|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
byrddogs

Joined: 19 Jun 2009 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
Los Angeloser wrote: |
TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
PatrickGHBusan wrote: |
Quite the little pogrom going on here.... |
Indeed. People taking a handful of personal experience(s) as representative of the general education system. |
But they all add up to many more than a handful and pretty much the same thing. Are you saying we don't know about the general education system within S. Korea? Or, is it just you and your tiny posse/PatrickGHBusan that does? |
Are you saying you speak for all 25000 or so foreign teachers in Korea?
What I'm saying is you have a few people on a site that is KNOWN for its negativity saying some negative things. That doesn't translate into reality. I'd say that lies somewhere between the bashers and the "apologists" |
It's pretty obvious what his point was. Many would agree with it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thebearofbundang
Joined: 02 Sep 2012 Location: Bundang
|
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm Canadian and my wife is Korean.. This study doesn't surprise me much. We've come to the same conclusion ourselves over the past 10 years which is why we've decided to send our children through the Korean education system over the Canadian one.. We will monitor the stress placed on our children carefully, but feel it gives them the best chance to be successful..
As for Scorpion.. Saying that there have been no Noble Prize winners over the last 50 years from South Korea explains a lot about how you think..I'm pretty sure this study was done over the past 5 years, meaning the noble prize winners who benefited from it would have to be about 22 years old? Not a lot of them around.. Maybe it's time to go back to the All Mighty country you come from? Why don't you? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
We all know what a mess they make of English but I dread to think how badly the average UK student would do in Korean class if that was suddenly on the curriculum.
Also, Koreans do much harder maths problems than the equivalent grades in the US at least - not sure about other countries - and they have done very well on international science competitions too. You can still say they learn a lot despite all the objections about copying and fudged results.
Given that the educational and social system here so strongly values conformity - even more than the average school system does elsewhere - this does not mean Koreans will produce actual advances in maths or science or any field, because conformism and obedience to authority kills the pure academic curiosity you need to break new ground. There's also so much economic and social pressure to succeed and raise the next generation.
US and other western leaders will continue to praise South Korea's system, however, because they have an agenda of cutting education spending and passing the costs on to the public. SK's government spends the lowest per capita amount on education of all developed countries, while the reverse is true for SK's population. An example to us all.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geldedgoat
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Privateer wrote: |
We all know what a mess they make of English but I dread to think how badly the average UK student would do in Korean class if that was suddenly on the curriculum. |
Did you not have mandatory foreign language courses as part of your curriculum? I know I did as part of my much maligned US education, and I can say without a shadow of a doubt that had Korean been taught like my German class was, I would have ten times the proficiency that most of my Korean students had... and that's with only three years of it beginning in high school. Most of these students start learning English in elementary school, yes? And it continues through to high school? By simple osmosis, a properly structured curriculum of that length should leave them with at least the ability to count high enough to tell time and then have a simple conversation about it. Alas...
Again, Korea's system deserves zero accolades. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
12ax7
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
|
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Test scores and tertiary education attainment do not necessarily indicate quality of eduction.
The index should have also taken into consideration whether people are satisfied with the education they received. It's not insignificant. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
because conformism and obedience to authority kills the pure academic curiosity you need to break new ground. |
I've always wondered about this. Didn't Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia produce great advances under conformist and obedient regimes? Weren't England and the United States far more conformist during the Industrial Revolution than say, Korea is now?
Quote: |
and I can say without a shadow of a doubt that had Korean been taught like my German class was, I would have ten times the proficiency that most of my Korean students had... |
So you're saying that every student in that class now is near-fluent in German?
I took mandatory foreign language in HS and sorry, at best 10% of students are conversational in whatever language they took. Most of them being immigrant students who are learning their 3rd or 4th language.
That's how it is in Korea AND here. The fact is, in any country that lacks linguistic diversity you aren't going to get more than 10% of people being able to hold conversations in a foreign language.
Korea isn't Belgium where you have two major languages living side by side in the same country.
Quote: |
As for Scorpion.. Saying that there have been no Noble Prize winners over the last 50 years from South Korea explains a lot about how you think..I'm pretty sure this study was done over the past 5 years, |
It explains how Scorpion thinks- Lacks critical thinking. Perhaps this is the result of a poor educational system. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geldedgoat
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steelrails wrote: |
Quote: |
and I can say without a shadow of a doubt that had Korean been taught like my German class was, I would have ten times the proficiency that most of my Korean students had... |
So you're saying that every student in that class now is near-fluent in German? |
Of course not. That would've been an incredibly stupid argument to try to make.
I suggest reading my post again. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steelrails wrote: |
Quote: |
because conformism and obedience to authority kills the pure academic curiosity you need to break new ground. |
I've always wondered about this. Didn't Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia produce great advances under conformist and obedient regimes? Weren't England and the United States far more conformist during the Industrial Revolution than say, Korea is now? |
Both Germany and Russia had a rich intellectual tradition already - Weimar Germany reached perhaps the peak of Western civilization in both the sciences and the arts. It's an interesting question what made an authoritarian regime like Soviet Russia more brilliant in science than any Asian country, but I would guess that - aside from the intellectual legacy already mentioned - Russian education never valued conformity for conformity's sake the way Korean education does - and that it did value intellectual curiosity. Koreans seem more interested in education only as a means to climbing the ladder until they can enjoy the privileges at the top, which they then feel have already been earned. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
It's an interesting question what made an authoritarian regime like Soviet Russia more brilliant in science than any Asian country |
Victory in WWII?
And you're quite mistaken.
The Japanese were far superior in military technology to the Soviets and especially the Chinese at the onset of World War II. Unfortunately all the military technology in the world wasn't enough to even subdue China, much less the U.S., Britain, and Russia, just like V-2 rockets and ME-262 jet fighters weren't enough to save the Third Reich.
Russia did excel between 1945~1975 when Korea and Japan were still rebuilding/developing. I think we can safely say that the Japanese, and in certain industries (consumer oriented), the Koreans have exceeded them.
I think having a developed economy, government funding, pro-business orientations, and a broad middle class is far more likely to create innovation, but even then these are not guarantees as a strict, authoritarian, statist, nationalzied, and repressive country with high-income inequality can produce innovation.
Perhaps it really comes down to that old quote that "necessity is the mother of invention".
Quote: |
Russian education never valued conformity for conformity's sake the way Korean education does - and that it did value intellectual curiosity |
Never? Seriously? Soviet Russia?
Quote: |
Koreans seem more interested in education only as a means to climbing the ladder until they can enjoy the privileges at the top, which they then feel have already been earned. |
But you aren't looking at it from their perspective, especially in earlier times. When you're country is 2nd/3rd world and you grow up without electricity, one doesn't necessarily have the luxury of pursuing education for education's sake, you have to pursue things in a rather practical fashion. One could say that they have succeeded rather well considering the number of well-developed industries. That education must be doing something right or else those industries would not be leaders.
The problem is all the lofty ideals about education are useless without economic leverage. Especially given the chance that if someone in Korea were to develop something new, odds are that a foreign firm would either go in and use economic force to strip it or would outright steal it.
People in Korea watch the rest of the world, even though we don't think so. And the lessons they learn are not always ones that reflect nicely upon ourselves. Much as they are delusional about their negative qualities, we can sometimes be oblivious to ours and the lessons our negative qualities impart upon others.
===================================
geldedgoat wrote: |
Of course not. That would've been an incredibly stupid argument to try to make.
I suggest reading my post again. |
Your post talked about your performance. Your performance is a poor example to base conclusions about an educational system. What does it matter if you would have been better in Korean, starting in H.S. than Korean kids in English starting in elementary. As someone who took mandatory foreign language in H.S., featuring languages much more closely related to English (Spanish, French, German), at best 10% of kids were able to hold a beyond-basic conversation, which is about the same percentage I'd give to Koreans. I'd say that the completely different nature of Korean to English offsets the longer study time.
I don't think this negatively reflects on either the American or Korean educational system. Given the lack of linguistic diversity in both countries, its not surprising that it's about 10%. That's really all you can ask for. 90% of students just aren't that interested. It's a mandatory class, not an elective.
Quote: |
By simple osmosis, a properly structured curriculum of that length should leave them with at least the ability to count high enough to tell time and then have a simple conversation about it. Alas... |
Well this is my individual experience, which is just as valid as yours (which means it really isn't), but in my case I'd say 50% of my 6th grade elementary students can count high enough to tell time and hold a very basic simple conversation and this is a down year in terms of English ability. Our English literacy rate (able to read whatever is in the textbook, not necessarily recall the information) is about 95%.
But results vary drastically. I've encountered students from other schools who have significantly lower rates.
Quote: |
Again, Korea's system deserves zero accolades |
If it didn't deserve any accolades, Korea's industries would be failing and this place would be an economic nightmare. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
T-dot

Joined: 16 May 2004 Location: bundang
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
The rankings are probably based on graduation rates and % of population with a tertiary education.
Korea does have a problem with their public education system, but so does most of the world.
I have no idea why people are making assumptions based on the english level of their students. Unless Im mistaken, this is not a ranking based on english proficiency. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Chance
Joined: 30 May 2011
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Korea followed in Japan's footsteps, and that's all there is to it.
The guy who set down the blueprint for education and the economy, Park Chung-hee, fought for the Emperor and modeled everything in Korea on Japan's zaibatsu (chaebol)-controlled system.
In the 80's after Japan started pummeling the US economically and started buying up significant US companies and properties, certain measures were introduced into the rules of international finance which torpedoed Japan's advance; they were too much of a threat.
South Korea doesn't have the mentality or heart to actually go toe to toe with the US, and are only too glad to play the role of supporting little brother, as the elite have been doing since Joseon, first to the Chinese, then to Japan (whom were aided in their takeover of Korea by Joseon elite eager to maintain position and power), and of course more recently the US.
So as the younger brother who is ever so eager to show up its former colonial master, South Korea has done well to connect the dots and sell the cars, computers, pop idol music et al in the same manner (plus the aid of the F5 key) that Japan did. Your average Korean citizen is to be applauded for bearing down and putting in the time and effort.
But on the whole, congratulating them for ranking 2nd in the world for their educational system has a rather hollow ring to it, especially considering the lack of government investment placing the burden of cost on the Korean household, and that in this system kids are obligated to study morning to late at night; is this the type of thing to hold up as a shining example to the rest of the world? Is life all about selecting the right answers on math and science tests because your parents had enough money to send you to an elite academy? We know the flip side is an astonishingly high rate of suicide for young people, addiction to video games, bullying, et al as well as arguably a lack if aptitude in broad-based thinking/ability to reason independently later on in life (especially regarding international issues; if the Korean media says it's true, and CNN seconds it, there is no further discussion or inquiry).
Well Park Geun-hye can carry on with what her father set down after she's elected, even though she's declined to have one-on-one TV debates with her strongest rival (there will be a 3-way debate including a candidate who has zero chance of winning). After all, since she does the Gangnam Style dance at her political rallies, who needs to consider how her policies stack up, or whether she can keep up with her strongest rival in an in-depth discussion on issues regarding education and the economy? We know such things take a back seat to image and media-generated 'official polls' (not to mention surveys like the one concerned with this thread) in Korea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Steelrails wrote: |
Quote: |
It's an interesting question what made an authoritarian regime like Soviet Russia more brilliant in science than any Asian country |
Victory in WWII? |
Maybe but the Russians have had a small elite Europeanized intellectual class for hundreds of years, and did brilliant scientific war before WWII.
Steelrails wrote: |
And you're quite mistaken.
The Japanese were far superior in military technology to the Soviets and especially the Chinese at the onset of World War II. Unfortunately all the military technology in the world wasn't enough to even subdue China, much less the U.S., Britain, and Russia, just like V-2 rockets and ME-262 jet fighters weren't enough to save the Third Reich.
Russia did excel between 1945~1975 when Korea and Japan were still rebuilding/developing. I think we can safely say that the Japanese, and in certain industries (consumer oriented), the Koreans have exceeded them. |
Not talking about technology or economic development but science. You clearly can have very skilled technicians and advanced industries with the Japanese or Korean educational systems but advances in pure science have been scant. Russian contributions to physics far exceed those of Japan - although there had been quite a decline since the fall of the Soviet Union.
Steelrails wrote: |
I think having a developed economy, government funding, pro-business orientations, and a broad middle class is far more likely to create innovation, but even then these are not guarantees as a strict, authoritarian, statist, nationalzied, and repressive country with high-income inequality can produce innovation.
Perhaps it really comes down to that old quote that "necessity is the mother of invention".
Quote: |
Russian education never valued conformity for conformity's sake the way Korean education does - and that it did value intellectual curiosity |
Never? Seriously? Soviet Russia? |
I said 'I would guess' and I meant relative to South Korea. That's what it means when you add 'the way Korean education does' to the sentence 'Russian education never valued conformity for conformity's sake'. All education systems impose conformity to an extent, but Korea's is more extreme than most, probably including that of the former Soviet Union's. Although, as I said, that is a guess.
Steelrails wrote: |
Quote: |
Koreans seem more interested in education only as a means to climbing the ladder until they can enjoy the privileges at the top, which they then feel have already been earned. |
But you aren't looking at it from their perspective, especially in earlier times. When you're country is 2nd/3rd world and you grow up without electricity, one doesn't necessarily have the luxury of pursuing education for education's sake, you have to pursue things in a rather practical fashion. One could say that they have succeeded rather well considering the number of well-developed industries. That education must be doing something right or else those industries would not be leaders.
The problem is all the lofty ideals about education are useless without economic leverage. Especially given the chance that if someone in Korea were to develop something new, odds are that a foreign firm would either go in and use economic force to strip it or would outright steal it. |
Sure. The situation may well change and Korea's young generation may start leading the way in science. The Japanese, however, despite their highly advanced economic and technological level, have contributed relatively little to science. The past 40 years in the West don't compare very well in terms of scientific advance to the preceding 100 either. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Chance
Joined: 30 May 2011
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The Japanese, however, despite their highly advanced economic and technological level, have contributed relatively little to science. The past 40 years in the West don't compare very well in terms of scientific advance to the preceding 100 either. |
Generally cutting-edge high tech is supported by appreciable gains in science. When I lived in Tokyo I can tell you there was a lot of evidence that they were doing solid work (I often taught people involved in r & d).
What happens is usually the science labs are funded by companies, who co-opt the findings for product development, which is why one doesn't normally hear too much about their discoveries; a famous example is the inventer of the blue LED- http://www.out-law.com/page-5208
Professor Shuji Nakamura invented blue LEDs (light-emitting diodes) while working at chemical company Nichia Corp. Blue LEDs are used as indicator lights in electronic equipment, car dashboards and traffic lights. For his contribution, his employer gave him a bonus of just $200 � while it made a fortune.
Professor Nakamura, now at the University of California, has since helped to develop green and white LEDs. According to his University, white LEDs are likely to replace today's incandescent light bulbs with long-lasting devices based on semiconductors.
They are beginning to get more recognition, however-
http://thomsonreuters.com/content/press_room/science/Japan-research-front |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
geldedgoat
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Steelrails wrote: |
What does it matter if you would have been better in Korean, starting in H.S. than Korean kids in English starting in elementary. |
Check the quoted post I was responding to initially, read my post again, and it'll probably make more sense. I'm not defending the US education system, and I'm not claiming it would produce fluent second language speakers. I'm saying the Korean system is dreadful in that it eschews functional use for test-taking proficiency, and to accomplish this end it demands an incredible increase in time (both in hours in the day and years throughout the child's school life), much more money (usually spent on hagwons to make up for the poor primary education), a higher mortality rate (!!!), and, if all else fails, collusion on the part of the teachers, faculty, and administration.
...and this is just for their English education!
Quote: |
Quote: |
Again, Korea's system deserves zero accolades |
If it didn't deserve any accolades, Korea's industries would be failing and this place would be an economic nightmare. |
I guess America has the best education system in the world then because it's still the largest economy?
Koreans succeed (and survive... for f***'s sake survive!) in spite of their schools, not because of them.
---
I apologize to anyone who saw the pre-edit version of this post. I was feeling inappropriately snippy.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
a higher mortality rate (!!!) |
Quote: |
Koreans succeed (and survive... for f***'s sake survive!) |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1414751/table/T1/
http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/Publishing.nsf/Content/1D2B4E895BCD429ECA2572290027094D/$File/intsui.pdf
According to the data...
And stop being so melodramatic. That's like me saying "AMERICAN STUDENTS SURVIVE HIGH SCHOOl" because of greater incidents of school shootings.
Quote: |
I'm saying the Korean system is dreadful in that it eschews functional use for test-taking proficiency |
And yet when you compare Korean students in English vs. American students in Spanish, French or German their performance is quite similar, so I don't see what the disaster is.
Quote: |
and to accomplish this end it demands an incredible increase in time (both in hours in the day and years throughout the child's school life) |
Yes, non-Roman alphabet, non Indo-European peoples have to study significantly more in order to learn a Roman-alphabet Indo-European language.
Quote: |
much more money (usually spent on hagwons to make up for the poor primary education) |
But I believe that dollar amount compares to the amount per pupil spent on education in the US through government spending, which I believe leads the world in dollars per pupil.
Quote: |
I guess America has the best education system in the world then because it's still the largest economy? |
It means its not without its merits.
=====================================
Quote: |
Maybe but the Russians have had a small elite Europeanized intellectual class for hundreds of years |
Many of whom were sent to the gulag.
Quote: |
and did brilliant scientific war before WWII. |
Russia was the least prepared of any nation pre-WWII, especially in technology.
Quote: |
Not talking about technology or economic development but science. You clearly can have very skilled technicians and advanced industries with the Japanese or Korean educational systems but advances in pure science have been scant. |
So their is something "Wrong" with their scientists favoring practical, applied science and technology and not theoretical?
Quote: |
Russian contributions to physics far exceed those of Japan |
Can you name any Japanese nobel lauretes in physics?
Quote: |
but Korea's is more extreme than most, probably including that of the former Soviet Union's. Although, as I said, that is a guess. |
There's no NKVD getting people to rat out their parents for wrong views and hauling them off to the gulag.
Seriously dude, you sound a bit ridiculous saying the Soviet Union wasn't more repressive and conformist in its education. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|