Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

12 Extremely Disappointing Facts About Popular Music
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ghostrider



Joined: 27 Jun 2011

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:05 am    Post subject: 12 Extremely Disappointing Facts About Popular Music Reply with quote

1. Creed has sold more records in the US than Jimi Hendrix.

2. Led Zeppelin, REM, and Depeche Mode have never had a number one single, Rihanna has 10.

3. Ke$ha's �Tik-Tok� sold more copies than ANY Beatles single.

4. Flo Rida's �Low� has sold 8 million copies � the same as The Beatles' �Hey Jude�.

5. The Black Eyed Peas' �I Gotta Feeling� is more popular than any Elvis or Simon & Garfunkel song.

6. Celine Dion's �Falling Into You� sold more copies than any Queen, Nirvana, or Bruce Springsteen record.

7. Same with Shania Twain's �Come On Over�

8. Katy Perry holds the same record as Michael Jackson for most number one singles from an album.

9. Barbra Streisand has sold more records (140 million) than Pearl Jam, Johnny Cash, and Tom Petty combined.

10. People actually bought Billy Ray Cyrus' album �Some Gave All�� 20 million people. More than any Bob Marley album

11. The cast of �Glee� has had more songs chart than the Beatles.

12. This guy (Justin Bieber) exists.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/daves4/12-extremely-disappointing-facts-about-popular-mus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JustinC



Joined: 10 Mar 2012
Location: We Are The World!

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 7:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This list was obviously compiled by a bitter, elitist rock/alt music fan, particularly one fond of music from the 1970s and earlier, who has no concept or perspective of the population growth in the last 50 years. It's pop music simply because of its mass appeal. Plus now you don't even have to get your fat a** down to the store to get a track.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mnjetter



Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Location: Seoul, S. Korea

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:49 am    Post subject: Re: 12 Extremely Disappointing Facts About Popular Music Reply with quote

ghostrider wrote:
5. The Black Eyed Peas' �I Gotta Feeling� is more popular than any Elvis or Simon & Garfunkel song.


Elvis was a poser who got famous by putting a white face on already existing African American songs.

Simon & Garfunkel are awesome, though I find their songs too mellow for my personal tastes. "I Gotta Feeling" is catchy, even if the lyrics aren't terribly deep, and BEP has done some groundbreaking stuff in its own genre. Apples and oranges.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dave Chance



Joined: 30 May 2011

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 5:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah Elvis was just a poser kkk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
warmachinenkorea



Joined: 12 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:50 pm    Post subject: Re: 12 Extremely Disappointing Facts About Popular Music Reply with quote

mnjetter wrote:
ghostrider wrote:
5. The Black Eyed Peas' �I Gotta Feeling� is more popular than any Elvis or Simon & Garfunkel song.


Elvis was a poser who got famous by putting a white face on already existing African American songs.

Simon & Garfunkel are awesome, though I find their songs too mellow for my personal tastes. "I Gotta Feeling" is catchy, even if the lyrics aren't terribly deep, and BEP has done some groundbreaking stuff in its own genre. Apples and oranges.


Tons of people from the 70's, Zeppelin is a good example, took old blues songs and made them their own. It's part of music.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
out of context



Joined: 08 Jan 2006
Location: Daejeon

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The numbers for singles are entirely due to the shift to digital downloads instead of 45s. If iTunes had been around in the Beatles' or Elvis's day, they'd have more than enough sales to match the BEP, Kesha, or Flo Rida, none of whom sells any albums.

Not only did Katy Perry tie Michael Jackson's record, she may have a better claim to it than he did. The five songs she took to number one were, for better or worse, all massive hits. Nobody remembers "I Just Can't Stop Loving You" or "Dirty Diana."

OTOH, no excuse for the Celine Dion and Shania Twain numbers. They got those when albums were expensive as they ever were in history.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pugwall



Joined: 22 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As Kurt Vonnegut said, the Beatles were the only people to make the whole world smile. Numbers are irrelevant
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gorf



Joined: 25 Jun 2011

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

pugwall wrote:
As Kurt Vonnegut said, the Beatles were the only people to make the whole world smile. Numbers are irrelevant


Tell that the the bible belt in 1966.

Also, Elvis had pure, unmatched talent. He had a lot of respect for R&B and anyone who says that he just copied Black music is incredibly short-sighted and a moron.

And as far as these "facts", well, yeah, the world is a lot more connected nowadays and there are a lot more people with more disposable income and ways to buy records. You literally had to drive into town and buy a big damn record and a machine a long time ago, provided you were lucky enough to have a car or enough money to buy these things. There weren't also 7.1 billion people alive that had internet access, radios, TV, etc. These are more like "12 really not that surprising facts about music if you understand globalization in any sense".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pugwall



Joined: 22 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kurt Vonnegut actually said: "I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did" . If that joy did not spread down to the Bible belt, then unlucky for them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Unposter



Joined: 04 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pugwall,

That is a great Vonnegut quote! Thanks for sharing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. BlackCat



Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Location: Insert witty remark HERE

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think many people here have already brought up the problem with these 'facts'. I will add though, that every generation thinks it has a monopoly on good music but the Boomers have really tried to lay claim to pop culture in general. Yeah yeah, rock died in the 70s and people just copy your idols these days.

So Kesha selling more albums than the Beatles is supposed to show that kids these days have no taste in music, unlike their trailblazing forefathers? They conveniently forget that the Beatles weren't even topping the charts in their time, either. The #1 of 1969? Nope, not John, Paul, George and Ringo. Rolling Stones? Joplin? Hendrix? How about The Archies. Sugar Sugar.

The fact is many of these music legends that are quoted here weren't necessarily thought of highly in their times, either. It's because they became so popular that a generation ties their youth to them, thereby making them legendary over time. Many believed Michael Jackson was just some little kid from a boy band when he went solo. Even after Off the Wall, many people initially thought Thriller was just a gimmick album. Many 'rockers' dismissed Depeche Mode (and other acts that used synths) as posers. And of course everyone over 30 laughed at the four young men with bad haircuts from England. I sincerely love Vonnegut, but really the Beatles only created good music for 3 years and didn't even tour in that time. Boomers like to pretend that everyone liked the same music they did, but reality just doesn't support that. Kesha may be a joke now, but so was Cyndi Lauper in the early 80s, and many women (and men) thought of her as a role model. Now she's revered for releasing one of the most feminist albums of all time.

My parents thought many of the bands I loved growing up were crap, and I certainly think most music these days is crap too. But maybe that's because the music I had was the soundtrack to so many life milestones, and it became so important to me that I still use that music to celebrate, to cry, to wallow, to chill, to energize, etc. We all reinforce our likes and dismiss our dislikes. And we like to think that we have dibs on what good taste is, and that we found it first. Besides, since when has the most popular thing ever been the best thing? The #1 sitcom in the US is 2 1/2 men while Community flirts with cancellation. The Honeymooners weren't exactly the height of civilization, either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. BlackCat



Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Location: Insert witty remark HERE

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

out of context wrote:


Not only did Katy Perry tie Michael Jackson's record, she may have a better claim to it than he did. The five songs she took to number one were, for better or worse, all massive hits. Nobody remembers "I Just Can't Stop Loving You" or "Dirty Diana."



Yeah, were you around in the 80s? Networks (there used to only be 3 of them) would halt what they were doing for half an hour in prime time to show the new MJ music video----sorry, "short film". It's ridiculous to compare the longevity of two songs that were released 20 years ago to ones that were released last year. Do you think Perry's songs will be remembered in 20 years? Maybe a couple, but probably not outside karaoke nights. MJ had the #1 best selling album, the #5 (Bad) and #14 (Dangerous) ever along with some of the most influential music vi---"short films"---we've seen. MJ influenced a whole generation of performers and changed the way musicians did videos. What has Katy done besides reminding us that BIG BOOBS = $$$.

I'm not trying to argue quality, I understand what you were trying to say in your post. But to think of MJ and his songs as anything but massive hits is crazy. The man owned the 80s.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dave Chance



Joined: 30 May 2011

PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Groups like Depeche Mode evolved and developed because of intensive ongoing critical dialogues about music and artists that have come before.

Same for the other arts.

I think generally most people appreciate that von Gogh was later recognized through people reappraising his work and telling others about them, so that we are able to view them today in a fairly accessible manner.

Ditto for bands like the Velvet Underground, who became elevated above cult status about 20 years after their debut (similar situation for Joy Division, John Lee Hooker, etc).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
out of context



Joined: 08 Jan 2006
Location: Daejeon

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was very much around for the 80s, and I remember all about how big MJ was back then. So big, in fact, that his fame propelled otherwise unmemorable songs (like the ones I mentioned) to the top of the chart. The record for most #1s off one album wasn't held by "Thriller" -- it was held by "Bad," a.k.a. the disappointing follow-up. And I defy anyone but the biggest chart nerds to name all of them without looking them up.

I certainly wouldn't argue Katy Perry has done anything in the same corner of the galaxy as "Thriller." She's not a trailblazer, she's not very talented at all. But I feel fairly certain that the people who actually listen to today's pop music, especially the ones growing up with it, will absolutely remember songs like "California Gurls" and "Firework" in 20 years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mnjetter



Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Location: Seoul, S. Korea

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gorf wrote:
Also, Elvis had pure, unmatched talent. He had a lot of respect for R&B and anyone who says that he just copied Black music is incredibly short-sighted and a moron.

Thanks for calling me a moron, man. That's totally appropriate for the magnitude of this argument. I love you too.

I happen to disagree that he had "pure, unmatched" talent. I did not live in that time period, as he died before I was born, so I must qualify my statements by saying that my knowledge of his work is filtered through the songs that survived in the pop culture eye over the years. But I just don't see how he is any better than other artists of his time. I didn't say he "just" copied Black music. I said he got his fame doing it. Heck, my favorite of his songs is "Love Me Tender," which is an old country song. He borrowed heavily from country and folk classics, and I'm sure he made some of his own stuff too. I even like Elvis music. I just get irritated when people hold him up on a pedestal above contemporary music artists as though he is the bar that nobody can measure up to. No matter how much of a pioneer in the billboard charts he was, he didn't create pop music in a vacuum, and his songs really aren't more musically complex than today's top hits.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International