|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
wenchstalker
Joined: 04 Jan 2009 Location: Gyeongju
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just a bit of information is that I did NOT sign the contract knowingly pregnant. My due date is a bit later, but Korean law allows for 45 days leave prior to due date date and 45 days leave after due date (only 60 days of which are paid by the employer. The remaining 30 days are paid by the government if you are registered within their unemployment insurance/public pension system which I'm not).
I would have taken my job regardless of what the contract said about maternity because I wasn't thinking about it at the time. However, my contract has no mention of maternity - it does say (see above) about the housing though.
As I read the contract, it was an agreed upon benefit for the duration of the contract. When my boss is saying they are not obligated to pay it during maternity leave, despite how it is written in both Korean and English (particularly with the reference family use etc), it seems as if they are trying to deny me an agreed upon benefit.
The university still gets the accreditation points for having me on their roster for the fall. I'm not removed from their numbers, I'm just listed on leave - sanctioned leave by the government.
Does any one know of any other foreign women who have taken maternity leave from a university that also canceled their housing stipend during their leave period? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First off�just want to say congratulations to you and wishing you the best.
And though you have probably already given this a lot of thought�just wanted to mention a few things from a different perspective.
| Unposter wrote: |
| I have no experience with this issue but I think you have a legitimate argument. Fighting it may impair your relationship with your employer but your victory will help the next pregnent employee to follow. |
...or maybe just make it that much harder for the next foreign female to get hired on there.
| wenchstalker wrote: |
Just a bit of information is that I did NOT sign the contract knowingly pregnant. My due date is a bit later, but Korean law allows for
I would have taken my job regardless of what the contract said about maternity because I wasn't thinking about it at the time. However, my contract has no mention of maternity - it does say (see above) about the housing though.
As I read the contract, it was an agreed upon benefit for the duration of the contract. When my boss is saying they are not obligated to pay it during maternity leave, despite how it is written in both Korean and English (particularly with the reference family use etc), it seems as if they are trying to deny me an agreed upon benefit. |
A bit later...so you can see that just maybe they might be thinking there is a possibility that you were gaming them?
You would have taken the job regardless...but now you want to make something out of this.
It seems to you they are denying you an agreed upon benefit.
How do you think it seems to them?
You are denying them 90 days of service...and they are still paying for 60 of that...though they will have to pay someone else for the full 90...yes?
While the 'letter of the law' may be on your side, this seems like a battle you will lose if you choose to fight it...in more than just monetary terms.
Maybe just talking with your boss...and trying to settle this on personable grounds would be the best option.
Fighting this (legally) over iffy contractual grounds...for $600...hardly seems worth it.
Somehow, financially, it just doesn't seem worth the stress it will involve.
Don't get me wrong...if you feel strongly about this, fight it.
Ethically/Integrally...it could well be worth your while.
Again, best of luck and health to you...and yours. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
isitts
Joined: 25 Dec 2008 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Unposter wrote: |
| ...I think you have a legitimate argument. Fighting it may impair your relationship with your employer... |
The employer would have brought that on him/herself by trying to screw over an employee.
| Unposter wrote: |
| ...but your victory will help the next pregnent employee to follow. |
Exactly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JustinC
Joined: 10 Mar 2012 Location: We Are The World!
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Unposter wrote: |
| I have no experience with this issue but I think you have a legitimate argument. Fighting it may impair your relationship with your employer but your victory will help the next pregnent employee to follow. |
Bahahahahahaha! So taking your boss to court will make him treat the next pregnant employee better?
Oh, you're serious? Wait, while I laugh that much harder. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unposter
Joined: 04 Jun 2006
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
While it might make the employer think twice about hiring an already pregnent employee, like the OP, most women become pregnant after they have been hired. If the labor board rules against the university, then the university will be aware of the consequences of the law. Furthermore, the labor board will further penalize an institution who has been brought up on a repeat offence. And, in an un-related matter, if the university is a repeat offender, it could also be an issue for the Human Rights Commission.
So, yes, if the labor board finds against the university it would help the next employee.
On the other hand, I am not a lawyer and I don't know how the labor board will rule. And, yes, I do think the chances of being re-newed diminish (minimumly, the university could make it difficult for the OP because she has brought them to the labor board). But, if the OP could prove that the university acted in a discriminatory and revengeful manner, she may - and I mean only may - have grounds for another lawsuit.
While not on this specific issue, I know that the university I work for has been taken to the labor board (Korean employee issues) and lost and had to deal with the reprecussions of the labor board's decision. I suspect the OP's university would take any decision by the labor board seriously. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| wenchstalker wrote: |
Just a bit of information is that I did NOT sign the contract knowingly pregnant. My due date is a bit later, but Korean law allows for 45 days leave prior to due date date and 45 days leave after due date (only 60 days of which are paid by the employer. The remaining 30 days are paid by the government if you are registered within their unemployment insurance/public pension system which I'm not).
I would have taken my job regardless of what the contract said about maternity because I wasn't thinking about it at the time. However, my contract has no mention of maternity - it does say (see above) about the housing though.
As I read the contract, it was an agreed upon benefit for the duration of the contract. When my boss is saying they are not obligated to pay it during maternity leave, despite how it is written in both Korean and English (particularly with the reference family use etc), it seems as if they are trying to deny me an agreed upon benefit.
The university still gets the accreditation points for having me on their roster for the fall. I'm not removed from their numbers, I'm just listed on leave - sanctioned leave by the government.
Does any one know of any other foreign women who have taken maternity leave from a university that also canceled their housing stipend during their leave period? |
All you are saying is right. However, right and reality sometimes do not match. It is up to you to weigh the risk vs reward here.
This is 600 000W vs what?
Only YOU know the relationship you have with your University and with your immediate supervisor. Only YOU know if you wish to stay on longer term with your University.
No one ca provide you with a bulletproof solution and I know this might dissapoint you.
Bascially, you need to consider if fighting for this will be worth it in the end. Do NOT stop at considering only the contractual clauses and what you can do legally because frankly it is about far more than this!
You are pregnant and will need the job and all its advantages (lower hours, vacation, benefits) after you give birth right? That needs to be considered.
For what its worth, if you think challenging your employer on this with legal means could damage your work relationship you then need to carefully evaluate if that damage is worth 600 000W. Also consider that in this current market, you are a highly replaceable commodity. It's not like there is a shortage of qualified applicants for University positions.
If you do decide it is worth fighting over this, I wish you well and hope for the best possible outcome for you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Home sweet home
|
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2012 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi! Congrats on the pregnancy and sorry you have to go through this while pregnant. I was in a similar situation. I'm not a lawyer and didn't have to take my uni to court, but I hope I can point you in the right direction.
I'm PRETTY sure that they have to pay you since it's part of your contract. That being said, it seems like an extra, so they might not have to pay. (I'm sorry, it's confusing). When I went on maternity leave I went down to base pay, we don't get a housing allowance but do get paid extra for teaching extra so it seemed logical that they didn't pay me.
However, you get paid your housing allowance when you don't teach, right? During breaks? Then you should get it on maternity leave.
There are people you can contact who will help you
The labour board: 1350
ATEK: www.atek.or.kr
AFIK, not AFEK, it's a group of foreign-foreign couples with kids (not married to Korean), a good number of us work at unis, you can find us on FB. http://www.facebook.com/groups/afikorea/
LOFT: http://www.facebook.com/loftsk
There's also another FB group, but many of them are married to Koreans, so have access to stuff that you don't (F visas, connections, someone who speaks Korean, etc). BUt it's still worth checking out. http://www.facebook.com/groups/ExpatParentsKorea/
There'a a foreign prof group too.
http://www.facebook.com/groups/105493526268816/
My uni actually tried to screw me over, by telling a co-worker (while I was on maternity leave) that I wasn't going to get paid AT ALL: It wasn't until about 2 weeks later I found out that I was when I checked my bank book. I did get renewed, but they've successfully built their case against me citing not being committed to the uni itself or to education and they're going to get rid of me. Just keep that in mind. I knew it going in, the only reason they didn't get rid of me last year is that they knew I'd fight it and win. Now I can't. Doesn't matter, there are better schools out there.
You need to fight them. Call the labour board and ATEK and threaten your school, though do it nicely. They probably know that they're wrong but think they can get away with it. If you know the laws and show that you do, they'll back down.
Though to be honest, you may have to choose: fighting it or them getting rid of you. If you think that they won't re-hire you becuase of maternity leave, but all means fight. But if it's a good job and you think you'll get re-hired you'll have to choose between those 600,000 won or another contract.
I second what peopel say by going higher up. Your boss doesn't pay your salary, check with accounting. And sadly what happened to other women at other schools won't help you. It's a case-by-case issue.
The Labour Board and ATEK were both very helpful and they speak English.
Have other women be re-hired by your uni after having babies? If I were you, I'd fight it, because I'd seriously question whether my uni would re-hire me even if I agreed that I didn't need the housing allowance. Though I'm incredibly stubborn and always want my way LIke Patrick says it comes down to you. You won't be the first pregnant women to be scrwed over. I know of unis who have fired teachers as soon as they could, refused to pay their salaries at all, and on top of that had them pay their replacements.
best of luck |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
ATEK disbanded naturegirl, unless there was a major turnaround.
http://roboseyo.blogspot.ca/2012/03/atek-eulogy.html
I think we kind of agree anyway naturegirl. The OP needs to consider if 600 000W is potentially worth having to find a new job. In this market, you have to know that a teacher making legal threats against a University will be replaced come contract renewal time and for the simple reason that there are 10 qualified applicants ready to take the job.
On another topic, I know a few Universities in Busan and one near Daegu who re-hired their female teachers-professors after they had babies. Sadly, some do not and that is a bad and wrong policy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Home sweet home
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
ATEK disbanded naturegirl, unless there was a major turnaround.
http://roboseyo.blogspot.ca/2012/03/atek-eulogy.html
I think we kind of agree anyway naturegirl. The OP needs to consider if 600 000W is potentially worth having to find a new job. In this market, you have to know that a teacher making legal threats against a University will be replaced come contract renewal time and for the simple reason that there are 10 qualified applicants ready to take the job.
On another topic, I know a few Universities in Busan and one near Daegu who re-hired their female teachers-professors after they had babies. Sadly, some do not and that is a bad and wrong policy. |
That stinks! ATEK had a good list of resources as far as lawyers.
I guess what has to be done is just to look at a contract as a contract. There's no guarantee that you'll get re-hired. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| naturegirl321 wrote: |
| PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
ATEK disbanded naturegirl, unless there was a major turnaround.
http://roboseyo.blogspot.ca/2012/03/atek-eulogy.html
I think we kind of agree anyway naturegirl. The OP needs to consider if 600 000W is potentially worth having to find a new job. In this market, you have to know that a teacher making legal threats against a University will be replaced come contract renewal time and for the simple reason that there are 10 qualified applicants ready to take the job.
On another topic, I know a few Universities in Busan and one near Daegu who re-hired their female teachers-professors after they had babies. Sadly, some do not and that is a bad and wrong policy. |
That stinks! ATEK had a good list of resources as far as lawyers.
I guess what has to be done is just to look at a contract as a contract. There's no guarantee that you'll get re-hired. |
Quite true!
Still, making a fuss over this may not help her (OP) get re-hired and with a baby I would assume a University job is something one would love to keep.
I wish the OP the best with the upcoming birth and with the job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|