View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Weigookin74
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 5:48 pm Post subject: Newbies: stay home. North Korean war possible. |
|
|
I will stay because I am far enough south. But I wouldn't be going anywheres near Seoul, Gyeong-gi do, Daejeon, Daegu, etc. Think it's best if you stay home or teach in another country, like China or Vietnam. Another blog here states better reasons why danger may be imminent. I'm usually one to shrug these things off. But having heard from US personnel myself, you'd be best avoiding things for several months. If I weren't already here and set up, I'd prob reconsider coming over myself. But, best of luck whatever you decide. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PigeonFart
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Agreed
Newbies should not come here. Even better i'd like to see others leave their jobs and go home within the next few weeks. (I'd like things to be like they were before the big influx a few years ago ) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
augustine
Joined: 08 Sep 2012 Location: México
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Psf... selfish propagandizing.
Don't listen to this Canuckery. If anything goes down, people in Seoul will have good seats to watch the big boys torch those fools up north. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chrisinkorea2011
Joined: 16 Jan 2011
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah warn others to stay away right? And the US personnel MUST be 100% accurate. Just so you know if something happens if youre so far south id have a guess to as you being near busan or gwangju and being those are bigger areas have just as much a chance as being hit as seoul or else where. The north declared their "war" against the US and S. Korea so there would be more targets that just locations you stated. Aish seriously, get a damn clue.
Of course this is considering that the north will even make a move. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Threequalseven
Joined: 08 May 2012
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
People are being led to believe that NK is the aggressor by the Western media, but I doubt this could be further from the truth. First, how much military power does NK even have? They don't even have military aircraft. Are we led to believe that they'll use all their armaments blowing up South Korea just to leave themselves defenseless immediately after? Sure they have more military personal than the South, but other than bumrushing the DMZ, they really don't have much for options.
It's much more probable that the US has finally had enough and is going to take control of the North as they did with the South after the Korea War. Fresh sanctions and drone exercises are a good indicator of this. The news is always eager to make a headline story anytime NK claims that they will defend themselves, but I will not be persuaded into thinking the North is leading the saber-rattling that's been going on. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nicwr2002
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Threequalseven wrote: |
People are being led to believe that NK is the aggressor by the Western media, but I doubt this could be further from the truth. First, how much military power does NK even have? They don't even have military aircraft. Are we led to believe that they'll use all their armaments blowing up South Korea just to leave themselves defenseless immediately after? Sure they have more military personal than the South, but other than bumrushing the DMZ, they really don't have much for options.
It's much more probable that the US has finally had enough and is going to take control of the North as they did with the South after the Korea War. Fresh sanctions and drone exercises are a good indicator of this. The news is always eager to make a headline story anytime NK claims that they will defend themselves, but I will not be persuaded into thinking the North is leading the saber-rattling that's been going on. |
Seriously? Do you really think that the US would attack NK without China's and Russia's agreement? So, it's American media's fault and the US government's fault for starting the saber-rattling when NK tested nukes several times? Has NK not always said that they would love to take over the South who has betrayed their true country?
On another note, if you are into the conspiracy stuff, why would the US attack NK? They don't have any oil to take anyways. Seems like a waste of time and money right? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yaya

Joined: 25 Feb 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The sky is falling, the sky is falling!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Weigookin74
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Weigookin74
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are chances of missles falling anywhere, even down south. But there's more of a chance of having most of them fall up North (Seoul and area). As far as troops, perhaps they could make it through to Seoul and Gyeong-gi area, even down near Daejeon. I would suspect every white person would be shot on the spot by Nork troops as a capitalist dirty foriegner polluting the pure Korean race. You'd have to hide inside and hope a missle doesn't hit you. Being further south lowers the likelyhood of running into North troops, though there may be spies anywheres. Who knows? As I've said, I got to much going on to leave and am far enough away from things. But as a newbie, stay away if you're smart. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
augustine
Joined: 08 Sep 2012 Location: México
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lil Kim's just stomping his feet around and trying to establish some cred with his own crew. Unless he's a total idiot, wants to commit suicide, and have his country no longer exist within a matter of hours, he's not going to do anything really significant. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rollo
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: China
|
Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
3x7; Of course the U.s. is the aggresor. In the past the U.s. has blown up a civillian airliner, attacked a warship and killed sailors, and shot up an island and killed civilians. Oh wait! that was the peacful North koreans
North korea doesnt have war planes??? they can have anything the Chinese want them to have including SU 27 flankers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
World Traveler
Joined: 29 May 2009
|
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Threequalseven wrote: |
First, how much military power does NK even have? They don't even have military aircraft. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_People%27s_Air_Force
North Korea has more than triple the number of military aircraft as South Korea.
South Korea's air force:
Quote: |
The ROKAF has about 500 combat aircraft |
North Korea's air force:
Quote: |
between 1,600 and 1,700 aircraft of different types |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Head for Dok-do...kwikk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Itz thu ownlee sayfe playse in Kkorea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mw182006
Joined: 13 Feb 2013
|
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry dudes, it's either head to China and deal with pig-water and bird flu 2.0, or take my chances with nuclear Korea. Hope yall are still there in the Fall! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ranman
Joined: 18 Aug 2012
|
Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2013 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
World Traveler wrote: |
Threequalseven wrote: |
First, how much military power does NK even have? They don't even have military aircraft. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_People%27s_Air_Force
North Korea has more than triple the number of military aircraft as South Korea.
South Korea's air force:
Quote: |
The ROKAF has about 500 combat aircraft |
North Korea's air force:
Quote: |
between 1,600 and 1,700 aircraft of different types |
|
You do realize that most of their aircraft are 3rd generation tech stuff like MIG-21s and MIG-23s, right? The highest quality aircraft they have are 40 MIG-29 Fulcrums that they keep around Pyongyang.
Aerospace technology has reached a point where numbers don't mean much. F-22s can engage up to 6-8 targets at a time with their onboard computers. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|