recruiters that they request the RCMP check because it's a sure thing. Often they have to deal with immigration officers that demand the RCMP check and there's nothing the recruiter can do to sway the stubborn bureaucrat. So really it's an inconsistency with immigration offices in Korea not even following their own national regulations. |
True, I was being a bit too hard on them, though I do think they may take the easy road a bit too often, i.e. "you're male so there are zero jobs in Seoul ever, would you like to work in Wonju?". Requesting the RCMP check seems like it could be in line with that. |
I see what you're saying. It would be nice if they would at least try a different immigration officer rather than make the applicant apply for a whole new background check. |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
