|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Died By Bear

Joined: 13 Jul 2010 Location: On the big lake they call Gitche Gumee
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Zyzyfer wrote: |
| Moondoggy wrote: |
| actually your brain cells are dead already. i like your user name though, hogwon guy. O what a miserable life... |
You really think a 33-year-old came here in 2003 and still works in a hakwon? |
He's not 33, and he's been teaching ABC's to uni students for at least ten years. He can't get a job back home either.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dodge7
Joined: 21 Oct 2011
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CentralCali wrote: |
| Korea already proved they don't care about having a good thing when they chased out both Wal-Mart and Carrefour. |
Korea's protectionism makes me sick. Yet they want free trade--which means they trade with you and take your money but you don't get to sell your products and get their money--or they ModEdit if they see you are outdoing them in any business model and run you out of town. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nicwr2002
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:19 pm Post subject: h |
|
|
To be honest, what is the definition of a mom and pop store? When I think of mom and pop stores I think of one unique store owned and operated by the individual. At most, maybe their store did really well and they have two in the same town. When I see those smaller stores here they are still chain(family) stores. Unless you can head to one of the traditional markets (which there are none within a short distance without riding the bus for an hour.
To be honest, outside a bongo truck vendor, I've never seen veggies or fruit cheaper in a smaller store. Milk is at least 1000 won more expensive as well and meat is ridiculous. I don't even consider them mom and pop stores, just bigger and cheaper version of a CU, but more expensive and less convenient than a E-mart. I think the mom and pop stores are "brand" too. Maybe my idea of what a mom and pop store is incorrect. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dairyairy
Joined: 17 May 2012 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:42 am Post subject: Re: h |
|
|
| nicwr2002 wrote: |
To be honest, what is the definition of a mom and pop store? When I think of mom and pop stores I think of one unique store owned and operated by the individual. At most, maybe their store did really well and they have two in the same town. When I see those smaller stores here they are still chain(family) stores. Unless you can head to one of the traditional markets (which there are none within a short distance without riding the bus for an hour.
To be honest, outside a bongo truck vendor, I've never seen veggies or fruit cheaper in a smaller store. Milk is at least 1000 won more expensive as well and meat is ridiculous. I don't even consider them mom and pop stores, just bigger and cheaper version of a CU, but more expensive and less convenient than a E-mart. I think the mom and pop stores are "brand" too. Maybe my idea of what a mom and pop store is incorrect. |
You're correct. What's "funny" is that sometimes you'll meet other foreign teachers who are new to Korea who start spouting off about how "Big is bad and small is good." They don't have a clue about what's happening in Korea so let them waste their money for overpriced goods that are often past date. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Korea already proved they don't care about having a good thing when they chased out both Wal-Mart and Carrefour. |
There are good points to be made about protectionism, however calling Wal-Mart a 'good thing' I think is not one of them.
I wouldn't mind, though not necessarily support, if Aldi, Best Buy, Michael's Crafts, Whole Foods, etc. type stores came to Korea. But I think Wal-Mart might be a bit much.
I will say that the economics of cheap consumer goods, supply side economics (a staple of W. Bush), might not be the best method for ensuring the well-being of the economy.
If you asked people if they wanted George W. Bush economic policies, most people would vehemently object. However if you ask them if they want cheap imported consumer goods, they all jump up and down and scream "Yes!" Do you realize that cheap imported goods = George W. Bush economic policies?
Low wage jobs and cheap imported potato crisps and mayonnaise. The backbone of any healthy economy. Surely not things like high rates of small business ownership.
| Quote: |
It is a bit lame, but I also see a bunch of for rent signs in empty storefronts. It's sad how the Walmart effect has hit here as well. I go out of my way to get produce from the wholesale market in Incheon because
1) Fewer middlemen between the farm and market.
2) It's way cheaper. I split a 20kg box of potatoes that cost 30k with 2 friends. My husband and I ate a lot of potatoes that month, but our food budget had extra left over for some nice cheese.
3) There's far more variety when it comes to fruit and veg.
|
At least one person gets the big picture.
I also like the fact that a successful mom and pop store owner would likely be able to afford to send their kids to a hagwon and provide me employment opportunities whereas the average employee at Homeplus likely can't afford to even have kids.
"Stupid mom and pop stores. I want cheap goods."
"My hagwon boss is late again with the pay. Also class size has dropped to 7 students. Do you think my job is safe?"
Might there be a connection? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NYC_Gal 2.0

Joined: 10 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's a shop on a side street near where we live. We call it the yucky mart, because before a fairly recent total renovation, it was super grimy. The people who run it live around the corner from us and are really nice. When Typhoon Bolaven was supposed to hit, the cashier's husband (who does stock) carried a 6-pack of water to my apartment's elevator for me. The owner's garden is right near our building, and once, when my husband was walking the dog, the owner was there and pulled up a huge bunch of lettuce and handed it to him.
The place doesn't have a ton of variety, but I buy my bottled water, snacky things, and canola oil there. They also sell individual eggs and milk, so when I don't get a chance to get to the supermarket, it's right down the block, though I do prefer to buy organic eggs and Pasteur milk, which they don't have. Sure, I could save maybe 1-2k won on my oil at Homeplus, but these people are nice, and let me bring my dog into the shop without making me pick him up. They also offer me food and drink fairly often, and I've returned the gesture by bringing western-style snacks that I've made. It's more of a neighborly vibe, and I dig it.
EDIT: They also have Coca Cola in glass bottles for 1,000 won, which my husband loves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
atwood
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think too many people squawk about paying a bit extra at the mom and pop supers. They are usually convenient and you're paying for that convenience.
But many are dirty so that shopping in them is unpleasant, their product selection is hit and miss and heavily skewed to products for children, they price gouge, and the clerks are glued to the TV.
There are good ones and they make money my running a smart, clean business, not by the government shutting down their competition. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dairyairy
Joined: 17 May 2012 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| steelrails, why should small store owners who care little about quality products and customer service just be handed money? Why should their competition be closed by the government? Do you know who pays for all of this government intervention into the marketplace? We do, as consumers, in higher prices. Don't worry about who is going to pay for your hagwon kiddies. Worry about the money coming out of your pocket to pay for small shops that refuse to moderize and always cost more than other stores. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dairyairy wrote: |
| steelrails, why should small store owners who care little about quality products and customer service just be handed money? Why should their competition be closed by the government?. |
As was pointed out, many do care about customer service. Yes, some have bad products, others have quite good ones. Not all mom and pop stores are equal. In my area, being rural, the mom and pop stores and outdoor market offer produce direct from the grower and you can search around for really good vegetables and better quality meat.
| Quote: |
| Do you know who pays for all of this government intervention into the marketplace? We do, as consumers, in higher prices. |
That's true. And that's what the economic policies of George W. Bush favored- economic prosperity through cheap imported goods and low prices. Consumers were motivated to shop at stores like Wal-Mart and the theory is that a store like Wal-Mart would provide employment and income at levels similar to store ownership, while providing cheaper goods and better overall economic prosperity.
If you choose to believe in the economics of the NeoCons and W. Bush, fine.
| Quote: |
| Worry about the money coming out of your pocket to pay for small shops that refuse to moderize and always cost more than other stores. |
I firmly believe that the 10 dollars I would spend more a month at a mom and pop/small business is better in the long-term for both my economic health and the economic health of whatever country I am living than the 10 dollars I would save spending at Wal-Mart.
Gainful employment and high rates of small business ownership are the backbone of a healthy society and economy, not cheap (and often unnecessary/luxurious/excessive) consumer goods.
Again, do you favor the economic policies of George W. Bush? Do you believe he was a great economic president? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
atwood
Joined: 26 Dec 2009
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Steelrails wrote: |
| dairyairy wrote: |
| steelrails, why should small store owners who care little about quality products and customer service just be handed money? Why should their competition be closed by the government?. |
As was pointed out, many do care about customer service. Yes, some have bad products, others have quite good ones. Not all mom and pop stores are equal. In my area, being rural, the mom and pop stores and outdoor market offer produce direct from the grower and you can search around for really good vegetables and better quality meat.
| Quote: |
| Do you know who pays for all of this government intervention into the marketplace? We do, as consumers, in higher prices. |
That's true. And that's what the economic policies of George W. Bush favored- economic prosperity through cheap imported goods and low prices. Consumers were motivated to shop at stores like Wal-Mart and the theory is that a store like Wal-Mart would provide employment and income at levels similar to store ownership, while providing cheaper goods and better overall economic prosperity.
If you choose to believe in the economics of the NeoCons and W. Bush, fine.
| Quote: |
| Worry about the money coming out of your pocket to pay for small shops that refuse to moderize and always cost more than other stores. |
I firmly believe that the 10 dollars I would spend more a month at a mom and pop/small business is better in the long-term for both my economic health and the economic health of whatever country I am living than the 10 dollars I would save spending at Wal-Mart.
Gainful employment and high rates of small business ownership are the backbone of a healthy society and economy, not cheap (and often unnecessary/luxurious/excessive) consumer goods.
Again, do you favor the economic policies of George W. Bush? Do you believe he was a great economic president? |
Can you show any real links between shopping at Wal-mart and Bush's economic policies? Or any evidence that people believed working at Wal-mart would provide the same income as owning your own hardware, butcher or electronics shop?
| Quote: |
| Wal-Mart�s �everyday low prices� were built on leveraging economies of scale, low-price Chinese suppliers, advanced satellite-based IT systems for inventory and shelf management, and �float� � paying suppliers in 90 days, while selling their goods within 7. The latter �float� is a three-month interest-free loan, which on Wal-Mart�s annual $351 b. annual sales (now second to Exxon-Mobil in revenues), is worth about $4 b. |
I don't know what any of that has to do with Bush.
If the mom and pop store is providing a service for that extra $10 then it may be money well spent, but the problem is that many supers offer very little in the way of service or product selection and that's what driving shoppers away. If I need a quart of milk I'd rather walk the two minutes to the super than the 10 to HomePlus, but the super almost never has non-fat milk. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
The person was advocating supply-side economics in simplistic form. Cheap imported consumer goods are better for the economy and one's own personal finances. Stores like Wal-Mart are representative of that. Barriers to trade and protectionism are always bad. Those stores that are inefficient will be replaced by efficient ones like Wal-Mart and that in theory, the same income earned at mom and pop stores should be transferred to them as they become employees at Wal-Mart.
I say screw it. Pay 10 bucks more per month for less variety and slightly inferior consumer products, much of which gets wasted anyway or is an excess. Gainful employment and small business ownership for your community is preferable to being able to find cheaper low-fat milk provided by a bunch of 4 dollar an hour clerks who won't be able to afford to even have kids to send to the hagwon that employees me.
Gainful employment and ownership, not consumer goods are essential to a good society. Or do you really believe that cheaper milk is going to lead to better prosperity? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NYC_Gal 2.0

Joined: 10 Dec 2010
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Lowfat milk sucks anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dairyairy
Joined: 17 May 2012 Location: South Korea
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Steelrails, you keep comparing economic conditions in Korea to the USA, and the fact is that in Korea in 2013 the conditions are all anti-consumer, and the government is actively limiting consumer choices to an extreme degree. There's simply no justification for that kind of strangulation of the free market in order to limit consumer choices. The justification for doing it, "helping smaller merchants", is iffy at best, and the consequences are that higher prices are being paid by consumers and consumers are being inconvenienced in extreme ways. All of this is being done in the middle of a Korean recession and worldwide economic depression. Hopefully someone in the new administration will understand basic economics and alleviate the situation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nicwr2002
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:49 am Post subject: g |
|
|
| I'm willing to argue that there aren't really any small businesses, they are really part of huge chains that just look like small businesses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cdninkorea

Joined: 27 Jan 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Steelrails wrote: |
I firmly believe that the 10 dollars I would spend more a month at a mom and pop/small business is better in the long-term for both my economic health and the economic health of whatever country I am living than the 10 dollars I would save spending at Wal-Mart.
Gainful employment and high rates of small business ownership are the backbone of a healthy society and economy, not cheap (and often unnecessary/luxurious/excessive) consumer goods. |
You're assuming the $10 you spend at a small business would somehow disappear if you hadn't had to spend it by going to Wal-mart. It wouldn't.
If you save $10 shopping at Wal-mart, it means you have an extra $10 for something else. You might decide to spend it elsewhere, which means it stimulates economic health in whichever industry you spend it in, and, this is so important I want to put it in boldface, you get more utility for the same amount of money, since you've bought more with it.
Maybe you decide to save it, which is then loaned out by the bank to someone wanting a mortgage, car loan, or looking to expand their business.
Oh, and about George Bush: No, he was not a good president on economic issues. The only way he could have been would be to leave the economy alone, i.e. laissez-faire. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|