View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
big_fella1
Joined: 08 Dec 2005
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:04 pm Post subject: It's time for native teachers to be paid weekly. |
|
|
With all the stories of Hagwons going broke and the few stories of Hagwons deliberately scamming employees it's time that native teachers were paid weekly. In the interests of equality, I think actually all teachers should be paid weekly.
This helps the Hagwon as it's easier on their cashflow to pay weekly, and it's makes runners a lot less likely, as teachers can't run on a weeks pay. It will even keep those bad with money working hard as they will need next weeks pay after they spent last weeks on the weekend.
It's helps teachers because they get paid every week, and they can start looking for new jobs should their employer get more than a week behind.
There would be problems as hagwons may get all their cash in at one time of the month, they would need to manage that money over the month. Also pension and health insurance are calculated on monthly salaries, however most of the hagwons this is addressed at would be pulling the 3.3% scam thus not paying tax, insurance or pension.
Any opinions? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stan Rogers
Joined: 20 Aug 2010
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It'll never happen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gorf
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A good idea, but it won't ever happen, considering Koreans are staunch at procrastination and screwing over their employees. That would put more risk into being a hagwon owner, because then they can't split and run with your money once they screw up their schools. If you were to ever get that deal, you'd have to be a seasoned vet with wiggle room to negotiate. Most NETs are over here for a year or less, so their nuts are always in the employer's vice. Reducing risk for teachers would also mean a lower salary as well.
There's also some kind of weird mentality where people think that teaching little kids English in Korea is a "real job". Who knows where that comes from? Anyways, because it's believed to be a "real job", they expect you to be paid the way Samsung or LG pays their employees, once a month. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Juregen
Joined: 30 May 2006
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Talk to the governement first.
The system in Korea is not set up for things to be paid weekly. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lemak
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
It's time for native teachers to be paid weekly. |
You could go back and find near identical posts on Daves from almost 15 odd years ago making the exact same demands. And it's exactly zero percent closer to being a reality now.
If it's important to you why not talk to your boss and post back how it goes. Trip of a thousand miles starting with a single step and all that.
I did have a friend who'd negotiated to get paid every couple of weeks instead of monthly for what it's worth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
YTMND
Joined: 16 Jan 2012 Location: You're the man now dog!!
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
and find near identical posts on Daves from almost 15 odd years ago |
And what was the salary back then? If you look the exchange rate jumped to like 2,000 won to the US dollar, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Korean_won |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lemak
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
YTMND wrote: |
Quote: |
and find near identical posts on Daves from almost 15 odd years ago |
And what was the salary back then? If you look the exchange rate jumped to like 2,000 won to the US dollar, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Korean_won |
Who cares what the exchange rate or salary was? It's not the point of my post. What I'm saying is that people have been calling for changes to the frequency of pay as long as these boards have been around, both online and offline - and it hasn't changed yet- and bar some massive radical change never will. It's up to the individual to discuss it with their boss if it's massively important to them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PatrickGHBusan
Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: Busan (1997-2008) Canada 2008 -
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Korea workers are paid monthly, not just foreign teachers.
That will not change unless Koreans demand it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
The best way I've seen or heard of is when teachers demand to be paid in advance.
I've seen this work, but the school has to be desperate enough to agree.
If they have any chance of just replacing the teacher, they will go that route instead.
It's up to individual teachers to negotiate things with their respective schools,
it will never be a law or anything of the sort. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CPJ
Joined: 30 Dec 2008
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Most of what you posted makes no sense to a hagwon. If I had a hagwon, I would never go for it.
If someone is going to pull a runner, they are going to pull a runner. However, this makes it way more likely for teachers to run as the hagwons would have less of their money. A normal runner loses 10+ days of pay. If teachers were paid weekly, the most they would lose is 5 days of pay.
Also, they would have to do payroll 4+ times a month instead of 1. It would be like asking a teacher to write report cards every month. Would you do report cards every month or every 2 or 3 months?
And if a school is so desperate for a teacher that they will agree to pay you weekly, it is a school you should not work for. With the excess of teachers, there must be something seriously wrong there. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Skippy

Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Daejeon
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think asking for a weekly pay would then change the nature of the worker. Change for a contracted/full time worker to part time worker or fixed term worker.
With that change will likely come some advantages and disadvantages. For example, the school then could then use some legal trickery to to opt out of benefits like severance or pension.
Still anything is up for negotiation. It can be done. Just each worker is going to be different. For F4/F5s this would be nice. Yet for the E-2 who have restrictions on movement. This has problems.
Actually you know what would be better then paying weekly. It has already happened to a degree. The labor board! 10 years ago most of the time these situations would end up with the teach being able to do nothing. Now many teachers are learning and fighting back with the board. Just wish the boards had some English services. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
YTMND
Joined: 16 Jan 2012 Location: You're the man now dog!!
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
lemak wrote: |
YTMND wrote: |
Quote: |
and find near identical posts on Daves from almost 15 odd years ago |
And what was the salary back then? If you look the exchange rate jumped to like 2,000 won to the US dollar, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Korean_won |
Who cares what the exchange rate or salary was? It's not the point of my post. What I'm saying is that people have been calling for changes to the frequency of pay as long as these boards have been around, both online and offline - and it hasn't changed yet- and bar some massive radical change never will. It's up to the individual to discuss it with their boss if it's massively important to them. |
Because it shows a pattern in how things fluctuate. Maybe you don't care about exchange rates, but why are you in Korea and not China then? Don't you want to make more money that can exchange to more dollars or pounds? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lemak
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
YTMND wrote: |
lemak wrote: |
YTMND wrote: |
Quote: |
and find near identical posts on Daves from almost 15 odd years ago |
And what was the salary back then? If you look the exchange rate jumped to like 2,000 won to the US dollar, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Korean_won |
Who cares what the exchange rate or salary was? It's not the point of my post. What I'm saying is that people have been calling for changes to the frequency of pay as long as these boards have been around, both online and offline - and it hasn't changed yet- and bar some massive radical change never will. It's up to the individual to discuss it with their boss if it's massively important to them. |
Because it shows a pattern in how things fluctuate. Maybe you don't care about exchange rates, but why are you in Korea and not China then? Don't you want to make more money that can exchange to more dollars or pounds? |
You like arguing a lot about inconsequential points online I take it. Pick the spelling mistake and run with it, pick the fact I said almost 15 years, and nitpick about something irrelevant to what I had to say and then try and change the goalposts to tell *me* what *I* meant. If I'd said 1999 would you be happier? I tell you what....go back to my original post, and where I said "almost 15 odd years ago"...change it in your little head to "13 years ago" -because heaven knows it's so important - and then STFU and stick to the point of what I wrote.
Don't seek to lecture me about how exchange rates changed the employment market or pay rates in 1998. I was *in* Korea, and working my ass off at that time. I experienced the grief and headaches firsthand. I don't need to link to wikipedia pages telling me what it was theoretically like.
Back on topic though, as I said you misunderstood what I wrote, the point. Miscomprehended. It's fine. It's the internet. Mostly crap. You're trying to salvage some dignity by arguing about nothing now and going for the whole I got the last word, therefore I won deal. Funny, but pathetic and pointless at the same time.
Nothing you say has any relevance to what I wrote, so stop misquoting me and trying to put words in my mouth.
P.S - I am in China, not Korea for what it's worth, and similar to the rest of your post equally irrelevant as I'm not exchanging my pay to hard currency, rather using it on expenses here. So again more pointless gibberish. I *know* firsthand what the situation is like here. Don't try and condescend to me about what you read online when I'm seeing it, hearing it, smelling it, living it even as I type.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
YTMND
Joined: 16 Jan 2012 Location: You're the man now dog!!
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
pick the fact I said almost 15 years, and nitpick about something irrelevant |
So, a double standard is ok. You are the one nitpicking something 15 years ago, but I am crazy for worrying about an exchange rate today? You are funny. What else you got to entertain us with today? Starting off my day nicely, thanks for this comment.
Quote: |
P.S - I am in China, not Korea for what it's worth, and similar to the rest of your post equally irrelevant as I'm not exchanging my pay to hard currency, rather using it on expenses here. |
The original post if you forgot was talking also about the reasons for getting paid weekly. You haven't addressed that. Let me help you out.
"With all the stories of Hagwons going broke and the few stories of Hagwons deliberately scamming employees"
How does one "use it on expenses here" if one does not get the money to pay for expenses? What is your financial advice since you don't want to save up money or exchange it? I am interested in this method of yours.
"There would be problems as hagwons may get all their cash in at one time of the month"
If 15 years ago (or nitpick if you want and change it to 13) was the crucial time, then what was the salary back then? Here, I'll give a dog a bone. Don't consider the exchange rate. We don't need to use USD or pounds right? Just tell me the Korean won. Or is RMB easier to think of? (Dang, double standard again, and in the same post ) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dog Soldier
Joined: 29 Sep 2010
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For those who use systems to pay salaries (not cash) it also costs the company more to run weekly payroll, so yeah, it'll never happen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|