|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ghostrider
Joined: 27 Jun 2011
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 12:14 am Post subject: Are We Evolving To Be Stupider? |
|
|
Since dumb people are more likely to reproduce their genes are more likely to be passed on to the next generation. Over time there is a significant decline in average IQ. I wonder how long it will take us to get down to the intelligence level of chimpanzees.
Quote: |
"These findings strongly indicate that with respect to general intelligence the Victorians were substantially cleverer than modern Western populations," the study says.The study had other positive observations about the Victorian era, noting that economic efficiency began to flourish during the period and that the �height of the per capita numbers of significant innovations in science and technology, and also the per capita numbers of scientific geniuses,� occurred during that time, followed by a steady decline. |
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/researchers-western-iqs-dropped-14-points-over-last-180634194.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joelove
Joined: 12 May 2011
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
It does seem that dumb people are more likely to have kids, or more kids, than smarter people. You'd think smarter people would have an easier time attracting a mate though. I don't think being a geek or nerd is as bad as it was socially a few decades ago, if it ever was really that bad, or was that just in movies? But there is still a lot of anti-intellectualism, or whatever it's called. It's almost like you're expected to be smart but never sound like it.
I was of the impression that people were getting smarter actually. It just seems like younger people know more than when I was a teenager, before the Internet. We have easier access to information at least, but also I guess people don't read as much as they used to either. In some ways the world has become more complex, it seems.
I have a feeling people were saying all these sorts of things 20, 40, 60, ...
years ago as well. A bit of "oh, the past was better" kind of thinking, forgetting all the troubles that were present then, remembering simpler times or whatever it is people do when they think of older days. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Died By Bear

Joined: 13 Jul 2010 Location: On the big lake they call Gitche Gumee
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80lEy-iYGTY
Lornsome night, babbits bawlin', wind bitin' the bone. Wind like this, full of voices. Ancestry howlin' at you; 'you bring the stories'. All their voices tied up into one. One voice different, one voice whispering out there, spying from the dark. Now, find you devil, Old Georgie himself. Now you hear up close and I'll yarn you about the first time we met eye to eye. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
young_clinton
Joined: 09 Sep 2009
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
joelove wrote: |
It does seem that dumb people are more likely to have kids, or more kids, than smarter people. You'd think smarter people would have an easier time attracting a mate though. |
Intelligent people tend to say things that are irrelevant to people that are mediocre or dumb. Thus the genes tend to get taken out of the gene pool. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
World Traveler
Joined: 29 May 2009
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FMPJ
Joined: 03 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect
Quote: |
The Flynn effect is the substantial and long-sustained increase in intelligence test scores measured in many parts of the world from roughly 1930 to the present day. When intelligence quotient (IQ) tests are initially standardized using a sample of test-takers, by convention the average of the test results is set to 100 and their standard deviation is set to 15 or 16 IQ points. When IQ tests are revised, they are again standardized using a new sample of test-takers, usually born more recently than the first. Again, the average result is set to 100. However, when the new test subjects take the older tests, in almost every case their average scores are significantly above 100.
Test score increases have been continuous and approximately linear from the earliest years of testing to the present. For the Raven's Progressive Matrices test, subjects born over a 100 year period were compared in Des Moines, Iowa, and separately in Dumfries, Scotland. Improvements were remarkably consistent across the whole period, in both countries.[1] This effect of an apparent increase in IQ has also been observed in various other parts of the world, though the rates of increase vary.[2] |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Julius

Joined: 27 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
joelove wrote: |
It does seem that dumb people are more likely to have kids, or more kids, than smarter people. |
The growth of the welfare state may have had something to do with it.
They also tend to view life more simplistically. They don't over-think anything too much.
Quote: |
You'd think smarter people would have an easier time attracting a mate though. |
Attraction appears to depend on pretty basic/ primitive things. Stuff that thinking or intelligent people tend to move away from in life.
What worries me is this massive growth in video games.
.. people are stopping reading books, for example, and switching to lazy entertainment that does not require an attention span. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
schwa
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 Location: Yap
|
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Julius wrote: |
...What worries me is this massive growth in video games.
.. people are stopping reading books, for example, and switching to lazy entertainment that does not require an attention span. |
An apt observation. While stunted reading ability might not reflect intelligence levels directly, it does point to a certain intellectual decline.
Case in point: Charles Dickens. 150 years ago, his novels were hugely popular across class & age demographics. Even the illiterate paid money to have his stories read to them. Not highbrow. Marvelous writer. Nowadays relatively few adults could keep up with his vocabulary, wit, & long sentences, let alone for simple reading pleasure. Kids, forget it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joelove
Joined: 12 May 2011
|
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
We have some support for claims of people getting smarter and some who can back up claims of the opposite.
Has the average attention span decreased? Are people less patient? Why all these diagnoses of attention problems in recent times? A real problem that was previously unnoticed or just a way to sell drugs?
Has the vocabulary of the average adult decreased as well? That sounds strange if more people have more education. It seems to me most people hate hearing or using big words in everyday talking. I'm not sure why this is. A lot of very smart people seem to use the simplest words though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Times30
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
|
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Intelligence is hugely subjective. If anything, the "stupid" people who manage to procreate versus the "intelligent" who don't, creates a real quandary...
Who is the most intelligent creature if we're following evolutionary objectives? Technically as animals our objective is to pass our genetic lineage. That's essentially the only purpose we live for at it's most basic. The failure to do so could be considered "stupid". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steelrails

Joined: 12 Mar 2009 Location: Earth, Solar System
|
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The culture of ignorance. Somewhere between 1960-1990 (It wasn't an abrupt event but rather just a rising phenomenon), we started to treat being smart, having a strong vocabulary, and having a strong educational background as objects of derision.
This isn't the apologist in me saying this- I think a large part has to do with the decline in rote memorization, the increasing emphasis on grades, and the rise of the essay as the means to evaluate students. Rote is not the key to educational aptitude, but it is important to have a base of knowledge stored in your brain. If you lack that base, it is impossible to make intelligent decisions. In an effort to give more "opportunity" and to balance schools, we've emphasized grades (which often reward doing homework) over test scores- which if structured correctly, will show that you understand the concepts. Lastly, the rise of the essay as a means of evaluation, while good in theory, has in practice turned into 30 students handing in 8 pages of BS each. Add to this the emphasis of citing sources rather than exploring the concept often results in papers that have the requisite number of sources with little connecting them and no coherent conclusion.
When out with people under 35 or so, it is shocking what their level of ignorance is. People over 35, even anti-intellectual types, tend to still be rather cogent about history, literature, and subjects that are outside their disciplinary range. They also understand how to acquire knowledge outside of a wikipedia search and have the patience to sit and read a book. These are people that still did things like write letters, use rotary phones, listened to whole record albums straight through, went to libraries and used the card catalogue, and such. People 28-35 tend to be in a bit of a grey area. But with people under 28 there is just a stunning drop off in the average knowledge of each person. You get people who have no knowledge of history outside of their lifetime, who have almost no knowledge of figures and events from Classical Antiquity, The Bible, to Shakespeare and the Romantic Age. In fields such as chemistry and physics they lack knowledge of basic concepts and components. Then you get a large swath which have a generally contemptuous attitude towards mathematics.
What skills do they have?- Social interaction and sensitivity in the area of diversity, computers, Good Enuf paper writing, speech, cynicism and criticism (not critical-thinking), and perhaps some knowledge in their field of study, though even that tends to be low. Strangely enough, the people that tend to not be as ignorant are people in fields like engineering, math, and science, though they still tend to be below previous generations in their breadth of knowledge. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blm
Joined: 11 Nov 2010
|
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I saw a documentary about this..... Idiocracy.
Look it up  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KimchiNinja

Joined: 01 May 2012 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's interesting, this idea that people are getting dumber has come up on three different msg boards I visit.
Agree that people are getting dumber, and agree that some of it might be smart people not breeding (Idiocracy theory). But I believe a large part of it is nutritional-driven degeneration; the modern processed foods that make us fat, break down our hearts, and give us ADD also make us stoopid.
Koreans who don't have this nutritional problem to the degree Westerners do, don't seem to be getting stupider? Or at least if they are they have IQ points to spare I guess... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leon
Joined: 31 May 2010
|
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
schwa wrote: |
Julius wrote: |
...What worries me is this massive growth in video games.
.. people are stopping reading books, for example, and switching to lazy entertainment that does not require an attention span. |
An apt observation. While stunted reading ability might not reflect intelligence levels directly, it does point to a certain intellectual decline.
Case in point: Charles Dickens. 150 years ago, his novels were hugely popular across class & age demographics. Even the illiterate paid money to have his stories read to them. Not highbrow. Marvelous writer. Nowadays relatively few adults could keep up with his vocabulary, wit, & long sentences, let alone for simple reading pleasure. Kids, forget it. |
People can't keep up with his vocabulary because English has changed, and we know longer speak like they did 150 years ago. Not sure if this is a good example. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leon
Joined: 31 May 2010
|
Posted: Sun May 26, 2013 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steelrails wrote: |
The culture of ignorance. Somewhere between 1960-1990 (It wasn't an abrupt event but rather just a rising phenomenon), we started to treat being smart, having a strong vocabulary, and having a strong educational background as objects of derision.
This isn't the apologist in me saying this- I think a large part has to do with the decline in rote memorization, the increasing emphasis on grades, and the rise of the essay as the means to evaluate students. Rote is not the key to educational aptitude, but it is important to have a base of knowledge stored in your brain. If you lack that base, it is impossible to make intelligent decisions. In an effort to give more "opportunity" and to balance schools, we've emphasized grades (which often reward doing homework) over test scores- which if structured correctly, will show that you understand the concepts. Lastly, the rise of the essay as a means of evaluation, while good in theory, has in practice turned into 30 students handing in 8 pages of BS each. Add to this the emphasis of citing sources rather than exploring the concept often results in papers that have the requisite number of sources with little connecting them and no coherent conclusion.
When out with people under 35 or so, it is shocking what their level of ignorance is. People over 35, even anti-intellectual types, tend to still be rather cogent about history, literature, and subjects that are outside their disciplinary range. They also understand how to acquire knowledge outside of a wikipedia search and have the patience to sit and read a book. These are people that still did things like write letters, use rotary phones, listened to whole record albums straight through, went to libraries and used the card catalogue, and such. People 28-35 tend to be in a bit of a grey area. But with people under 28 there is just a stunning drop off in the average knowledge of each person. You get people who have no knowledge of history outside of their lifetime, who have almost no knowledge of figures and events from Classical Antiquity, The Bible, to Shakespeare and the Romantic Age. In fields such as chemistry and physics they lack knowledge of basic concepts and components. Then you get a large swath which have a generally contemptuous attitude towards mathematics.
What skills do they have?- Social interaction and sensitivity in the area of diversity, computers, Good Enuf paper writing, speech, cynicism and criticism (not critical-thinking), and perhaps some knowledge in their field of study, though even that tends to be low. Strangely enough, the people that tend to not be as ignorant are people in fields like engineering, math, and science, though they still tend to be below previous generations in their breadth of knowledge. |
People who have lived longer know more things than people who haven't, what a shocking idea. It doesn't have anything to do with the fact that they've been alive longer and had many more years to learn things, even in passing, nope it's those stupid good for nothing kids. Just like every other generation talking about the ones that follow it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|